Merlimau and Kerdau byelection analysis

/* March 11th, 2011 by poobalan | View blog reactions No comments »
 Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


The below are excerpts from article by Ong Kian Ming:


… The eventual share of BN’s vote was 72%, which provided a majority of 3,643 votes. As stated in my prediction piece, because of the relatively even distribution of the non-Malay vote across the seven polling stations in this seat, it is difficult to estimate BN’s share of the vote by ethnic group using data at the polling station or poling stream levels.

Instead, I try to draw conclusions based on the levels and changes in the level of BN support by polling station.

Table 1 shows the levels and changes in the levels of BN support in each of the seven polling stations in Merlimau. It also shows the ethnic composition of each polling station.


A few points are worth noting. Firstly, the polling stations with the largest swings in the level of BN support from 2004 to 2008 are also the polling stations with the largest swings from 2008 to 2011.

These two polling stations – Jasin Lalang and Ladang Merlimau – are also the polling stations with a high percentage of Indian voters – 52.6% and 42.4% respectively.

A polling station which is 50% Indian, a 10% swing in the level of Indian support for the BN will translate into a 5% swing in the total BN support in that polling station.

In a polling station like Jasin Lala, which is 53% Indian, the almost 30% swing in the level of BN support indicates an Indian swing of 50% to 60%, much higher than the 45% I projected in my prediction piece.

The same can be said of Ladang Merlimau, with 40% of Indian voters and a 21% vote swing in BN’s favour.

Little movement among the Chinese

The level of BN support among the Chinese in Merlimau is harder to discern because of the even distribution of Chinese voters across the polling stations.

My best guess, based on the polling stations with more than 15% Chinese and with relatively few Indian voters – Permatang Serai and Pengkalan Samak – and based on Ayer Merbau – the polling station with 31% of Chinese voters, the highest in Merlimau – is that of a small swing back to the BN of 1% to 2%.

This is because the increase in BN’s share of the vote in all three polling stations were relatively small. (In fact, one can make the argument that BN’s share of the Chinese vote in Ayer Merbau actually decreased slightly). Certainly, my projection of a 5% swing in the Chinese vote is higher than the actual increase in this by-election.

If the Indian support for BN is estimated to have swung 50% to 60%, and if the Chinese vote swing back to BN was 1% to 2%, we can estimate that the remaining Malay vote swing back to the BN was approximately 3%, half of the 6% I predicted.

An increase in the Malay, Chinese and Indian vote of approximately 3%, 1% and 50% respectively gives us the Malay, Chinese and Indian support levels for BN at 74%, 61% and 82% respectively, delivering slightly over 72% of the popular vote and a vote majority of slightly under 3,700 votes, not far from the actual results.

Kerdau

In Kerdau, BN’s share of popular vote increased to 67.7% from 61% in 2008 and the BN’s majority increased from 1,615 to 2,724.

In an almost 90% Malay-majority seat, an almost 7% increase in BN’s share of the total vote reflects a similar increase in BN’s share of the Malay vote. This is not far off from my estimate of a 6% increase in the share of Malay votes for this seat.

According to Table 2, the increase in BN’s share of the popular vote in the only non-Malay majority polling station – Kerdau – was 13.5%. This increase is consistent with an increase in the Malay (6%), Chinese (10%) and Indian (20%) support for BN in this polling station. The increase in the BN’s share of Chinese support of 10% is higher than my prediction of 5%.

 

Another interesting point to note is that the percentage of BN support in the three Felda Jengka areas did not shift significantly from 2008.

In fact, BN support actually decreased slightly in Felda Jengka 25 and 22, which is surprising given the supposed commitment offered by BN to solve some of the outstanding Felda issues. Indeed, the increase in BN’s share of the popular vote was far greater in some of the non-Felda Malay majority areas.

Finally, even though the BN’s winning majority of 2,724 votes surpassed its 2004 majority of 2,565, one must take note that BN’s share of the total vote, at 67.7%, is less than the 69.3% it achieved in 2004.

The larger majority is reflective of the increase in the number of voters from 2004 to 2010 of approximately 10%.

Implications

What then are the implications of these two by-elections?

