Author Archive

Ampang temple demolishment on national TV

September 29th, 2008
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Well, a temple being demolished seldom makes main news especially on TV. The last time that happened was in Padang Jawa, and we know what that led to. This time, the tables are turned, with MIC as accusers and the Pakatan Rakyat led state goverment on the defensive, being accused of condoning temple demolishment. Add to this statement from MP Zuraida, and you get accusations and counter-accusations. The story of the temple being demolished is covered here and here. In a nutshell:

1. Maha Kaliamman temple in Ampang demolished on 9th September, supposedly by officers from MPAJ, the local council.
2. An state EXCO, Ronnie Liu, told the next day that it was not ordered by the state government nor were they informed about it. The MPAJ president is overseas, so he is also in the dark.
3. MIC, Samy Vellu gets to hear about this two weeks after the demolishment, and one if its state youth leaders, make a police report. MIC accuses the state goverment of not being able to keep its promise.
4. Another EXCO, Xavier Jayakumar angers the community by saying that its a “shrine not a temple” and saying that its not registered. However, he clarified that no orders came from state government for demolishing the temple.
5. MP for Ampang, Zuraida says MIC trying to politicise the issue and says that it was demolished for renovation. This is in conflict with earlier statement by Xavier.
6. Temple committee chairman says not sure who reported the temple causing it to be demolished.

Let’s continue with what happened after those postings.

MIC quickly highlights the confusing statements by PKR leaders, condemning them as trying to mislead and confuse the community:

In a statement today, he said the conflicting claims indicated that the Selangor government was diverting public attention away from the fact that the temple was demolished by state authorities.

“We want the state government to come clean on the matter and expose who had authorised the demolition of the temple,” Samy said, adding that the outcome of any investigation ought to be made public.

NST reported that MIC wants the state government to make public the report of the temple demolishment since there are conflicting statements by the two leaders.

MIC president Datuk Seri S. Samy Vellu said the conflicting statements showed that the state government had deceived the people over who was responsible for the demolition of the Sri Mahakaliamman temple on Sept 9.

“We want the state government to come clean on the matter and expose who had authorised the temple’s demolition,” he said in a statement.

Ampang MP Zuraida Kamaruddin had said that the temple’s committee members had demolished the temple for renovation work, while Selangor’s health, estate workers and caring government committee chairman Dr Xavier A. Jayakumar said it was the work of Ampang Jaya Municipal Council (MPAJ) enforcement officers.

“Who is telling the truth now? We demand an explanation,” Samy Vellu said.

MP Zuraida later issued another statement on the 28th saying that her initial one was misquoted. She was referring to her statement that the temple was demolished for renovation purposes. According to her, Murugiah, the temple chairman was in the process of doing minor renovation when the temple was demolished by MPAJ workers.

A part of her first statement is reproduced below:

 Hakikatnya, kuil tersebut telah dirobohkan pada 10 September untuk kerja pengubahsuaian bangunan dan dokumentasi. Pada 11 September, Ahli Majlis MPAJ En. Soorianarayanan dan En. Supiramany tampil untuk berbincang bersama Timbalan Yang di Pertua MPAJ untuk menyelesaikan isu prosedur pengurusan kuil tersebut. Kini pihak pengurusan kuil masih menunggu laporan dari pihak Majlis Perbandaran.

Menurut Pengerusi kuil En. Murugiah, masalah kuil ini iaitu tanpa dokumentasi sudah berlanjutan hampir 19 tahun, malah pernah dirobohkan sebanyak dua kali di bawah pentadbiran Barisan Nasional. Barisan Nasional telah membiarkan masalah kuil tersebut.

I’m not sure who wrote it, but its pretty clear that is says the the temple was demolished on 10th September for renovation work and documentatio.

Xavier Jayakumar later visited the temple and said that temple committee is equally at fault. He was also recorded on camera as saying that he talked to Zuraida and she had clarified that her earlier statement was misused.

The Sri Maha Kaliamman temple committee must share equal responsibility for the demolition of the temple, Selangor state executive councillor Dr A. Xavier Jayakumarare said.

