Posts Tagged ‘Education’

More bumi places in IPTA is not racist says Mahathir

December 13th, 2009
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Ex-PM Mahathir has his own opinion, that’s his right. As for me, I think the term bumiputra has been abused and misused to promote certain race only. Look at the Orang Asli, the natives of East Malaysia, the Chitties who were once bumiputras and so on. How many managed to enter IPTAs before year 2000?

Now there are 22 IPTA with enrolment of about 100,000, if I’m not mistaken. Then we have polytechnics, MARA-owned colleges, community colleges and so on. Plenty of places. Do we need quota anymore? Maybe according to rural/urban (but the urban community is more than rural area, so logically, urban students should have more percentage), but definitely not according to race hiding behind veil of status.

Secondly, now every student can apply for PTPTN, so there’s no excuse for saying its expensive to study in private college. Don’t forget, many private colleges own by bumiputra companies too. Also, Malay institutions like MARA and FELDA sponsor students by busloads in the private colleges like Lim Kok Wing uni.

So, why are there more non-Bumi students in private colleges? For one, because they don’t get a place for degree in IPTAs after SPM (while the Malays go to matriculation). Rather than risking 2 years in STPM for another lottery attempt at IPTA, they choose private colleges. So, its kind of comical to blame the situation which was created by the powers-to-be in the first place, on the victims

And many parents suffer to educate their kids – selling off properties, taking loans, living a frugal lifestyle and so on. Does the ex-PM think every non-Bumi has money tree growing in their houses?

I think instead of using status (race), just base on income or location is better. Students from rural area, due to handicap, should have better probability of getting a place. Maybe 30 years ago it was justified to use race or status. But in the new millenium, its a travesty of natural justice.

What do you think?

Dr Mahathir Mohamad said today the opportunity given to more bumiputeras to enter public universities should not be considered as a racist act.

The former prime minister said the move was to ensure a balanced racial development so that the bumiputeras were not left behind in the mainstream education, which could have negative repercussions.

He said that at the private institutions of higher learning, which now numbered nearly the same as the public institutions of higher learning, the bumiputera enrolment was very small, only in the region of 10 percent, while the rest was made up of the other races because many bumiputeras could not afford the fees.

“If we conduct a census of the number of students in the government and private universities, there are more non-bumiputera students. That’s why we give attention and more places to bumiputeras,” he said in his keynote address, entitled ‘UUM 25 Years Expectation vs Reality’, at the Universiti Utara Malaysia (UUM) Alumni Convention 2009 here.

“So we should not feel guilty (just) because we have places for the bumiputeras. We have a right to attain a position that is on par in this country. We want reasonable rights,” he said.

Mahathir said the affirmative policy under the New Economic Policy to bring the bumiputeras into the country’s mainstream development in various fields, including education, was not something extreme because although bumiputeras made up about 60 percent of the population, the set quota was only 30 percent.

“This is not racism… we only ask for half of what we should be demanding. This shows that we are not racist… in fact to get 30 percent is not easy,” he said.

He said that if there was no balance, those left behind would feel hatred and jealousy and might act irrationally, and this was what the country wanted to avoid.

Other races not sidelined

Mahathir added that the extra attention and opportunities given to the bumiputeras did not mean that the other races were sidelined.

He also said that it was important for the bumiputeras to have the knowledge in running a business because many of them did not use the money as capital or
to invest but to shop.

“We must change the bumiputera mindset. The money will bring returns when invested and this can enhance their wealth. Normally they spend when they have money… often more than the money available and this causes problems.”

On the UUM, Mahathir said the aspiration of its establishment had been achieved as was evident from the success in producing bumiputera graduates as well of graduates of other races in management but it was still not enough.

“The UUM’s future still hinges on efforts in capacity building, especially for the bumiputeras, in business,” he said.

He said students in management finance and accounting must be taught to have the right mindset, strong resilience as well as the intricacies to be successful in business and other fields.

Mahathir also hoped that one day there would be a univerity town in Sintok, where the UUM is located, like the university towns in Cambridge and Oxford.