Firstly, the consistent trend of the shift in the Malay vote back to the BN since March 2008 has not changed significantly. The exceptions were the by-elections in Kuala Terengganu and Permatang Pauh. A nationwide swing of approximately 5% in the Malay support for the BN would not be surprising if a general election were to be called now.

Secondly, the swing in the Indian vote back to the BN, which is a more recent phenomenon, continues to pick up steam. Depending on the magnitude of the swing from 2004 to 2008, the expected swing in the Indian support for the BN could be anywhere from 20% to 50%.

Thirdly, the Chinese vote is swinging back to the BN, albeit in small numbers, especially in the semi-rural areas in which the DAP does not have a strong presence.

 

source: http://www.malaysiakini.com/news/158252

JICCI Women Entrepreneur Division Training Workshop

/* March 11th, 2011 by poobalan | View blog reactions No comments »
 Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


THE newly-formed Johor Indian Chamber of Commerce and Industry (JICCI) Women Entrepreneur Division was aimed at producing more Indian entrepreneurs in the state.

Its new chairperson Dr K. Tasha Sulosana said the division would encourage more women entrepreneurs through various programs and workshops.

“We are also targeting single mothers and the division will organise programs to allow these women to be financially independent and helping them set up their own businesses,” she said.

The division was launched by Malaysian Associated Indian Chamber of Commerce and Industry president (MAICCI) Datuk K.K. Eswaran.

Dr Sulosana said some 30 women are registered under JICCI but the division was hoping to increase the number.

She added that the first training workshop will be held on March 13 at the Dato Wahid Hall in the JICCI office in Jalan Dato Jaafar 1 here.

“During the workshop, attendees would be able to attend various workshops including workshops on flower arrangements, ice-cream making, make-up, hair do, nail art, making accessories with beads,” she said.

She added that the workshop conducted would be free of charge and open to women of all ages.

For further information and registration for the free program, readers can contact the JICCI secretariat at 07-222 5210.

source: http://thestar.com.my/metro/story.asp?file=/2011/3/10/southneast/8201877&sec=southneast

SRJK (T) Perak Sangeetha Sabah new building

/* March 7th, 2011 by poobalan | View blog reactions No comments »
 Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Phew, after more than 3 decades! Hope the school will achieve more success after this. Also, some news stats are mentioned by Palanivel:24 fully-aided schools would benefit from redevelopment works under an RM86.4 million allocation;  RM5.3 million was allocated to upgrade existing facilities; partially-aided schools would also benefit from a RM69.9 million Education Ministry allocation; and MIC deputy president Datuk Dr S. Subramaniam added: 69 schools with fewer than 25 students would be relocated in the next few years.

 

 

IPOH: Up to 30 students used to sit in a classroom divided into three sections by plywood walls.

They struggled to listen to their teacher amid lessons given by other teachers, which could be heard through the thin partitions.

That was what at least 160 SRJK (T) Perak Sangeetha Sabah pupils had to endure before their school in Jalan Tun Abdul Razak here was rebuilt recently.

They now enjoy their lessons in a proper school environment thanks to the redevelopment of Tamil schools programme planned by MIC and the Cabinet Committee for the Development of Indians.

After more than three decades, the single-storey, two-classroom school was transformed into a four-storey building with 10 classrooms, a staff room and office, library, computer laboratory, science laboratory and living skills laboratories.

Headmistress D. Pathmani said the redevelopment programme brought great relief to her teachers and students.

“We can now organise events and celebrations on our own premises instead of elsewhere.”

The school started classes in the new building in January.

While waiting for the construction to finish, the pupils and teachers shared the premises of SK Buntong, 5km away.

Despite not having their own place for about two years, Pathmani saidher Year Six pupils who sat the Ujian Pencapaian Sekolah Rendah examinations last year did exceptionally well.

“Eighteen of 25 students passed all five subjects and recorded the highest passing rate of 72 per cent for the school since 2006.”

She said the better study environment played a major role in the pupils’ achievements.

“The pupils had a more conducive learning environment at SK Buntong.

“This enabled them to focus and participate in lessons.”

She said she expected her UPSR pupils to do well this year because of the improved school condition.