Xavier said the temple was built on forest reserve land and the Ampang Jaya Municipal Council was right to take action.

He said, however, the council should have sought permission from the state government before demolishing the temple.

“The state government was not informed of this matter.

“According to our guidelines, local authorities must seek permission from the state executive council before demolishing any place of worship,” Xavier said after visiting the temple site at Kampung Tasik, Ampang yesterday.
He said the council had been directed to submit a report on the demolition but declined to say if disciplinary action would be taken against anyone.

Xavier said the temple committee chairman, S. Murugiah, had also been advised to write to the state government for approval before rebuilding the structure.

He also described the demolition as a small issue.

“This is a small issue compared with other more serious problems affecting the Indian community. Why don’t we look at the bigger picture?”

Ampang member of parliament Zuraida Kamaruddin has denied that she had said “temple committee workers had demolished the temple to carry out renovation works”.

Her political secretary, who was at the site yesterday, said Zuraida was “misquoted” by several newspapers on Saturday.

I still remember my friend telling that “small things will become big things if not handled”. It is wrong of Xavier to brush aside this as a small problem, because this incident is a symptom of disobedience by officers. This problem can easily manifest in other areas. Secondly, this incident is about religion. Anything to do with race and religion is never a small issue.

At the site also was MHS representative, who said that state government or local council must approach MHS before demolishing any temples. He said MHS will find a solution for these sort of problems. This incident can be avoided if MHS was involved.

its quite clear that MPAJ is involved. The next steps are clear – get a report out, investigate who/where/why it happened. Mete out punishment to the guilty party. Anything less than that means Pakatan Rakyat is also like BN. All talk, no action.

two ISA detainees wives question HINDRAF

September 29th, 2008
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


10 months under detention can start to show the cracks. Dr M Kalaivani and B Buvaneswary, the wives of K Kenghadharan and V Ganabatirau, respectively, have held a press statement (organised by who?) last weekend. The full report from Malaysiakini is below.

ISA detainees’ wives: Hindraf has changed
Fauwaz Abdul Aziz | Sep 26, 08 7:53pm
The struggle of the Hindu Rights Action Force (Hindraf) is different now compared to when it started some 10 months ago under the leadership of the five who are currently under Internal Security Act (ISA) detention, said the wives of two leaders today.

Dr M Kalaivani and B Buvaneswary, the wives of K Kenghadharan and V Ganabatirau, respectively, said they were not comfortable with the direction in which the movement has taken.

Speaking at a press conference in Kelana Jaya, Kalaivani said aside from the goal of obtaining the release of the Hindraf leaders, what is of utmost importance is that the Indian community’s problems are alleviated.

Both these goals can be affected without rallies planned by those now coordinating Hindraf activities.

On the contrary, they said the rallies may actually serve to harm the chances of the five’s release.

“What I know from my husband, the struggle was different in the beginning and it seems to have taken a different turn at the present moment. I was not involved in Hindraf at all so I cannot comment on what their principles were,” said Kalaivani.

“(But) from what we see in the present leadership, we’re not very comfortable with it,” she added.

Citing plans by Hindraf to gather 10,000 people at Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi’s Hari Raya open house later next month, she said this would serve as a form of ‘intimidation’ rather than anything else.

Asked if her husband insisted on supporting the movement along such lines in the even he is released, Kalaivani said she would not support him.

“I feel that there are a lot of ways to help the community. You would have to ask my husband, but … I would not support him if this is how the struggle is going to be.

“I personally feel there is a lot of other ways to continue helping the community, and this we would definitely do.

“If fact, I might even join him to do it together (if he chooses other means of helping the Indian community),” she said.



During the press conference, the wives also recorded their appreciation for MIC president S Samy Vellu and other quarters who are pushing for the five’s release.

Commenting on the statements by certain quarters who questioned the “integrity and sincerity” of Samy Vellu in declaring he had met with Abdullah and sought the release of the Hindraf leaders, Kalaivani said her family’s only wish was to see her husband’s return.

