Students joining political party

/* November 26th, 2009 by poobalan | View blog reactions No comments »
 Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Students are not allowed to join political parties at least that’s what AUKU says. I guess it doesn’t apply for foreign students since I remember some parties have foreign branches in UK, Russia and so on.

Latest to open a branch is Putera MIC. They set up a branch in Indonesia.

MIC Youth chief T. Mohan, who launched the movement here recently, also announced the appointment of S. Moganaraj, a fourth year medical student at the Universiti Padjajaran, as the movement’s coordinator.

Moganaraj would coordinate the formation of Putera MIC Indonesia committees throughout the country, Mohan said.

“For a start, we have registered about 80 students as Putera MIC Indonesia members. We hope to register at least half or about 400 of 800 Malaysian Indian students in the country,” he said here.

Announcing the formation of Putera MIC Indonesia at a Deepavali celebration organised by Indian students here last Monday, Mohan said Putera MIC Indonesia would ensure Malaysian students abroad were able to receive accurate information on events back home.

Just like Umno clubs overseas, which cater to the Malay students, Mohan said the Putera MIC Indonesia would not be involved in politics but would focus on student activities and maintaining close relations with central MIC.

Mohan said at this initial stage, Putera MIC in Indonesia would also look out for activities involving Indian female students.

Meanwhile, Malaysian Students Department director in Indonesia Datuk Dr Junaidi Abu Bakar said the department welcomed the Putera MIC.

He said that the movement would be an additional platform for students to carry out activities in the 1Malaysia spirit.

He said Putera MIC would be affiliated to the Malaysian National Students Association in Indonesia.

Like those by Umno clubs here, Putera MIC’s activities would also involve the participation of students of other races, he said.

Its good that students are exposed to political parties so that they can get some idea on the workings and importance. Maybe some of them will be future leaders in the parties.

I do wonder though, how many people join political parties for own benefit, hoping to gain something through the contacts. For some, its just like any other business network or associations, I guess.

Q: what would motivate you to join a political party? Is it a necessity to be a member of a party?

Banggarma saga continues while Masitah praises conversion!

/* November 25th, 2009 by poobalan | View blog reactions 8 comments »
 Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


She claims she said she was converted at the age of seven. The Welfare Department countered that her father converted her at the age of one! Now, which is which?

Her lawyer is demanding that the Welfare Department provide proof of their allegations:

Welfare Department director-general Meme Zainal Rashid should furnish evidence to substantiate her claim that S Banggarma was converted on Nov 30, 1983 in Rompin, Pahang.

Demanding this at a media briefing today, Banggarma’s lawyer Gooi Hsiao Leung pointed out that the conversion certificate dates the conversion at Dec 28, 1989.

“The Welfare Department now claims that she was converted by her Hindu parents when she was a year old. There cannot be two conversions into Islam for the same person,” he said.

Gooi chided Penang Islamic Affairs Council (MAINPP) president Shabudin Yahaya for saying that Banggarma, 27, is a Muslim and that her marriage to a Hindu is a legal issue.

He said the Welfare Department and Islamic authorities have failed to address the key question on the conversion of a minor by the administrators of the welfare home.

Section 80 of the Penang Administration of Islamic Affairs Enactment 1993 stipulates that anyone below the age of 18 shall not be converted to Islam without the consent of his or her parents.

Banggarma’s conversion, Gooi said, was illegal from the start.

“By converting her at (the age of seven), the Islamic authorities infringed their own law.”

Gooi hoped that MAINPP will assist Banggarma by expunging records of her conversion, so that the issue can be resolved amicably.

Banggarma, who was present, told reporters that her father had never mentioned anything about the 1983 conversion.

My father is a practising Hindu like me,” she said, showing a photo of her father with vibuthi (sacred ash) on his forehead. [not sure when the photo was taken though!]

He had enrolled her and three siblings – two elder brothers and a younger sister – at the home, after its welfare officers convinced him to do so, she said.

