Posts Tagged ‘discrimination’

parent has right to determine religion of child

June 16th, 2009
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Today’s Tv3 news saw coverage of dewan rakyat proceeding. Nazri Aziz was quoted as saying:

On the issue of determining the religion of children below 18 when one of the parents converts to another religion, he said the Cabinet had agreed that it must be made in accordance with Clause (4) Article 12 of the Constitution.

In the case of R. Subashini versus T. Saravanan last year, the Federal Court had interpreted the word “parent” in the law as singular and not plural and as such, the converting parent had the right to determine the religion of their children below 18, he said.

Note: Clause (4) of Article 12 is as follows: For the purposes of Clause (3) the religion of a person under the age of eighteen years shall be decided by his parent or guardian.

Now, the question is which parent should one follow? The converting parent have right to convert the child, but the non-converting parent ALSO HAVE THE SAME EQUAL RIGHT to maintain the child’s religion! Why divert into the converting parent’s rights only?

Isn’t this a deadlock? Both have EQUAL RIGHTS. Just because one of them is a coward who wants to hide behind the name of certain religion, doesn’t make it correct action.

Subashini has all the right to maintain the religion of her kids. How can the court make such an erronous, logic-defying, ill-thought decision?

7 arrested over demolition of houses in jinjang selatan tambahan

June 15th, 2009
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Latest news:

Seven people, including one activist, have been arrested today for trying to stop the demolition of houses in Kampung Jinjang Selatan Tambahan in Kuala Lumpur.

Six of those arrested were residents whose houses were being demolished by the Kuala Lumpur City Hall (DBKL). The sole activist – Julie Wong – was from urban poor people’s organisation Permas.

They have been taken to the Sentul district police headquarters for questioning.

Human rights movement Suaram said that it received reports that several people were injured caused by DBKL officers during the incident.

“We call on the police to release the seven individuals immediately. We remind the police that their duty is to ensure safety of all Malaysians and to curb violence from being used against residents and activists instead of arresting them,” said Suaram in a statement.

The movement also condemned DBKL for taking a heavy-handed approach in the demolition.

“We also call on DBKL to respect the rights of the residents of Kampung Jinjang Selatan Tambahan, to halt demolition works immediately and to take the concerns of the residents of Kampung Jinjang Selatan Tambahan into consideration,” it added.

The demolition exercise by DBKL today involved 17 houses to make way for a new road connecting Jalan Kepong to Jalan Segambut.

The new road project is now stalled as a result of these houses which lie on the way.

Deadline expired yesterday

Although DBKL has issued these residences a notice to relocate, the residents claimed that the notice was served to residents of Kampung Benteng.

Kampung Benteng no longer exists as they have been evicted by DBKL for the same roadwork.

Its dreadful to read stories like this. Our community seem to end up as losers whenever development takes place. why? uneducated? illiteracy? wrong advice? ignorance? crooked politicians and administrators? profit-oriented developers/land owners? lop-sided law?  We have many such cases – bukit raja, putrajaya, jinjang, kampung pandan, bukit pala, sungai buloh, bukit jalil, etc. in most (if not all cases), the settlement were established before independence, so what are the remedy for these situations? Who were the people involved in the “talks/negotiations”?

Reading about the mental anguish of one such family is sad indeed:

AFTER months of anguish and sleepless nights, one of the families in the 17 homes in Jinjang Selatan Tambahan (JST) that are to be demolished, called it quits.

M. Ramasamy, who had been living in the area for 45 years, decided to take up the offer of a unit in the Batu flats offered by the Kuala Lumpur City Hall (DBKL) yesterday as he had no other choice.

Too much to bear: Ramasamy being consoled by his family members and neighbours after he broke down.

While the DBKL officials were helping him shift out, the other affected residents were holding a press conference down the road to seek justice for their case.

When the other residents caught wind of Ramasamy’s move, they all went to stop Ramasamy and his family from shifting out.

The residents were upset to see Ramasamy’s family in tears and demanded that the officers put back the furniture they had loaded onto the lorry.

