Posts Tagged ‘Crime’

The protestors wanted their voices heard?

September 3rd, 2009
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


We can see it coming now. After a “small” crowd of 50 people did their vile, embarrassing, insulting, and damaging stunt with an animal head in from of state government office, the police and Home Minister have provided some input. While the police said the probe was completed and case files to be submitted to AG office today, there need to be an inquiry on why the incident was allowed to take place in the first place since the police gave rather innovative reasons – situation was not permitting and that a junior officer was in charge. Granted the district police chief was forced to apologise for the inaction, but still need to review to avoid future problems. I mean, people are asking – why is this particular protest handled differently from others? What’s so unique about it? Is it due to the fasting month? Is it due to the participants? Is it due to the large crowd and lack of officers? Wasn’t there a worry of the  later impact of the protest even though the immediate situation on the ground was controlled (protest was allowed for 15 minutes or so).

Did the probe also cover (i)  the statements by the protest leader that his protest was hijacked (what a lousy leader! I won’t want him to represent me after this, if I was a resident in Section 23 – small protest also cannot handle, how to face the state government?), (ii) the source and the owner of the animal head, (iii) identification of the culprits based on the video clip freely available on the Internet?, (v) the hate-inciting and religion-insulting banners/words uttered, and (v) the persons behind the scene who instigated or planned for the s0-called hijack? I hope so because IGP said 60 people were interviewed within 3 days and the persons involved have been identified.

Our esteemed Home Minister have also provided his valuable thoughts after issuing warning action against actions that can be detrimental to national security (I take it as meaning if someone protests against the cow head protestors?):

“We need to look at the angle where a temple is going to be moved there, so we need to go across the political ideology. The relocation could be offensive to anyone.

Hmm…I guess we should only consider that angle. Non-relocation also offensive to “anyone”. So, why no just demolish and pretend nothing happened?  Can ask a certain ex-MB for advice and contacts – he’s experienced in ordering demolition of temple.

Home Minister Hishamuddin also met some of  the residents at Putrajaya. He tried his best to rationalise the action of the protestors, which is kind of unexpected for a person who is supposed to be in charge of internal security. Probably wanted to show a softer approach to this problem. Among the interesting arguments put forth by the minister:

he said the protesters “had no intention at all to bring the cow’s head and invoke racial sentiments or cause tension”.

“They are not going (to be let off) scot-free. But they just feel victimised because they feel there is another valid explanation and had no intention to cause racial (divisions),” he said. [don’t we all feel victimised. So, means can carry some head or another to voice our dissatisfaction? how about wearing certain color shirts? No? Only cow head allowed? Need clarification here.]

… Hishammuddin said he was told that the “residents did not know the organisers and did not know a cow’s head would be brought during the demonstration”. [I thought the organiser also attended this meeting? Or is the organiser an outsider, a non-resident?]

“When we sat and discussed this, they (said they) realised that they were in a situation they could not control.” [sesal dahulu pendapatan, sesal kemudian tak berguna – have heard of this proverb? Doesn’t apply here?]

He further defended the protesters, saying that “they just wanted their voices to be heard”.

“However it was unfortunate that the protest was given negative publicity because it was linked to religious and racial sentiments,” he said. [Err…isn’t that the whole point? So, we must give it positive publicity? If want to voice out also, use the brain a bit la. Very clear even for small kids, that this is not voicing out, but provocation.]

… The minister noted that the residents have since taken “a pro-active” measure by meeting with members of the Hindu Sanggam two days ago, and that both sides will hold another meeting tomorrow.“So if it can be resolved quickly and both sides understand each other, why (should) they be penalised?” said Hishammuddin. [Ahh..so if you do something and later do something else to negate the first action, then it should be alright. I like this word pro-active. Maybe the residents should have approached MHS BEFORE allowing outsider to organise the protest, siap dengan banner pulak! That would be super pro-active. Can win prize for best RA.]

Although the protestors reportedly did not have a permit the minister said “the protest was not big and they (organisers) were very respectful of the Selangor sultan” [Hmm…two criterias outlined for protests in Selangor. Is this written somewhere or just use common sense? ].“They even limited the number of people from the committee to only 10. In fact if they wanted to have a bigger protest they could have, but they were conscious (of the impact).“All they wanted to do was to voice their unhappiness and the unwillingness of the state government to consider their request.” [so, this is the way to voice out. Lesson to be learnt here?]

