Posts Tagged ‘Politicians’

Misleading Publicity by YB Sungai Pinang

September 8th, 2010
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


I’m flabbergasted to say the least! This looks like a case of misleading the public. Teng Chang Kim should have not put the word “sumbangan” as it means contribution (but rakyat like me usually associate it with “donation”). Obviously its not the assemblyman’s contribution but actually from Selangor government. This doesn’t sound right to me at all.

Consider the amount of money wasted to print or emboss on each of the items.

Everywhere you turn looks like seeing his name.  Silap-silap, end up get cursed instead of praise. Cannot be like this la YB.

SELANGOR Speaker Teng Chang Khim’s name is found written all over the place at public parks in the Sungai Pinang constituency.

The Sungai Pinang assemblyman seems to have adopted a bold strategy by displaying his name on benches, gazebos and playground equipment provided by him to the constituents.

However, Teng’s action has not gone well with some of the residents in the constituency which covers a large part of North Klang town, Taman Eng Ann and a section of Jalan Meru.

Nothing spared: A slide in the playground bearing the Speaker’s name.

These residents felt that the move to display the assemblyman’s name as a contributor of the facilities was misleading especially when public funds were used to provide them.

A check by StarMetro following tip-off from a Klang resident, revealed that there were some 110 parks and playing fields in the constituency with Teng’s name displayed on the benches, gazebos and playground equipment.

Each venue has between three and seven benches. A few of them have facilities like playground equipment and three parks has gazebos.

Based on the information provided on the equipment, it was learnt that the assemblyman had started displaying his name on the facilities since 2008 after Pakatan Rakyat took over Selangor.

All the benches, gazebos and playground equipment displayed his name — as the contributor of the facilities.

For all to see: A signage in Malay and Mandarin on a gazebo stating it was a contribution from the Sungai Pinang assemblyman (why no English and Tamil?)

Checks also revealed that the names on the benches were very bold as they occupied almost the entire space of the back rest of the concrete structures.

The white coloured concrete benches had black prints which stated (Sumbangan dari Teng Chang Khim Ahli Dewan Undangan Negeri 2008) Contributed by Teng Chang Khim, state assemblyman 2008 and the third line written in Mandarin.

Some of the benches have the year 2010 printed to indicate the year the benches were provided.

The check also revealed that a white rectangle signboard was placed on the entrance of the each of gazebos with similar information provided in red characters.

All the playground equipment had a square black plastic signage with golden square lining and characters. They stood majestic on the colourful PVC board.

These black pieces had Bahasa Malaysia wordings stating that they were contributed by “Speaker, Teng Chang Khim”.

Some residents claimed the number of public facilities bearing Teng’s name have increased over the last two years and the situation had caused confusion among the public.

They said most people have been misled into believing that the facillities were provided by Teng through his personal contribution.

And the situation has attracted strong criticism from voters in the constituency who felt there was no need for Teng to advertise himself in this manner since he was duty bound to serve the constituents.

A resident who alerted the StarMetro on the existence of what she viewed as a strange practice by the Speaker questioned Teng’s sincerity.

In a strong tone of voice, the caller who declined to be identified said, this is clear misuse of authority by the assemblyman.

“How can he take credit for facilities that have been provided to the people from the public funds especially when his action gives an impression that he had used his own money to do so.

“It does not go well when some of the labels also stated that it was contributed by the Speaker,’’ she said,

While the majority of the residents were appreciative of Teng’s contribution in his official capacity as the elected representative, some of them felt that the presence of his name on the facilities at the public parks and fields in the constituency does not reflect well on the Speaker.

They described Teng’s action as uncalled for and felt that the assemblyman had gone overboard by displaying his name on these objects.

Social worker Peter Tan said it was clear that the assemblyman cum Speaker had became power crazy by seeking cheap advertisement for himself.

Teng, he said, had adopted an “ungentlemanly” approach to seek political mileage for carrying out his responsibility as a state assemblyman.

“You can see his name scattered all over the parks from the benches to gazebos and I wonder from where he got such an idea.

“I think he is getting too obsessed over his position especially after becoming the Selangor State Assembly Speaker from an opposition assemblyman in the past,” said Tan who is Taman Eng Ann resident and a voter in the Sungai Pinang constituency.

Law Chee Keen, 45, of Taman Gembira said he was taken aback when he first spotted the name of the assemblyman on the benches at a park in his housing estate about two years ago.