“He was shocked to hear that my siblings and I were converted to Islam in the welfare home,” Banggarma said, alleging that the four were then separated and have not met since.

Meme had told Malaysiakini yesterday that Banggarma, whose Muslim name is Siti Hasnah Vangarama Abdullah, was placed into the welfare home in Kepala Batas in March 1990 following a order under the Juvenile Courts Act of 1947, for her own protection.

Meme claimed Banggarma was found wandering aimlessly in Sungai Petani, Kedah.

Questioning this, Banggarma pointed to the conversion certificate which shows that she was converted in 1989.

“It’s a lie. The department is trying to cover this up,” said the mother of two.

… Her birth certificate shows that she was born on Aug 13, 1982 in Keratong, Pahang to plantation worker B Subramaniam and Latchumy Ramadu, both Hindus.

Describing herself as a staunch Hindu, Banggarma said she would fight till the end to restore her rightful identity.

“I was born as a Hindu, I live as a Hindu, I will die as a Hindu,” she said. [ahh..the famous quotes! I’m sure you have heard this before]

The Star reported Banggarma as saying below:

Banggarma claimed it would have been impossible for the 1983 conversion to have happened as her younger sister, who was five years her junior, was not even born then.

“Three of my siblings were placed in the welfare home along with me and we all have conversion certificates dated Dec 28, 1989. How could my father have converted us in 1983 when my sister was not even born?” Bang garma asked.

Err…tough question, that one.

But what really surprised (and angered me) is these words:

Mashitah said while it was commendable for the orphanage to take the initiative to preach about Islam and convert Banggarma to Islam, it was also its responsibility to teach her about the religion.

“It should be followed with the efforts to bring her up according to true Islamic teachings and way of life,” she said.

Its disgraceful to say the least!  I must say that its a blot to their religion from outsider’s (like me) point of view.

And rightly, questions are being asked on this irresponsible conduct of the Deputy Minister:

Women, Family and Community Development Minister Shahrizat Abdul Jalil was asked to clarify if it was government policy to convert young children, especially minors, into Islam while being under the care of government welfare homes.

PKR Kedah deputy youth chief Gooi Hsiao Leung said Shahrizat’s clarification was imperative following a controversial statement by Deputy Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department, Mashitah Ibrahim, who praised such conversions.

“Mashitah’s statement is scandalous and reckless. Shahrizat should take an immediate stand on it,” said Gooi.

He also wants Shahrizat to clarify whether Mashitah’s remarks were made in her personal capacity or from her official position in the Putrajaya administration.

Mashitah was quoted as saying it was commendable for the orphanage to take the initiative to preach about Islam and convert Banggarma to Islam and it was also its responsibility to teach her about the religion.

“It is shocking that a deputy minister had condoned conversion of young children living under the care of government run welfare homes,” said Gooi.

“Welfare homes’ primary functions are to provide care and protection to helpless abandoned children or where parents are unable to care for them until they turn 18.

It would be entirely outside the scope of their duties and a blatant abuse of their powers to convert young children’s religions, whether it is to Islam or to any other religion for that matter,” added Gooi.

He said Mashitah’s statement was also inconsistent with the remarks made by the Muslim Welfare Organisation of Malaysia’s secretary general Abdul Hamid Othman.

Abdul Hamid said it was inappropriate to convert a child before he or she reached 18, although the welfare homes can educate the children about the Islamic religion.

Gooi said as the minister in charge of women, family and community affairs, Shahrizat has a duty to explain the government’s religious policy to all Malaysians.

“It is of utmost public importance for Shahrizat to immediately clarify the government’s position,” he said

BTW, MCCBCHST’s president wrote in Malaysiakini on the council’s view:

The Malaysian Consultative Council of Buddhism, Christianity, Hindusim, Sikhism and Taoism (MCCBCHST) refers to the case of Banggarma Subramaniam, 27 (a.k.a. Siti Hasnah Vengarama Abdullah) who has said that she was converted to Islam at the tender age of 7. 

