Posts Tagged ‘MIED’

ex-MIED CEO Chitrakala freed

September 13th, 2011
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


This is an interesting case indeed! After the case was initiated last year (around May), we get this result. The accused has provided proof that the money was returned (among others), and the prosecution says go no other evidence to offer. So, case closed, accused free.

What do you make of it?

For me, it seems that (i) the money was taken wrongfully, and returning it deemed the case irrelevant, (ii) some sort of deal was arranged with the parties involved and all this was just a misunderstanding or attempt to get back at certain quarters, or (iii) the prosecution had a very weak case and returning the money broke their case.

Whatever it is, seems very weird.

Former chief executive officer of Maju Institute for Education Development (MIED), P. Chithirakala, has been acquitted and discharged of three charges of cheating involving RM4mil.

Sessions Judge Che Mohamad Zulkifly Jusoh reached the decision after allowing DPP Kevin Morais’ application to withdraw the case against Chithirakala, 40.

Morais said the accused had submitted three letters of representation to the Attorney-General stating several material facts.

“Among the facts was that the accused had returned the RM4mil, which formed the basis of the three charges against her, to MIED Capital Sdn Bhd.

“After considering the representation, the Attorney-General agreed to withdraw all charges against the accused,” he added.

“In relation to this, the prosecution offers no evidence against the accused on the charges,” he said.

On May 11 last year, Chithirakala pleaded not guilty to cheating former MIC secretary-general Tan Sri M.Mahalingam , who was a director and signatory of MIED Sdn Bhd (the educational arm of MIC), by deceiving him into signing two cheques worth RM4 million in total. BERNAMA.

source: http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2011/9/13/nation/20110913194213&sec=nation

MIED loan given out

July 2nd, 2010
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Surprising news indeed since there wasn’t any news of the loan application being open in recent times. Maybe I missed it.

Anyway, RM96 million has been given out since 1984, which is 26 years period. That’s about RM3.69 million per year. Its also an average of RM10105 per student. For the current session, RM1.5 million for 189 students averages about Rm7936 per student.

The Maju Institute of Educational Development (MIED) has disbursed study loans and grants worth RM96 million to 9,500 students since 1984, its chairman Datuk Seri S. Samy Vellu said today.

Samy Vellu, who is also the MIC president said MIED would continue to assist needy students in pursuing their education at tertiary level.

“At the same time, I also urge recipients who are currently employed to repay their loans so that we can help other students,” he said before handing out MIED study loans worth RM1.5 million to 189 students at the MIC headquarters here.

He said to-date, the MIED had managed to collect more than RM38 million from previous MIED recipients.

“We managed to recover this amount following several reminders and legal notices to some loan recipients,” he said.

He also said the MIC owned-Tafe College in Seremban managed to create more than 40,000 professionals to-date.

“The MIC will continue to place priority on education amongst the Indians,” he said, adding that he was happy that the target set by the party to create a graduate in each Indian family has gained momentum.

“In fact, there are more than one graduate in a family and many of them are professionals. The MIED itself has helped thousands of students to become doctors and lawyers,” he added.

UPSR 2009

November 19th, 2009
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Some interesting statistics from NST, Star and Malaysiakini:

  • National grade average increased by 1 percent
  • all As students increased from 9.19 t0 9.51 percent
  • Minimum C students increased to 63.03 percent compared to 62.56 in 2008.
  • All Es declined to 0.64 percent from 0.66 percent.
  • 506,620 pupils sat for the UPSR this year compared to 507,320 last year.
  • Gap between rural and urban pupils achieving excellent results this year was 3.64 per cent compared to 4.22 per cent last year.
  • Gap for good performance between the two areas is 5.55 per cent this year compared to 6.25 per cent last year.
  • Tamil language showed a strong improvement in A students, which is 3.6 per cent
  • Mathematics also showed a strong increase, which is 4.2 per cent.
  • Divyashree who died in the Kuala Dipang Kampar bridge tragedy got 4As and 3Bs.
  • 3,937 out of 44,856 pupils or 8.8 percent scored straight As in Perak compared to 9 percent last year.
  • 27,709 pupils or 62 percent passed the examination in Perak.
  • 817 Tamil school students scored 7 A’s this year compared to 725 last year, an increase of 92 students or 12.6 percent.
  • Selangor again emerged as the school with highest 7As students from Tamil schools.
  • 2 schools in Johor had 23 7As.
  • Samy Vellu attributed the students’ success to the hard work put in by them and their parents as well as the strategy implemented by the MIC through MIED (including printing and distribution of UPSR revision books to Tamil school students every year.)

