Author Archive

More BTN stories

December 2nd, 2009
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Interviews (1 and 2) from Malaysiakini below. Its similar to what I have heard from reliable friends too.

‘We were shown a picture of Anwar Ibrahim with an American. The instructor told us that he is a traitor to the country as he had a good relationship with the Americans.’
This was among the issues raised during a nation building programme carried out by Biro Tatanegara or the National Civics Bureau, recalled fourth year economics student Fakhrul Zaki Fazial.

Fakhrul, who is studying in Universiti Islam Antarabangsa (UIA), said the focus of the talks is on the Malay race.

“They (the instructors) also criticise leaders from the opposition and consider their criticism as being patriotic,” he added.

Universiti Malaya student leader Mohd Ridzuan Mohammad, who attended the BTN programme in 2004, said there were even talks about other races being a threat to the Malays.

“It is not the right thing to do for BTN to play up racial sentiments… that will create racial rift…(as) this programme could influence some students (into accepting the propagation of racist ideologies),” he added.

Chin Shin Liang, a former Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM) student who attended a BTN course in December 2008, related his experience.

“We were shown video clips of the Bersih rally and then pictures of war-torn Palestine with a caption; Is this what we want?…we were also shown an (unidentified) protester throwing stones.”

‘Promoting blind obedience’

Describing it as “incredibly biased”, Chin said: “It does not show who the stone thrower is, probably a Mat Rempit who decided to join the fun or how the police provoked the protesters with a water canon in the first place.”

He said the instructors also taught that the BN government is chosen by the people and therefore is the legitimate government while making no attempt to distinguish the political party and the government.

The instructors, he said, also suggested that all government agencies should serve BN and be careful of any requests from the opposition which is trying to topple the government.

“This is very misleading, because as a rule, government agencies should be neutral and serve the country as a whole (not just a particular party/coalition),” he added.

It is as if the course is suggesting that the BN government ‘represents’ the country and should be blindly obeyed without question, he noted.

Meanwhile, Fakhrul expressed doubts over BTN’s choice of instructors.

“I feel that some of the instructors were not qualified because they were very emotional and not intellectual in their presentations.

“If students disagreed with their viewpoint, they would be scolded in front of everyone,” he said.

‘BTN taught us mutual respect’

Brickbats aside, there are some quarters who felt that BTN courses have been unfairly targeted.

Yesterday, a group calling itself ‘ex-BTN graduates’ held a press conference in Kuala Lumpur to air their views.

“We feel it is our social responsibility to correct the lopsided views about BTN courses,” said its leader Ahmad Shafei Ahmad Hanbali (left).

He denied that the modules sowed seeds of hatred towards other races. “BTN taught us how to mutually respect the rights of other races as spelt out in the constitution.”

“It is not fair to say that BTN tries to create division when it is only teaching the country’s official history,” he said.

On the allegation that BTN is a propaganda tool of BN, Ahmad Shafei alluded that there was nothing wrong with teaching obedience to the sitting government.

“In a mature democracy, those who lost, even by one vote, must respect those who have won and the victory that the majority of the rakyat has given to the victors,” he said.

Also coming to the defence of BTN was Majlis Gabungan NGO Pembela Negara (Magaran) legal adviser, Mohd Khairul Azam Abdul Aziz.

He said everything that is taught in BTN courses follows what is spelt out in the constitution.

He explained that the special position of the Malays, Bahasa Melayu and Islam is clearly mentioned in articles like 152 and 153 of the constitution.

Mohd Khairul, who claims to be a BTN graduate himself, said “these are facts, not opinions.”

ISO certification

As for allegations of facts, issues and images being manipulated and misrepresented, he explained: “These images and issue are not uncommon even outside BTN, these are usual fare in blogs, publications and other sources. Every fact, image and issue shown or mentioned is credited to sources.”

“Participants can think for themselves, BTN is just exercising freedom of speech. I think that the use of those images are appropriate (in order to highlight certain matters).”

Asked about the problem some graduates have with instructors, Mohd Khairul said: “Report the wrongdoings of the instructors and BTN will address the problem. Don’t reject BTN totally.”

In 2008, BTN was apparently awarded ISO certification by Sirim for its courses.

However, concerned parties have pointed out that Sirim’s endorsement only confirms BTN’s ability to deliver the training on a consistent basis, not an endorsement of the course contents.

Commenting on this, Tenaganita director Irene Fernandez asked whether the authorities who issued the certification are “conscious of the seditious and racially inflammatory nature of the curriculum”.