Cabinet backtracks on SPM subject limit

December 5th, 2009
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


After Samy’s not-so-subtle reminder that support for BN will erode, the government today revised its own decision. I’m still not clear on the details (and that is worrying too) – but more on that later. On one side, MIC is being praised for able to convince the government to allow students to take up to 12 subject for SPM, while on the hand, some consider this as fixing a problem which self-created in the first place. And shockingly, it needs intervention of PM to solve the problem.

For last 6 months since the implementation was announced, nothing moved. Education Department was strong on its stance, saying limit is 10 subjects as it was cabinet policy. The DG even mentioned about school-level certification,which made the Tamil groups’ blood boil because it looked as if downgrading the language.

Today, news came via FB that cabinet had listened to the points by Dr S.Subra and decided to revise (some already labelled it as flip-flop!) its own decision.

So, no protest next week. Who should we thank? I say Samy Vellu because he knew what words to say that will push the button in the right places. All this while, nothing much happened (Dr Subra said that MIC doing many things but cannot announce, and that’s why people may consider it not being proactive – me included). Well, if don’t announce what you doing, its like digging own grave. Same as like not updating websites. Not easy to have blogs and websites, you know.

The NGO’s also deserve a big thanks, because they decided to push the ante. If not, MIC may have not moved in to solve the problem and save itself more ridicule from the community.

Putera MIC started a petition, which is still in the hundreds of signatures. Should have done that earlier, much earlier. But hey, better late than never!

Who should not be thanked – Those late-comers from certain opposition political parties who issued statements recently. No news for last few month but now want to protest and “save” the Tamil language. No brownie points  for you guys.

OK, let’s move to the solution. I listened to radio and read two papers. Excerpts from Malaysiakini report as below while from  Star report is after that.

The cabinet has decided to allow students sitting for the SPM examination to take 12, instead of 10 subjects to let some students to take vernacular language papers.

The decision comes following strong protests from various groups, including MIC and MCA, who argued that the 10-subject cap would not bode well for the future of vernacular languages.

Education Minister Muhyiddin Yassin said students can include Chinese or Tamil and Chinese or Tamil literature subjects among the 10, but they will not be counted as “officially recognised” subjects.

“The cabinet has decided that the 10-subject cap will remain but we are giving some leeway for students to have options,” said Muhyiddin, who is also deputy prime minister, after chairing the 65th National Land Council meeting in Putrajaya.

He said Education director-general Alimuddin Mohd Dom would provide a more detailed explanation on the matter soon.

According to Muhyiddin, students can still enrol for more than 10 subjects in SPM examinations if they find it useful, but only 10 would be officially recognised.

“They can take (more than 10 subjects) but it would not counted for purposes of scholarships and other matters. (Additional subjects) might be useful for example if someone wants to be a Tamil teacher and wants to show qualifications,” he said.

“They can take 12 or 11 subjects but it will not be considered in the 10 core and elective subjects,” stressed Muhyiddin.

The cabinet’s decision to limit 10-subject cap has caused outcry because vernacular languages would lose its official recognition at the SPM level.

… In an immediate reaction, MIC president S Samy Vellu lauded the cabinet for making the changes.

“I thank the prime minister and the deputy prime minister for agreeing to our (MIC’s) request,” he said.

Yesterday, Samy Vellu had appealed to Najib Abdul Razak to step in and resolve the issue.

“The prime minister has heard and acted on our request,” said the MIC president, adding that the cabinet’s decision reflected the true spirit of the ‘1Malaysia’ concept.

“The prime minister has understood the feelings of the Indian community. He is a true leader for all Malaysians,” he said, adding that Najib should be congratulated for making a bold move.

Samy Vellu said he hoped the issue will be put to rest, and all concerned parties will accept the decision.

“Tamil language and Tamil literature will continue to flourish in this country with the cabinet’s decision,” he said.

He said that the cabinet’s decision proved that all issues can be resolved through negotiations with the government and not through other means.

“We (the MIC) will continue with this (negotiations) on other issues and I am confident that the government under Najib’s leadership will strive to do the best for the people of all races,” he said.

Samy Vellu also congratulated MIC vice-president Dr S Subramaniam, who is also the human resources minister for securing a solution to the long-standing issue in today’s cabinet meeting.

