Posts Tagged ‘Perak’

Storm in Sitiawan over land acquisition?

August 11th, 2010
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


The article from Malaysiakini is at the end, but before that, I’m not clear on why the land was not properly developed for last 80 years. Minus the labratory built in 1964, there should be plenty of space to develop the place. Maybe Sitiawan was a sleepy town all this while, and only now things are picking up. Maybe.

According to the news, the land is partially occupied by the SK Simpang Empat (aka Gandhi school) established in 1934, the school’s field and the DR VRN Menon labratory(built 1964), and the Dindings Indian Association (DIA) club house (according to MP Kula’s website). You can see some pics here. The school has its own website at http://www.skses.edu.my/

Secondly, if the acquisition is for building a school, isn’t the place already partially occupied by a school now? So, maybe its an extension of the school? Then its for a good reason right? Its not like they are going to build a supermarket or highrise condominium there. However, if its to build another school, what’s going to happen to the existing school and the Gandhi Hall, and its history?

Having historical value is a good reason. But having historical and economical contribution to the community is even better reason. Maybe they can work something out. No point owning a piece of land, but not utilising it properly. Build a temple or give land to Tamil school or set up a community hall (get return via rentals), plenty of things can be done.

For 80 years, the Dindings Indian Association in Sitiawan, Perak, has been the steward of a two-hectare plot of land originally purchased with the contributions of rubber tappers.

Last week, the federal government issued notice that it will acquire the land to build a school – the formal hearing of acquisition is to be held on Aug 25 at the Manjung Land Office. 

The Perak DAP has now pitched in with an accusation that there is an ulterior motive behind the move.

State deputy chief M Kulasegaran said the site, located in the heart of town, is worth at least RM20 million now, and that it is the pride of the Indian Malaysian community which makes up 15 percent of the local population.

“Is it true as speculated that part of the prime land will be given to cronies of the people in power for commercial development?” he asked.

He said the plot was bought “with the blood, sweat and tears of the first generation of Indian settlers” who had cleared the jungle for rubber planting.

“Indian rubber-tappers from the 35 estates in Sitiawan had contributed two Straits Settlement dollars each per month for 18 months to purchase this piece of land,” he said.

“The idea of purchasing the land at the time was to build a school for the children of rubber tappers to study English in the afternoon, after attending Tamil school in the morning.”

Part of the site is now occupied the SK Simpang Empat (formerly the Simpang Empat English School), the school field and the VR Menon science laboratory built in 1964.

“There is no logical reason or justification for the government to acquire this piece of land. We are adamant that it should at all times remain in the hands of the Indian community,” Kulasegaran said.

He said that a large number of people will gather at the Manjung Land Office on Aug 25 to object to the proposal. 

Questions that arise

Kulasegaran, who is also Ipoh Barat MP, called on the Perak and federal governments to organise a roundtable conference to discuss the proposed acquisition and arrive at a win-win solution.

It is understood that both governments had carried out a feasability study a year ago, in preparation to acquire the site.

Kulasegaran said the Perak government’s Indian Affairs adviser S Veerasingam (left) had reportedly said that “a settlement will be reached” after discussion with Mentri Besar Zamry Abd Kadir, who is currently abroad. 

He demanded answers from Veerasingam on these questions:

1. Was he aware of the feasibility study? Was the Perak government consulted before the decision on acquisition was made? 

2. Why was there no prior consultation with the local Indian community? 

3. Why did he say a settlement would be reached after the notice of acquisition was issued? 

4. What are the details of the settlement formula? 

Kulasegaran, who was born in Sitiawan, said the Indian community is angered because the move is “most insensitive, unfair and unjustifiable”. 

The community also cannot understand the need for this plot when there is vacant land in many other areas where a new school can be built, he added.

parents of Kampar river victims yet to get compensation from state education dept

July 20th, 2010
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Do you remember this case? 3 girls drowned last year. You can read more articles on the Kampar Tragedy here. The court case is pending.

The parents of the three primary school pupils who drowned in the Kampar River after the bridge they were on collapsed on Oct 26 last year have finally received a total of about RM76,000 in donations collected from various schools in Perak.