“I’m sure it’s the same for the other detainees as well and we sincerely hope that no individuals would continue questioning the integrity of any leaders or individuals from any party or question why they are asking for the release of our husbands.

“We appreciate the efforts taken by anybody to secure the release of our husbands, and we sincerely hope that the prime minister, the Deputy Prime Minister (Najib Abdul Razak) and the Home Minister (Syed Hamid Albar) would seriously consider their release very soon,” she said.

Kalaivani said her husband was being treated well and was provided with the necessary medical attention at the Kamunting Detention Centre.

“We would like to thank the government for having looked after my husband well. He has not had any problems with medication so far, and I’m thankful for that,” she added.

Commenting on the anti-ISA vigil planned for tomorrow night, she said as long as the organisers have obtained the required permits to ensure the gathering is legal, she appreciates the effort of all quarters to highlight the plight of her husband and other Hindraf leaders.

“If they are going to do it legally, if they’ve got a permit, I really appreciate the efforts taken by these individuals. The vigil will be peaceful, so I don’t think there is anything wrong with it – as long as they do it legally,” she said.

Echoing her statements, Buvaneswary said she too disagreed with the planned gathering at Abdullah’s Hari Raya open house as it may be detrimental to her husband’s chances of being released.

Contending that the rallies organised after the detention of the Hindraf five had deviated into becoming ‘anti-government’ rallies, Buvaneswary said they were defeating the purpose of highlighting the problems of the Indian community.

She said her husband had also told her to call for an end to such rallies.

“Who are these people to call for rallies? If our husbands wanted these rallies, their wish would be conveyed through us because we are their wives. What are the Hindraf coordinators trying to do now?”

“If you want the Hindraf five to be released, there are other methods of seeking this,” she added.

In another development, one of the five detainees T Vasantha Kumar said the government has not given serious consideration to the detention of the five leaders.

“It’s been almost 10 months since the arrests and yet, there is inaction on the part of the government, despite the anger within the Indian community,” he said in a statement, released to the media by his wife K Vickneswary.

“Letters of appeal from various political parties and NGO’s have also been ignored. This is a reflection of the current ruling party’s attitude towards Malaysian Indians whom they do not consider to be an important part of the nation,” he added.   

Vasantha Kumar said the five Hindraf leaders are innocent of all charges and should be released.

“Their detention under the ISA is an abuse of government power, used solely for political purposes and not for national security, as it should be. There is no need for ISA in a democratic country like Malaysia,” he added.

Charles Hector wrote on his blog analysing the comments by the wives of the detainees.

My take is simple. Its not about what’s happening outside of KEMTA, but what’s happening in the heads of the detainees. People can shout all they like, but as long as the detainee don’t repent, he won’t leave the prison. So, the wives have to persuade their husbands to “repent” and soon, they will be freed. The detainees have to admit that they made a mistake, that they were wrong, and even perhaps have to provide evidence against their friends. They have show remorse, subscribe to the ideology thrust upon them, and repent. If indeed they committed any crime, they may have to serve time in prison, and then they will be out. Agree to all they say. Sign whatever they want. Admit to all the accusations. Whatever it takes to get out. You may lose respect and integrity, but at least you get freedom and can join your family again. Start a new life. Simple.

So, the wives can save their press conferences and try to work on other alternatives like pressure their husbands to give up.

By the way, its interesting to note that among the 5 detainees, one is branded a plant, while another two’s wives are questioning Hindraf. Uthaya is unmarried, while Manoharan is a state assemblyman for DAP in Selangor, with his wife effectively holding the fort. The age of the first three is between 35 and 41, while the latter two are 47.

PHEB makes burial more costly

September 29th, 2008
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


The Penang Hindu Endowment Board had decided to charge RM500 for burial plots at the Batu Lanchang Hindu cemetery. Not only that, there’s a renewal fee of RM5000 to be paid after 20 years. Naturally this riles the community and some NGOs.

A group of Hindu non-governmental organisations yesterday handed a memorandum to the state government protesting a sharp rise in fees for burial plots at a cemetery here.

