It stinks in Perak

Perak sounds similar with another word that emits stinking smell. And that may well describe the situation in the Silver State.

Elections and change of governments are quite common throughout the world. We see it often in India, Thailand, Phillippines, Japan, Taiwan, Korea, Eastern Europe, EU countries etc.  But in Perak, the issue gets complicated when Sultan “asks” current MB to resign, but the MB refuses. Is it a crime to refuse? Is it against the law? Is it an act of treason? Why not just sack the MB instead of asking him and his EXCO to vacate? Is there a provision in the constitution for that? So, without this crucial step of sacking, the new government is sworn in. And now we have two state governments – complete with two MBs.

Karpal Singh said that they will file a suit in High Court against the Sultan, but later today, Anwar clarified that there would not be a suit. Instead they will seek audience with the Sultan to plead their case. The Sultan most likely will not rescind on his decision, as it may be seen as signs of weakness. Perhaps Pakatan will offer to change the MB as well.

I think the Sultan had it in for the current MB. The Nizar fellow already offended the Sultan during the head of religous department issue. And probably there are some concern with having so many Chinese reps in the assembly. Who knows what the actual reason is?

The rakyat may have felt cheated by the Sultan’s action. Do they trust his wisdom or would they want to voice out their dissent? I heard the palace’s website was taken down after so many comments criticising the Sultan’s decision were posted. We have not seen any mammoth rally throughout the state so far. If Pakatan can produce such rallies in all major cities and town in Perak, then it may well show that the new government will be rejected. So, we MAY have a case where a government not supported by the people is ruling the state, thus revealing the mistake of the royal house. Sadly we do not see such rallies. Instead we saw PAS/PKR led protests which led to few arrests. The protestors allegedly threw stones and bottles at the FRU, and blocked the cars from entering the palace. FRU shot tear gas into mosque compound (sounds like Hindraf rally at Batu Caves!).

Pakatan’s only option is through legal option or through its proxy – the rakyat. Both may not work out.

Worse case scenario with two MB is when the state assembly reconvenes, UMNO will move for a motion of no confidence. Then, Nizar will have to resign as he will lose 31-28.

Of course, I was wondering when the clown would make an entrance. And surely he did today:

Stern action, including detention under the Internal Security Act (ISA), could be taken against anyone who incite or create trouble that could affect security in the state of Perak.

The warning was issued by Home Minister Datuk Seri Syed Hamid Albar regarding action by members and supporters of the Pakatan Rakyat who were unhappy after losing the majority in the State Assembly and failing to retain the government leadership in Perak.

“Pakatan Rakyat can take the matter to court if they are dissatisfied but don’t take their dissatisfaction to the streets to the extent of jeopardising security,” he said.

… Syed Hamid, who received feedback from Inspector-General of Police Tan Sri Musa Hassan, said nine people had been detained for sedition and involvement in demonstrating against the swearing-in of Pangkor Assemblyman Datuk Dr Zambry Abdul Kadir as the new Perak Menteri Besar at Istana Iskandariah, Bukit Chandan, in Kuala Kangsar today.

The demonstration was held at the Ubudiah Mosque, 300 metres from the palace where the demonstrators hurled pieces of wood, stones and bottles at police personnel and vehicles passing through Jalan Istana.

He said police would take whatever action, including bringing police personnel from outside Perak, to ensure security was maintained in the state

So, the threat of ISA has been issued, and in TV3 Nightline just now, the action by PR leaders is being linked to treason by our friend.

Next, the defection of two PKR and one DAP assemblymen leading to change of government affected the Indians and Chinese the most. The Indians would not be represented at all, while the Chinese has been reduced to a single MCA rep.No more speaker and deputy speaker post for the community. Sadly, there’s not even a whimper of protest or unhappiness from either of these communities. So, does it mean they (i) support BN, (ii) giving up on Pakatan/DAP/PKR, or (iii) not bothered? So, the defectors can say their voters support their move?

