Kg Bukit Pala showdown

/* June 30th, 2009 by poobalan | View blog reactions No comments »
 Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


As it stands, the residents are pissed off with their ADUN lawyer RSN Rayer. He tried to give some excuse saying he is standing with them or something. They are also accusing the state government of not doing anything, not caring about them, just like the previous government. Lim Guan Eng will be waking up to a protest tomorrow from his own rakyat, who helped his representative to get a place in the state government. He was upset with HINDRAF’s claims, and asked them to protest at federal government level so that the federal government can do something under National Land Code.

HINDRAF is planning a series of protests at DAP offices throughout the country. That speaks something for their impartiality. At least they step on everyone’s toes once in a while. But it remains to be seen if they can get an estimated 10,000 people at KOMTAR this week. Probably less than half of that is my estimate.

Question also arise if the Indians in DAP will stand with HINDRAF or with Penang state government. My guess is party comes first for them. How about those in PKR ? – no news from Manikavasagam, Sivarasa or Gopalakrishnan so far.  MIC  should be having  good time seeing the misery of DAP/PKR, but I’m not sure what they themselves are doing to solve the problem as well. It was their partners who caused all this problem in the first place. Which makes them, what, partners-in-crime? The role of  the previous state government who caused all this headache for current state government should not be forgotten.

Can the state government buy back the land from the people it sold to? Probably not if it the buyers got it over some dubious and nominal fees, thus standing to make a large amount of money. Lim Guan Eng says the figure will be astronomical. if want to buy back And secondly, there may be no laws to compel for such buy-back options or to stop the development of the land. I guess the only way is to discuss with the developer or relocate the whole village to another location.

Anyway, Deputy CM 1 Mansor is doing some firefighting work – trying to talk to the developers, Koperasi Pegawai Kerajaan Pulau Pinang Bhd and Nusmetro Venture.

He said that he would ask the developers to hold on to the vacant possession directive served on the villagers while the state investigates allegations of misuse of power and corruption in the transfer of the land.

“I am confident that the developers will cooperate with the state,” he told a press conference here on Monday.

The residents filed an application today to set aside an ex-parte order dated June 16 obtained by the developers, to issue a writ of possession, which is to be enforced at 11am on July 2. In their application, the residents also applied for the bailiff’s notice, execution and enforcement of the writ to be set aside. In his affidavit, labourer K. Shanmugham said to date he and the other village residents had yet to be served with the Court of Appeal’s order dated May 11. He said the writ of possession was defective as the Koperasi and Nusmetro Venture have failed to obtain any permission from the authorities and the Penang Municipal Council to demolish the houses in the village. The application will be heard on a date yet to be fixed.

A bit of background on the village (from Malaysiakini):

Originally the village was legally gazetted as the Helen Brown housing trust under the Housing Trust Act 1950.
However, in 2005, the land office alienated the land to the state government without dissolving the trust which is a requirement under law.

Penang Island Municipal Council (MPPP) had allegedly given planning approval in 2007 to Umno-linked Nusmetro before the land was legally transferred to the cooperative. This is a breach of the council’s building by-laws.

The land was only transferred on March 27 last year – nine days after Pakatan Rakyat captured Penang in the general election.The land transfer was done by certain land officers without the knowledge of the current government.

How would this turnout? I expect the talks between Mansor and opposition-controlled company to fail. There will be some bloodshed and arrests, and Kampung Buah Pala will cease to exist. After 6 months, we will forget all this and move on. In 2013, the issue will be raised again, but both parties will not be getting any mileage because one caused the problem, and the other failed to keep to its promise to solve the problem.

Veera Muneswarar Temple demolition in Ampang

/* June 29th, 2009 by poobalan | View blog reactions No comments »
 Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Hindraf’s Jayathas issued statement that the temple – Veera Muneswarar temple – in Jalan Yap Kwan Seng was demolished by gangsters associated with MIC. MIC Youth denied this and claimed that they were in the process of finding a solution to the temple issue. The temple is 20 years old, so most likely its on private land that belongs to someone else.

There are few things that I like to note:

1. Vel Paari is right in the sense that just complaining is pointless. HINDRAF is limited to doing just that – protest because they don’t have locus standi to do anything else, save initiate legal proceedings. No one will accept their memorandum or ideas or solutions. They are considered “outlawed” organisation which is not even registered.

2. If I’m not mistaken, Deputy FT  Minister Saravanan did pledge that no more temples will be demolished without proper alternative or solution. Looks like another broken promise for MIC?

3. Where/what is Hindu Sangam’s role in this? No statement yet from them.

4. What is DBKL’s role in this? Where is their committee on temple issues?

5. At least the developer removed the deities before demolishment, unlike the gangsters in local councils and their henchmen.

MIC Youth is unhappy with being blamed for playing a role in the demolition of a 20-year-old Hindu temple in Kuala Lumpur on Sunday.

The temple – Veera Muneswarar Alayam in Jalan Yap Kwan Seng – was demolished by some unidentified people and had prompted both Hindraf and MIC to converge at the scene to help the temple committee save the place of worship.

Hindraf, which for long has been in the forefront when it comes to protesting temple demolitions, issued a press statement immediately after the demolition, putting the blame on MIC, among others, for the demolition.

Hindraf’s S Jayathas bluntly blamed “MIC gangsters who worked with the developer” in demolishing the temple.