Bahasa Malaysia teacher Lourde Mary, 46, said the upgrade had also benefited teachers.

She said all 14 teachers had either completed or were pursuing the Primary School Teaching Degree course introduced by the government in 2005.

Mary expects to complete the course in December next year.

She used to be embarrassed about not embracing technology and felt intimidated when her pupils displayed better aptitude for computers than her.

“I never had the interest in tinkering with a laptop or surfing the Internet. But to complete my assignments for the course, I had to learn to be computer-savvy.

“Now I am no longer ashamed and have a renewed passion for my vocation.”

MIC president Datuk G. Palanivel said he hoped the upgrading would produce more positive results and pave the way for advanced Tamil school education.

“I hope other Indian languages such as Telugu, Malayalam, Punjabi, Gujarati and Bengali will not be alien to Indian Malaysians.”

Palanivel said 24 fully-aided schools would benefit from redevelopment works under an RM86.4 million allocation this year.

Another RM5.3 million was allocated to upgrade existing facilities.

Partially-aided schools would also benefit from a RM69.9 million Education Ministry allocation.

MIC deputy president Datuk Dr S. Subramaniam said efforts were ongoing to relocate low-enrolment schools to areas with higher demand for Tamil education.

He said 69 schools with fewer than 25 students would be relocated in the next few years.

He said the process was time-consuming and involved finding suitable sites as well as fund-raising.

Urban poor Indians should go back to estate says Palanivel

/* March 7th, 2011 by poobalan | View blog reactions 1 comment »
 Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Most important news today is not the by-elections, but the comments made by MIC President Palanivel below (The Star has a similar story, without the last 4 paragraphs):

MIC president Datuk G. Palanivel has asked members of the Indian community, who are unable to make a living for themselves in towns and cities, to come back and work in the plantation sector, including in estates owned by government-linked companies.

Palanivel, who is deputy plantation industries and commodities minister, said the government had agreed to a minimum wage of about RM700 a month for the sector, compared to RM300 previously.

There were also other facilities available in estates, including free transportation for students in estate areas and free housing, he said, adding that the cost of living in estates was also low.

“The ties among estate communities are also close and the environment is secure because they are guarded round-the-clock,” he told reporters after visiting the party’s community service centre at Wisma MIC here.

He explained however that the call was meant for those who were unable to get used to urban life and were mired in hardships, particularly single mothers.

He said estates owned by GLCs such as Sime Darby were facing a shortage of workers.

Rather than taking foreign workers from Indonesia and Bangladesh, it would be better that the shortage be filled by Malaysians, he said.

Palanivel added that poverty was among problems faced by the community and that the MIC was striving to find a solution to it.

On whether the Indian community now recognised the MIC after rejecting the party in the 2008 general election, Palanivel said he was confident that the community would support the party in the coming election.

On the demonstrations staged by Hindraf in the national capital last month, Palanivel said the protest was not about fighting for the Indian community.

“I want to ask you, was the demonstration held to uphold the struggle for the Indian community, to highlight problems of poverty? The demonstration was against the use of the novel ‘Interlok’.

“They are not fighting for the Indian community,” he said. — Bernama

OK, i’ll skip the part about Hindraf, Interlok and fighting for the Indian community.

The highlighted parts above seems to indicate the positive things of relocating to estates.

Now, let’s look at the situation of estate workers who worked in estates owned by GLCs for last 20 to 50 years. Are their situation better off now? Why do we hear about “squatters”, “eviction”, “poverty” etc when talking about estate workers? Is having the above “other facilities” enough? Free housing for how long? Is it free housing or free accommodation? Kind of misleading right? Can these people dream of their own house, or will be evicted later? When we are talking about Wi-Fi in interiors areas of Pahang/Sarawak, MIC president is talking about free transport, 24/7 security, and ‘free housing”.  Is this proof that Indian community is so poor until basic needs are still yet to be fulfilled?

Next RM700, yes its basic pay, and if work hard, can earn up to RM1500. There’s a big IF because of the price of the commodity will fluctuate.  And really, is fair to compare RM700 that a foreign worker can earn to RM700 a local can earn? The foreign workers can scrimp and live on shoestring budget, but locals have many expenses – from food for family, insurance (a big if here) to Astro (yeah, its a necessity now – even setinggan [squatter] area have them),  medical bills, education etc. With prices increasing rapidly, I don’t think rural areas will be left out. Even RM1500 also won’t be enough for a family of 3 or 4.

