Tamil Language and Hinduism Classes Available. Click Here for Details
Powered by MaxBlogPress  

Tag Archive 'UMNO Youth'

Jul 17 2008

Scholarship quota a problem



The PSD scholarship allocation ratio issue is refusing to go away. Since Nazri revealed that all this while normal Malaysian were discriminated by being given only 10% of the scholarship amount, and only this year it has been increased to 45%, the privileged people’s representatives are up in arms. They have been using the “privilege” name but only giving it to certain race while the other privileged groups (in East Malaysia) were left out. And today, MP for Putatan, Sabah threatened Nazri - telling him not to make the Sabahans angry in the Dewan Rakyat (check the Hansard later). That’s because the independent MP keeps on mentioning his race’s rights, thinking that the reduced quota affects his race, forgetting that it affect all privileged people.Even Deputy Prime Minister Najib took a populist stance and said that the quota should be reviewed.

Few days back, Dr suggested that only academic criteria is used to determine scholarship recipients. He says:

No matter how good you are at your ECA or your interview performance, you should not be eligible for a scholarship for tertiary with low academic results

He also gave a very surprising statement - “all Indians students who score 9As and above in the Sijil Pelajaran Malaysia will be given government scholarships, starting this year, to pursue their studies in local government universities and four local private institutions — Monash, Swinburne, Curtin and Nottingham universities” as decided in the cabinet committee for the indian community. However, I’m unsure if he meant ALL students with 9As and just mentioned Indian students in the context. Since NST also chose to accept the statement, proclaimed that all students should be given scholarships if the government sets 9As as the benchmark. They said it should not be slanted towards a particular race. Now in this instance, can we say is meddling in other people’s affairs? Oh right, they’ll say it affects them as well. They can always do that, but others cannot do the same. That’s fairness and justice for you.

If the government wants to use 9As as the main academic requirement, then make sure it applies to all races

is worried that if given to all races based on 9As cutoff, it will affect government finances. But that’s the point, government only giving to Indians! Ahmad Ikmal of the further disagrees with Dr ’s idea of using academic results, by suggesting that Public Service Department should also consider the family background and geographical factors. He also suggested that the top 50 SPM achievers be automatically awarded government scholarships to pursue a course of their choice to ensure that the best brains in the country were rewarded.

Well, when it comes to , will also wants to have its say. According to Youth bureau chief Datuk Dr Wee Ka Siong, who is also Deputy Minister, the decision to give scholarships for those who score 9As and above in their SPM applies to all!

This is blanket approval given by the government to recognise the students’ hard work

Alamak, that means someone misunderstood what Najib said in the cabinet committee or purposely misleading the Indian community. Third possibility - media misquoted! :-)

Amidst all this, today Nazri announced in Parliament that government will set up a specific scholarship programme under the Public Service Department (JPA) for students who achieve exceptional results in their SPM examination for exceptional students regardless of race, religion or social standing. This was after being bamboozled from all corners due to the scholarship quota.

This is different from the normal scholarship programme, which is given out based on a quota system between bumiputra and non-bumiputra students

He said for example the cutoff results can be 15A1s.

He had a hard time defending the quota for this year (55:45) which according to him was based on racial composition of the country, examination results and family financial background. However, one of MPs said that EPU statistics indicate privileged are 62.1 percent while normal Malaysians are 30-something percent. Balance is “others”.

Pasir Salak MP Tajuddin Abdul Rahman said the ratio was a populist decision as it did not reflect the racial composition and could threaten the interest of the Malays and Bumiputeras while Pontian MP Ahmad Maslan said the PSD scholarship should not be awarded to students from rich families as the parents could afford to finance their children’s . On the contrary, he said outstanding students from poor families especially those from the rural areas should be given more attention while the conditions loosened for them.

Nazri assured the MPs that Malay and Bumiputera students would account for at least 50 per cent of the scholarship recipients. Says Nazri:

We are not taking a populist stance but wanted to be fair when comes to performance as this cannot be compromised.

So, what would be the fate of the scholarship ratio? Expand the number of scholarships? Reduce the quota for normal Malaysians? Keep quiet until next year? Change the criteria to add location or other parameters?

Popularity: 1% [?]

No responses yet

Apr 26 2008

a dangerous apology from Youth Chief



Is it an apology or not? Yeah, I’m nitpicking. Why is there an “if” in the apology when its crystal clear his action has hurt feeling of Malaysians?

Then, he goes on to apologise for “his failure for not upholding the Malay symbol”, as if he is forced to apologise and not necessarily really meant it. That apology looks like fanning racial sentiment to pit the Malays againsts the other communities.

Cue the organisations that will come in defence of him and start challenging others. Continue Reading »

Popularity: 1% [?]

One response so far

Apr 26 2008

no consensus from BN Youth on HINDRAF 5

Posted by poobalan under Indian | View blog reactions



While the focus was on “is-it-an-apology-or-not” from over the keris display, I was attracted to what Vigneswaran said on the discussion about detainees. According to him, no consensus was attained. He said he explained MIC’s stand during the Youth meeting. As far as I can recall, MIC, , Gerakan have called for the detainees’ release. Not sure on stand of parties from East Malaysia, and I don’t see a reason for them to oppose. That leave only one culprit. No prizes for guessing why consensus was not reached. Does this mean that the rest of them are there just to make numbers, as we suspected all along?

Reaching a consensus is easy. They can choose to agree, disagree, leave it to PM or any other decision.  This also cannot do? Continue Reading »

Popularity: 1% [?]

No responses yet

Next »

This blog is nominated for: Best SocioPolitical Blog Most Popular Male Blogger
Read more...