As they persuaded Ramasamy, the tension and anguish got the better of him and he broke down in tears.

“I never wanted to shift; from the first day, we have wanted to remain here. We have lived here for more than 40 years,” he said.

He added that one of the main reasons for his decision to shift out was the mental torture of not knowing when the DBKL would demolish his home.

“At night, unknown people would roam our streets on motorbikes and cars. We felt really unsafe, and all this prompted us to move out,” Ramasamy added.

Ramasamy had not gone to work for a week, which added to his stress.

“I am worried that during my absence from work, they might fire me, but at the same time, I have this problem at home,” he added.

After 15 minutes of shouting, negotiation and tears, the DBKL officers finally put the family’s belongings back into their house.

The JST residents, who held Temporary Occupancy Licences until 1997, had been given a final extension until yesterday to shift out.

Thus far, the DBKL has been branding the TOL residents as squatters of Kampung Benteng and have addressed them as such in letters sent to them.

The residents held the press conference yesterday in a final bid to lobby for a halt to the demolition exercise.

The houses are being demolished to make way for a new road connecting Jalan Kepong to Jalan Segambut (near the KTM Segambut).

JST Residents Association secretary Sin Ah Seng said the road was a not a necessity as it would only create a bottleneck.

“The road will end at Metro Prima Kepong; this route will only flood the place with more cars,” he added.

The road was initially supposed to be built about 20 metres from the affected houses but the route was changed due to the presence of high tension electricity cables.

On June 8, DBKL officers had spray-painted the homes with the words “T/R 10/06/09”, meaning that the houses were to be demolished on June 10.

The residents immediately met DBKL deputy director-general of services Datuk Amin Nordin to seek justice.

“He instead forced us to accept the letter and the keys to the flats if we wanted to stay until June 14,” said another resident, S. Susil Raj.

Raj said they reluctantly opted to accept the keys to buy more time to stop the demolition.

Another issue that is bothering the residents is the DBKL’s offer to them to shift out.

According to resident M. Selvamani, they were offered a flat and RM1,000, but the money would not even be enough for the extra fittings needed in the new flats.

“Amin said the flats are ready for occupation but our survey of the place revealed that most units do not have electricity and water supply,” Selvamani added.

The units also lack light bulbs and fans as well as doors and grills, which would cost RM1,200 to fix.

Moreover, the DBKL would deduct RM402 as deposit and the balance would be given to the residents later, but it was not stipulated when.

For some houses, like Ramasamy’s, which house three or more families, the residents would have to bear extra costs as they would all need to shift into separate units.

Their current furniture will not fit into the flats, which are smaller than their current homes which are more than 1,200 sq ft.

“We will have to buy new mattresses, kitchen cabinets, sofas and a host of other new things,” Ramasamy said.

He added that in the current economic situation, it was a burden to come up with such a large amount of cash.

Selvamani said these problems would only prompt the residents to turn to illegal moneylenders like Ah Long.

Ramasamy said while the land belonged to the government, the homes were theirs and they needed to be compensated accordingly.

“We built our homes slowly over the last 30 to 40 years; the authorities should give us the right compensation,” he added.

The residents will be facing the DBKL officers again today as the extension expired yesterday.

Look at their neighbours at Jinjang Utara, 16 years and still counting – no permanent homes yet, but the people living there still having hope. Our country have lots of people who don’t fulfill promises and yet still stay in power or position.

In another case which was highlighted recently, its the SIME UEP company which did not build houses for ex-plantation workers in Bukit Raja housing project in Klang.

people who stay on hills…

June 15th, 2009
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


I was surprised by the front page photo in the Star today:

Mutiara Court, Taman Bukit Permai, Cheras

I haven’t been to the place, so my view is based on the photo above only.