Student council representatives from several public universities are opposed to the controversial Biro Tatanegara (BTN) courses which is a requirement at campuses.

Universiti Malaya Students Council president, Mohd Ridzuan Mohammad, said only four out of 41 council members who have been asked to attend the course chose to do so.

“I made it optional for members as I felt the course was unsuitable. It incites racial sentiments and does not help provide better representation to the student body,” he said.

The council received an official letter from the Ministry of Higher Education, via UM’s student affairs department, saying it was compulsory for council members.

Ridzuan, who had attended a BTN course in his first year, said his decision to make it optional had “angered” assistant vice chancellor of student affairs, Azarae Idris, who threatened disciplinary action.

However, he said, Azarae withdrew his threat after Ridzuan made his case in a meeting with the vice chancellor after the BTN course in April earlier in the year.

Ridzuan’s defense was that pro-opposition student leaders were depicted negatively at a BTN course held in Kuala Terengganu.

He said the incident where a pig’s head was thrown into a surau in UM was used to tarnish the image of pro-opposition student leaders.

“The course is run over three days, which I think can be better spent on looking after the welfare of the students on campus,” he said.

When contacted, neither Azrae nor senior officers at the student affairs department were available for comment.

Compulsory for Islamic studies students

At University Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), student council member Hisyamuddin Che Ali said most chose not to attend despite warnings from the student affairs department.

“We received calls from the student affairs department almost everyday to pressure us to go,” he said.

Thus far no action has been taken on those who did not attend, as it is not compulsory for most UKM students.

The course, however, is a must for Faculty of Islamic Studies students. Unhappy at being singled out, the faculty’s mostly Muslim students protested to the vice chancellor.

“They too, complained that racial sentiments were fanned at BTN courses…for example, they were told that the Chinese are lording over the country,” said Hisyamuddin.

Other complaints included the inciting of political sentiments and the fact that male and female participants were not segregated during the activities.

Hisyamuddin said the student affairs department responded by saying that they were merely acting on the instructions of the Ministry of Higher Education.

‘It all depends on the facilitators’

On the other end of the spectrum, a former UUM student council president said that he had encouraged council members to attend BTN course.

Nur Mohd Saifuddin Salahuddin said that 25 of the 36-member student council members attended the course.

“It’s good for team-building,” he said, adding that the courses were optional for UUM students despite rumours that those who did not go would not be allowed to graduate.

Saifuddin, who has attended several BTN courses, said the benefits outweighed negative perceptions, and that the modules mostly concentrated on historical facts.

“Whether or not BTN is an indoctrination camp depends on the facilitator, as some facilitators choose to focus on politics,” said the member of the Pro-Aspirasi faction.

Pro-Aspirasi is commonly known to be a pro-Barisan Nasional government group in campus politics.

Saifuddin said that out of the 20 to 30 facilitators present at the BTN courses which he attended, only one or two made their political leanings obvious.

“I had even provoked a facilitator, calling him an ‘Umno man’, but he told me that it was a requirement for BTN facilitators to not be members of any political party,” he said.

‘Steer clear of politics’

Despite supporting the ISO-certified BTN, Saifuddin felt BTN courses should be clear of political influences, and use history instead of current events, as a teaching reference,

“I do not agree with some facilitators who try to convince those with different political leanings by stating ‘fact’ after ‘fact’.

“If they must relate the modules to current events, at the very least they should stay neutral and not be so partial to the ruling government,” he said.

He also said that the BTN courses should be more transparent, to ensure that the public understands what takes place.

Currently, all participants are asked to surrender cameras, mobile phones and all other recording devices.

This is not the case in Selangor’s BTN equivalent SPIES where students taking part are allowed to bring along recording devices and best of all, the course is not compulsory.

“It popular because the facilitators are qualified and the activities are fun and beneficial,” said Universiti Selangor student council president Wan Azraei Wan Husin.

Wan Azraei said the course includes the history of political parties, motivational speeches, spiritual lessons and outdoor activities like white water rafting, something also included in BTN course modules.

Blame is on the bridge

December 1st, 2009
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


The government’s version of the investigation report is out, well in a way. A statement was issued:

The suspension bridge which collapsed near SK Kuala Dipang in Kampar, Perak, did not meet required engineering codes and specifications.

A statement issued by Education director-general Tan Sri Alimuddin Mohd Dom Tuesday revealed that the structure was only able to take the weight of eight pupils (each weighing 35kgs).