Samy clarifies AIMST and MIED status

October 30th, 2009
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Update from the Star on 3 Nov:

Speaking on the matter for the first time since several past and present leaders accused him of planning to hijack both organisations, Samy Vellu said he had briefed the party Central Working Committee on the legality, ownership, formation and management of both institutions.

Although both are part of the MIC, he said they would function separately from party affairs.

Samy Vellu said there were five trustees and 33 members on the MIED board and all of them are party office-bearers.

“This clearly shows the close relationship between the party and the two entities. MIED was set up to achieve an educational vision for the Indian community.

“None of the trustees nor the members of the board own the MIED or AIMST and the question of hijacking them does not arise,” said Samy Vellu, hoping MIC members would regard both organisations as their own.

So, its clear that the two institution are not property of MIC. They are separate entities, with own management and owners. The MIED is mostly represented by CWC members and MIC office bearers, so it looks as if MIED will be under MIC control. But if things change? So, MIC controls MIED and MIED owns AIMST via its subsidiary AIMST Sdn Bhd.

From Malaysiakini:

MIC president S Samy Vellu today explained to the party’s central working committee (CWC) on the issue surrounding the legality and ownership of the Maju Institute of Educational Development (MIED) and AIMST University.

“I gave them a full briefing on the formation, management and the inseparable relationship between the two entities and MIC,” he said in a statement after chairing the three-hour CWC meeting at the MIC headquarters here.

He told the CWC members that although the MIED and AIMST University in Semeling, Kedah are separate entities of the MIC, no individuals or MIC leaders owned the two entities.

“The ownership between MIC and MIED will be a perpetual relationship and will be part of the MIC,” he said.

Samy Vellu said the MIED trustees and board members were made up of MIC office-bearers, thus cementing the link between the MIED and MIC.

“The MIC through the MIED will work closely towards achieving the educational objective and vision of the party in its capacity as an educational arm of the party,” he said.

He said the CWC members agreed that MIED and AIMST University are separate entities with the MIED formed as a company limited by guarantee.

He also urged all MIC members to regard the two institutions as their own organizations which are managed by their appointees. [is that "regard" same as when the host says "regard this as your own house" when you visit them? Its like yours, but not yours? :-) ]

None of the MIED trustees are owners of the university and as such the question of hijacking the MIED and AIMST University does not arise,” he said.

Samy Vellu said the MIED had done very well to help the MIC in looking after the educational interests of the Indian community.

It has already produced 7,000 students while another 7,000 students are continuing their studies, he added.

Samy Vellu’s clarification on MIED and AIMST today came in the wake of questions posed by several party leaders, including former deputy president S Subramaniam, over the status of the two institutions.

Their concerns were raised following Samy Vellu’s remarks in September that he would be resigning soon and would be spending his time at these two NGOs, which he had claimed to be separate entities from MIC.

Indrani Samy Vellu interview

October 1st, 2009
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


This is exclusive interview by Malaysiakini with Samy Vellu’s wife Indrani. Very rare to get her interview on online or non-Tamil media. Let’s see what she says about the issues affecting her family now:

Since her husband’s defeat in the last general election, Indrani Samy Vellu has kept a low profile. But now, she feels compelled to voice her thoughts in the wake of the mounting criticisms against her husband of 49 years.

What hurt her most were the scathing remarks by former premier Dr Mahathir Mohamad, whom she considers to be almost like family. [lesson: there's no permanent friends in politics]

In an exclusive interview with Malaysiakini yesterday, Indrani, 69, said it was not proper for Mahathir to state, among others, that in Japan, defeated leaders would have committed ‘harakiri’ (killed themselves).

He did not say it directly… but what if he (Samy Vellu) had taken it seriously. It may not affect my husband but such statements do leave an impact on our family,” she said.

Indrani also disagreed with Mahathir and others describing her husband as a liability for Barisan Nasional.

“He (Samy Vellu) lost his parliamentary seat (in Sungai Siput) once (in the last general election) because of certain events, including some who worked towards ensuring his defeat.

But he was not the only BN leader who lost… so why single him out?” she asked. [biasalah, need a scapegoat.]