Banggarma says this was done by the welfare home, whilst the welfare authorities say it was done by her father. In any case, Banggarma has vigorously and categorically asserted that for most of her life, she has lived as a Hindu and that she is now a Hindu.

We object most strongly to the suggestion by the deputy minster for Islamic Affairs (as reported by the media on Nov19) that Banggarma must go to the Syariah Court to ascertain her status, a statement repeated by Welfare Department’s Director-General Meme Zainal Rashid. 

Penang Islamic Council President Shabudin Yahaya, meanwhile, stated that she will have to undergo the standard procedure to leave Islam and to undergo counseling.

We recall that Dr Syed Ali Tawfil Al-Attas, the director-general of Ikim, was quoted by the media on May 1, 2007 as saying that a child deemed ignorant cannot convert to Islam as the child does not understand the ‘kalimah shahadah’ and cannot bear witness to his/her own free will and understanding.

According to Article 11 of the federal constitution, every person is guaranteed the freedom to profess and practice his or her religion. 

It is our view that Banggarma, upon reaching the age of majority, should have the complete freedom to choose her own religion without having to go through any procedure or counseling

In some states, people deemed to be Muslims face possible terms of imprisonment and punishment for ‘apostasy’ or for ‘attempting to leave Islam’ or ‘insulting the religion of Islam’. This renders illusory their exercise of the freedom of religion protected by our federal constitution and by all international norms.

The Syariah Courts only have jurisdiction over ‘persons professing the religion of Islam’. Banggarma does not profess the religion of Islam – she professes herself to be a Hindu. It is not proper to require her to go to the Syariah Court before she is allowed to profess her religion of Hinduism. 

We therefore reiterate our calls, made many times before, for the authorities to put in place legislative reforms to ensure that Islam, and Islamic law, is not forced upon people like Banggarma who do not profess themselves as Muslim.

The writer is president, MCCBCHST.

HINDRAF 25 November rally 2nd Anniversary

/* November 25th, 2009 by poobalan | View blog reactions 1 comment »
 Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


It was quiet on the media front today. Nothing much happened actually. Some people fasting and a failed handing over of memorandum. So, no water cannons or tear gases. No fiery speeches. No images of Uthaya being dragged around. No photos of Indians being bashed and pulled into police trucks. Quite an anti-climax, and probably some section of the media may have been disappointed.  In a way, its good. If it means there’s lack of support, then its good for the present government. If its perceived as HINDRAF being disciplined and focused, then its good for the movement.

Last I checked, HINDRAF was still banned, so wonder why police didn’t arrest anyone. I think its to downplay the group’s agenda. If government doesn’t react, then it won’t play into HINDRAF’s hands. “Let them fast and hand over memorandums, after some time things will cool off” strategy? Knowing HINDRAF, it won’t be so easy to dismiss them. Even if the 5 leaders are split, one can see the support is mainly for Uthaya. MMSP is probably a decoy to rejuvenate MIC and kick some sense into them. Once MIC is back on its feet, MMSP will be discarded.

So, what happened today? Read MK’s report:

About two dozen Hindraf supporters gathered at the Kuala Lumpur City Centre shopping mall this morning to take part in a hunger strike to commemorate the second year anniversary of the movement’s mass gathering.

NONELed by Hindraf activist S Jayathas, the group arrived at the KLCC entrance at about 9.10am. Sixteen of them were wearing orange coloured Hindraf t-shirt. Most of them also have anti-ISA badges on them.

They plan to observe a hunger strike until 4pm to represent the movement’s 18-point demands to the government to alleviate the plight of the Indian community in this country.

“The 18-point demands are meant to alleviate the ethnic Indians Malaysians from hardcore poverty.

NONE“There is no guidance and opportunities for the Indians, so many turn to crime. The government knows about the problem but is not taking action,” said Jayathas.

One of those participating in the hunger strike T Samy, 32, said he joined the group to highlight the “sufferings” of the Indian community.