The tragedy occurred on Oct 26 when pupils from 60 schools in the state tried crossing the bridge in groups of 14 to 17. [tried? why? was the person(s) supervising the movement aware?]

Alimuddin added that the collapse was caused by a faulty concrete block connection.

“The investigation committee found that the concrete block connection in Pylon A could not handle the uplift force from the back-stayed cable.

“Additionally, the private contractor involved had not submitted a plan of the structure or received any approval from authorities such as the district council and Drainage and Irrigation department,’’ he said.

In the tragedy, three primary school pupils attending a 1Malaysia camp drowned after the suspension bridge they were on collapsed into the Kampar river.

At around 10.30pm after an ice-breaking session at the campsite, the organising teachers allowed pupils in groups of 14 to 17 to cross the bridge for their meal at the school. [so, does it mean the teachers were not informed about the weight limit or there was no info?]

Meanwhile, some pupils returned to the campsite to retrieve their water containers and cutlery.

According to Alimuddin, under the weight of pupils crossing from both directions, the bridge began to collapse.

Additionally, heavy rainfall earlier in the evening had increased the river level and current, causing the bridge to sway.

Some of the pupils who were swept away by the current were saved by the camp commandant, trainers, teachers and workers who had jumped into the river after them, he said.

Firemen, rescue workers and the police showed up later to continue the search for missing pupils.

The Education Ministry, he said, would take into account the views of the Public Works Ministry and Department, the Construction Industry Development Board, and the Attorney-General’s Chambers in deciding the appropriate measures to be taken against the involved parties.

There is also an ongoing police investigation into the incident, he said.

Read the alternative reports here, here, and here.

Nothing was mentioned about teachers, supervisors, and the various departments. How can a bridge be built and these people were unaware? Does it mean, you will allow anyone to just come and built something on your land? Sure, the bridge was faulty. But why was it there in the first place?

SPM subject limit standoff

December 1st, 2009
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


MIC is adamant to get 11 or 12 subject limit. The Education Ministry is not budging from its stand. So, how long is MIC going to try talking before giving up? Would it go to extreme measure and quit from BN since it is unable to fulfill the community demand? Radio, newspaper, Internet group, Facebook – most comments is for 12 subject limit. The Education DG proposed the below idea, which was rejected by MIC’s Dr Subra:

To overcome this, the education ministry today suggested that schools conduct their own vernacular examinations for students who were unable to sit for it at SPM level.

Director-General of Education Alimuddin Mohd Dom said, by doing so, school teachers could gauge the ability of the students concerned and issue certificates based on their efficiency and proficiency in vernacular languages.

“I suggest students take school-based vernacular examinations if they are not able to sit for it when the 10-subject limit for candidates sitting for SPM begins next year.

“Learning is an ongoing process and students intending to take vernacular subjects can always continue, upon completing their school,” he told reporters today.

He also said this:

Alimuddin clarified that certain elective subjects could be dropped.

“For instance, if students are interested in pursuing medicine, they have to take mathematics, biology and chemistry but can drop physics.

“So, they can pick any other elective of their choice to replace physics,” he explained.

Would a student risk dropping physics in hope that he will surely get place for medical studies? If forced to chose between physics and chinese/tamil language, what would the student do?

I think this will be a failure for MIC. There’s one other alternative – postpone the implementation until 2011 (similar for the religious stream students). In the meantime, merge the two Tamil subjects into one.  Another extreme possibility is to remove Moral as core subject and replace it with vernacular language (but will be a problem since for Punjabis, Thais etc, their vernacular language is not Tamil or Mandarin). Anyhow, removing Moral won’t be considered by government even though its an useless subject. A case of failing to admit one’s mistake.

Or, this could be some sort of drama, and later the approval will be given so that MIC gets some brownie points. You never know. 🙂

I asked myself, why would a student take language and literature subject for SPM?

1. If Science stream background, then most likely for the love of the language, and obviously, if the students is good, then to gain an extra A or two.

2. If Arts stream student, then its to apply for education line (teaching) or social studies/media. However, since the places for these courses are extremely limited (I checked with UM and there’s only 3 programs that list Tamil as one of the subjects at STPM level. I’m sure you know non-bumiputeras cannot enter UM using SPM results), the students also need to take other subjects like Accounts, Economy, English Literature, Arts, etc so that can have more choices at IPTAs (diploma programs) politeknik and private colleges. So, if a student takes Tamil at SPM level, most likely he/she will take it at STPM level too, if the results are good.

For case (1), the students may accept to take the language as non-examinable subject, maybe subject to school level accreditation (or even from a reputable organisation).