Indrani, who repeatedly stressed that Mahathir is a great leader whom she and her husband admired, called on the former premier and other BN leaders to be more judicious in their criticism.

Why didn’t they say something sooner?

“He (Samy Vellu) is not saying that he will not step down as MIC president. He will step down when the time is right.

“Other coalition party members also suffered major losses, so it is not acceptable to say that BN’s failure is because of Samy Vellu alone,” she said during interview which was conducted in Tamil.

“The BN leaders are now saying that he has not done anything for the community but nobody seems to remember the years he sacrificed to bring upliftment to the community,” she said. [maybe too many years already, so cannot focus on the "many" achievements and "upliftments"!]

“Samy Vellu was not the only minister in the cabinet, there were other ministers and there was the prime minister… if they are saying now that he failed the community, why didn’t they say something sooner or reprimand him for lagging? [ something about outliving its purpose comes to mind]

He did all he can to help the people… but sometimes you have to help yourself too, he can’t be knocking on everyone’s door to give aid. All we can do is teach them how to fish and feed themselves, we cannot be spoon feeding them,” she added. [true indeed. but when others get spoon-fed, one tends to ask "why not me?"]

The mother of two also stressed that her husband was a man of his own making, who worked very hard to get to where he is today.

On the claim that Samy Vellu was grooming their son Vell Paari to enter politics, Indrani said that was up to her husband.

Breaking into laughter, she quipped that Samy Vellu, whom she described as being a temperamental person, never even gave her a single award.

“When I asked to be recommended for an honorary title, he asked me why do I need one and where do I plan to stick it (the badge),” she said.

“But then, is it wrong for Vell Paari to come into politics? The other politicians also groom their children to be leaders one day. [Yes of course. every one have the right to groom their children, especially to follow the footsteps]

“My husband knows that Vell Paari has the capability and my son does contribute to society without any publicity,” she added.

Vell Paari is not a cruel person

Meanwhile, Indrani was also asked about her son being implicated in the death of drama actress K Sujatha.

Frankly speaking I hardly knew her. But to say my son had forced the poison down her throat is ridiculous,” she said, adding that Vell Paari was incapable of such cruelty.

She recalled how her son had even balked at the idea of slaughtering a chicken to cook a meal at home, and this was one of the reasons why he opted to pursue architecture instead of medicine. [this is quite subjective and possibly irrelevant. desperate people can do desperate things. Anyway, inquest already ruled it was suicide, and any personal relationship between employer and employee may have not contributed to the suicide.]

“Her (Sujatha’s) own family members had testified that she committed suicide, if that was not the truth wouldn’t they fight for justice,” she asked.

Indrani also lashed out at PKR MP S Manikavasagam who had pursued the matter, saying that it was a political ploy to attack the father by using the son as a scapegoat.

She also took a Tamil daily to task for running reports on the Sujatha case by splashing photographs of the deceased.

It was wrong of them to disrespect the girl in that way. They could have run the stories without using her photos, but they chose to print all sorts of photos in order to attract readers,” she said. [morally not good, but newspaper will claim need to sell the paper la..wonder why the family never sue the papers]

Ex-MIED CEO gets a lashing

Indrani also defended her husband against the accusations by P Chithirakala Vasu, the former chief executive officer of MIC’s education arm MIED.

Last week, Chithirakala said that Samy Vellu will leave behind an ‘empty shell‘ for his chosen successor G Palanivel.

Commenting on this, Indrani sarcastically said that while she lauded Chithirakala’s concern for Palanivel’s future, the former MIED CEO should not forget that she was given the ‘Thirupathi Undiyal’ by her husband.

Thirupathi is a holy shrine in India, where the ‘undiyal’ or donation box is known for raking in millions of dollars.

He had given her the utmost respect and treated her like a daughter… But she now makes all these baseless allegations against him, the man who sponsored her education and gave her everything that she has today,” she said.

According to Indrani, Chithirakala left MIED some three years ago after expressing unhappiness with Samy Vellu.

Then she asked for her job back and despite my disapproval, he forgave her saying that she was a young girl who did not know better, and took her back.

“But look at how ungrateful she is, and now she makes all sorts of accusations against my husband,” she added.

Hmm…what can I say. Once in politics, have to brace for back-stabbing, scandals, political manoeuvring, gossips, challenging decision-making, ethics, morality. Never an easy job.