Archive for July, 2008

Don’t merge schools says Tamil Youth Bell Club

July 30th, 2008
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


The call was made by National Council of Tamil Youth Bell Club president P. Ponniah, who urged the Education Ministry not to deregister schools with 50 or fewer children.

He said many estate Tamil schools had fewer than 50 children per school and should be allowed to continue and not merged.

He said the schools’ management should open the schools to families in nearby new housing estates. He said that at present many parents were forced to send their children to national schools, as there were no Tamil schools nearby and also because of the transportation problems.

He urged political parties to hold talks with the Ministry in opening new Tamil schools in housing estates with Indian majority. He said this would ensure that the number of Tamil schools in this country would not be reduced.

HINDRAF unhappy with Pakatan states

July 29th, 2008
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Very surprising indeed. in the pro government Star, HINDRAF coordinators Kannan and Thanenthiran were quoted as HINDRAF not regretting asking supporters to vote for opposition. They said many changes were seen after the elections, especially in Pakatan led states.

But today, in the pro-opposition Malaysiakini, a different tune is being sang. The report says that HINDRAF, together with two previously unheard of groups – Penang Makkal Sakti Welfare Association (Pemaswa) and Hindu Action Network (Han) are fed up with the “indifferent attitude of Pakatan Rakyat governments”.

These three groups are now asking for these Pakatan states to set up state Indian councils to be led by the menteri besar or chief minister. The suggested councils will plan and implement beneficial programmes
for the Indian community, with short, medium and long term goals.

Hindraf National Coordinator, Thanenthiran declares that the Pakatan government had failed to fulfill the promises. He said during the elections, Pakatan used the Hindraf tagline Makkal
Sakti but since winning they have not unveiled any policy to benefit
the community. “Pakatan Rakyat ruling parties, be it DAP in Penang, PAS in Kedah and
Perak and PKR in Selangor, seemed to have made empty electoral promises
to the Indians,” he added. He stressed Hindraf would continue to fight along the movement’s
18-point memorandum submitted to the federal government last year.

Pemaswa’s president, G Asohan also chips by saying that Indian leaders in the Pakatan government have “betrayed the Indian community’s trust in them” to deliver the goods. “Until today, the state governments, particularly Indian leaders, are resting on their laurels,” he said. He claimed that more from MIC, PPP and IPF have benefited from the DAP government in Penang than genuine Hindraf supporters.

HAN’s coordinator G Mugunthan criticised Penang’s elected Indian assemblypersons of protecting their
chronic self-interests when they rejected a previous DAP proposal for a
state council. Though DAP members were keen for a one-stop council, the DAP Indian
assemblypersons rejected it as “it will put undue pressure on them to
deliver.” “Now they are freely doing anything according to their
whims and fancies,” he said, adding that the appointment of an Indian
as Penang deputy chief minister has been more “a curse than a blessing”
to the community. “It has only helped some chronic characters from BN.”

The three groups plan to organise a joint dialogue session with all relevant Pakatan Rakyat heads of state governments over the issue.

As for me, in the short period since last August, HINDRAF had done the impossible. and brought immense self-confidence into the community. It may be a relatively short-lived shot in the arm for the community which was fed up with shoddy treatment from all corners. Post-elections, its a new voyage into unchartered areas. Here, HINDRAF, just like the Indian community, had to make sure its stand is clear. How the community’s newly acquired self-confidence is used may be out of HINDRAF’s control. As Waytha admitted in Singapore months ago (the famous misused interview), it is very likely that HINDRAF will cease to exist in the near future. If it has outlived its purpose – to create an awakening – then its time to retire HINDRAF. The spirit of Makkal Sakthi can take form in newer groups or agendas. It might even cleanse MIC, for all we know. But the contribution of HINDRAF is undeniable.

HINDRAF’s main agenda is to push its 18 point memorandum, and to free its detained leaders. They should stick to that and be clear. They should not meddle into many things (like PI Bala’s disappearance) and cloud the situation. They are apolitical. A pressure group. Their job is to push the community’s agenda (just, fair and logical ones) to the authorities. If group A does not help, then move to group B. Remember that political parties need Hindraf, not the other way around. If such parties conveniently forget HINDRAF now, they will be rudely reminded in the next election. Its not end of the world if Pakatan states neglect the community. In the end, these people will come begging for votes. The community have realised that the era of 50 years of empty promises are gone already. Now, 5 years only given, maybe lesser.