The Star:

Students sitting for the SPM examination can take two additional subjects but exam results will only be based on 10 subjects, said Education Minister Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin.

He said the matter was decided by the Cabinet request by certain quarters that the ministry allowed students to sign up for 12 subjects.

Muhyiddin, who is also Deputy Prime Minister said the matter was also raised in the Cabinet meeting by Human Resource Minister Datuk Dr S. Subramaniam.

“The Cabinet has decided to give students the flexibility to take two additional subjects for their SPM exams. However, the results of the two additional subjects will not be counted as part of the SPM results. Their SPM results will be based on the 10 main subjects.

“Education director-general (Tan Sri Alimuddin Mohd Dom) will announce the details soon,” he told reporters after chairing the National Land Council meeting Friday.

Muhyiddin said if a student took 12 subjects for SPM, results that would be considered for scholarships, for instance, would be based on the 10 main subjects.

“However, if a student aspired to become a Tamil language teacher, the results of the additional subjects may be used to determine if they qualify to sign up for such courses,” he said.

Recently, youth wings from MIC, Gerakan, MCA and People’s Progressive Party (PPP) had asked the Education Ministry to review its decision to cap the number of subjects in the SPM examination at 10.

They wanted students be allowed to sit for 12 subjects to cater to those keen on Literature or Tamil or Chinese languages.

So, what does it mean? We have two category of subjects: core and elective (which have own sub-branches). For Science stream there are 5 core subjects, and 6 for Arts stream students. Science stream students would take 4 subjects from pure science group, so total nine subjects have been taken, leaving room for one more subject that will be counted for 10 official subjects. That means the Science stream student can choose to take any one from the following: Geography, Accounts, Economy, Tamil, Mandarin, Tamil Literature, Chinese Literature, Malay Literature, English Literature, Arts etc. After that, he/she can choose another two subjects from any group as per his interest. For Arts stream, its similar except that the core subjects are 6, thus leaving only 4 place for elective subjects for the compulsory 10 places. OK, fair enough.

Question is, can the student choose language/literature subjects as part of the compulsory 10, or is it limited to the “extra two ” category?  We have to wait for the details later.

Anyway, its a simple solution, yet effective on the face of it. In fact I think I have read similar suggestion in one of the forums (lowyat or recom). Why wasn’t this done earlier? – could have saved lots of time and hassle. Makes me wonder if the public is smarter than leaders (obviously yes since more heads are better than one!) or even if the leaders are capable and competent in the first place.

Free ICT training in Port Klang

December 2nd, 2009
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Free ICT training program conducted by Yayasan Kemajuan Sosial Malaysia. Co-organised by the Ministry of Human Resources as part of its effort to tackle issues of workers’ retrenchment and jobless youths.

NO REGISTRATION/ENROLLMENT FEE

Duration of Course: 2 months (December & January)

Date: 7th December 2009 (Monday) – First Lesson

Venue:
Pusat ICT MPK Port Klang.
(Above Port Klang bus station)

Subjects:
Introduction to ICT
Desktop Publishing
Teleworking in publication
Web designing
MS WORD
MS Excel
MS Powerpoint

Each student will be paid an allowance of about RM 500 – RM 800 per month.

Allowance rate (monthly basis):
Single mothers: RM500
Retrenched workers: RM600
Retrenched workers with child: RM 600 + RM 50 (for each child – max 4 children)

To reserve your seats, kindly pre-register before 7/12/09 with Mr.Balaguru or Mr.Dharmen. First-come first-served basis.

2 classes allocated but could go up to 3 classes depending on number of applicants. So, hurry up and register before vacant seats are filled.

For further details, pls contact :
Mr. Balaguru – 0123176464
Mr. Dharmen – 0162804660

SPM limit saga continues

December 2nd, 2009
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Education Ministry says:

The Education Ministry is staying firm with its decision to limit the number of subjects Sijil Pelajaran Malaysia candidates may take to 10.

The ministry has no plans to make special provision for SPM candidates wishing to take additional vernacular subjects.

Education director-general Tan Sri Alimuddin Mohd Dom said the 10-subject limit was a cabinet policy that could not be changed at this point. [which Dr Subra is a member of. Maybe the cabinet members not agreeable with his arguments]

He said schools where such vernacular subjects were taught could take the initiative to issue special certificates to students who took school examinations in vernacular subjects, for Form Five school leavers. [initiative? This guy must be joking!]

Alimuddin told the New Straits Times that these certificates could be produced by students when they wished to apply for jobs requiring proficiency in a vernacular subject. [Would employers accept it? Maybe need to have 3rd party certification?]

He said otherwise the students could use the school report cards which also show their proficiency in the vernacular subject. [but it won’t be standardised]

And thus the call for centralized coordination:

Schools which want to offer the vernacular language examinations for students unable to take these subjects at the Sijil Pelajaran Malaysia (SPM) level must be centrally coordinated to ensure standards.

Principal research fellow at the Institute of Ethnic Studies in Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Datuk Dr Denison Jayasooria said the Education Ministry must be in charge of this.

“The learning of community languages is our heritage and should be encouraged especially in line with 1Malaysia,” he said.

National Collaborative Parent-Teacher Association of Malaysia president Assoc Prof Datuk Mohd Ali Hasan said an agency within the ministry such as the Malaysian Examinations Syndicate (MES) should set the guidelines for these examinations.“The MES has to monitor the examinations set by schools to ensure quality as there would be no standardisation if all schools were to set their own papers,” he said.

… United Chinese School Committees Association of Malaysia (Dong Zong) deputy chairman Chow Siew Hon said he disagreed with the suggestion as there would be no standardisation and consistency if schools came up with their own exams to evaluate students.

“My concern does not just revolve around the future of Chinese and Tamil languages but also how the ruling to limit students to taking only 10 subjects for SPM would affect students’ learning and decision when selecting the SPM subjects for the courses that they want to pursue at tertiary level,” he said.

But Dr Ramasamy was more direct:

Education director-general Alimuddin Mohd Dom has been told to resign over his failure to find an amicable solution to the ’10 subject’ Sijil Pelajaran Malaysia examination controversy.

Penang Deputy Chief Minister 2 P Ramasamy slammed Alimuddin for suggesting the ‘bizarre’ idea for schools to draw up their own vernacular language examinations to overcome the hindrance to students caused by the 10-subject SPM cap.

Yesterday, Alimuddin said schools can conduct their own examinations on respective vernacular language subjects and issue certificates to the students to acknowledge their level of proficiency.

Commenting on this, Ramasamy said: “He is not listening to the people’s views and opinions.”

“He is trying to bulldoze an examination policy that would kill vernacular subjects from the country’s schooling system.

“He is incompetent and insensitive over the education needs of all Malaysians. He is not fit to head such an important portfolio,” he told reporters at the Penang state assembly.

Ramasamy plans to table a motion at the ongoing assembly sitting to pass a resolution calling on the federal government to scrap the 10-subject cap and increase it to minimum 12-subject cap.

He said only a minimum 12-subject cap would enable Indian and Chinese students to sit for their vernacular language and literature subjects for SPM.

He said the 10-subject grand plan would first discourage students from taking up their mother tongue subjects at the secondary and tertiary levels, which ultimately would create a severe shortage of teachers in vernacular schools.

Eventually, he said vernacular schools, including 534 existing Tamil schools, would have to close down due to dearth of teachers.

“The 10-subject magical formula is damaging to the Indian and Chinese communities. It’s an Umno grand plan to banish Tamil and Mandarin in the country,” added the former university lecturer.

Over the last 10 years, he said students taking up Tamil language and literature subjects for SPM have gone up, from 340 in 1998 to 4,391 in 2008. [can verify this or not?]

“It shows the interests of students to learn their own mother tongue has gone up,” he said.

More than 20 national Indian non-government organisations (NGOs) have already planned to stage a protest on Dec 12 at the Wisma Peladang in Petaling Jaya against the ministry’s attempt to introduce the 10-subject SPM formula.

Ramasamy welcomed the rally and hinted he would take part in it.

“Indians definitely need to hold a major protest against this infringement of our language rights,” he said.

Oh ya, MIC Youth submitted memorandum protesting the limit to DPM today.

More BTN stories

December 2nd, 2009
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Interviews (1 and 2) from Malaysiakini below. Its similar to what I have heard from reliable friends too.