These folks are complaining on the hillside development BEHIND their property, but look at where their apartment is located! I guess its a case of who gets to the hill first! 🙂

Seriously speaking, those who are occupying properties on hillsides may need to be charged a premium for the upkeep and maintenance of the hills as well. Probably need to have a reevaluation of the assessment the residents pay. Those who stay in these kind of areas should be assessed on the areas on the hill that not unusable due to the location of their properties. In other words, if the whole hill has about 5000 square meters of surface, and there are 2000 resident units, then the 2000 unit should pay for the 5000 square meters as well! Terrible? maybe! Well, you want the view, you want the privacy, you want the cool air, and others can’t develop the area. So who going to pay for its maintenance?

Secondly, projects on hillsides should be banned and stay banned to avoid potential disasters in the future. Most of our high-rises were built within the last 30 years, so I think the time is ripe for disasters to happen due to lack of maintenance, massive development, underground movements etc. I won’t be surprised if another Highland occurs.

This is the whole article that accompanied the photo above:

KUALA LUMPUR: Residents of Mutiara Court in Taman Bukit Permai, Cheras, here, are living in fear of being buried under boulders if the development of bungalows on a clifftop facing their apartments is allowed to continue.

Taman Bukit Permai – popularly known as “Little Genting” – has had its share of landslides and “boulder rains” from the slope for the past 10 years, the most recent in September when an incident caused the car park in the apartment complex to be flooded with mud.

The 30m-high cliff is not far from the guardhouse of the apartment complex, which is currently home to more than 1,000 people housed in 321 units.

Three weeks ago, a developer started work on the clifftop to construct 26 bungalows, and a check at the site yesterday showed that the foundations for the buildings were being laid down about 12m from the edge.

Residents’ association joint management board chairman S. Madhavan said that when it rained heavily, rocks would fall down onto the apartments.

“With the construction on the clifftop, the rock fall risk is higher. We don’t want to be buried under a rock fall,” he said, adding that allowing construction on any steep slope or cliff was not a wise move.

Another resident, Siinh Tani, 42, said she did not want to share the same fate as residents in Bukit Antarabangsa, where a landslide happened in December last year which left five people dead and 14 bungalows crushed.

“Please stop the construction. You have seen what happened at Bukit Antarabangsa. This is about our safety,” she said.

K.C. Lim, 45, who has lived here for 10 years, said the developer should at least install a safety net to prevent rocks from falling down onto the apartments.

Wanita MCA Selangor government policy monitoring bureau chief Cindy Leong said construction was still ongoing despite the Federal Territories Ministry’s earlier order for a halt to hillside development in Kuala Lumpur.

“The residents don’t feel safe and they are worried. We want the Government to put a stop to the construction, assess the situation and come up with a thorough report on the development.

“They should also meet with the residents to give them updates on the situation,” she said.

Leong said one resident had written to the Ampang Jaya Municipal Council (MPAJ) to complain about the development but was told that “a complaint from one person was not enough”.

The residents, she added, later collected 85 signatures and wrote to both MPAJ and Pandan MP

Datuk Seri Ong Tee Keat, who is also Transport Minister, on the matter.

In November 2001, boulders and rocks fell near the apartments, sealing the only route in and out of the complex.

Last year, the residents were shocked by another landslide, this time caused by a damaged drain at the top of Bukit Permai which also flooded the car park at the apartment complex with mud.

Facebook Kopi O campaign at Old Town Kopitiam Part 2

June 9th, 2009
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


The earlier campaign saw up to 5 Old Town brances shut down for various award-winning excuses. To test various theories, another campaign is planned this Thursday. The agenda – visit a Old Town kopitiam and drink kopi o – to signify a certain 1Black something. I must say, Malaysians are quite creative-lah.

So, is it illegal to get together at a licensed restaurant to drink black coffee? Will the koptiam chain bring down its shutters once more? Is this a sinister ploy to damage Old Town business – an attempt by its competitors? Or are the Old Time owners doing this to gain some free publicity – something that the powers-to-be are not happy with? Will anyone make a movie out of this – “The Day Old Town Kopi closed its shop” Part I sounds apt.

Will it be another coincidence that Jaya One, 3rd Mile Square Old Klang Road, Bangsar South, Bandar Puteri Puchong and Aman Puri Kepong Old Town branches are closed this Thursday?

