we can see both sides arguments:
Boycott
– retaliation against the temple committee for backstabbing the community on 25 November by calling the police
– Boycott batu caves does not mean boycott Thaipusam or Lord Muruga
– Going to Batu Caves will be misused by MIC as sign of support for Samy Vellu and MIC
– as a support for Hindraf ISA detainees
– show support to other temples who may be in danger of demolition
No to Boycott
– don’t politicise religion
– don’t show anger against Batu Caves or Thaipusam
– it is disrespect/sin against religion (not sure how true this is)
– use other methods to show displeasure towards temple committee/Samy vellu/MIC
– even Hindraf leaders did prayer at Batu Caves after 25/11
– go there, but don’t spend money as a show of support
Well, there can be other reasons for both parties, so let’s make it short:
Please cast your vote at http://www.poobalan.com/blog