Samy clarifies AIMST and MIED status

October 30th, 2009 by poobalan | View blog reactions Leave a reply »
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe by Email



Update from the Star on 3 Nov:

Speaking on the matter for the first time since several past and present leaders accused him of planning to hijack both organisations, said he had briefed the party Central Working Committee on the legality, ownership, formation and management of both institutions.

Although both are part of the , he said they would function separately from party affairs.

said there were five trustees and 33 members on the board and all of them are party office-bearers.

“This clearly shows the close relationship between the party and the two entities. was set up to achieve an educational vision for the Indian community.

“None of the trustees nor the members of the board own the or and the question of hijacking them does not arise,” said , hoping members would regard both organisations as their own.

So, its clear that the two institution are not property of . They are separate entities, with own management and owners. The is mostly represented by CWC members and office bearers, so it looks as if will be under control. But if things change? So, controls and owns via its subsidiary Sdn Bhd.

From Malaysiakini:

president S today explained to the party’s central working committee (CWC) on the issue surrounding the legality and ownership of the Maju Institute of Educational Development () and University.

“I gave them a full briefing on the formation, management and the inseparable relationship between the two entities and ,” he said in a statement after chairing the three-hour CWC meeting at the headquarters here.

He told the CWC members that although the and University in Semeling, Kedah are separate entities of the , no individuals or leaders owned the two entities.

“The ownership between and will be a perpetual relationship and will be part of the ,” he said.

said the trustees and board members were made up of office-bearers, thus cementing the link between the and .

“The through the will work closely towards achieving the educational objective and vision of the party in its capacity as an educational arm of the party,” he said.

He said the CWC members agreed that and University are separate entities with the formed as a company limited by guarantee.

He also urged all members to regard the two institutions as their own organizations which are managed by their appointees. [is that "regard" same as when the host says "regard this as your own house" when you visit them? Its like yours, but not yours? :-) ]

None of the trustees are owners of the university and as such the question of hijacking the and University does not arise,” he said.

said the had done very well to help the in looking after the educational interests of the Indian community.

It has already produced 7,000 students while another 7,000 students are continuing their studies, he added.

’s clarification on and today came in the wake of questions posed by several party leaders, including former deputy president S Subramaniam, over the status of the two institutions.

Their concerns were raised following ’s remarks in September that he would be resigning soon and would be spending his time at these two NGOs, which he had claimed to be separate entities from .

Share this article in:
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Twitter
  • email
  • RSS
  • PDF
  • Print
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • Technorati
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit

Related posts

Advertisement

Leave a Reply