Hishammuddin said the Selangor government made a poor decision in relocating the temple to a predominantly Malay area.“Even the Hindus are not passionate about the relocation of the temple to the area,” he claimed. [The minister should have elaborated which Hindus are not passionate on the relocation – MHS, Section 19 residents, Section 23 residents, or some MIC people.  There should have been some statistical data, backed by the complete case study and survey forms /AV recordings of the interviews. Then it would carry more weight. And surely, can provide sugggestion for alternative location? Shah Alam has about 30-odd sections only].

Asked why the police had not acted when the cow’s head was brought in, he claimed that action had been taken.“I was monitoring it myself and reporting it to the prime minister,” he said. Commenting on the upcoming dialogue between the Shah Alam Municipal Council and the residents to be held on Saturday, Hishammuddin said this comes “a little too late”.“The residents had met the state representatives before. If they (the representatives had) resolved it then, there wouldn’t need to be a protest (in the first place),” he said. [So, this is not considered pro-active after residents said they are unhappy? The meeting was already being arranged, but the protest still went ahead. Why?]

On a personal note, Hishammuddin felt the protest “in this day and age should be accepted in this world, as the people want their voices to be heard”.“If we don’t give them room to voice their opinions, they have no choice but to protest. (But) regardless of the action they take, they have to adhere to the laws of the country. So they have to be responsible,” he said. [Motivation talk to protest responsibly.]

Hmm… I wonder if HINDRAF /candle vigil/”wear black” protestors can borrow him to argue their case. The reasons seems applicable to them as well.

The resident association also met with MHS earlier, and will be meeting them again to issue some sort of statement – damage control I guess. For the greater good.

Anyway, I guess we know the outcome. Anyone willing to bet a prosecution to take place?

animal abusers threaten peace in Shah Alam

August 28th, 2009
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Update at 11.49pm: Malaysiakini mentions:

Contacted later, Mahyuddin distanced his organisation from the act of bringing the cow head to the protest.

“It is not our intention. We were surprised,” he said, denying that the act was intended to insult Hindus.

He said that the cow head was likely brought by angry residents.

“Maybe, they meant it (as a symbol of) stupidity. In Malay culture, the cow is a symbol of stupidity, or leaders that are stupid,” he said.

Looks like this guy is trying to evade responsibility for the crime the group committed. Will the investigations reveal “lack of evidence” later?

Also, The Star Online finally came out with a muted report:

Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak has asked the Inspector-General of Police to investigate a protest by a group against the proposed relocation of a Hindu temple in Shah Alam.

Human Resources Minister Datuk Dr S. Subramaniam said Najib had also told him that he was upset with the incident.

The protesters, numbering 50, marched some 300m from the state mosque to the state secretariat building in Shah Alam Friday.

“Their actions, if not controlled from the beginning, may create unnecessary racial tension,” Dr Subramaniam said.

MIC president Datuk Seri S. Samy Vellu said the authorities should not allow anyone to challenge or ridicule any religion in this country.

“I urge everyone to be calm and let the authorities deal with it,” he said.

Umno Youth chief Khairy Jamaluddin, in an email, condemned the protest and said such actions posed a threat to national security.

Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department Tan Sri Dr Koh Tsu Koon, in a statement, urged the state government to resolve the issue quickly, peacefully and rationally.

NST was more daring:

About 50 people gathered at the gates of the State Secretariat building here carrying a cow head and warned of further action if a temple is constructed in Section 23 here.

The group marched from the State Mosque about 300 metres away after Friday prayers.

Once at the gates of the building, they unfurled several banners calling for the temple to be moved and also on the beer issue.

They were at the gates for only 15 minutes before being dispersed by the police.

Some of the residents of Section 23, protesting against the temple relocation, demonstrated in front of the Selangor State Government Secretariat in Shah Alam today. Bernama pic.
Some of the residents of Section 23, protesting against the temple relocation, demonstrated in front of the Selangor State Government Secretariat in Shah Alam today. Bernama pic.

The group, who claimed to be residents from Section 23, shouted the names of Menteri Besar Tan Sri Abdul Khalid Ibrahim and executive councillor Dr Xavier Jayakumar, and said the cow head was for them.

The new temple in Section 23 was supposed to be the relocated Sri Maha Mariamman temple currently in Section 19.

The Section 19 temple is about 150 years’ old and originally located in a plantation, but when the State Economic Development Corporation decided to develop the area into a housing estate, it left the temple there.

It was supposed to be relocated, but the problem had been left idle for many years.

Initially the temple was supposed to be relocated in an industrial area in Section 22 but it was moved to Section 23 to make it more accessible for devotees.

However a group of people in the area have protested against it, saying it is a Muslim majority area and no temples should be allowed to be built there.

About 40 per cent of the population in the area are believed to be Hindus.

Meanwhile in an immediate response, MIC president Datuk Seri S. Samy Vellu strongly condemned the action by the group.

“The cow is a sacred animal of the Hindus, and for this group to resort to such action, is intolerable and tantamount to challenging the freedom of religion as enshrined in the Malaysian Constitution.

He said nobody can be allowed to challenge or ridicule any religion in this country.

“I worry that this action may lead to retaliation from the Hindu community. However, I wish to urge the Hindus to be calm and let the authorities deal with it.

“The MIC is calling on the Government and the police to take action against the organisers of this group and their followers. They must be punished according to the law for endangering the racial harmony in this country.”

Meanwhile Human Resources Minister Datuk Dr S. Subramaniam said while Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak was promoting the 1Malaysia concept and racial unity, this kind of action would hinder the process and turn back the clock.

Dr Subramaniam said he had spoken to Prime Minister Najib Razak on the incident.


It may be dead, but stepping on the head of cow and spitting on it is abusive, vile, vicious, and unbecoming of people who claim to profess any religion. They have brought untold shame to their religion. This barbaric action is unforgivable, given that they just finished their prayers. Their evil action did not get support from the majority (only 50 people, whereas the Friday prayers crowd will see thousands attending in Shah Alam). Its time for DVS, PAWS or SPCA to lodge police report on animal abuse

I’ve surfed NST and Star online, but nothing on this issue till 8.45pm. Same with TV3 News.  Only Malaysiakini carrying the news since 3.00pm or so.

The news:

Some 50 residents enraged with the proposed relocation of a Hindu temple to their area staged a noisy protest with a severed cow’s head this afternoon.

The residents – from Section 23 in Shah Alam – who gathered after the Friday prayers, placed the head outside the gates of the state secretariat building for a short period before removing it.

Where is Xavier? This head is for him,” shouted one of the protesters in reference to Selangor executive councillor Dr Xavier Jeyakumar.

Jeyakumar is one of those in charge of non-Muslim affairs in the state.

Earlier, the protesters had marched some 300m from the state mosque to the state secretariat building.

The protesters also condemned Menteri Besar Khalid Ibrahim, exco member Rodziah Ismail (as the area falls under her state constituency) and Shah Alam MP Khalid Samad.

Before dispersing, several protesters spat and stomped on the cow’s head. The cow is considered sacred among Hindus.

Addressing the crowd, Section 23 action committee deputy chair Ibrahim Sabri said: “If there is blood, you (the state government) will be responsible if you are adamant about building the temple.”

This is a warning. Relocate the temple to Section 22. This cow is a present to the state government. This is a gift from us,” he added.

The protesters also carried several banners which among others read ‘Take Beer’ (mocking PAS’ rallying cry of ‘Takbir’) and ‘Illegal temples are very small, but once relocated, they are as big as Putrajaya‘.

The crowd gathered for about 15 minutes at the main entrance of the state secretariat building under the watch of more than a dozen police personnel. [what were the police doing?]

‘We’ll not budge an inch’

Speaking to reporters later, Action Committee chair Mahyuddin Manaf warned that the state government must give in or the residents would retaliate.

“We will not budge one inch, even if lives are lost or blood is made to flow. We will still defend Section 23 from having a temple built there,” he said.[Hmm…later don’t blame anyone if you are in trouble with the law]
He added that a protest memorandum was forwarded to the state government two months ago but there has been no response.

On Aug 11, the state government announced that the relocation of the temple from Section 19 to Section 23 was final and will be situated 200m from the nearest house and 400m from a surau.

The temple will face an industrial lot and will be separated from the houses by a playground and a multi-purpose hall.

However, some residents felt that it was not appropriate to build a temple in a Muslim-majority area.

The Pakatan Rakyat state government accused rivals Umno of instigating the crowd to protest the relocation.

Jeyakumar to lodge police report

In an immediate reaction, a furious Jeyakumar described the protest as “unwarranted, unacceptable and without sensitivity towards other religions.”

He also said that he will lodge a police report on the matter soon.

“These people should have ethics. They are inciting racial and religious hatred. I am going to lodge a police report against these people,” he told Malaysiakini.

He also expressed disappointment towards the police personnel at the scene for not taking any action against the protesters.

“The police didn’t stop anybody. The police should have arrested them and charged them for inciting hatred,” he said, adding that he could tolerate with “ethical” demonstrations.

Following this, MIC’s Dr S.Subra said the following:

Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak is outraged over this afternoon’s ‘cow head’ protest in Shah Alam, said Human Resources Minister Dr S Subramaniam.

The MIC secretary-general told Malaysiakini that Najib had conveyed his disappointment when he telephoned him regarding the incident.

The prime minister was very upset. He promised to look into the problem and nip it in the bud,” he said.

“Some 15 minutes later, the prime minister called back and said that he had spoken to Inspector-General of Police (Musa Hassan) and instructed him to take immediate action,” he added. [however, I heard nothing on the TV from PM or the IGP. So, just have to take Dr S.Subra’s words]

In a statement earlier, Subramaniam said incidents such as these hinder the 1 Malaysia concept being promoted by the premier and serve to only ‘turn back the clock’.

After performing their Friday prayers, some 50 angry residents from Section 23 in Shah Alam marched with the cow’s head to protest against the relocation of a Hindu temple to their area.

The protesters had marched from the state mosque to the state secretariat building.

“The group took their protest to the extreme by bringing a severed cow’s head which clearly is a sign of disrespect to the Hindu community,” Subramaniam said.

“It has emotionally angered the Hindus and if it is not controlled from the beginning, it may create unnecessary racial tension,” he warned.

Samy Vellu: This is intolerable

Meanwhile, Penang Deputy Chief Minister II P Ramasamy called the protest a “disgraceful” act.

“It was very uncivilised and brutish…and the group had just come after attending their (Friday) prayers,” the DAP leader said.

Also seeing red over the incident was MIC president S Samy Vellu, who called it an “intolerable” act carried out by an “extremist group.”

“The cow is a sacred animal of the Hindus, and for this group to resort to such action, is intolerable and tantamount to challenging the freedom of religion as enshrined in the Malaysian Constitution.

“It is the right of Malaysians of any faith, including Hindus to build temples and other places of worships. I am very sad that this group had paraded the cow’s head on their way to the state secretariat building,” he said in a statement.

“We must not allow anyone to challenge or ridicule any religion in this country. I am worried that this action may lead to retaliation from the Hindu community. However, I wish to urge the Hindus especially to be calm and let the authorities deal with it,” he added.

Samy Vellu called on the government and the police to take action against the organisers of this protest.

They must be punished according to the law for endangering racial harmony in this country, he added.

MIC Youth was also appalled and expressed shock over the protest.

“It is a very shameful and disgraceful act and they do not seem to have any feelings for the sentiments of the Hindu community,” said the wing’s chief T Mohan.

“We strongly condemn their actions and call on the authorities to take immediate action. There are proper channels to express one’s views but ridiculing the Hindu religion reflects the shallow minds of the protesters,” he added.

Human Rights Party leader P Uthayakumar was disappointed that the police did not arrest those involved in the protest.

He said the Attorney-General’s Chambers should initiate criminal proceedings and charge them under Sections 298 and 298 (A) of the Penal Code read together with Article 11 of the Federal Constitution.

Section 298 concerns the offence of uttering words etc with the deliberate intent to wound religious feelings while Section 298 (A) is related to the offence of causing disharmony.