“The government should open their ears to the Indian plight. Treat us fairly,” said Samy, an engineer from Klang, Selangor.

The police – numbering about 24 – are monitoring the situation.

The KLCC management meanwhile had requested the group not to sit on the pavement as it would disrupt their business.

Memo to PM too

Although the group agreed to this request, the police had then asked the group to disperse following complaints from the property owners. The police also told the group that they were involved in an illegal gathering.

NONEJayathas refused to stop the hunger strike and split his group into smaller groups of four to continue with the hunger strike.

At about 1pm, a group of eight children presented the hunger-strikers with garlands.

The group then accompanied the children to Putrajaya to hand the same 18-point memorandum to Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak.

Memo left at PM’s office

They arrived at the PM’s office at about 2.45pm but there was a brief stand-off between them and a representative from the premier’s department over where the memorandum will be handed over.

The group had wanted the premier’s representative to come out to meet them while the other party had invited five representatives from the group to go in to deliver the memorandum.

After waiting for about 45 minutes, the group then left their memorandum at the doorstep and dispersed. Those on the hunger-strike will break their fast at 4pm.

Till next year’s anniversary then. 🙂

Counseling for teachers only?

/* November 25th, 2009 by poobalan | View blog reactions No comments »
 Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


It is indeed sad to read the news about the parents being depressed over untimely death of the children during Kuala Dipang, Kampar bridge collapse.

The emotional upheaval and mental anguish of the families has been exacerbated by the knowledge that the bridge at the Kuala Dipang 1Malaysia camp was constructed without the required permits. It collapsed on Oct 26.

Lorry driver T Nathan said he has not slept properly since the death of Dina, his favourite child. She was born after her mother S Mogana had suffered several miscarriages. They have two sons, now 19 and 17.

Nathan, 45, said Dina “was the live-wire of the family and her smile lingers in my mind”.

“Before she was born, my wife used to serve my food. When Dina turned seven, she took over…she knew what I like,” he said in distress.

Technician K Vasudevan, 43, has become withdrawn and depressed after Divyashree’s death.

He wakes up frequently in cold sweat, thinking of the ordeal his daughter would have experienced when she was thrown into the water and fought for survival.

Vasudevan last saw his daughter alive on Oct 18, after Deepavali, when he and his wife K Kanakam,41, returned to Kuala Lumpur where they work.

Divyashree (right) was the eldest of three girls and a bright student who wanted to become a doctor. She scored 4As and 3Bs in her UPSR examination this year – results that she never saw because these were released last week.

Vasudevan said he was told at 1.30am on Oct 27 that his daughter was reported missing in the incident, and he had dashed to the camp site with his wife.

They waited, hoping she was alive but two days later, were told that her body had been found. Relatives prevented him from viewing her remains at the Kampar Hospital because he was so distraught.

“It is like the right hand of my body has been chopped off. Every time I see small children now, memories of my daughter come to haunt me and I choke up,” he said.

He has had to resign from his job because his employer refused to grant him compassionate leave to attend to the funeral rites. [what kind of useless employer is this?]

His wife has quit her job as a clerk in a private firm to look after her other two daughters. She said her husband no longer smiles and has a lost look, as he was very attached to Divyashree.

K Mageswaran left it to his wife R Nagarathna, 41, to talk about Devatharshini as he is in deep depression over his loss.

Devatharshini (left), the only girl and the youngest of four children, was the darling of the family. She was conceived after Nagarathna prayed for a daughter, and was named after a Hindy deity.

Mageswaran had initially refused her permission to attend the camp, as he was concerned about her safety. When she pleaded and cried, he relented.

A good cook, Mageswaran made her a meal and took her on his bicycle to her school, from where she reported to the camp. Her brother Sarveswaran,12, was also a participant.

About 1.30am on Oct 27, Nagarathna received a phone call from her friend who told her that the bridge had collapsed and that her daughter had been swept away in the current. By then, her husband had left with a friend for the camp site.