He also claimed that the police and Kuala Lumpur City Hall (DBKL) had failed to protect the temple and its devotees while allowing others to demolish the temple.

“It is disappointing that the police did not do anything despite the temple committee launching police reports previously against any attempts to demolish the temple,” he said.

But the main plank of his complain was against the MIC.

“Around 35 Indian guys that we suspect were MIC gangsters demolished the 20-year- old temple,” he said in a statement.

MIC Youth was naturally unimpressed with Jayathas’ sweeping accusations.

“This is what he does best – making such clumsy statements and then going away until another temple is demolished,” said MIC Youth wing advisor S Vell Paari.

MIC Youth in talks with developer

Vell Paari added that MIC was not involved in the demolition of the Jalan Yap Kwan Seng temple. On the contrary, he said, the movement was deeply involved in getting the problem solved.

“We have been following up with this temple case from the beginning. We have spoken to the temple committee about three weeks ago and they told us that they wanted to deal directly with the developers.

“And when the demolition took place yesterday, we immediately sent our people over to see what was happening. We contacted DBKL who confirmed that they were not demolishing the temple,” he added.

He said that the demolition was done by the developer who had paid some people to remove the deities from the temple before tearing it down.

“Even then, it was MIC Youth members who helped the temple committee in sorting out the issues. We were there when they lodged a police report after one of them was hurt in the demolition process,” he said.

Vell Paari said that MIC Youth was now working with DBKL and the developer so that some form of arrangement can be made to save or relocate the temple.

“They want to remain in the same place. That will be tough but we are trying to find a best alternative spot for them as well as with adequate compensation from the developer,” he said.

Start finding solutions

He also challenged Jayathas to come up with a proper solution for the Jalan Yap Kwan Seng temple.

“He should not just talk and make wild accusations. Can he sort out the mess for the temple committee? No point in making any noise but without being able to find solutions,” he said.

Temple demolitions have been a thorny issue for the past few years. In 2007, at the height of temple demolitions throughout the country, Hindraf capitalised on the issue by evoking raw emotions among the members of the Indian community.

The anger of the community towards the Barisan Nasional government was apparent when the ruling coalition, including MIC, was roundly routed in the 2008 general election.

Since then MIC had been playing a more proactive role in solving the issues concerning the Indian community.

Delay in conversion law changes

/* June 29th, 2009 by poobalan | View blog reactions No comments »
 Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


The council of Rulers who met today decided to get the views of state religious councils on the approval of changes to laws involved in conversion before making a decision. The Sultans are head of the religion in the states, so probably they want to discuss at state level first before putting it in front of the Council of Rulers.

The laws in question are Law Reform (Marriage and Divorce) Act 1976, Administration of Islamic Law (Federal Territories) Act 1993 and Islamic Family Law (Federal Territories) Act 1984. The amendments are postponed now until its cleared at both levels before brought into parliament.

Bukit Pala resident asks ADUN to resign?

/* June 28th, 2009 by poobalan | View blog reactions No comments »
 Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Anil Netto reports that:

High Chaparral villagers hold protest outside Adun Rayer s and call for his resignation. They now want to meet the CM on Monday.

If the state government comes out with any sort of excuse, its a black mark for them since can’t fulfill election promise. 26 days left for some action. I’m wondering what is the response from MMSP, Penang Hindraf, and also other NGOs.

I agree with the comments by ex-Deputy Chief Minister of Penang on this issue. Its been more than a year and still no solution in sight. If they can’t solve the problem, they should have told the residents.

Also, NST reported the following:

On the Kampung Lorong Buah Pala issue, Dr Hilmi said the previous administration had discussed with the land owner and developer to help the 31 affected families then.

Meanwhile, the NST learnt that 11 of the 31 families had since taken up the offer made by the previous administration. Those who opted for cash were given between RM180,000 and RM200,000 for each family and have since moved out. Those who opted for houses, were given a RM10,000 start-up and a three-year rental prior to the completion of their new houses.

That means the balance 20 families did not accept the offers.  By some family accepting the offers, it weakens the case for the residents.

Rulers Council to discuss law amendments on conversion

/* June 28th, 2009 by poobalan | View blog reactions No comments »
 Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Remember the controversial cabinet directive on child conversion? Well, the latest news is that the amendments will be discussed in the Rulers’ Council meeting on Monday. Funny thing is, I never read anything in the papers about the proposed changes. Will it be made public at any stage before being brought to parliament?

Amendments to laws to accommodate the cabinet’s decision on conversion to Islam will be discussed by the Rulers’ Council on Monday.

The proposed changes, once endorsed by the council and passed by Parliament, will put to rest some of the issues relating to controversial conversions.

The three laws involved are the Law Reform (Marriage and Divorce) Act 1976, Islamic Family (Federal Territories) Law 1984 and Administration of Islam (Federal Territories) Islamic Law 1993. Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department Maj-Gen (rtd) Datuk Jamil Khir Baharom said any amendments would have to be endorsed by the council first before they were tabled in Parliament.

The government has formed a five-man committee on conversion, although moves to introduce the changes started in 2007.

Apart from Jamil Khir, other ministers entrusted to look into the issue are Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department Datuk Seri Mohamed Nazri Abdul Aziz, Senator Tan Sri Dr Koh Tsu Koon, Human Resources Minister Datuk Dr S. Subramaniam and Women, Family and Community Development Minister Senator Datuk Seri Shahrizat Abdul Jalil.

By the way, did Indira get her baby?