I’m avoiding coffee for the last one week just in case there are overzealous people waiting to arrest anyone or anything in sight that’s within proximity of coffee 🙂 Teh-0 anyone?

The Coalition for Free and Fair Elections (Bersih) today urged all parties to respect the people’s right to wear black and drink kopi-o (black coffee).

MCPX

Bersih’s call comes ahead of an 1BlackMalaysia campaign on Facebook to hold ‘kopi-o’ sessions in several Old Town White Coffee outlets this Thursday.

old town white coffe shop closed 040609 noticeThe campaign was conceptualised to mourn the death of democracy in Perak and Malaysia.

Last week, five Old Town White Coffee outlets – Jaya One, Three Two Square, 3rd Mile Square Old Klang Road, Sunway Mentari and Bangsar South – chosen by Facebook members as gathering points for such Kopi-O sessions were mysteriously closed down on Thursday late afternoon, for ‘upgrading work’ or ‘private functions’.

They resumed business the very next morning.  Some notices were even handwritten, suggesting a last-minute decision was taken to shut for the day.

Bersih quoted a report by online news portal MerdekaReview that a staff member at one of the Old Town White Coffee outlets claimed that their drinks-making machines were out of order or needed an upgrade.

The staff members claimed that they were not aware of the Facebook invitation.

“Bersih hopes that the closures were indeed coincidental and not caused by any undue influence,” the coalition noted in a statement.

“If the authorities force the Old Town White Coffee to close its outlets just to bar patrons wearing black, it is tantamount to ‘sabotaging’ the national economy and should be investigated by the police,” it added.

Supporting national economy

old town white coffe shop closed 040609 3 two squareBersih said it hopes there will be no “equipment breakdown” in the six outlets so far picked by Facebook members as meeting points: Jaya One, 3rd Mile Square Old Klang Road, Bangsar South, Bandar Puteri Puchong and Aman Puri Kepong.

“It would be silly if any party tries to orchestrate a ‘local hartal’ of Old Town outlets. After all, if this campaign continues every week, can Old Town outlets afford to shut down every time they see customers in black entering their restaurant?” it asked.

Bersih said it is confident that the police will respect Malaysians’ right to wear black and drink kopi-o with friends.

“Any attempt by the police to harass, intimidate and arrest kopi-o drinkers in black, will only make the Najib administration look like an ‘uncivilised’ regime.

“Malaysians who wish to drink kopi-o in black this Thursday night should be able to patronise their favourite shops or restaurants without fear or anxiety.

“They are in effect patriotically supporting the national economy by increasing domestic demand, by consuming local products,” it added.

Some quick stats on Mara

May 29th, 2009
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


A quickie:

To date, Mara has financed 351,330 students for tertiary education locally and overseas since the start of the 1st Malaysia Plan until today.

Under its entrepreneur development programme, the agency has given out RM1.8 billion in assistance to more than 20,000 entrepreneurs since 2006.

source: NST

Note: Rancangan Malaysia Pertama (RMK1) was from 1966-1970. In 43 years, 351,330 students meaning on average of 8,170 students per year.

RM1.8 billion per year since 2006, means on average RM450 million per year (inclusive 2009). If 20,000 entrepreneurs as stated above, that works out to be RM90,000  per entrepreneur!

Do note that the similar statistics were provided in March 2008 – RM18 billion, 130,000 entrepreneurs, 4 years. If we divide 18 billion by 130,000 people = Rm138 thousand per entrepreneur.

Of course entrepreneur can refer to a company instead of one person, but very rare.

Now, of course, we can compare with RM430 million allocated to Indian community (that means the whole 2 million of us) over the last 5 years (9th MP) and the community should be grateful and thankful  for such big grants. 🙂

I mean “allocating” RM430 million to a community of 2 million trouble makers, hooligans, criminals, jokers, etc. is quite noble and is on par with allocating RM18 billion to 130,ooo people (or RM1.8 billion to 20,000 people).