Population imbalance worry

/* October 9th, 2009 by poobalan | View blog reactions 1 comment »
 Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


The PewForum report on Global Muslim population gave some interesting global statistics:

A comprehensive demographic study of more than 200 countries finds that there are 1.57 billion Muslims of all ages living in the world today, representing 23% of an estimated 2009 world population of 6.8 billion.

While Muslims are found on all five inhabited continents, more than 60% of the global Muslim population is in Asia and about 20% is in the Middle East and North Africa. However, the Middle East-North Africa region has the highest percentage of Muslim-majority countries. Indeed, more than half of the 20 countries and territories1 in that region have populations that are approximately 95% Muslim or greater.

More than 300 million Muslims, or one-fifth of the world’s Muslim population, live in countries where Islam is not the majority religion. These minority Muslim populations are often quite large. India, for example, has the third-largest population of Muslims worldwide. China has more Muslims than Syria, while Russia is home to more Muslims than Jordan and Libya combined.

Of the total Muslim population, 10-13% are Shia Muslims and 87-90% are Sunni Muslims. Most Shias (between 68% and 80%) live in just four countries: Iran, Pakistan, India and Iraq.

My focus is on Malaysia. The map below indicates current Muslim population in Malaysia to be about 17 million or 60.4%. The report says the Malaysian Muslim population is about 16,581,000 which is 1.1% of world Muslim population.

world-distribution-weightedClick to enlarge

Most likely this figure will grow, and coupled with lower growth rate of other communities, will lead towards a bigger gap between the majority Muslim and minority non-Muslims in the country. As I worried earlier, population imbalance may lead to various problems. Our political situation at the moment is not actually helping to bridge the gap, while the policies for last half decade have only served to widen the gap between the communities.  The constitution, which guarantees the rights of the non-Muslims, is often subject to interpretration that seems lop-sided.  So, its may well remain words on paper only since the realisation of the constitution is at the hands of politicians and administrators, and the separation between government, judiciary, and legistation is not very clear.

Would a Minorities Act help in this case? A review of the constitution? A check and balance mechanism for all the policies? Population control seems far-fetched of course, at the moment, but may be needed in future.

On hindsight, would an evenly balanced population trigger more social unrest and threat to national security? A minority “Minority” will be easy to subjugate and control.

Indian community support for PM Najib decreases

/* October 9th, 2009 by poobalan | View blog reactions No comments »
 Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Even though Malaysiakini report states the support from the community is the highest among the three communities at 68%, it actually reduced by 6%! And this is the smallest drop among the the biggest groups:

Indians 68% (down 6% from 74%)

Malays 64% (down 10% from 74%)

Chinese 36% (down 12% from 48%) (but high percentage of “don’t know”/’no response” answers).

Overall drop is 9%.

What could have cause the overall drop, and specifically the why lowest among the Indian community? Is it because of the publicity given to benefits announced for the Indian community? Perhaps other communities don’t feel they are getting the attention, so bigger drop among the others? How is the impact of Kg Buah Pala and cow head protest on the community support? Does the emergence of multiple Indian based parties affect the support level?

merdeka-center-survey-2009-sept

Looking at the past one year track, we can see an upward trend till July this year.

merdeka-center-survey-najib-2009

Images from Malaysiakini.

Sri Maha Mariamman Temple Jenjarum demolition postponed?

/* October 9th, 2009 by poobalan | View blog reactions 1 comment »
 Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


I thought current Selangor govt said “no temple demolition” without proper relocation? What’s the story with Jenjarum temple?

THE demolition of the 130-year-old Sri Maha Mariamman temple in Jenjarom, Selangor, has been aborted after the temple committee, the developer and the Kuala Langat police came to an agreement, reported Malaysia Nanban.

Temple president M. Sinnayah was quoted as saying that the Banting police had instructed developer KLIA Holdings to postpone the demolition after resolving the issue of relocation.

Furthermore, demolishing a temple during the Deepavali season may cause resentment among the Indian community, he said.

Samy still making roads

/* October 7th, 2009 by poobalan | View blog reactions 1 comment »
 Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Looks like ex-Works Minister still involved in roads, I mean, making inroads! 🙂

The Malaysiakini article title blared – “Samy: MIC makes inroads in Bagan Pinang estates”

The article contained the usual stuff from Samy Vellu that we have heard in the past 4 or 5 by-elections. Not sure how this one will turn out. The food and fun is still there via a pre-Deepavali open house (pre-Deepavali???). The goodies still being promised.  Schools promised funds and hopefully land. Temples allocated land. Youths to apply job via Jobs Malaysia etc. Really good that there’s election in such rural areas, and the people can demand for many things. One can also wonder why nothing before this? 🙂 NS have been under the same rule for so many decades, with same Chief Minister for quite some time, and estates under GLC. Nothing much changed back then. So, can the people expect change now and immediate future? Are they willing to put their trust on new leader? Samy thinks they will.