The three girls who drowned in the incident were N Dina Dewa and M Davadharshini both aged 11, from SJK (T) Mambang Diawan in Batu Gajah and V Diviyasari, 12, from SJK (T) Gopeng.

They were among 22 pupils crossing the suspension bridge (left), from the SK Kuala Dipang primary school back to a ’1Malaysia’ camping site across the river when the bridge gave away at 10.30pm.

Today, lorry driver T Nathan, father of Dina, and K Mageswaran, father of Davadharshini, displayed the cheques they received at the PKR office in Gopeng. K Vasuthavan, father of Diviyasari, could not be present as he was working in Singapore.

The two parents said they received their cheques from the headmaster of the SJK (T) Mambang Diawan Tamil school last Friday.

Both Nathan and Mageswaran received RM25,312.55 each. The parents said they were aware that donations were being collected from various schools, but were unsure when the state education department would hand the collected amount over to them.

Several observers have pointed out that the donations may have been held back from the parents out of spite, in light of the settlement of a lawsuit that the parents had filed against the department.

The handing over of the donations to the bereaved families and the release of the federal government’s findings into the bridge collapse tragedy were highlighted to Deputy Education Minister Wee Ka Siong when a Pakatan ad hoc committee, headed by ousted Perak speaker V Sivakumar (right), visited Parliament on July 12.

The visit apparently proved fruitful as the donations collected were then ordered to be released by the authorities, though there has been no word yet on the release of the government’s findings into the tragedy.

Pakatan had disclosed on Nov 16 last year their findings of the tragedy and have urged the government to officially announce their results as well.

The parents of the deceased children have filed a RM105 million civil suit against SJK (T) Mambang Diawan and SJK (T) Gopeng where two of the children studied, the Kinta Selatan district education office, the Perak Education Department, the Education Ministry, the commandant of the 1Malaysia camp, the sponsor of the bridge’s construction, the contractor and the Malaysian government.

They also want the Ipoh High Court to compel the government to reveal their findings of the bridge collapse tragedy.

The families’ suit is coming up for mention at the Ipoh High Court on July 28.

Flying Sikh dumps DAP

June 15th, 2010
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Well, would you believe it! The Sikhs in DAP would be incensed after Malim Nawar (my mother’s hometown actually) assemblyman Keshvinder Singh (a lawyer too) quit from DAP to be independent (i.e. BN friendly and firm supporter of PM Najib, Menteri Besar Zambry, and 1Malaysia). I believe Keshvinder is also the first Indian rep to quit DAP and be independent. Well done!

And for what purpose? For the “kebaikan of the rakyat” of course :-)

According to him:

He also said he was leaving because he was “very disappointed” with the DAP and Pakatan Rakyat leadership and the “excessive politicking” that got in the way of him carrying out his duties.

“I found it very hard to work with the Pakatan Rakyat people to serve my constituents,” he said, adding that he could not get any allocation for his constituents.

“I now realise that only Barisan can bring progress and prosperity to the people. I hope this decision will help me serve my constituents better,” he said at a press conference at a hotel here Tuesday.

“I will be going to my constituency soon to explain my decision,” he said, adding that he gave his resignation letter to DAP secretary-general Lim Guan Eng earlier Tuesday.

In Malaysiakini, the following is mentioned:

Keshvinder said he chose to defect now instead of February last year – along with Hee Yit Foong (Jelapang), Mohd Osman Jailu(Changkat Jering) and Jamaluddin Mohd Radzi (Behrang) – because he didn’t know how serious the problems were at his constituency then. 

“When I started doing work there (after February 2009) I found that there are severe poverty issues that really need to be solved,” he said.

Keshvinder said he hoped the BN state government will provide financial aid so that he can serve his constituents. 

“The state and national DAP did not assist me in helping the people. I couldn’t do anything for my constituents as an opposition state assemblyperson,” he said, adding that he had been using his own funds thus far.

Good for him, until we find out (or remember) that he was one of the people who claimed there were offers to buy him over last time:

On Feb 5 last year, five Pakatan Rakyat assemblymen, including Keshwinder, had claimed they had been approached by agents to cross over to Barisan Nasional.

