Archive for the ‘BornInMalaysia’ category

Not automatic citizenship if father is Malaysian?

November 19th, 2008
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


I’m am surprised to read in today’s Star Metro section about the plight of Teresa Ratnam. Read the full story at the end of this post. Its clearly stated that if the parent is a citizen, the children is automatically citizens also. But in this case, the children have been deprived. Teresa is stateless but her husband Lawrence is Malaysian! Anak sendiri pun tak dapat kerakyatan??? UNLESS Lawrence and Teresa is hiding some facts, this is a crime by those officers in the relevant department. They should report to Deputy Minister Murugiah of BPA immediately, take legal action against the departments, and reveal the name of the officers who misled them. 10 years of suffering, how is the government going to compensate the children? Free medical treatment? Scholarship for education until university? Free low cost housing?

We have so many children from Indonesians and Bangladeshi mix marriages getting citizenship, but not for two Malaysians, one of which is stateless.

AS it is late now (11.45pm), I’ll suggest to the persons below tomorrow to do the above.

THE story of Teresa Ratnam is a story of suffering, right from the time when she was an infant.

The 40-year-old mother of three from Jinjang Selatan Tambahan in Kuala Lumpur was abandoned at the Kuala Lumpur Hospital at the tender age of four when her parents sent her there for treatment.

Teresa cannot recall anything from her past except the names of the couple who adopted her and took care of her until both of them died, after which she had to fend for herself.

She discovered the agony of not having a birth certificate, and was declared stateless. Without a citizenship, she was unable to get an education, let alone a job.

She survived by working as a maid until she met a kind and loving man who married her and gave her the security and protection that she needed.

In a quandary: Lawrence (right) with his wife Teresa and three children at their home in Jinjang Selatan Tambahan.

They have three lovely children – Daniel Christie, 12, Nelson Christie, 10, and Patricia Christie, five.

Teresa’s trouble begun when she and her husband G. Lawrence, 44, discovered that despite Lawrence being a Malaysian citizen, the authorities have denied citizenship to their three children as she is considered stateless.

Although Teresa was abandoned by her own parents, that did not stop her for being a loving and caring mother. It was simply heart-renting to see this woman sobbing and begging for mercy on behalf of her three children.

Don’t let my children suffer because of me. Please have mercy, Teresa sobbed as she pleaded for help to get citizenship for her children.

I don’t want my children to suffer. They are innocent and should not have to go through what I went through in life, she said.

My wife is a victim of circumstances. Due to no fault of hers she is unable to prove her citizenship, but I am a Malaysian citizen and my children were all born here, yet the government is denying them their basic right, Lawrence said.

He said he had spent 10 years of his life running from one government department to another trying to get his children’s citizenship problem resolved.

In some places they have treated me very unkindly by pushing me from one officer to another, making me run around from Putrajaya to Kuala Lumpur and all over the place, he said.

According to Lawrence, he has been to the National Registration Department, the Welfare Department, the Kuala Lumpur Hospital and the Public Complaints Bureau of the Prime Minister’s Department countless times yet no one was able to help him.

He said some officers even gave him wrong information which caused him to waste more time.

Lawrence is now desperate as his youngest child Patricia has been diagnosed to be suffering from a rare disease called Pierre Robin Syndrome, a congenital condition of facial abnormalities in humans, and she also has a heart problem and requires surgery as soon as possible.

We need an OKU (disabled person identification card) from the National Registration Department to enable her to get free treatment from the National Heart Institute because I cannot afford it, Lawrence said.

But to get the card, she needs her citizenship, and it is an urgent matter, he said.

Their eldest son Daniel passed his UPSR exams with five A’s and one B and will be going to Form 1 next year. But Teresa and Lawrence are worried that Daniel may not be able to go to Form 1 as he is not qualified to get the MyKad as he doesn’t have citizenship status.

We did not have problems when he entered primary school but now the school is saying there may be problems with him enrolling into secondary level, Lawrence said.

The family is seeking help from the Government to solve their problem and is hoping that Teresa’s natural parents or any other family member can come forward and produce documentation to prove that she was born in Malaysia.