Makkal Sakthi Party president S Thanendran also condemned the protest as a “barbaric” act.

He urged the Selangor government as well as the police not to tolerate this sort of behaviour and to take stern action against the protesters.

“How can a temple disturb the peace of these people?

“Things can become really ugly if we start raising other questions,” he said.

And our esteemed police chief had to say this:

Selangor police chief Khalid Abu Bakar today called on the public to remain calm in the wake of a protest against a proposed temple relocation which saw some 50 angry residents marching with a severed cow’s head in Shah Alam.

The police chief also cautioned the public against holding demonstrations which touch on religious sensitivities.

“There was no police permit for this protest. It was an illegal gathering. The crowd gathered for about 15 minutes and dispersed after they were instructed to do so.

“They were also ordered to remove the cow’s head, which they complied,” he told Malaysiakini.

As of now, Khalid said no police report has been lodged over the incident.

“If a report is lodged, we will definitely take the necessary action,” he stressed.

Expressing regret over the incident, the police chief reiterated that everyone should respect religious and racial sensitivities and not resort to such actions.

Exco to lodge police report

Selangor executive councillor Dr Xavier Jeyakumar said he would be lodging a police report over the matter soon. [waiting for what?]

He also expressed disappointment with police personnel who were at the scene for not taking action.

Following this afternoon’s Friday prayers, some 50 residents from Section 23 marched from the state mosque to the secretariat building in Shah Alam with the cow’s head.

The protesters then placed the cow’s head outside the gates of the state secretariat building before removing it later.

The protest evoked condemnation from various quarters, including MIC president S Samy Vellu and Penang Deputy Chief Minister II P Ramasamy.

Samy Vellu, who was saddened by the incident, urged the police to take action against the organisers.

Granted, this is an act by some people who were instigated, and most of the rakyat seem to know who are the perpetrators. The hooligans mentioned all kind of threats and the police still waiting for someone to make a report. How efficient and law-abiding. Since the state government said they will be meeting the folks of Section 23 to explain, why not wait? Worried that the residents will be convinced by the explanation?

There’s some hidden agenda here. While we need to address why the temple’s initial proposed location at Section 22 was changed to Section 23, the action by these few barbarians are not helping to solve the problem at all.

Kg Buah Pala residents give memo to DPM Muhyiddin

August 19th, 2009
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


I got to hand it to the residents, they are really pushing every possible button in order to save their land. If state government not able to help, go to Federal. Even though PM Najib already said land matters are state issue, DPM Muhyiddin seem to indicate otherwise.

Not sure what he meant by “The deadline (for the residents to vacate the land) is Aug 31. We want to see how the state government can resolve the issue”. If after 31st August only want to do something, most probably they will only see a flattened land. The developer is itching to demolish the place, so I’m not sure where the DPM is leading the residents to. A false hope? Now the state can turn around and say since the Federal government seem to indicate can do something, we’ll just leave it to them. That’s the peril of jumping ship. Its like burning the bridge at both ends.

I’m sure the residents are aware their problem was caused by the same group from which they are asking for help now. When desperate, have to  resort to desperate measures. Can’t blame them. Now, its up to Federal government to save them. How? Maybe federal government and coalition can make some deal with the coperative and/or the developer, bypassing the state government. Err..along the way, MIC need to be given some role to play as well.

So, its with (in)sincere feeling that the rep, Sugumaran pleads:

“…Now we realise that only the BN can really help the people,” said Sugumaran.

Kg Buah Pala issue may also impact the upcoming by-elections in Permatang Pasir, so each coalition needs to play its card properly. Will this be turned into a racial point? corruption point? administation weakness point? Which coalition can milk the most out of Kg Buah Pala sage to entice the 70% over Malay voters and minority Chinese and Indian voters?

The federal government has so far not intervened in the Kampung Buah Pala land ownership issue as it wants to see whether the Penang government is capable of resolving the issue.

Deputy Prime Minister Muhyiddin Yassin said this to Kampung Buah Pala residents association chairperson M Sugumaran after receiving a memorandum on the issue from him.

“The deadline (for the residents to vacate the land) is Aug 31. We want to see how the state government can resolve the issue,” he said.