MIC president S Samy Vellu said his party’s election machinery has managed to make significant inroads in estates located in Bagan Pinang, where a by-election will take place on Oct 11.

According to him, MIC wanted to ensure its pledge of delivering as many Indian votes to the Barisan Nasional.

He said since nomination day last Saturday, almost 1,000 party members, including from the Youth, Wanita, Puteri and Putera wings “literally camped” at the predominantly Indian populated estates.

“We have maintained our position in the estates even before nomination day and have assured the Indian voters (in the estates) that the government will continue to bring changes and progress to them,” he told reporters after concluding another day of six straight hours of campaigning in Bagan Pinang last night.

The Bagan Pinang state constituency, which is under the Teluk Kemang parliamentary constituency, has 20 percent or 2,834 Indian voters who are mostly concentrated in the four estates namely Bradwell, Atherthon, Siliau and Sua Betong.

Samy Vellu said his confidence of Indian voters’ support for the BN candidate Isa Samad would be further strengthened by Human Resources Minister and MIC vice-president Dr S Subramaniam’s scheduled announcement tomorrow on his (Subramaniam’s) meeting with officials of Sime Darby which owns the four estates.

Subramaniam had said that he would announce details of his discussions with the plantation giant last Monday on the solutions to many of the estate workers’ woes.

Samy Vellu who is leading the MIC charge in Bagan Pinang, admitted that Indian voters are not only concerned with developments but also wanted their rights to be protected by the government.

“We have held several discussions with the residents in the estates and they are happy with the initiatives being taken by our prime minister.

“They are very clear now. They know for a fact that the government has taken steps to bring progress to the Indian community and it can only continue if BN is given a stronger mandate,” he said.

Samy Vellu said other MIC leaders like deputy president G Palanivel and minister Subramaniam who have also been campaigning daily, managed to “break the barrier” with the Indian voters since the last general election where many of them had supported the PAS candidate.

“The environment and mood among the Indian voters is now different compared the last general election,” he said.

He said MIC expected a big turnout at the party’s Deepavali open house tomorrow (Thursday) at 8pm at the Sua Betong estate.

Deputy Prime Minister Muhyiddin Yassin would be among top BN leaders expected to attend the open house.

“The entire BN machinery has worked well and cooperated with each other in ensuring a victory for BN,” he added.

Survey results on wearing religious mark on forehead

/* October 6th, 2009 by poobalan | View blog reactions No comments »
 Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


The intro to the poll received many interesting and varied comments. Do read them first over here.

The poll ran from September 15th until October 3rd (18 days). A total of 175 response was elicited, with a majority saying they do wear such religious marks (67%)9% do so on special occasions, while 7% do not wear such marks as they don’t believe in it. 6% wear such a mark if they remember while 4% feel uncomfortable doing so. 3% each voted for reasons “not praying” and “divisive mark”, while only 1% cited health reason.

[poll id=12]

As usual, this poll is just a general indication and is not representative of any segment/group of the population. The demographics of the voters are unknown, and as such, its relevance is limited to being a topic for discussion.

The earlier article received comments saying that its a personal choice and that no necessary need to wear marks on the forehead (not necessarily vibuthi only, can be thilak, or kungkumum, santhanam etc. too).

It is possible that many people wear such marks without knowing the benefit or use to one’s self and community. Some argue its a personal choice or a tradition/culture (which is possible as Hinduism is firmly entrenched in Indian culture).

I hope the poll did trigger readers to investigate further and learn something about putting religious marks on their foreheads.

  • Is it merely culture/fashion/symbolic or is it actually beneficial in some scientific/medical way?
  • Do we actually know why need to wear such marks on our forehead? Is there a valid reason acceptable to us?
  • Do we forsake the culture/fashion/symbol (if that’s what it is) due to the environment we work/live in or do we educate those around us to appreciate the diversity?
  • Does wearing such mark indicate one’s “holiness”? Many will agree that its a big “NO”.
  • Is wearing such marks considered creating friction by highlighting the differences between “you” and ‘others”?
  • Does wearing such marks indicate one’s backwardness or unprofessionalism or “stuck in certain mentality” type?