Funnily, there’s not much news from other BN coalition parties on the defection of three PR reps and the forming of the UMNO government in Perak.

Pakatan has a fine line to tread. They cannot be seen as insulting the Sultan, and yet at the same time cannot give up on their position meekly.

The bigger fear is that the events in Perak may cause an implosion in other Pakatan states, especially in Kedah.

Suspicion envelopes the events leading to the defection. Two of the assemblymen have corruption cases pending and were “missing” for few days prior to their defection. The DAP candidate said that she won’t quit the night before but ended up in Putrajaya the next day afternoon. With these kind of dubious characters offering support, what made the Sultan accept their words? They may simply renege on their words and be really independents. giving both PR and BN headaches. The behaviour of the defectors also raises questions and this will be hanging over the heads of the new government. The two PKR defectors can’t join UMNO until their cases are cleared. If their corruption cases are thrown out, this will only reinforce the rumours that its a set-up. More black mark.

The three independents make it quite risky for either coalition since they will be the kingmakers. BN may double its effort to pull more PR reps to improve the odds. Likewise, PR may also try to entice BN reps, but it will be much harder as its in the opposition now.

There are views that by calling for fresh elections, it will be a waste of funds. But really, is democracy less valuable or too cheap? Can’t we spend some money for democratic process when we waste much more for flippant reasons? In fact, having an election can be part of the stimulus package for Perak. Lots of SMBs will benefit. Voters will get pocket money and other benefits. Free food. Free entertainment. Publication and printing contracts will be given. Volunteers will get paid. Hotels and F&B outlets will see increase in sales. The revenue will spur local economy and the locals will have some spending power.

By the way, if BN ultimately wins, what will happen to the JKKKs? The Federal government created separate committee called JKKKP, meaning villages had two separate committees.  Most likely the state government’s JKKK will be abolished, and the federal JKKK will take over the state JKKK.

To top it all, all this happened within days after Tajol Rosli quits Perak BN chairman post and DPM Najib takes over. Raises lots of eyebrows.

We can expect more drama over the weekend, perhaps even an ISA arrest or two. I hope it doesn’t affect the Thaipusam celebrations this weekend.

By poobalan on February 7, 2009 · Posted in BornInMalaysia, Indian

Tags: , , , ,

2 Comments | Post Comment

Killi Valavan says:

as usual (as been there for 50years) the botak using ISA fear on others to protect umno’s stunts . He and his gang could get his apologist support but not the people’s support . The Perak people are actually cant wait to spit on their faces .

Posted on February 7th, 2009

SA VIGNESWARAN says:

MP: I can’t verify that this is actually from SA Vigneswaran or MIYDF since did not arrive via email. So, we should read it with caution.

“The Raw Lesson from Perak”
_________________________________________
In War It Is Not About Who Is Right But Who is Left
Was this the guiding principle of the Pakatan Rakyat in obtaining power without total disregard to moral principles?
Q: Who hailed he had signed up more than 31 defectors needed to form a new government and called on Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi not to impose emergency rule to thwart a takeover on 16th September 2008?
Q: Who pumped our adrenalin by claiming the Pakatan Rakyat was able to form a new government by September 16 2008 with the help of defecting BN MP.
From the dawn of 12th General election, Dato Seri Anwar Ibrahim sowed the seeds of defections and cross overs. Datelines were set. September 16 came and went.
Then, in October 2008 he said he had enough defectors from the Barisan Nasional (BN) coalition to form a new administration possibly before Hari Raya Haji on 8 December 2008. That day too came and went.

At the party’s Congress in December 2008, Anwar again announced that Sarawak would be Pakatan Rakyat’s new battle ground. There was strong wind but we saw no rain.

When Dato Seri Anwar set the datelines, one after another, to take over the government by defection, how come there was no hue and cry from the so called leaders of community, bloggers and opposition leaders that the defection was immoral, undemocratic, appalling and oppressive.