On another note, if the Pakatan led governments implement race-independent measures and policies that directly and indirectly benefit the community, HINDRAF should welcome those measures and policies. We have seen settlers getting land title and pig farms projects continuing, but partially-aided Tamils schools have not got their land. Perhaps the process is longer, but Pakatan leaders in Selangor, Penang and Perak must keep the community updated. What is the progress in getting the land? what are the problems they face? Is it due to federal laws?

The Indian community does not owe any party or individuals a living. Those who think that we should bow down and kowtow to others are seriously wrong. We don’t agree that some other group are supremacist, while we are slaves. We stand equal, shoulder to shoulder with other human beings, and are not fourth class citizens. The community may be stuck between two useless groups – the BN and the Pakatan, but it must never lose its self respect.

MIC wooing Hindraf

July 29th, 2008
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Well, the word “woo” reminds me of marriage. And surely we remember Samy Vellu’s statement on MIC and Indian community are like husband and wife, which he made before elections. After that, the divorce happened.

Now, MIC wants to get married again 🙂 To Hindraf, no less.

MIC president Datuk Seri S. Samy Vellu said the party had been holding discussions with Hindraf youth leaders in Kedah, Perak and Selangor, which he said went well. He said the meetings went well as the Hindraf leaders realised that the MIC was also fighting to upgrade the living standards of the Indian community.

“Whatever happened in the past, especially in the March polls, is history. We must work together for the betterment of the community,” he said, claiming that some of the Hindraf leaders also regretted their decision to support the opposition.

However, the overtures were rejected outright by the intended bride.

Hindraf national event co-ordinator Kannan Ramasamy, when contacted, said he was baffled by Samy Velu’s claims as none of the movement’s 10 coordinators had met any MIC leaders.

“Hindraf does not have a membership roll. It is led by P. Waythamoorthy who is assisted by 10 coordinators and as far as I know, none of us had met anyone from the MIC,” added Kannan.

Both Thanenthiran and Kannan advised Samy Vellu to back off and concentrate on rebuilding the MIC.

Rebutting Samy’s claims that some Hindraf leaders also regretted their decision to support the opposition, Kannan said Hindraf has never regretted convincing the Indians to vote for the opposition in the 12th general election as the move had brought much improvement for the community in some parts of the country. “We have noted that a lot of improvement has taken place for Indians in the five states led by the Pakatan Rakyat coalition since the election,” he said.

Hindraf national coordinator R.S Thanenthiran concurred and added the best thing that happened from supporting the opposition was the awareness created that Indians mattered in the country. “For the first time ever, it has been made known to the minority Indians that they had the power to bring changes through the ballot box,” he added.

So, will the wedding take place?

Pakatan state magazines come under fire

July 29th, 2008
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Penang and Perak state governments had announced the publication of magazines that various groups branded as propoganda. These groups called the the two state governments ‘hypocrites’ as they were doing the same thing as the previous governments which they had earlier criticised.

Malaysiakini carried some of the responses from these groups:

Media Watch:

Penang-based Media Watch group described Suara Rakyat, published by the DAP-led Penang government and Citra Perak in PAS-led Perak as “merely a public media tool of partisan propaganda.”“The Pakatan Rakyat governments are no different from the previous ones after all. They are hypocrites by copying BN media policy to serve their cynical self interests,” said its coordinator B K Ong, stressing Media Watch’s stand on governments to ‘stay away’ from media publications.

Even if a state government funds and publishes a state magazine, he argues it should be administrated by an independent editorial board to provide free and fair news coverage.

“But these magazines are more like mouthpieces of Pakatan Rakyat state governments than independent magazines,” he told Malaysiakini.

By following the precedent set by his predecessor, Ong said Penang Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng had proven to be a hypocrite since “he had condemned BN-controlled media all these years.”

“He should have titled the magazine as Suara Kerajaan (Government Voice) not Suara Rakyat (People’s Voice),” he said.