According to the Federal Constitution, children born in Malaysia, with at least one parent holding citizenship is deemed qualified to be citizens.

It is strange that in this case, where the children’s father is a Malaysian citizen and they were born in Malaysia, they are still being deprived of their citizenship.

The Jinjang Selatan Tambahan Tamil Youth Club, the Jinjang Selatan MIC branch and Komuniti Bestari Jinjang Selatan are trying to help the family apply for citizenship for the children.

Those who can help can call Selvakumar at 012-615 6011 or R. Krishna Moorthy at 017-226 4952.

RPK at Anti-ISA Freedom Run

November 17th, 2008
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Some photos of the Anti-ISA Freedom Run by DAP, courtesy of a reader. Note the T-shirts that read “Bebaskan Makkal Sakthi 5”.

Silibin versus Patto

November 16th, 2008
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


First, let’s look at two different statistics:

NST:

He pointed out yesterday that during a month-long survey conducted by the state DAP, only 12 out of 100 respondents living in Jalan Silibin had voiced their reservations over the renaming of the road.

He said 55 residents and business operators had supported the renaming while 37 others were neutral in the matter.

55+37+12 = 114. This is more than 100 possibly because the combination of residents and business owners, but still need to clarify why 114 responses exist.

The Star:

He said of the 74 respondents interviewed, 55 supported the idea while 12 disagreed and seven were neutral.

“We made sure we got the views of a multiracial group of people so that all races were represented,” he said.

55 + 12 + 7= 74. Perfect fit.

But how can the Star and NST report two different set of numbers? Who to believe?

Let’s see both side of the arguments:

For change
– honor the late Patto
– the late Patto served Silibin area before
– The hassle for residents is minimal. (well, then perhaps the state government can cover the cost of the changes – MyKad, business cards, letterheads etc.).
– Jalan Silibin is not that well known, unlike Jalan Alor which is world famous
– No record of the history or origin of the name “Silibin” – claims Kulasegaran.
– 70% of residents affects agree to the change

Against change
– Its a hassle and unnecessary expense
– Will affect businesses
– Can rename a monument or park, or name a road in new housing area.
– Silibin has lots of historical significance.

A group of businessmen even sent a petition to Perak Menteri Besar protesting the proposed change.

I think there should be a study on the historical significance or origin of “Silibin”. It should be having some history behind it. Secondly, since 30 percent are opposing, perhaps the state government can hold a public forum to get more responses (being a transparent state, its should do so). The state can also identity other sites/roads that can be named after the late Patto. Being a caring government, it can reimburse the affected businesses and residents if the name is changed.

Protest sans signs of protest

November 16th, 2008
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Imagine you want to complaint against your school. The school says fine, but you cannot carry any banners, wear any clothing opposing the schools, nor say anything negative about the school. In other words, just stand in a place for a while until you feel contented or have achieved something, and then disperse.

That’s the scenario with the anti-ISA vigil held at PJ, which saw police attacking the crowd last week. This week, a permit was given, but with 12 conditions. Three of them are as follows:

One of the organiser of the gathering, lawyer and blogger Harris Ibrahim told Malaysiakini
that the police had given permission for the gathering on the provisions that no candlelight vigil was held, no anti-ISA T-shirts were worn by the participants and no speeches by politicians – all main ingredients of the pasts gatherings.

Anil Netto provides few more of the conditions:

  • No candles allowed
  • No T-shirts showing support for the Abolition of the ISA allowed
  • “Penganjur dilarang melakukan sebarang aktiviti yang lain yang melambangkan simpati terhadap tahanan Akta Keselamatan Negara” (Organisers are prohibited from any other activity that suggests sympathy towards ISA detainees!)
  • No banners or distribution of leaflets allowed
  • No political speeches allowed

I got to say this: Only in Bolehland!!!

Well, as mentioned by commenter Novinthen in another post, the alternative is join the ruling party! You get permit, no questions asked. 🙂

Pics from Anti ISA Freedom Run

November 16th, 2008
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


There’s some photos at Anil Netto‘s and Charles Santiago‘s blogs.

Earlier report is here.