For case (2), the subject must be in SPM certificate in order to apply for certain courses in tertiary education (teaching courses).

For me, as more students enter Tamil schools nowadays, they will be deterred in taking both the Tamil subjects at secondary school level since it will affect their career options. Sooner than later, interest and love for the language will give way for need to score good results in examinations.

But to develop students with more capability, i like to reiterate my suggestion: have a combination of core, elective, and “interest” subjects. It can be 5+4+2 or 4+4+2 (dropping Moral and Agama – if the students are interested in these subjects, can take it under “interest category.).

Salary of estate worker

December 1st, 2009
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


I’m sure readers are familiar with the recent spat between Plantation Industries and Commodities Minister Bernard Dompok and PSM over the salary of estate workers. It was started by Dompok who said that plantation workers like rubber tappers and oil palm harvesters earn more than the monthly poverty level amount, even quoting RM1700 per month for one category of workers. This was disputed by the Parti Sosialis Malaysia and JERIT. Dompok is even threatening to sue the challengers. But we need to remember that poverty line is for family income, not individual (Dompok compared wrongly in the first place because he took a person’s salary and compared with family poverty income level). This was even pointed out by the Deputy Minister after MK published pay slips of two people:

Malaysiakini had published two pay slips of plantation workers which showed that they were earning below the poverty line which is set at RM720 a month.

Hamzah, upset over statements from representatives of the plantation workers, asked for the news report to be retracted.

He claimed that this had to be done ‘as its objective was to ruin the dignity of the government and his ministry in particular’.

Hamzah (right) said a probe was done on the persons of whose pay slips were published and it was discovered that they were women who were employed as common workers at an oil palm plantation in Sungai Siput. They earned RM21.30 per day.

“Usually, common workers are women who are involved in fertilising and removing weeds (in the plantations). Mostly, they are wives of workers employed for other duties.

“Generally, the accumulated salary of both husband and wife is more than RM1,200 a month, which is above the poverty line,” said Hamzah.

According to him, oil palm fruit harvesters earn from RM26 to RM60 a day, depending on their productivity.

The wages, he said, were based on the ‘productivity-linked wage system’ (PLWS) which was adopted in the collective agreement between the Malayan Agricultural Producers Association (Mapa) and the National Union of Plantation Workers (NUPW).

“At the level of crude palm oil being priced at RM1,200 per tonne, when a harvester produces 38 tonnes a month, he will get RM844.

“At the level of crude palm oil being priced at RM2,000 per tonne, the harvester’s income is RM1,292.16 a month,” said Hamzah.

Therefore, that it was not ‘an impossible task and it is not a lie’ to say that an oil palm plantation worker could earn up to RM1,700 a month. [ah, not impossible, theoretically. why not produce payslips of workers (say 100 workers) who actually got such salaries? Its not that difficult, is it?]

“Especially workers who are productive and are able to produce three tonne bunches of oil palm fruits a day or 78 tonne of bunches of oil palm fruits a month,” said Hamzah.

Today, PSM provided some info and proof by showing salary slip of workers. Its shocking to say the least! Agreed, its just few workers, so may not really represent the whole sector. But I think HR Ministry, NUPW etc have done a survey on this before. What does it say? I also remember reading that many of the plantation workers are actually foreigners since locals shun these jobs.

The salary may be tied to productivity. Maybe it was low season so not much work or product. In the example below, the guy earns less than RM200 per month and has 8 kids. Not a good example for PSM.  While Dompok is most likely wrong in his assessment, the workers also need to play a part and not make their own lives more difficult. If  8 kids, RM10,000 also not enough in this age!

Many plantation workers in Perak, including foreigners, are being exploited and fleeced by estate managements who charge them exorbitant amounts for electricity and water supply.
Parti Sosialis Malaysia (PSM) state coordinator M Sugumaran told Malaysiakini today that estates are charged industrial rates for both the supply of water and electricity.

According to him, Tenaga Nasional Bhd (TNB) bills the estates on a monthly basis whereas the Perak Water Board (LAP) serves them with a bimonthly bill.

Sugumaran said the management could afford to charge domestic rates as the workers are occupying housing areas inside the estate but a recent survey painted a grim picture.

The survey of the working conditions of plantation workers in about 50 estates revealed that they are not only paid low wages but are also charged high electricity and water rates.

“The average gross daily salary for a plantation worker is RM21.10, inclusive of other benefits and allowances. The management deducts RM50 per person per month for utilities.