United Hindu Religious Council:

President G Mugunthan criticised the Pakatan Rakyat state governments of not going on an austerity drive to save government spending, more so during such difficult times for the people.“The Pakatan state governments claim to be thrifty but are wrongly spending precious government funds
on propaganda. The money could have well spent for noble causes like helping the poor and Tamil schools,” he stressed.

Aliran:

Although social reform movement Aliran is not against the government-sponsored publications, it nonetheless said that state magazines should be more for “intellectual discourse, intelligent thinking and people centric.”

Penang Heritage Trust:

Penang Heritage Trust head Dr Choon Sim Poey concurred that it would not be right for the state governments to utilise public funds for political publicity, instead of  publishing government policies and action plans for the information of the people.

Opposition Leader in Penang:

Azhar Ibrahim on Monday criticised the state government of going back on its promise to cut operational costs due to a lack of funds.“Is this what we call the ‘CAT’ government?” he asked, taking a swipe at the state government’s widely-propagated principles of competency, accountability and transparency (CAT).

it is estimated that Penang government will spent RM300,000 (20,000 copies x 3 editions) . Perak is also expected to spend same amount for 6 editions of 10,000 copies each. Suara Rakyat (52 pages), Penang’s version is in 3 languages – Malay, Mandarin, and Tamil. Citra Perak (20 pages) is in Malay only.

Previous Penang government spent nearly RM300,000 a year to publish separate Malay, Chinese and Tamil magazines in Penang. The Malay version, Wawasan Rakyat was published first in 1994, Hong Yuan in Mandarin was launched in 1999 while Makkal Madal in Tamil was started in 2003.

The previous Perak BN government only published Warta Perak in Bahasa.

The Pakatan government must be careful to ensure that they do not follow the path of those they criticised earlier. This kind of expense will not go down well with public, and will be used by opposition to attack government.

IPF drowning?

July 29th, 2008
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


after the death of Pandithan, IPF have been very quiet given that it has split into to two, which I think is not good. There was supposed to be an announcement on long term plans, but nothing so far. Calls for AGM are not heeded.

IPF Bersatu, headed by former secretary general says the party is weakening due to leadership given to Pandithan’s wife.

“She is from India and with no experience. For the party’s solidarity, Pandithan, in his dying days, should have rallied round party veterans, including those outside the party, to take over.”

He said members were unhappy with the appointment of Jayashree as acting president.
“By appointing her, it shows the late Pandithan’s self-interest in safeguarding the RM3 million building housing the party headquarters.”

He felt that the only way out for IPF was to reunite the 380,000 members and former members under one roof.

Panjamurti, who claimed to have 200,000 former IPF members in his party, said: “The members want the two factions within the party to rejoin to restore their confidence in the party’s struggle.

“IPF Bersatu extended its hand of friendship to IPF but the acting president did not respond.”

He feared that the delay might weaken the party..

Meanwhile, IPF deputy president V. Senggutuan agreed that several hundred had left the party but could not say what the exact number was. He said some had joined Parti Keadilan Rakyat, Pas and DAP.

“I am now visiting various states to register members and give them motivational talks,” he said, adding that most of them were hardcore party supporters.

He said the only way to strengthen the party was to become a member of the Barisan Nasional.

“This will give us some focus. It will also give confidence to our members, who are mostly poor Indian families still mourning Pandithan’s death.”

IPF vice-president N. Sargunan said the party’s struggle was still relevant, having survived for the past 20 years without power or media support. He hopes IPF can join BN, but I don’t MIC will appreciate that.

“Our hope is that BN leaders will see our importance and accept us into their fold.

“There is space for two Indian-based parties in BN considering that there are so many coalition parties representing the people of Sabah.”

It seems the party has been quite dormant for some time, with lack of interaction between leadership and grassroot support. The acting president, Pandithan’s widow, madam Jayashree said that a press conference will be called for announcements on the party’s future plans.

By the way, IPF is suing IPF Bersatu for RM1 million for using its name, logo and registration number. The suit says IPF Bersatu is not part of the IPF, and as such has caused confusion among party members. IPF Bersatu is headed by former IPF secretary-general K. Panjamurti. IPF was set up by Tan Sri M.G.
Pandithan in the late 1980s.