He said most residents from the housing estate were of the impression that the facilities were contributed personally by Teng.

“Initially, there were only benches with his name on the park but now we even have playground equipment and gazebos.

“We are happy that the assemblyman has provided us with these facilites but putting his name on them sounds strange,’’ he said

K. W. Tan, 56, from Jalan Serendit 9 of Taman Eng Ann said the park in front of his house had benches, a playground equipment and a gazebo with Teng’s name displayed on them.

He said he was unsure if the facilities were provided thorugh Teng’s personal money or allocation from the state but acknowledged that there was a need for the facilities in the area.

Tan said he was more concerned about the frequent flash flood problem in the area than the facilities at the park.

“We have been having sleepless nights for more than 10 years due to flash floods and we hope Teng can help us solve the problem,” he said.

YB Teng has this to say:

SUNGAI PINANG assemblyman Teng Chang Khim sees nothing wrong in putting his name on the benches, gazebos and playground equipment that had been provided to his constituents from state allocation.

Teng said he had been doing so since the Pakatan Rakyat won the Selangor state in the 2008 General Election in a move to show the voters the new administration was doing more things for the people now.

He said he had turned around the image of more than 10 open areas in the constituency into public parks.

“Most of these venues used to be just plain fields but now they have benches, gazebos and mini playground facilities.

“The facilities will encourage the residents including children to come out of their homes and get involved in outdoor actitivies as a community,” he said.

Teng said he had spent 30% from his RM500,000 annual allocation for providing park facilities in his constituency.

He said he was very focussed in his efforts to turn the plain grounds in the constituency into a recreational area for the community.

“At the same time, I want the public to be aware that I am doing my part to make their life better than what it was in the past.

“Just in three years since PR took over, I have been able to bring about so much changes that I was unable to do in the past,” he confessed.

Furthermore, Teng said, the Klang Municipal Council was in the red and had ran out of money to offer the residents with this sort of facilities.

However, he said, things had changed for the better for the people now as he was in the position to offer them such facilities.

“In fact, I was in a way assisting the council so that it can be relieved of some of the financial burden,” he said.

On displaying his name, Teng said, it was aimed at sending a clear message to the people on his contribution as a Pakatan assemblyman.

When asked why some of the singanges had addressed him as Speaker, he said, it was merely for easy identification.

“The wordings are printed according to the availability of the space and it does not matter if it says speaker or assemblyman, both refers to me,” he added.

Me thinks, best if you edit the signages to say “peruntukan Kerajaan Negeri Selangor melalui YB Sungai Pinang tahun [xxxx]”. The word “peruntukan” means “allocation” which is more accurate than “contribution”.

DPM Muhyiddin on policies favoring bumiputras

September 5th, 2010
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


I checked the meaning of racist at few sites:

Oxford:

noun: a person who believes that a particular race is superior to another
adjective: having or showing the belief that a particular race is superior to another (e.g.: we are investigating complaints about racist abuse at a newsagents)

S: (n) racist, racialist (a person with a prejudiced belief that one race is superior to others)

Adjective:

S: (adj) racist (based on racial intolerance) “racist remarks”

S: (adj) racist, antiblack, anti-Semite (discriminatory especially on the basis of race or religion)

Merriam-Webster:

This dictionary returned the definition for racism instead of racist:

Definition of RACISM

1. : a belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race

2 : racial prejudice or discrimination

— rac·ist noun or adjective

I don’t know. If you read the article below and look at the definitions above, looks like its racist policy because it discriminates or prejudices according to race.  However it doesn’t indicate that these policies are promoting superiority over other races (that’s another topic).  The implementation of such policy gave birth to various entities and schemes that favored only one race, and kind of gave carte blanche to devise methods, rules and guidelines that favor them. Maybe the policies were needed 30 years ago, but is it still needed now? Maybe need to “fine tune”.  I think people (non-Malays especially) feel the policy has deviated from the its initial purpose 30 years ago, so the support has been lost now. Talk to younger people. They see people of all races shopping and spending money like nobody’s business (Don’t believe? go to Midvalley and see the Raya shoppers there!). So, where’s the poor people? Are the poor people only from one race? Don’t forget, the word bumiputra has been used liberally, but can we say the folks in East Malaysia are well off now?  Look at the estate workers.What did 20++ years of NEP did for them? Did they get own land? Did they participate in land schemes? Were they given shares or units? