Race Relations Act?

/* September 18th, 2008 by poobalan | View blog reactions No comments »
 Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


What is Race Relations Act? I found a similar named Act in UK, the 1976 version which was updated in 2000:

The Race Relations Act 1976 was established by the British Parliament to prevent discrimination on the grounds of race.

Items that are covered include discrimination on the grounds of race, colour, nationality, ethnic and national origin in the fields of employment, the provision of goods and services, education and public functions.

The Act also established the Commission for Racial Equality with a view to review the legislation.

The Act incorporates the earlier Race Relations Act 1965 and Race Relations Act 1968 and was later amended by the Race Relations Amendment Act 2000, notably including a statutory duty on public bodies to promote race equality, and to demonstrate that procedures to prevent race discrimination are effective.

In 2003 additional regulations made certain forms of discrimination due to religious belief illegal also.

The Act (2000) is found here.

Back in Malaysia, MCA Youth proposed the setting up of the Act on 14th September, following the arrest of Sin Che journalist Tan Hoon Cheng, but the letting off of Ahmad Ismail:

The MCA has proposed to the government to draft a race relations act to strenghten relations among multi-ethnic Malaysians.

Youth chief Datuk Liow Tiong Lai said such an act was relevant and necessary, in view of racial issues resurfacing and plaguing the nation, of late.

He said the proposed act could also reinforce efforts taken by the unity, culture, arts and heritage ministry to promote unity and solidarity among the people.

“We will propose to the ministry. Such act is needed to look into race relations, (and) how to engage a multi-racial community into postive relations and avoid discrimination.

“Some countries have in place, such an act, where you can’t discriminate or belittle other races,” he told reporters after opening The Federation of Malaysian Clans and Guild Youth Association’s annual meeting here today.

Barely 5 days after that, this is the response from Home Minister Syed Hamid (NST):

The Cabinet has agreed to enact an Act on race relations to prevent possible racial conflicts.
Home Minister Datuk Seri Syed Hamid Albar said Malaysia still had to cope with sensitive issues relating to racial problems and relationships despite having achieved its independence 51 years ago.

Syed Hamid said his ministry would be working closely with the Culture, Arts and Heritage Ministry in formulating the Act.

He was also quoted on Malaysiakini:

Responding to queries, the home minister said Shafie Apdal’s ministry will be drafting the law after consultations with various groups.

The Home Ministry is tasked with giving feedback on the penalties if the law is infringed.

On the need for the act, Syed Hamid said: “Even in the European nations, a law governing race relations is now important as they too are becoming ‘rainbow’ nations. What more for us?

“But the law is still in the early stages of drafting and it will be take some time before it is ready to be looked at.”

The minister also said that the cabinet will look at other countries’ race relation laws before deciding on Malaysia’s.

Basically, such Acts are to avoid discrimination in services, employment, public functions etc. But in Malaysia, it may also incorporate clauses to ban questions special rights of Malays, nationality of citizens, economic allocations etc.

Uthaya’s appeal rejected again

/* September 18th, 2008 by poobalan | View blog reactions 1 comment »
 Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Habeas Corpus application by Uthayakumar to be released from ISA due to medical neglect reason have been rejected by the KL High Court. According to the judge, Justice Suraya Othman:

…the claim by the applicant that he was denied proper medication, treatment and proper diet by the Taiping Hospital and officials of the Kamunting detention camp was not true and without merit.

She said the respondents, the Home Ministry and the camp officials through numerous affidavits had stated that all complaints by Uthayakumar were throughly investigated, diagnosed and proper medications were prescribed by doctors at the hospital.

Secondly, the judge noted that vegetarian diet was provided as recommended by a dietician:

According to Bernama, Suraya said the affidavits also revealed that even the camp officials prepared a suitable vegetarian diet for Uthayakumar, who was diabetic, after being recommended by a dietician.

The NST wrote that:

In the application filed on May 22, Uthayakumar claimed he was denied his medication for diabetes between mid-February and April 6.

Prior to that, Uthayakumar, 46, was taking the medicine that was given to him by his fiancee, S. Indradevi, 36, when she visited him at the Kamunting camp.