‘We were shown a picture of Anwar Ibrahim with an American. The instructor told us that he is a traitor to the country as he had a good relationship with the Americans.’
This was among the issues raised during a nation building programme carried out by Biro Tatanegara or the National Civics Bureau, recalled fourth year economics student Fakhrul Zaki Fazial.

Fakhrul, who is studying in Universiti Islam Antarabangsa (UIA), said the focus of the talks is on the Malay race.

“They (the instructors) also criticise leaders from the opposition and consider their criticism as being patriotic,” he added.

Universiti Malaya student leader Mohd Ridzuan Mohammad, who attended the BTN programme in 2004, said there were even talks about other races being a threat to the Malays.

“It is not the right thing to do for BTN to play up racial sentiments… that will create racial rift…(as) this programme could influence some students (into accepting the propagation of racist ideologies),” he added.

Chin Shin Liang, a former Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM) student who attended a BTN course in December 2008, related his experience.

“We were shown video clips of the Bersih rally and then pictures of war-torn Palestine with a caption; Is this what we want?…we were also shown an (unidentified) protester throwing stones.”

‘Promoting blind obedience’

Describing it as “incredibly biased”, Chin said: “It does not show who the stone thrower is, probably a Mat Rempit who decided to join the fun or how the police provoked the protesters with a water canon in the first place.”

He said the instructors also taught that the BN government is chosen by the people and therefore is the legitimate government while making no attempt to distinguish the political party and the government.

The instructors, he said, also suggested that all government agencies should serve BN and be careful of any requests from the opposition which is trying to topple the government.

“This is very misleading, because as a rule, government agencies should be neutral and serve the country as a whole (not just a particular party/coalition),” he added.

It is as if the course is suggesting that the BN government ‘represents’ the country and should be blindly obeyed without question, he noted.

Meanwhile, Fakhrul expressed doubts over BTN’s choice of instructors.

“I feel that some of the instructors were not qualified because they were very emotional and not intellectual in their presentations.

“If students disagreed with their viewpoint, they would be scolded in front of everyone,” he said.

‘BTN taught us mutual respect’

Brickbats aside, there are some quarters who felt that BTN courses have been unfairly targeted.

Yesterday, a group calling itself ‘ex-BTN graduates’ held a press conference in Kuala Lumpur to air their views.

“We feel it is our social responsibility to correct the lopsided views about BTN courses,” said its leader Ahmad Shafei Ahmad Hanbali (left).

He denied that the modules sowed seeds of hatred towards other races. “BTN taught us how to mutually respect the rights of other races as spelt out in the constitution.”

“It is not fair to say that BTN tries to create division when it is only teaching the country’s official history,” he said.

On the allegation that BTN is a propaganda tool of BN, Ahmad Shafei alluded that there was nothing wrong with teaching obedience to the sitting government.

“In a mature democracy, those who lost, even by one vote, must respect those who have won and the victory that the majority of the rakyat has given to the victors,” he said.

Also coming to the defence of BTN was Majlis Gabungan NGO Pembela Negara (Magaran) legal adviser, Mohd Khairul Azam Abdul Aziz.

He said everything that is taught in BTN courses follows what is spelt out in the constitution.

He explained that the special position of the Malays, Bahasa Melayu and Islam is clearly mentioned in articles like 152 and 153 of the constitution.

Mohd Khairul, who claims to be a BTN graduate himself, said “these are facts, not opinions.”

ISO certification

As for allegations of facts, issues and images being manipulated and misrepresented, he explained: “These images and issue are not uncommon even outside BTN, these are usual fare in blogs, publications and other sources. Every fact, image and issue shown or mentioned is credited to sources.”

“Participants can think for themselves, BTN is just exercising freedom of speech. I think that the use of those images are appropriate (in order to highlight certain matters).”

Asked about the problem some graduates have with instructors, Mohd Khairul said: “Report the wrongdoings of the instructors and BTN will address the problem. Don’t reject BTN totally.”

In 2008, BTN was apparently awarded ISO certification by Sirim for its courses.

However, concerned parties have pointed out that Sirim’s endorsement only confirms BTN’s ability to deliver the training on a consistent basis, not an endorsement of the course contents.

