Archive for the ‘BornInMalaysia’ category

Lina Joy Case – Articles from Today’s Newspapers Part 3

May 31st, 2007
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Rayuan Lina Joy ditolak — Mahkamah Persekutuan putuskan perkataan Islam kekal dalam MyKad

Oleh: KAMARIAH AHMAD dan NOR ZAINAH NORDIN
ORANG ramai berkumpul di pekarangan Palace of Justice menunggu keputusan Mahkamah Persekutuan mengenai kes Lina Joy di Putrajaya, semalam.


PUTRAJAYA 30 Mei : Seorang wanita Melayu, Azlina Jailani atau Lina Joy yang mengaku murtad sejak 17 tahun lalu, gagal dalam usahanya untuk menggugurkan perkataan 'Islam' daripada MyKad setelah Mahkamah Persekutuan hari ini mengumumkan penghakiman secara majoriti 2-1 menolak rayuannya.

Mahkamah itu menegaskan bahawa Azlina, 43, yang menukar namanya kepada Lina Joy, perlu mendapat sijil Mahkamah Syariah yang mengesahkan dia tidak lagi menganut agama Islam sebelum Jabatan Pendaftaran Negara (JPN) boleh menggugurkan perkataan Islam dalam MyKadnya itu.

» Read more: Lina Joy Case – Articles from Today’s Newspapers Part 3

Lina Joy Case – Articles from Today’s Newspapers Part 2

May 31st, 2007
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Federal Court dismiss Lina Joy's appeal
 

By : A. Hafiz Yatim and Rita Jong

LINA Joy has lost her long battle to have her religious status adjudicated by the country’s civil laws.

A three-judge Federal Court panel ruled by a 2-1 majority that only the syariah court
has the power to determine whether a person is still a Muslim based on Islamic law.
It said Lina, born Azlina Jailani, should obtain a syariah court order confirming her
apostasy before the NRD could remove the word “Islam” from her identity card…

» Read more: Lina Joy Case – Articles from Today’s Newspapers Part 2

Lina Joy Case – Articles from Today’s Newspapers Part 1

May 31st, 2007
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Federal Court rejects Lina's appeal in a majority decision

By CHELSEA L.Y. NG and RAPHAEL WONG

 
PUTRAJAYA: The Federal Court, in a majority decision, has rejected Lina Joy's appeal to compel the National Registration Department (NRD) to remove the word Islam from her identity card. 
 
The 42-year-old will now have to either subject herself to the jurisdiction of the Syariah Court on whether she is an apostate or seek a review of the Federal Court decision. 
 
Chief Justice Ahmad Fairuz Sheikh Abdul Halim ruled that the NRD had reasonably imposed a condition requiring Lina to obtain a certificate of apostasy from the Syariah Court before it proceeds to make the deletion. 
 

» Read more: Lina Joy Case – Articles from Today’s Newspapers Part 1

Malaysia’s Crisis of Faith

May 31st, 2007
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Malaysia's Crisis of Faith
Wednesday, May. 30, 2007 By HANNAH BEECH

Muslims gathered for a vigil outside Malaysia's Palace of Justice awaited the verdict on Lina Joy's case, May 30, 2007
Tengku Bahar / AFP/Getty Images
 
In what has been dubbed a blow to Malaysia's religious freedom, the country's highest court on Wednesday denied an appeal by Christian convert Lina Joy to make her switch from Islam recognized by law. A multi-ethnic state composed largely of Muslim Malays, Christian and Buddhist Chinese, and Hindu and Sikh Indians, Malaysia has long prided itself on its diversity of faiths. To safeguard this religious heterogeneity, the country's constitution sets out a dual-track legal system in which Muslims are bound by Shari'a law for issues such as marriage, property and death, while members of other faiths follow civil law.
 

Malaysians expected Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi to be cautious, but he has quickly emerged as a bold reformer

But the parallel system has occasionally faced snags. Joy is a Malay originally known as Azlina Jailani, and by Malaysian law her ethnicity automatically makes her a Muslim subject to Shari'a law. In order to make her 1990 conversion to Christianity legal, she needed permission from the Shari'a courts, which consider a renunciation of Islam a major offense. But, since she is still classified as a Muslim by the state, Joy was not allowed to have her case heard by the civil courts. Her six-year-long campaign to convince the civil system to legalize her conversion failed, prompting her appeal to the Federal Court, after the Court of Appeal rejected her claim in September 2005.

On Wednesday, the Court announced that it had no jurisdiction over the case since it was under the purview of Shari'a law, effectively punting on any attempt to clear up the gray space that exists between Malaysia's two legal systems. The ruling was greeted by shouts of "God is great!" from many in the assembled crowd outside the Palace of Justice in Kuala Lumpur. More secular observers were far less jubilant. "I see this case not just as a question of religious preference but one of a potential dismantling of Malaysia's … multi-ethnic, multi-religious [character]," warned Malik Imtiaz Sarwar, a member of Joy's legal team, before the decision was announced.

The Joy verdict, which will likely become a precedent for several other pending conversion cases, is seen by many in Malaysia as evidence of how religious politics are cleaving the nation, with a creeping Islamization undermining the rights of both non-Muslims and more moderate adherents to Islam.. Last November, at a party conference for the Muslim-dominated United Malays National Organization ruling party, one delegate vowed he would be willing to "bathe in blood" to defend his ethnicity ? and, by extension, his religion. In several Malaysian states, forsaking Islam is a crime punishable by prison time.

Earlier this week, Malaysian Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi, who in December acknowledged that race relations in his homeland were "fragile," hosted the World Islamic Economic Forum in Kuala Lumpur. In an era where Islam is so often partnered with extremism and autocratic governance, Malaysia was held up at the annual conference as a model of a moderate Muslim nation committed to safeguarding the rights of its diverse population. But the Federal Court's verdict on Joy's case, which represented her last legal recourse, may undercut that reputation. After all, is it complete religious freedom if a 42-year-old woman isn't allowed to follow the faith of her choosing?

BBC – Malaysia rejects Christian appeal

May 30th, 2007
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


 

Mosque in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Ms Joy was disowned by her family and forced to quit her job

Malaysia's highest court has rejected a Muslim convert's six-year battle to be legally recognised as a Christian.

A three-judge panel ruled that only the country's Sharia Court could let Azlina Jailani, now known as Lina Joy, remove the word Islam from her identity card.

Malaysia's constitution guarantees freedom of worship but says all ethnic Malays are Muslim. Under Sharia law, Muslims are not allowed to convert.

Ms Joy said she should not be bound by that law as she is no longer a Muslim.

Death threats

Malaysia's Chief Justice Ahmad Fairuz Sheikh Abdul Halim said the panel endorsed legal precedents giving Islamic Sharia courts jurisdiction over cases involving Muslims who want to convert.

About 200 protesters shouted "Allah-o-Akbar" (God is great) outside the court when the ruling was announced.

"You can't at whim and fancy convert from one religion to another," Ahmad Fairuz said.

Ms Joy's case has tested the limits of religious freedom in Malaysia.

She started attending church in 1990 and was baptised in 1998.

In 2000, Ms Joy, 42, went to the High Court after the National Registration Department refused to remove "Islam" from the religion column on her identity card. The court said it was a matter for Sharia courts. Tuesday's ruling marked the end of her final appeal.

Ms Joy has been disowned by her family and forced to quit her job. She went into hiding last year. A Muslim lawyer who supported her case received death threats.

Sharia courts decide on civil cases involving Malaysian Muslims – nearly 60% of the country's 26 million people – while ethnic minorities such as Chinese and Indians are governed by civil courts in the multi-racial country