Archive for January, 2009

Omar and Nizar wrong on civil servants

January 21st, 2009
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


I read a very funny statement from Cuepacs president yesterday:

Cuepacs president Omar Osman has denied that civil servants had contributed to Pas’ victory in Saturday’s Kuala Terengganu by-election.

He said public services employees, both those serving the federal and state governments, fully supported the Barisan Nasional and Umno leadership.

He was commenting on a claim by Perak Menteri Besar Datuk Seri Mohammad Nizar Jamaluddin.

“Datuk Seri Mohammad Nizar Jamaluddin claimed government staff serving the federal and state governments sympathised with and supported Pas,” Omar said yesterday.

“He also said they had become more daring to vote for Pas in the by-election despite being threatened or forced.

“This is a big lie by a man who knows nothing about the public services or its system.

“The more than 1.2 million civil servants in this country have been loyal and supportive of the government. There is no doubt about that.”

He said civil servants appreciated what the government had been doing for them all these years.

“They know who has been fighting for their welfare and paying their salaries to enable them to feed and support their family. Leave them alone,” Omar said.

Firstly, I think its wrong of the Perak MB to suggest or claim that civil servants are supporting PAS or any other party for that matter. He cannot possibly represent any segment of 1.2 million people nor conclude how these people voted.

The same goes for Cuepacs president. Yes, he is the official representative of the civil servants FOR issues related to EMPLOYMENT only. He cannot represent the individuals nor can he claim that the civil servants are supporting certain parties. Civil servants can do their job without any political affiliation. Regardless of who is the government of the day, the work must go on.

Secondly, it is known that civil servant salary comes from tax collection, i.e. the public money.  Never had been a case that any political party paid for salary of government staff from its own coffers. So, who is it the workers should be indebted to ultimately?

If one remembers the results for Putrajaya parliament seat, the opposition did garner a number of votes. Thus its meaningless to say that all civil servants support certain parties when even in the most important parliamentary seat it was not a clean sweep of the votes.

I am obliged to think that these employees are professional enough to separate work from political leanings.  Perhaps only the leaders need some education on this matter.

Civil servants., just like any other citizen, can vote for whoever they like and its nobody’s business.  Any interference is a crime against basic human rights.  So, Omar, Nizar and the rest can keep their opinions and claims to themselves less they are made to look like fools.

Tan Sri Ramon on NEP deviation

January 21st, 2009
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Confirming what many Malaysians already know, one of the persons involved in the drafting of NEP, Tan Sri Ramon Navaratnam says this in Malaysiakini article:

The New Economic Policy (NEP) has deviated from its original aim of eradicating poverty in the country and thus, it is imperative that the policy is studied again in detail, not by politicians but by professionals.

MCPX

At the launch of a new book entitled “Malaya’s First Year At The United Nations” at the Royal Lake Club this afternoon, Ramon Navaratnam (right in picture) said, “I have some knowledge of it, as I was one of those who drafted the NEP. I agree with Tunku Abdul Rahman when he said there’s nothing wrong with the NEP per se, but (there are problems with) the way it is implemented.

“At that time, neither Tun Dr Ismail nor any of us thought of APs (approved permits) and special privileges for the rich. We thought of poverty eradication regardless of race and the removal of the association of occupation with race.

“But it has had different turns and twists, and I think it is well worth a study of where it deviates from the ideals and wisdom of people like the late Tun Dr Ismail,” added Navaratnam, who is also director of the Asian Strategy and Leadership Institute.

Race Relations Act plan grounded

January 20th, 2009
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


The Race Relations Act was mooted back in September by MCA after the Sin Chew reporter saga. The cabinet moved to work on it. However, there were hints that it will be “adapted” to our local environment as mentioned by Home Minister Syed Hamid.

In a major turnaround, it seems the Cabinet decided that such an act is not relevant.

The government has decided not to pursue the proposed Race Relations Act – just four months after saying that the cabinet had agreed to do so.

The change of heart was announced today by Unity, Culture, Arts and Heritage Minister Shafie Apdal.

He said that the cabinet has now agreed that there was no need for the Act, according to reports.

Shafie said that the cabinet had studied the matter thoroughly and has decided not to proceed with the proposed Act.

“Race relations is something that comes naturally and cannot be forced through legislation,” he told reporters today.

“That is why everyone in the cabinet agreed there was no need for such an Act.”

Shafie added that so many experts were against such an Act being implemented in this country.

The minister also said that he had studied similar acts in several other countries and found that such an act was not suitable here.

To overcome any religious tensions, the minister suggested that everyone respected each others’ religion and race.

“We have lived in harmony for more than 50 years. Why can’t we continue to do so? You cannot force someone to like you. It must come naturally,” he added.

Interesting words indeed – “The minister also said that he had studied similar acts in several other countries and found that such an act was not suitable here.” Wonder what he means by that.

Makkal Sakthi asks Obama to close Kamunting

January 20th, 2009
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


This is just a symbolic move by Makkal Sakthi. But what caught my attention was their tactic to just have four people gather to hold a banner, meaning there’s no need to apply for a police permit. Smart fellas.

And guess what,  there were 100 policemen there!!! How nice if these guys were deployed in crime infested areas in such short time. Sure can catch some criminals.

By the way, their rep in New York is also expected to pass a petition to Barack Obama

The Hindu Rights Action Force (Hindraf) has sought the help of US president-elect Barack Obama to close the Kamunting detention camp in Taiping, Perak.

MCPX

Four Hindraf members made the plea in a press statement issued today, saying that the movement welcomes Obama’s decision to close the camp for suspected militants in Guantanamo Bay.

The four held up a banner outside the US Embassy in Jalan Tun Razak, Kuala Lumpur, in a 15-minute demonstration this morning.

The assembled police force of about 100 personnel was surprised at the ‘small’ turnout. However, this was Hindraf’s bid to get around the restriction on gatherings of more than four people, which require a police permit.

In the statement signed by S Jayathas, Hindraf also congratulated Obama on his inauguration – scheduled for 1am tomorrow, Malaysian time.

Hindraf – banned by the government on Oct 15 last year – also said it counts on his support to help Indian Malaysians who “are being suppressed by the Umno-led government”.

R Shan, the movement’s representative in New York, is expected to hand over a petition to Obama in Washington today.

A similar petition will be submitted to Najib Abdul Razak when he becomes the prime minister of Malaysia in March.

What English?

January 19th, 2009
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Hours ago, I was talking to my niece who entered form 4 this year. She’s in Science stream – taking Physics, Chemistry, and Biology. The teachers are struggling with teaching in English. One spoke like bullet train, and asked the students to change to Arts stream when they said “don’t understand”. Another is trainee teacher is doing practicals and the students are made scapegoats because they guy can’t speak properly.  The third teacher also unable to communicate in English well.

So, this makes me wonder. What do you mean by teaching science subjects in English?