The seven-page memorandum was handed to Muhyiddin when he visited Permatang Pasir, near here, to look at the Barisan Nasional’s preparations for the upcoming by-election.

Sugumaran said in the memorandum, the association urged the federal government to intervene in the issue in order to save the traditional village and turn it into a planned village.

He said the residents were forced to ask for federal government intervention following the state government’s failure to keep its promise of helping the villagers if the opposition was given the mandate to govern the state.

“(Lim) Guan Eng (chief minister) cannot assist us. Now we realise that only the BN can really help the people,” said Sugumaran.

The Federal Court recently ordered the residents to vacate the 2.6ha village land belonging to Koperasi Pegawai Kerajaan Pulau Pinang (KPKPP), to make way for a housing project.

However, the Federal Court yesterday fixed Friday to hear a new application by the residents to set aside the Appeals Court’s decision made on May 11, that KPKPP is the rightful owner of the land. – Bernama

Gobala Gobala

August 19th, 2009
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Looks like Gobalakrishnan, MP for Padang Serai hitting out at a person (policeman):

And after that, he was manhandled and arrested. It seems broken/fractured the hand, torn pants until can see the underwear.

If based on clip shown in TV3, its a by-election in Padang Serai soon. Its possible that the MP was provoked, but still its wrong to hit a another person, especially law enforcement officer. I wonder how he going to escape from this mess.

Kg Buah Pala can unite Indians?

August 16th, 2009
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Unlike other races in the country, very few things can unite the Indian community. One such event that came close to achieving some resemblance of unity in recent years was the Hindraf rally in 2007. There’s another indicator as well – MIC’s membership which  claim to be in the region of half a million or so.

Other than the above two, I fail to see any other items/ideals that Indians agree upon. Be it religion, language, tamil schools, Thaipusam holiday, political parties, 1Malaysia, lockup deaths, temple relocation, etc. Every faction has its own opinions, often contradictory.

Could it be that for once, regardless its right or wrong, all Indians stand behind the residents of Kg Buah Pala (one of the current hot issues affecting the community)? Would it cause a ripple or change anything? Can we see political party representatives stand together in front of the bulldozers, instead of some leaders conveniently switching of their handphones (as was claimed in some articles)? We can learn from our brothers from the other community – one death related to MACC, and the community is showing anger. Or mention Islam, and the Muslims join  hands faster than a speeding bullet (being dramatic here).

Its clear the political parties are not really supporting the residents but merely playing dramatic scenes, while the media is portraying the residents as being “greedy”. PM Najib washed his hands off the problem, saying land is state issue. Ex-CM virtually dissappeared from the face of the earth, current CM talking law too much. Champion of community says got up to RM5 million to help state buy back land.

Kg Buah Pala is a straightforward issue. Any right thinking Malaysian will consider the rule of law, and also the “compassionate”  and “natural justice” part. If need to, suspend the development order until all investigations are initiated and completed. But where is MACC and other law enforcement agencies?

There are some valid questions asked by people – why no action taken to formalise or verify the land ownership for past 50 years? Why no advice to the residents? Why sell cheap? Why sell to that company? Why new government accept final payment? Can the agreement/sale be undone or halted? How can  try to demolish when there’s a review pending on 18th August?

I’m sure many smart and learned Malaysians can ask more questions, but who is actually answering these questions? Is it the stakeholders like residents, ex-CM Koh Tsu Koon, federal government, state government, cooperative, developer, the politicians who made promises, the champion of the community reps who didn’t do the job? How reliable are these answers?

If the issue of Kg Buah Pala happened to you – someone comes along and says that your ancestral house is no more yours because it was under the care of the government all this time and was sold it to a third person –  what would you do? Some may say tough luck and move on, others will fight to the end. If you feel you are on the side of justice, surely you’ll feel aggrived. If you felt that its your fault that never verify or follow up with the land matters, you will move on.

So, at the moment, its hinging on the 18th court hearing. After that, this issue will be forgotten, probably until next general elections. Well, one good lesson from this – please check the ownership of the land you occupy (make it an annual affair, just like paying tax or renewing car license). Remember that what happened to Kg Buah Pala residents can happen to you too.