Uthayakumar also claimed that he had been denied the diabetic diet he requested. Instead, he was given rice and curry which was sweet.

Suraya said Uthayakumar and another detainee, lawyer R. Kengadharan, had scheduled a meeting with a dietician, but Uthayakumar refused to go at the last minute, while Kengadharan kept the appointment.

The dietician prescribed a diet plan for Uthayakumar which was similar to Kengadharan’s despite him not turning up.

“The court is satisfied that all which could be done within the confines of the law was done by the doctor, dietician and prison wardens to assist Uthayakumar,” she said.

She then highlighted that Uthaya changed his appeal from IJN to overseas treatment citing that local doctors will be subjected to manipulation and pressure from authorities.This she says is alarming and insult to the doctors.

She said in his initial notice of motion on May 22 this year filed via Messrs Edwin Lim & Suren, Uthayakumar, besides seeking his release from ISA detention, or in the alternative (second order) to be admitted to the National Heart Institute (IJN) immediately to seek treatment for his diabetes and heart condition.

However, in his affidavit on July 30, he decided not to seek treatment at IJN and wanted the court to substitute the order to allow him to seek overseas treatment from a medical practitioner of his own choice.

Suraya said the applicant in the affidavit had claimed that he had absolute right to choose medical treatment since local doctors would be subjected to manipulation and pressure from the authorities.

Suraya said the court found the reason given by Uthayakumar to be very alarming since he alleged that he could not trust doctors at the government hospitals and IJN.

“He had alleged that these doctors were incompetent, where the court believes this is an insult to their professionalism.”

She said even Dr GR Letchumanan of Taiping Hospital acceded to Uthayakumar’s request to be sent to IJN immediately although the doctor did not feel his (Uthayakumar) condition merited to be referred to IJN.

“Despite two appointments being made to allow him to be seen by two prominent heart specialists at IJN, the applicant, in the eleventh hour, changed his mind and refused to attend.

“This court feels the sudden change in mind by the applicant showed that he was not serious in seeking medical treatment at IJN,” added Suraya.

No independent medical reports? Wonder why Uthaya’s lawyers never asked for independent medical examination. Or was it rejected?

RM27000 fine for Hindraf Rally

/* September 18th, 2008 by poobalan | View blog reactions 1 comment »
 Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Indians “contribute” RM27,000 to government by pleading guilty to offense committed during the HINDRAF rally on November 25. From Malaysiakini:

A total of 27 men who failed to disperse after being ordered by the police to do so during the Nov 25 gathering organised by the Hindu Rights Action Force (Hindraf) were fined RM1,000 each by the Kuala Lumpur Sessions Court.
The men were fined after pleading guilty to the offence.

Blog unaccessible temporarily

/* September 18th, 2008 by poobalan | View blog reactions No comments »
 Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Hi all,

I was informed that this blog was done since yesterday (Wednesday). Some settings went awry. Its back online now.

Buntong ADUN Sivasubramaniam claims trap over laptop

/* September 16th, 2008 by poobalan | View blog reactions No comments »
 Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Smart fella this guy. Wasn’t he the one who was tempted with “millions of ringgit” to crossover to BN?

The recent arrests of two Perak executive councillors on corruption charges seem to have caused jitters among Pakatan Rakyat state assemblymen.

In a move to prevent any perception of graft practices, Buntong assemblyman A. Sivasubramaniam lodged a report with the state Anti-Corruption Agency (ACA) yesterday over a laptop he apparently received on behalf of a student.

Sivasubramaniam said a man had gone to his Buntong service centre here asking if there were any needy persons he could help.”We informed the man that there was a student who needed a laptop for his further studies in Cuba,” he told reporters here yesterday.He said a laptop was sent over to his office yesterday.

”I got suspicious when the man refused to come forward to personally hand over the laptop to the student,” he said.“The man insisted that I give him a letter confirming that I had received the laptop,” he added.Sivasubramaniam claimed the man also refused to see him despite calls for him to do so.

He said his suspicions that the gift could be a trap grew when he received the laptop with his name printed on the receipt as the person to have received the item.

Buntong rep lodges report