Nagarathna said she fainted on hearing the news but, on recovering consciousness, stayed up the whole night, praying for the safety of her other two children.

On three occasions, she went to the camp site but could not locate her daughter. Her relatives even sought the help of a bomoh.

When the body was retrieved from the river three days later, identification had to be made based on the school uniform that Devatharshini was wearing.

“It’s hard to accept that she has gone. But her spirit remains with us in our home,” said Nagarathna, consoling herself.

Mageswaran’s relatives, worried for his health, have tried to persuade him to change residence, but he refuses to leave the house where his daughter once lived.

Did anyone provide emotional support for the parents and families of the deceased? Apparently not. But look at what Education Ministry is doing:

The Education Ministry will provide counselling for the teachers involved in the Kuala Dipang incident, in which three schoolchildren attending a 1Malaysia camp drowned after the suspension bridge they were crossing collapsed and plunged them into the Kampar river.

… Deputy Education Minister Dr Mohd Puad Zarkashi said the teachers who were directly involved when the incident occurred on Oct 26 had been traumatised by the tragedy.

”They will be given counselling to help them ride out this difficult period,” he told reporters on Wednesday after opening the national teachers education research seminar.

Dr Mohd Puad said that the teachers were not to be blamed for the incident.

”The incident was not due to negligence by the teachers,” he added, claiming that parents of the three deceased pupils told him that they were proud of the teachers for their quick action.

Deputy Education Minister said that part of the trauma counselling is due to harrassment faced by the teachers:

… More than 20 teachers have been traumatised, partly because they feel responsible, but also because they have have been harassed and threatened by parents.

Deputy Education Minister Dr Mohd Puad Zarkashi said the teachers have been advised to lodge police reports.

“But in fact, those who harassed or threatened the teachers are not parents of the victims but others who took advantage of the tense situation.” he told newsmen after launching the 3-day National Teachers Education Research seminar today.

He was asked to comment on the statement by the National Union of the Teaching Profession (NUTP) president Hashim Adnan urging the ministry to hold counselling sessions for the teachers.

Hashim said two teachers who were punched by parents following the incident had requested transfers to other schools.

Dr Mohd Puad agreed with NUTP that the affected teachers need counselling. He commended the teachers involved, especially those who joined the search for the missing pupils.

“I am willing to defend these teachers as it was not their negligence. In fact, the parents of the three children even commended the teachers for their quick action,” he said.

Its good that NUTP and Education Ministry is concerned about the teachers, but don’t forget the parents. They are also in dire need of counselling!

BTW, what happened to the report by the Education Ministry after being handed over to DPM Muhyiddin? Has it gone AWOL or branded under OSA? The PR report was very fast, within days, but Education Ministry is taking 30 days (and still counting). I hope its 5 volumes and thousands of pages thick!

The deputy Education Minister of course was unhappy with the PR’s version:

Dr Mohd Puad slammed a report by a Perak Pakatan Rakyat investigation committee, which had stated that the three teachers were not present to supervise the children during the crossing, claiming it was based on assumptions.

”They did not call witnesses or teachers when preparing the report. They are just assuming,” he claimed, adding that the state Opposition was “only good at pointing out people’s faults rather than finding solutions.”

The Pakatan committee claimed that the three teachers who were supposed to have been supervising the schoolchildren when they were crossing the suspension bridge had gone “missing” prior to the incident.

According to its chairman V. Sivakumar, deceased student Devatharshini’s elder brother, Sarveswaran, who also took part in the camp, had told him this after a visit to their home in Mambang Diawan.

Meanwhile Dr Mohd Puad said that the report by the committee set up by the Government following the incident had been completed and handed over to Deputy Prime Minister Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin, who is also the Education Minister.

Below is some of the findings of PR’s investigation:

The metal pillar anchoring the cable of the collapsed Kuala Dipang suspension bridge incident which took three young lives on Oct 26 had broken off from its concrete foundation causing the walkway to fall into the Kampar River.