Keshwinder had said then that he had been offered RM10mil plus the position of the Perak MIC chief and a place on the state executive council.

So, which is which?

If really for “kebaikan rakyat”, why not just resign and force a by-election? We can literally see money falling down from sky (or podium) whenever there’s by-election. The people can get new school, new road, new surau, new temple, new bridges, etc. Maybe the voters in Malim Nawar should think about this. The amount of goodies they could get from by-election should last them till the next general election.

I’m curious too, in case the PR wins GE13 and Perak state, would he realign himself to be PR-friendly (assuming he stands under BN banner then)?

Where’s the report, ask parents

January 7th, 2010
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


I was just thinking about the Kampar bridge disaster two days ago (its new school term, and my mind just went to the families that lost their children)  and look at what appears in today’s news. So, what has been done so far? I know Perak state government had the contractor blacklisted. The outcome of  the investigation was announced, but I don’t remember the report being released. Teachers given counseling (parents and students?).  The parents started a law suit. Other than that?

The parents of the three drowned schoolchildren from the Kuala Dipang collapsed bridge tragedy late last year wants the Education Ministry to publicise its report on its investigations.

Former Perak Speaker V. Sivakumar said the three parents were hell-bent on pursuing the matter and wanted the findings to be made known to them.

”If there is nothing to hide, why keep it (the findings) a secret?” he told reporters during a press conference here on Thursday.

”The Government should tell the parents and the public what went wrong and punish those responsible for the tragedy,” said Sivakumar, also the Tronoh assemblyman who led the Pakatan Rakat ad hoc investigation committee into the matter.

”The matter should not be put aside as it has not been resolved yet,” he added.

Sivakumar said no action has been taken against those responsible for approving the contruction of the bridge since the Education Ministry completed their investigations last year.

”They already know the cause for the collapse of the bridge and also identified all the parties involved,” he said.

”Only the contractor who built the bridge has been made the scapegoat,” he claimed.

He noted that Perak Mentri Besar Datuk Seri Dr Zambry Abd Kadir had blacklisted the contractor and said he would not be awarded any more contracts.

Counseling for teachers only?

November 25th, 2009
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


It is indeed sad to read the news about the parents being depressed over untimely death of the children during Kuala Dipang, Kampar bridge collapse.

The emotional upheaval and mental anguish of the families has been exacerbated by the knowledge that the bridge at the Kuala Dipang 1Malaysia camp was constructed without the required permits. It collapsed on Oct 26.

Lorry driver T Nathan said he has not slept properly since the death of Dina, his favourite child. She was born after her mother S Mogana had suffered several miscarriages. They have two sons, now 19 and 17.

Nathan, 45, said Dina “was the live-wire of the family and her smile lingers in my mind”.

“Before she was born, my wife used to serve my food. When Dina turned seven, she took over…she knew what I like,” he said in distress.

Technician K Vasudevan, 43, has become withdrawn and depressed after Divyashree’s death.

He wakes up frequently in cold sweat, thinking of the ordeal his daughter would have experienced when she was thrown into the water and fought for survival.

Vasudevan last saw his daughter alive on Oct 18, after Deepavali, when he and his wife K Kanakam,41, returned to Kuala Lumpur where they work.

Divyashree (right) was the eldest of three girls and a bright student who wanted to become a doctor. She scored 4As and 3Bs in her UPSR examination this year – results that she never saw because these were released last week.

Vasudevan said he was told at 1.30am on Oct 27 that his daughter was reported missing in the incident, and he had dashed to the camp site with his wife.

They waited, hoping she was alive but two days later, were told that her body had been found. Relatives prevented him from viewing her remains at the Kampar Hospital because he was so distraught.

“It is like the right hand of my body has been chopped off. Every time I see small children now, memories of my daughter come to haunt me and I choke up,” he said.

He has had to resign from his job because his employer refused to grant him compassionate leave to attend to the funeral rites. [what kind of useless employer is this?]

His wife has quit her job as a clerk in a private firm to look after her other two daughters. She said her husband no longer smiles and has a lost look, as he was very attached to Divyashree.

