I ask myself where’s the crime (according to law) and came to the following conclusion:
1. The person(s) who ordered, planned and/or installed the cameras in the bedroom. Crime: Invasion of privacy; intent to blackmail (need to prove)
2. The person(s) who aired the video. Crime: Pornography, airing of such materials.
3. The person(s) in the video. Crime: Zina (only if Muslim under Syariah law); prostitution/solicitation (need to prove).
I’m sure the crime above are not the exact law terms, since I’m not a law graduate. But its my observation and understanding. Obviously the easiest to solve is the number (2) since 3 of the admitted that they arranged for the screening of the video. Number (1) would be hardest, while number (3) can be proven using forensics.
In terms of morality:
1. The person(s) in the video. Crime: cheating on spouse (if married); not a good role model (if in some important position), and probably broken lots of values.
I also wonder, do the police wait for someone to make a police report? Can any of them make a police report on behalf, based on newspaper reports? I mean, just find an off-duty policeman, ask him to read the newspaper, and then make the police report. Can or not? No need to wait for public to make report, since its a widely publicized case.