At all time, the enigmatic truth is, the ONLY way Pakatan Rakyat was going to take over the government was by this immoral, undemocratic, appalling and oppressive defections.

Pakatan Rakyat continued to woo MPs and ADUNS to cross over to them for an eventual and hopeful ambition to take over the government without any criticism from the public.

Finally, the Bota state assemblymen decided its time for Anwar to reap what he has sowed. After 11 months of struggling to take over the government with cross-over MPs, Anwar succeeded to get the Bota state assemblymen crossover to PKR.

Again, there was no hue and cry from the Malaysian public that the Bota defection was immoral, undemocratic, appalling and oppressive. Neither was there nasty remarks made against Anwar or PKR.

But, the very moment four Pakatan ADUNs crossed over to Barisan Nasional, the nastiest remarks and accusations are casts at the government.

Let us not forget the cliché every action has a reaction! Mind you. It was not BN who opened the floodgates for defections.

Be fair to your own unflagging conscience, Malaysians.

Challenging the Sultan’s decision

What wrong has His Highness committed? Did he jump party and created this scenario?

The first and foremost one should realise especially by a new and evolving Pakatan Rakyat, that first it has to take responsibility for actions of its own and that of its members especially that of their elected representatives.

The first scenario in Perak began first with the Bota State Assemblyman crossing over to Pakatan Rakyat which did not earn the wrath of anyone from the Pakatan Coalition. Then, the second scenario, three (3) State Representatives including Bota crossed over to BN. Both the scenarios are identical morally and legally.

Only difference is, in the second scenario, it warranted the intervention of the Sultan, not by His Highness own accord, but by the Constitution of Perak that requires His Highness intervention.

When twenty-eight members indicated to the Sultan of Perak that they no longer have confidence in the incumbent Mentri Besar, and that with the three disputed memberships, they form a thirty-one team of majority of the members of the Legislative Assembly, on 5th February 2009 His Highness directed the Executive Council to resign.
His Highness Sultan’s ruling was pursuant to Article 16(6) of the Perak Constitution which expressly states where a request for dissolution is made as a consequence of the Mentri Besar ceasing to command the confidence of the majority of the members of the Assembly and His Highness refuses, the incumbent Mentri Besar must tender the resignation of the Executive Council.
It is the elected state representatives of Pakatan Rakyat in Perak and the modus operandi of the Pakatan to take over the government without election that has resulted in them getting the taste of their own medicine.
Instead of accepting the Sultan’s decision, all hell break loose for Pakatan Rakyat. Demonstrations and accusations are hurled at the Sultan now.

Has PKR and its leaders forgotten their declaration at PKR Congress in December 2008 that PKR took a strong stand on restoring the rulers’ immunity and their endorsement that although the country practised parliamentary democracy, the sovereignty of the rulers must be preserved.

Departing from their earlier rhetoric, where are they now when their own party members are insolent towards the Sultan of Perak. Demonstrations by Pakatan members against the Sultan is not our Malaysian culture.
It is not the public who are unhappy with the Sultan’s decision but the members of disgruntled Pakatan Alliance.
The Pakatan leaders must take responsibility for the acts of their members. Is this how they are going to run the government if they take over?
Have the Pakatan members forgotten all Malaysian’s solemn pledge to “Loyalty to King and Country” in Rukunegara that they very strongly uphold in their parties?
Pakatan should learn from the lesson in Perak and begin concentrating on its promises to people, to uplift the multiracial society.
We should look forward to better the economic state of our country and make Malaysia a better home for us rather than verbalising on individual prejudices, applying double standards and making loose accusations that unnerves the harmony.
The raw lesson we learnt from Perak is “Those who live by the sword die by the sword”.
_________________________________________
SA. Vigneswaran,
Chairman
Malaysian Indian Youth Development Foundation (MIYDF)
07.02.2009

Posted on February 8th, 2009