K Mageswaran left it to his wife R Nagarathna, 41, to talk about Devatharshini as he is in deep depression over his loss.

Devatharshini (left), the only girl and the youngest of four children, was the darling of the family. She was conceived after Nagarathna prayed for a daughter, and was named after a Hindy deity.

Mageswaran had initially refused her permission to attend the camp, as he was concerned about her safety. When she pleaded and cried, he relented.

A good cook, Mageswaran made her a meal and took her on his bicycle to her school, from where she reported to the camp. Her brother Sarveswaran,12, was also a participant.

About 1.30am on Oct 27, Nagarathna received a phone call from her friend who told her that the bridge had collapsed and that her daughter had been swept away in the current. By then, her husband had left with a friend for the camp site.

Nagarathna said she fainted on hearing the news but, on recovering consciousness, stayed up the whole night, praying for the safety of her other two children.

On three occasions, she went to the camp site but could not locate her daughter. Her relatives even sought the help of a bomoh.

When the body was retrieved from the river three days later, identification had to be made based on the school uniform that Devatharshini was wearing.

“It’s hard to accept that she has gone. But her spirit remains with us in our home,” said Nagarathna, consoling herself.

Mageswaran’s relatives, worried for his health, have tried to persuade him to change residence, but he refuses to leave the house where his daughter once lived.

Did anyone provide emotional support for the parents and families of the deceased? Apparently not. But look at what Education Ministry is doing:

The Education Ministry will provide counselling for the teachers involved in the Kuala Dipang incident, in which three schoolchildren attending a 1Malaysia camp drowned after the suspension bridge they were crossing collapsed and plunged them into the Kampar river.

… Deputy Education Minister Dr Mohd Puad Zarkashi said the teachers who were directly involved when the incident occurred on Oct 26 had been traumatised by the tragedy.

”They will be given counselling to help them ride out this difficult period,” he told reporters on Wednesday after opening the national teachers education research seminar.

Dr Mohd Puad said that the teachers were not to be blamed for the incident.

”The incident was not due to negligence by the teachers,” he added, claiming that parents of the three deceased pupils told him that they were proud of the teachers for their quick action.

Deputy Education Minister said that part of the trauma counselling is due to harrassment faced by the teachers:

… More than 20 teachers have been traumatised, partly because they feel responsible, but also because they have have been harassed and threatened by parents.

Deputy Education Minister Dr Mohd Puad Zarkashi said the teachers have been advised to lodge police reports.

“But in fact, those who harassed or threatened the teachers are not parents of the victims but others who took advantage of the tense situation.” he told newsmen after launching the 3-day National Teachers Education Research seminar today.

He was asked to comment on the statement by the National Union of the Teaching Profession (NUTP) president Hashim Adnan urging the ministry to hold counselling sessions for the teachers.

Hashim said two teachers who were punched by parents following the incident had requested transfers to other schools.

Dr Mohd Puad agreed with NUTP that the affected teachers need counselling. He commended the teachers involved, especially those who joined the search for the missing pupils.

“I am willing to defend these teachers as it was not their negligence. In fact, the parents of the three children even commended the teachers for their quick action,” he said.

Its good that NUTP and Education Ministry is concerned about the teachers, but don’t forget the parents. They are also in dire need of counselling!

BTW, what happened to the report by the Education Ministry after being handed over to DPM Muhyiddin? Has it gone AWOL or branded under OSA? The PR report was very fast, within days, but Education Ministry is taking 30 days (and still counting). I hope its 5 volumes and thousands of pages thick!

The deputy Education Minister of course was unhappy with the PR’s version:

Dr Mohd Puad slammed a report by a Perak Pakatan Rakyat investigation committee, which had stated that the three teachers were not present to supervise the children during the crossing, claiming it was based on assumptions.

”They did not call witnesses or teachers when preparing the report. They are just assuming,” he claimed, adding that the state Opposition was “only good at pointing out people’s faults rather than finding solutions.”

The Pakatan committee claimed that the three teachers who were supposed to have been supervising the schoolchildren when they were crossing the suspension bridge had gone “missing” prior to the incident.