Commenting on this, Tenaganita director Irene Fernandez asked whether the authorities who issued the certification are “conscious of the seditious and racially inflammatory nature of the curriculum”.

Student council representatives from several public universities are opposed to the controversial Biro Tatanegara (BTN) courses which is a requirement at campuses.

Universiti Malaya Students Council president, Mohd Ridzuan Mohammad, said only four out of 41 council members who have been asked to attend the course chose to do so.

“I made it optional for members as I felt the course was unsuitable. It incites racial sentiments and does not help provide better representation to the student body,” he said.

The council received an official letter from the Ministry of Higher Education, via UM’s student affairs department, saying it was compulsory for council members.

Ridzuan, who had attended a BTN course in his first year, said his decision to make it optional had “angered” assistant vice chancellor of student affairs, Azarae Idris, who threatened disciplinary action.

However, he said, Azarae withdrew his threat after Ridzuan made his case in a meeting with the vice chancellor after the BTN course in April earlier in the year.

Ridzuan’s defense was that pro-opposition student leaders were depicted negatively at a BTN course held in Kuala Terengganu.

He said the incident where a pig’s head was thrown into a surau in UM was used to tarnish the image of pro-opposition student leaders.

“The course is run over three days, which I think can be better spent on looking after the welfare of the students on campus,” he said.

When contacted, neither Azrae nor senior officers at the student affairs department were available for comment.

Compulsory for Islamic studies students

At University Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), student council member Hisyamuddin Che Ali said most chose not to attend despite warnings from the student affairs department.

“We received calls from the student affairs department almost everyday to pressure us to go,” he said.

Thus far no action has been taken on those who did not attend, as it is not compulsory for most UKM students.

The course, however, is a must for Faculty of Islamic Studies students. Unhappy at being singled out, the faculty’s mostly Muslim students protested to the vice chancellor.

“They too, complained that racial sentiments were fanned at BTN courses…for example, they were told that the Chinese are lording over the country,” said Hisyamuddin.

Other complaints included the inciting of political sentiments and the fact that male and female participants were not segregated during the activities.

Hisyamuddin said the student affairs department responded by saying that they were merely acting on the instructions of the Ministry of Higher Education.

‘It all depends on the facilitators’

On the other end of the spectrum, a former UUM student council president said that he had encouraged council members to attend BTN course.

Nur Mohd Saifuddin Salahuddin said that 25 of the 36-member student council members attended the course.

“It’s good for team-building,” he said, adding that the courses were optional for UUM students despite rumours that those who did not go would not be allowed to graduate.

Saifuddin, who has attended several BTN courses, said the benefits outweighed negative perceptions, and that the modules mostly concentrated on historical facts.

“Whether or not BTN is an indoctrination camp depends on the facilitator, as some facilitators choose to focus on politics,” said the member of the Pro-Aspirasi faction.

Pro-Aspirasi is commonly known to be a pro-Barisan Nasional government group in campus politics.

Saifuddin said that out of the 20 to 30 facilitators present at the BTN courses which he attended, only one or two made their political leanings obvious.

“I had even provoked a facilitator, calling him an ‘Umno man’, but he told me that it was a requirement for BTN facilitators to not be members of any political party,” he said.

‘Steer clear of politics’

Despite supporting the ISO-certified BTN, Saifuddin felt BTN courses should be clear of political influences, and use history instead of current events, as a teaching reference,

“I do not agree with some facilitators who try to convince those with different political leanings by stating ‘fact’ after ‘fact’.

“If they must relate the modules to current events, at the very least they should stay neutral and not be so partial to the ruling government,” he said.

He also said that the BTN courses should be more transparent, to ensure that the public understands what takes place.

Currently, all participants are asked to surrender cameras, mobile phones and all other recording devices.

This is not the case in Selangor’s BTN equivalent SPIES where students taking part are allowed to bring along recording devices and best of all, the course is not compulsory.

“It popular because the facilitators are qualified and the activities are fun and beneficial,” said Universiti Selangor student council president Wan Azraei Wan Husin.

Wan Azraei said the course includes the history of political parties, motivational speeches, spiritual lessons and outdoor activities like white water rafting, something also included in BTN course modules.