Hindu Action Network executive council member N. Ahilan said the board reserved the right to exhume the remains and lease the plot to others if the renewal fees were not paid within 10 years. He said that the exorbitant charges and conditions were inconsiderate.

Penang state assemblyman Rayer mentioned that Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng informed him an amicable solution would be sought, and that the issue will be discussed in the coming state executive council meeting.

 

Seri Delima assemblyman R.S.N. Rayer said he was informed by Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng that an amicable solution would be sought. He said the matter would be raised at next week’s state executive council meeting.

Are the members of PHEB appointed by the state goverment? Is it still under the old management? Is this proof that PHEB is acting independently of the state government or an act of disobedience (if the board members were appointed by current state goverment)?

More importantly, is the cost justified? Are there any ways to reduce the burden of the community before considering charging them for burial of the loved ones? Its a guessing game until we know the whole story.

Shut down NEP says Chua Jui Meng

September 29th, 2008
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


No doubt its a party election campaign strategy. Just like UMNO leaders who touched on hot issues to gain votes, MCA is also doing the same. Chua Jui Meng who is going for broke is proposing that the NEP is replaced with a new policy. This is surely going to be made into a controversy, as the politicians make use of certain statements by Chua and start a war of words. We might even see him arrested under ISA either for his own protection or to investigate his statements.

Before we proceed, let’s look at his proposal. Chua says NEP is a bone of discontent for the Chinese and Indians. He suggests that it is replaced with National Economic Consultative Council III. He believed the NECC III would bring back the support of the Chinese and Indian voters to Barisan Nasional in the next general election.

“I believe that a fair and open economic policy will bring in greater foreign direct investment, stimulate domestic investments for a repeat of the strong economic performance in the 1990s and restore the confidence of the rakyat.”

According to Chua, when National Development Policy (result of NECC 1) was in place between 1990 and 2000,:

“The NDP was fair and liberal to all races, resulting in plentiful economic and educational opportunities for all.

“As a result, the non-Bumiputera communities gave overwhelming support to the BN, giving it decisive electoral victories in 1995 and 1999.”

Chua said the introduction of the National Vision Policy in 1999, when the NECC II was established, saw an extraordinary election victory in 2004.

“If we don’t close the NEP before the next general election, I can tell that the BN has to forget about the Chinese and Indian votes because the opposition has agreed that the NEP must be scrapped.”

Thus he stresses that its time to replace NEP. Only the poverty eradication aspect should be retained (in other words – wealth distribution via discrimination is rejected).
The Star reported that Chua reasoned after 38 years since the NEP was introduced, the Malay middle class was now large and securely established.

“The need for the NEP therefore no longer exists, and the Constitutional rights of all Malaysians should be restored,” he said during his manifesto launch here today.

What do you think? Chua Jui Meng for MCA president or ISA?

Bye bye to NEP? Or just do cosmetic changes to it to please the public? Or maintain it?

Biggest Anti ISA gathering

September 29th, 2008
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


According to bmahendran.com, this was an unexpected crowd. Over 2,000 people managed to find time on Saturday night to spend a moment for the ISA detainees. HINDRAF contributed about 500 people while others like WAMI also come. This was a show of unity as people from all walks of life came together. The Chinese community are especially angry at the treatment of reporter Tan and politician Teresa, while others would be Raja Petra’s fans. I think by arresting these people, the goverment had led credence to the misuse of ISA. A bumbling Home Minister also does not help.

Hindraf volunteers and the PDRM did their job well, says Mahendran. I guess the presence of various groups helped in creating a more festive and relaxed atmosphere.

Let’s look at home the three media groups presented their new. Malaysiakini, The Star and NST had their own points to highlight:

Malaysiakini
:

About 2,000 people staged a peaceful march through the busy streets of Kuala Lumpur tonight calling for the abolishment of Internal Security Act and freeing detainees under the Act

Initially, two separate groups – Hindu Rights Action Force (Hindraf) and coalition of NGOs led by the Writer Alliance For Media Independence (Wami) – had initially planned to hold a candlelight vigil at Dataran Merdeka at about 7.30pm.