At a press conference held at the PAS state headquarters yesterday, Su said: “Our initial finding is that the foundation of the anchor block B is very shallow only 2.8 ft deep whereas the actual depth should, according to the chartered consultant structural engineer, be about 10 times that depth.”

He showed Malaysiakini a sketch of the foundation block B with a height of 5’10” , width of 2′ 3″ and depth of 2’8″.
According to the Pasir Pinji assemblyperson, the anchor block B should have been the size of a container.

“Furthermore the initial soil testing done by a civil engineer yesterday (Tuesday) at the bank where the tragedy took place showed that the soil there is very soft.

“This is the preliminary findings of the collapsed bridge tragedy and the final findings report will be ready by the weekend and we hope to reveal the full details on Monday,” he said.

Earlier during the same press conference, Sivakumar said they interviewed Kinta Selatan district education officer Raja Abdul Raman Raja Amaran on Tuesday.

“The surprising fact is that his department was not aware that a suspension bridge had been built by a contractor linking SK Kuala Dipang with the 1Malaysia camp site across the Kampar River,” he said.

“Pupils of SK Sentosa were the first to notice the suspension bridge when they camped at the site on Oct 9. The school notified Raja Abdul Rahman who visited the site on Oct 16 (10 days before the collapse),” he added.

Sivakumar said the education officer told him that a party had approached him early last month with a proposal for a bridge but the project was put on hold because it was deemed too costly at RM110,000.

Raja had informed Sivakumar that the directive to build the bridge came from the Co-curriculum Centre in Pangor Island.

The committee will call on the centre at Pangor Island today to gather details on construction of the bridge and contractor’s identity, said Sivakumar.

Raja also had stated that initially he had directed 40 teachers to attend the 1Malaysia camp but only 23 turned up for the four-day event.

Asked why 20 of the teachers were holding a meeting when 22 children were on the bridge at 10.30am on that day, according to Sivakumar, Raja had replied, “They (teachers) were within the vicinity of the camp area.

The team also held a public inquiry:

Thirteen eyewitnesses narrated their version of the horrifying incident during the four-hour ‘inquiry’ held in Kampar on Saturday.

Most vocal of them was lorry driver T Nathan, 44, (right in photo) who lost his daughter Dina Deve, 11, that night. M Davadharshini,11, and V Diviyasri,12 also drowned in the incident.

“Why weren’t measures put in place to safeguard the 300 pupils?” asked Nathan in anger and anguish.

“There were no bomba (fire and rescue services), medical or Rela personnel on hand to help the 22 children when they fell into the river. If a VIP or a minister’s child was taking part in the camp, there would have been adequate safety measures.

“But who are we? Just poor people whose lives are not important and can be sacrificed and forgotten.”

M Balan, 41, a teacher with the Sri Murugan Centre, said 21 of his students had reported for the four-day camp, involving 298 pupils from 64 schools in the Kinta Selatan district

It was organised by the Education Ministry to foster better ties among the races under the1Malaysia concept. The district education officer had directed 40 teachers to be on duty but only 23 turned up.

There was chaos and confusion among the teachers as to what to do when the bridge collapsed and the children fell into the swift-flowing river, as none of them (the teachers) were given prior training as to how to cope with an emergency,” said Balan. [was he there as well?]

A 12-year-old student (name withheld to protect his safety) said: “It was not the teachers who threw safety vests (as was reported in the media) to (the 19 students in river) but it was us (the students) who ran to the storeroom and got these items to help save them.

He said the 19 were left clinging to the metal cable of the collapsed bridge in the darkness for about 30 minutes before any attempt was made to save them. He said he had jumped into the river to save two of his classmates.

The student also claimed that there was only one teacher standing in the middle span of the bridge to control the pupils just before the bridge collapsed.

Earlier, the inquiry heard that pupils who had finished dinner were told to go back and clean used plates left on the other side of the river.

The to and fro movement of the pupils on the suspension bridge resulted in the weakened anchor block being ripped off its foundation, caused the bridge to collapse.