According to its chairman V. Sivakumar, deceased student Devatharshini’s elder brother, Sarveswaran, who also took part in the camp, had told him this after a visit to their home in Mambang Diawan.

Meanwhile Dr Mohd Puad said that the report by the committee set up by the Government following the incident had been completed and handed over to Deputy Prime Minister Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin, who is also the Education Minister.

Below is some of the findings of PR’s investigation:

The metal pillar anchoring the cable of the collapsed Kuala Dipang suspension bridge incident which took three young lives on Oct 26 had broken off from its concrete foundation causing the walkway to fall into the Kampar River.

At a press conference held at the PAS state headquarters yesterday, Su said: “Our initial finding is that the foundation of the anchor block B is very shallow only 2.8 ft deep whereas the actual depth should, according to the chartered consultant structural engineer, be about 10 times that depth.”

He showed Malaysiakini a sketch of the foundation block B with a height of 5’10″ , width of 2′ 3″ and depth of 2’8″.
According to the Pasir Pinji assemblyperson, the anchor block B should have been the size of a container.

“Furthermore the initial soil testing done by a civil engineer yesterday (Tuesday) at the bank where the tragedy took place showed that the soil there is very soft.

“This is the preliminary findings of the collapsed bridge tragedy and the final findings report will be ready by the weekend and we hope to reveal the full details on Monday,” he said.

Earlier during the same press conference, Sivakumar said they interviewed Kinta Selatan district education officer Raja Abdul Raman Raja Amaran on Tuesday.

“The surprising fact is that his department was not aware that a suspension bridge had been built by a contractor linking SK Kuala Dipang with the 1Malaysia camp site across the Kampar River,” he said.

“Pupils of SK Sentosa were the first to notice the suspension bridge when they camped at the site on Oct 9. The school notified Raja Abdul Rahman who visited the site on Oct 16 (10 days before the collapse),” he added.

Sivakumar said the education officer told him that a party had approached him early last month with a proposal for a bridge but the project was put on hold because it was deemed too costly at RM110,000.

Raja had informed Sivakumar that the directive to build the bridge came from the Co-curriculum Centre in Pangor Island.

The committee will call on the centre at Pangor Island today to gather details on construction of the bridge and contractor’s identity, said Sivakumar.

Raja also had stated that initially he had directed 40 teachers to attend the 1Malaysia camp but only 23 turned up for the four-day event.

Asked why 20 of the teachers were holding a meeting when 22 children were on the bridge at 10.30am on that day, according to Sivakumar, Raja had replied, “They (teachers) were within the vicinity of the camp area.

The team also held a public inquiry:

Thirteen eyewitnesses narrated their version of the horrifying incident during the four-hour ‘inquiry’ held in Kampar on Saturday.

Most vocal of them was lorry driver T Nathan, 44, (right in photo) who lost his daughter Dina Deve, 11, that night. M Davadharshini,11, and V Diviyasri,12 also drowned in the incident.

“Why weren’t measures put in place to safeguard the 300 pupils?” asked Nathan in anger and anguish.

“There were no bomba (fire and rescue services), medical or Rela personnel on hand to help the 22 children when they fell into the river. If a VIP or a minister’s child was taking part in the camp, there would have been adequate safety measures.

“But who are we? Just poor people whose lives are not important and can be sacrificed and forgotten.”

M Balan, 41, a teacher with the Sri Murugan Centre, said 21 of his students had reported for the four-day camp, involving 298 pupils from 64 schools in the Kinta Selatan district

It was organised by the Education Ministry to foster better ties among the races under the1Malaysia concept. The district education officer had directed 40 teachers to be on duty but only 23 turned up.

There was chaos and confusion among the teachers as to what to do when the bridge collapsed and the children fell into the swift-flowing river, as none of them (the teachers) were given prior training as to how to cope with an emergency,” said Balan. [was he there as well?]

A 12-year-old student (name withheld to protect his safety) said: “It was not the teachers who threw safety vests (as was reported in the media) to (the 19 students in river) but it was us (the students) who ran to the storeroom and got these items to help save them.

He said the 19 were left clinging to the metal cable of the collapsed bridge in the darkness for about 30 minutes before any attempt was made to save them. He said he had jumped into the river to save two of his classmates.