“There are about five to six foreign workers sharing a room and RM50 is deducted as electricity charges in their salary slips,” a shocked Sugumaran said.

“You mean to say that the electricity charge for a room in an estate comes to about RM300 monthly?” he asked.

Worker’s monthly salary of RM145

Earlier at a press conference, Sugumaran brought 15 plantation workers from Sungai Siput and Bagan Serai and displayed their monthly pay slips to disprove a claim made recently.

Plantation Industries and Commodities Minister Bernard Dompok (left) had stated in Parliament that rubber tappers earn RM870 monthly while plantation workers earn RM1,700.

Sugumaran welcomed the threat by Dompok to sue PSM for refuting his claims and calling him a liar as PSM have documentary evidence to prove the minister wrong.

“Dompok, instead of making statements in the comfort of Parliament, should come down and see the harsh realities of the sufferings of the plantation workers,” said Sugumaran.

Salleh Saari, 44, a plantation worker with eight children from Ladang Gedong in Bagan Serai, provided the press copies of his September and October 2009 salary slips.

His September 2009 salary slip showed that his net take home pay was a mere RM145.94. His gross earning was RM543.36 while his total deductions came to RM397.42.

Deductions were for his two-room estate home, water bill amounting to RM23.40 and electricity at RM85.27.

For October 2009, Salleh had to pay RM35 for water charges and RM93 for electricity usage. “Even a bungalow utilities charges would not be as high as mine,” said Salleh.

His gross October salary was RM381 and his net income after deductions showed RM181.

“How am I to feed my family of eight children? ” he asked, bursting into tears.

All this is going to be rendered academic, because we all know the poverty line is a joke. Good thing government is updating the line to something more sane. I think in rural area it should RM1000 to RM1500 per family of four.

Leaving that issue aside, this is what Sugumaran, coordinator for Plantation Workers Support Group said:

Moreover, he said that not even five percent of the housing policy introduced by former premier Abdul Razak Hussein had been implemented in the plantations.

“Even the clinics are not manned by qualified doctors… the clinics are run by dressers. And almost all Tamil-medium schools are only partially aided because the government does not have the will to convert the schools into fully aided schools,” said Sugumaran.

Also responding to the recent appeal by Human Resource Minister S Subramaniam to the Malaysian Agricultural Producers Association (Mapa) to create housing funds for estate workers, Sugumaran said:

“The problems of the estate workers can be solved if the employers and the government implement the existing policies.

“Since the Second Malaysia Plan, employers have been asked to implement housing schemes when the plantation sector was to be developed but most employers have not implement the policy. Until now fewer than 59 plantations have implemented the policy,” he said.

“It is clear here that employers are not committed to the implementation of housing schemes for their own workers. Then what is the use of the minister asking Mapa to invest these funds?

“Mapa will not execute it. Is it not better for plantation workers that a housing policy be enacted as law that requires companies to implement the practice?” Sugumaran suggested.

Why would employers build housing schemes when its more lucrative to redevelop land into housing schemes which can generate billions of ringgits? There’s no law, just policy.

MIC to talk about SPM subject limit in cabinet again

November 30th, 2009
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Tamil School Action Committee organised a forum today. Can read about in in MIC Info chief P.Kamalanathan’s blog. Below is Bernama version:

Human Resources Minister S Subramaniam said he would request the Cabinet to again allow Indian students to take a maximum of 12 SPM subjects.

“I will also continue to hold talks with deputy prime minister Muhyiddin Yassin (on this),” said the MIC vice-president after meeting with 20 Indian NGOs today.

Muhyiddin, who is also education minister, announced last June that students would be allowed a maximum of 10 subjects in the SPM from next year.

Subramaniam said the MIC wanted the education ministry to allow Indian students to take the Tamil Language and Tamil Literature subjects, along with the 10 subjects as decided by the ministry.

He said he had been asking for a review of the ruling at Cabinet meetings for the past three to four months, and would continue to engage in consultations with the education ministry until a reasonable solution was found.

He said his priority now was to work out a solution that would ensure Indian students took 12, instead of 10 subjects.

“We are working towards that. This is what the (Indian) community wants,” said Subramaniam.

In a related matter, Subramaniam said there was no point in getting emotional over the issue as it would not solve the problem.

He was referring to reports that some Indian NGOs wanted to protest over the issue.

He urged the NGOs and other interested parties to work with “one voice and one determination” to find an amicable solution to the problem.

“It was for this reason we held the meeting with the NGOs today to get their feedback and then submit it to the cabinet and the MIC education committee,” he said.