It is learnt that only six pupils were allowed at any one time on the bridge but that this guideline was ignored.

Balan said: “The bomba personnel were searching for survivors in a boat and refused to allow anxious parents to dive into the river to search for the pupils.”

He then used an alternate route about 5km away to get to the other side of the river to search for his students. However, the school authorities prevented him from leading the students back by the same route.

A frustrated Balan said he waited about three hours in the darkness for a rescue truck to come, and finally, in desperation, took the students over to the other side. It took another half an hour for a police truck o come to the rescue of other stranded students.

“There was very poor coordination and an indifferent attitude among the authorities concerned,” he alleged.

Another participant asked for the attendance list of the teachers so that they can be held accountable and not claim that they were not on duty during the incident.

An angry participant blasted the media for reporting that Indian Malaysian students had been jumping on the bridge, leading to its collapse.

“You mean to say that it is always the fault of the Indian community for any untoward incident in the country?” he asked.

However, Tronoh assemblyperson V Sivakumar (extreme left in photo), who is heading an ad hoc committee investigating the incident, told the parent that the fault lay with poor construction of the bridge.

“The authorities will find excuses to divert the blame from their shortcomings in building the illegal bridge but we will nail them,” he assured the 50 participants.

A 41-year-old mother of one of the drowned girls lamented that none of the school teachers came to pay their last respects and counsel those bereaved in their hour of need.

“Furthermore they (the teachers) had the cheek to say that we had assaulted them after the incident, when we did not do this,” she said.

The parents are now suing various parties for RM105 million (no doubt advised by the PR lawyers):

The fathers of the three pupils who drowned in the recent Kuala Dipang bridge collapse tragedy have filed a RM105mil suit against the Malaysian Government and Education Ministry.

The suit, which was filed on their behalf by their lawyers at the High Court here Friday, named nine others including bridge donor GS Synergy Sdn Bhd and contractor CWL Enterprise as defendants.

The others are the heads of SJK (T) Mambang Diawan and SJK (T) Gopeng, the Kinta Selatan education officer, Perak Education director, Kampar district council president, Perak Public Works Department director and the Kuala Dipang 1Malaysia Camp commandant.

Plaintiffs K. Mageswaran, K. Vasudevan and T. Nathan are each seeking RM35mil in general damages and a further RM100,000 in exemplary damages besides RM19,120 in special damages, and costs.

They claim that the deaths of M. Devatharshini, 11, V. Divyashree, 12, and N. Dinadevi, 11, on Oct 26 had been due to the defendants’ negligence.

Speaking to reporters outside the court, their lawyer A. Sivanesan said the papers would be served on the named defendants in the next few days.

Asked why he had decided to file the suit, Nathan said it was not about the money as all the money in the world would not bring back Dinadevi.

”We want to know who’s fault it is and make sure everyone else knows about it too so that no other parents would have to lose their children like this,” he said.

Vasudevan stressed that he wanted justice to be served.

”We want the teachers and the Government to be held responsible,” he said.

Nathan added: “I had sent my daughter to school but she was returned to me in a coffin.”

Also representing the plaintiffs are Datuk Ngeh Koo Ham, M. Kulasegaran, Nga Kor Ming, Keshvinder Singh and A. Magesan.

Perak Mentri Besar Datuk Seri Dr Zambry Abd Kadir said the Government would not stop the grieving families from suing it.

“This is about lives. The parents have lost their children and it is their right to pursue the matter,” he told reporters after a study loan presentation ceremony here.

“Most importantly is that we want to ensure that the Kuala Dipang incident would not be covered up,” he added.

He said the Government was still working to provide concrete studies and suggestion for the future so that similar tragedies would not recur.

Dr Zambry added that the government was not conducting the investigation to gain political mileage.

25 November 2007

/* November 24th, 2009 by poobalan | View blog reactions No comments »
 Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Does it ring a bell? Hint : Search for “HINDRAF rally”.