Moving on, how’s the school conditions in estates? Obviously, if the enrollment increases due to “returning back”, schools will have more clout to demand better infrastructure. But remember, the schools still sit on private land. No guarantees that anything will change.  Can we see 1Malaysia clinic in the estates? How about the Community Broadband Centres in estates? Got or not?

Living in rural areas like estate, the children will lose a lot in terms of exposure. How likely are they to mix around with other Malaysians? Instead they may pick up foreign habits and languages.

I know of some Malay folks who move back to their villages due to hardship. The reasons above are valid – lower cost of living, less pressure, better community ties. The BIG difference is that these folks have their own ancestral land, not work for other people.  I would love to have heard the MIC President say that the poor Indian families should relocate to rural areas and government will assist by giving them some land. Now, that will be helpful in a big way. Of course, if you expect these single mothers/poor folks to easily learn how to tap rubber or harvest oil palm, then surely can have same faith that they are able to till their own plot of land.

I would have been proud if the MIC President said that agriculture is a good industry and MIC would help to create more entrepreneurs or farmers by some special scheme. Instead, its just encouragement to be blue-collar, semi-skilled labor. Still be poor, but in different environment. Worse still, be dependent on the estate for basic facilities.

I think the estate environment needs much more improvement, but sadly, its not possible in near future. Thus the call for some folks to go work in estate is inappropriate at this point of time. If wrongly done, we’ll be condemning them to another long vicious cycle of poverty and subservience.

It is better to help the folks to adjust to life in their current location rather than suggesting relocation.

I too wonder, what would the reaction be if Palanivel suggests that other poor urban Malaysians (read: Malays and Chinese) also relocate to estates? Apa macam, bolehkah? What is good for the goose, should be good for the gander too, no? Or is it  a case of “hey, we need cheap labor. Why not make use of the hardworking Indians? Bring them back to estates and we can avoid taking foreign workers and paying levy. They worked hard for last 50 years. Surely can employ them again for next 50.”.

Oh ya, how about banning toddy and samsu first?

I think Palanivel made a big blunder here. Not sure who cooked up this idea for him to announce.

 

 

BN wins big in Merlimau and Kerdau

/* March 7th, 2011 by poobalan | View blog reactions No comments »
 Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


As expected, BN wins handsomely in the stronghold areas of Merlimau (Malacca) and Kerdau (Pahang).

In Merlimau, PAS candidate Yuhaizat Abdullah got 2,319 votes, while BN’s Roslan got 5,962 voters. Voter turnout was 79 per cent of the 10,679 voters and majority was 3,643 votes. This is an improvement from the previous majority, 2.615 votes.

In Kerdau,  BN candidate Syed Ibrahim Syed Ahmad defeated PAS’s Hassanuddin Salim by 4,960 votes to 2,336. This is an increased majority of 2,724 compared to 1,615-vote majority in 2008. Its even better than the 2004 GE results (2,565).  Voter turnout was 83 per cent of the 8,999 voters.

I’m not aware of the Indian votes (298 in Kerdau and 1,567 in Merlimau), but can be rest assured that most of the votes would have gone to BN. More so after PAS in Kelantan decided to ban lottery tickets. That surely chased away any “pity” votes the non-Muslim may have thought of giving. In the end, it was a walk in park for BN.

As an indication, the Chinese votes in Kerdau polling district, the only area with a substantial Chinese presence, saw BN  getting 428  votes while PAS got 216. In previous election, BN won the district with a thin majority of 37.

Oh yeah, as usual, there were calls of vote-buying, election goodies etc., but I think in these areas it would not have made much difference.

As mentioned by BN leaders, this is a big hit for PAS, but of course, the by-elections were done in BN strongholds, so the results are expected. Anyway, this is the 5th straight loss for PR coalition, after Galas, Tenang and Batu Sapi. I wonder how the results would be in a urban area.

How would these wins shape the coming months? Would there be a general election soon?