When they came across a police cordon at Dataran Merdeka, the Hindraf-led group numbering about 500 decided to march to the temple opposite the Puduraya bus terminal about 1km away.

The crowd marched unhindered towards their destinations and gradually the crowd swelled to about 2,000 people from all walks of life, with many carrying candles.

The other group, which was in a procession holding Chinese lanterns, eventually joined up with the Hindraf group.

The police were caught off-guard by the huge turnout. Many media personnel had also remarked that the large crowd was unanticipated as past vigils had been small in number.

Shouts of “Mansuhkan ISA (Abolish the ISA)”, “Bebaskan Raja Petra (Free Raja Petra)” and “Hindraf Valga (Long live Hindraf)” were chanted by the marchers.

Eventually, the crowd gathered at the temple compound where several individuals addressed the crowd with highly charged speeches.

Hindraf national coordinator R Thanenthiran said that government should heed the protesters’ demands to free ISA detainees.

“The Home Minister Syed Hamid Albar should listen to us. He alone cannot decide what is best for the country. Tonight, we the people, are the judges,” he said.

Later, Teluk Intan MP M Manogaran told the crowd that a large gathering is being planned to commemorate the first anniversary of the ISA arrest of five Hindraf leaders currently held in the Kamunting Detention Camp.

“We will keep holding gatherings until all ISA detainees are released,” he said.

Meanwhile, the crowd was peaceful throughout and a festive atmosphere permeates in the air.

Several supporters of detained blogger Raja Petra Kamaruddin were also at hand to sing ‘Happy Birthday Raja Petra’ as today was his birthday.

By 9pm, protest leaders dispersed the crowd. There were no reports of untoward incidents.

Hindraf national coordinator Thanenthiran later told reporters that the march tonight was proof that Malaysians can gather peacefully in order to express themselves.

“If the police follows the law, we can do the same,” he said.

In a statement immediately after the crowd dispersal, Hindraf leader-in-exile P Waytha Moorthy thanked the police for allowing the march to proceed.

“The government should now accept that Malaysians have sent a loud and clear message that the use of the ISA cannot be tolerated,” he said. Meanwhile, two visually blind participants told Malaysiakini at the scene why they took part in the march.

Ramli Abu Bakar, 51, said he has been supporting the anti-ISA movement ever since it was established because “the country has achieved independence and the act is nothing but a mediaeval law”.

“We have been independent for 51 years and why would we need such a legislation now?” asked Ramli.

Ramli’s friend, Kamal Abu Bakar, 48, echoed his views, saying that the government is “stupid for not abolishing ISA as it is no longer relevant”.

There were also supporters of Raja Petra who were in high spirits in showing their support to their idol on his birthday.

For Sampa Lee, 60, he said releasing Raja Petra and other detainees would be the best birthday gift the government could ever give to them.

“It would be the best present for Raja Petra and all Malaysians as we are all against the draconian law,” said Sampa.


The Star:

Almost 2,000 people from non-governmental organisations and opposition parties took part in a peaceful gathering near Puduraya calling on the Government to abolish the Internal Security Act (ISA).

They started gathering there at 8pm last night and dispersed one hour later.

Dang Wangi police chief Asst Comm Zulkarnain Abdul Rahman said police had received information that a gathering was scheduled to be held at Dataran Merdeka.

“But we had placed our people at various roads leading to Dataran Merdeka and this had caused the group to change the location of the gathering to an area near Puduraya.
“No untoward incident happened during the gathering and no arrests were made, but it added to the traffic congestion there,” he said. – Bernama

NST:

About 2,000 people marched from Dataran Merdeka to the Hindu temple near the Puduraya bus terminal in protest against the Internal Security Act (ISA).

The crowd started marching about 8pm while carrying candles.

Dang Wangi police chief Assistant Commissioner Zulkarnain Abdul Rahman said the march was held without a permit.

“However, no arrests were made and the crowd dispersed peacefully at 9.30pm,” he said.

At least all three agreed on the crowd figures.

A photo gallery is at National Express’ Picasa.