Two years down the lane, what’s the situation now? Are there any improvements in your life? I guess there would be some changes in your life, but how about improvement? Do you think the political scenario changed for the better? Do you think that the government is more responsive to the people’s need now?  Do you feel you have more chances/opportunities now? Are you being given the cold shoulder or being discriminated due to the rally?

How did the rally change the stakeholders – the Indian community (from the lowest rung to the elite), the political parties (MIC especially), the government, the local leaders, the other communities? After two years, is the effect still being felt or its just like a dream (or nightmare, for some)?

Who is still benefiting after two years? The opposition? The HINDRAF 5? Waytha who is overseas? MIC?

So many questions, is anyone doing research on the impact after two years?

As for celebrations to commemorate the anniversary, Hindraf (more likely the pro-tem HRP)  is organising the following events (received via email):

Event No 1 –

A gathering of 18 HINDRAF supporters in front of KLCC between 9.00am- 4.00pm (the time of the rally) to observe a hunger strike representing the 18 point demands that was submitted to the UMNO led government in uplifting the Malaysian Indian community that has been systematically marginalized and discriminated by the government for the last 52 years.

Event No 2 –

HINDRAF chairman’s daughter, W. Vaishnavi will be attending the Prime Minister’s Department in Putra Jaya to hand over a letter from HINDRAF Chairman detailing the current and immediate problems of the Malaysian Indians in regards to the discrimination that they face in socio development backwardness of the Malaysian Indian society within the sphere of Malaysian community in regards to education, economics, business, police abuses, freedom of religious practice and other continued suppression on Article 5, 8, 10 & 13 of the constitution against the public more particularly against the Malaysian Indians.

Event No 3 :

Nationwide prayers at more than 100 locations to light 18 ghee lamps to signify the 18 Point Demands submitted by Hindraf to the then Prime Minister that is yet to be fulfilled. A complete list of temples holding such prayers would be available for viewing on our website on the 25th November 2009.

A separate mega  Ruthra yagam/fire ritual would be held on 29th November 2009 at Agora Veerabathrar Sanggili Karuppar Temple 17 ½ Mile Kg.Benggali Rawang Selangor.

Another group led by two of the HINDRAF five (Vasantha Kumar and Ganabatirao) is holding celebrations in Dewan Hamzah, Klang.

Apart from a road map to improve the situation of the Indian community, resolutions will be tabled to restructure Hindraf’s leadership, at a belated dinner to celebrate Deepavali which fell on Oct 17.

“Important announcements will be made by Hindraf leaders that will have a big political impact on Indian Malaysians,” Vasanthakumar said when contacted today.

A 10-member adhoc committee led by Ganabatirao’s brother, V Raidu, is organising the dinner, to be held on Nov 25 at the Dewan Hamzah, Klang. Some 3,000 guests are expected.

Vasanthakumar said a “VVIP politician” has been invited to address the guests and is expected to “to endorse the demands of Indians”.

He declined to reveal the individual’s identity although it is widely rumoured to be PKR leader Anwar Ibrahim.

It has also been speculated that Vasanthakumar will be announcing his decision to join PKR on that day.

However when asked today, he declined to comment, adding that his restrictions to join politicals parties as imposed during his release from the ISA will only expire on Dec 13.

Meanwhile Ganabatirao expressed hope that the other three Hindraf activists – P Uthayakumar, R Kenghadaran and M Manoharan – will attend the event which is being dubbed as the “reincarnation of Hindraf”.

“My appeal is that all five of us can set aside our differences and stand united for the betterment of Indian Malaysians,” he said.

He was referring to differences of opinion that have split the group since their release from detention under the Internal Security Act in May.

Ganabatirao also disclosed that a move is underway to get Hindraf registered.

“We will appeal to the government to get Hindraf registered since the prime minister (Najib Abdul Razak) has mesmerised Malaysians with his 1Malaysia concept.

“It is time for the government to prove its genuineness in seeking a real 1Malaysia by accepting our effort to register Hindraf.”