The student also claimed that there was only one teacher standing in the middle span of the bridge to control the pupils just before the bridge collapsed.

Earlier, the inquiry heard that pupils who had finished dinner were told to go back and clean used plates left on the other side of the river.

The to and fro movement of the pupils on the suspension bridge resulted in the weakened anchor block being ripped off its foundation, caused the bridge to collapse.

It is learnt that only six pupils were allowed at any one time on the bridge but that this guideline was ignored.

Balan said: “The bomba personnel were searching for survivors in a boat and refused to allow anxious parents to dive into the river to search for the pupils.”

He then used an alternate route about 5km away to get to the other side of the river to search for his students. However, the school authorities prevented him from leading the students back by the same route.

A frustrated Balan said he waited about three hours in the darkness for a rescue truck to come, and finally, in desperation, took the students over to the other side. It took another half an hour for a police truck o come to the rescue of other stranded students.

“There was very poor coordination and an indifferent attitude among the authorities concerned,” he alleged.

Another participant asked for the attendance list of the teachers so that they can be held accountable and not claim that they were not on duty during the incident.

An angry participant blasted the media for reporting that Indian Malaysian students had been jumping on the bridge, leading to its collapse.

“You mean to say that it is always the fault of the Indian community for any untoward incident in the country?” he asked.

However, Tronoh assemblyperson V Sivakumar (extreme left in photo), who is heading an ad hoc committee investigating the incident, told the parent that the fault lay with poor construction of the bridge.

“The authorities will find excuses to divert the blame from their shortcomings in building the illegal bridge but we will nail them,” he assured the 50 participants.

A 41-year-old mother of one of the drowned girls lamented that none of the school teachers came to pay their last respects and counsel those bereaved in their hour of need.

“Furthermore they (the teachers) had the cheek to say that we had assaulted them after the incident, when we did not do this,” she said.

The parents are now suing various parties for RM105 million (no doubt advised by the PR lawyers):

The fathers of the three pupils who drowned in the recent Kuala Dipang bridge collapse tragedy have filed a RM105mil suit against the Malaysian Government and Education Ministry.

The suit, which was filed on their behalf by their lawyers at the High Court here Friday, named nine others including bridge donor GS Synergy Sdn Bhd and contractor CWL Enterprise as defendants.

The others are the heads of SJK (T) Mambang Diawan and SJK (T) Gopeng, the Kinta Selatan education officer, Perak Education director, Kampar district council president, Perak Public Works Department director and the Kuala Dipang 1Malaysia Camp commandant.

Plaintiffs K. Mageswaran, K. Vasudevan and T. Nathan are each seeking RM35mil in general damages and a further RM100,000 in exemplary damages besides RM19,120 in special damages, and costs.

They claim that the deaths of M. Devatharshini, 11, V. Divyashree, 12, and N. Dinadevi, 11, on Oct 26 had been due to the defendants’ negligence.

Speaking to reporters outside the court, their lawyer A. Sivanesan said the papers would be served on the named defendants in the next few days.

Asked why he had decided to file the suit, Nathan said it was not about the money as all the money in the world would not bring back Dinadevi.

”We want to know who’s fault it is and make sure everyone else knows about it too so that no other parents would have to lose their children like this,” he said.

Vasudevan stressed that he wanted justice to be served.

”We want the teachers and the Government to be held responsible,” he said.

Nathan added: “I had sent my daughter to school but she was returned to me in a coffin.”

Also representing the plaintiffs are Datuk Ngeh Koo Ham, M. Kulasegaran, Nga Kor Ming, Keshvinder Singh and A. Magesan.

Perak Mentri Besar Datuk Seri Dr Zambry Abd Kadir said the Government would not stop the grieving families from suing it.

“This is about lives. The parents have lost their children and it is their right to pursue the matter,” he told reporters after a study loan presentation ceremony here.

“Most importantly is that we want to ensure that the Kuala Dipang incident would not be covered up,” he added.

He said the Government was still working to provide concrete studies and suggestion for the future so that similar tragedies would not recur.

Dr Zambry added that the government was not conducting the investigation to gain political mileage.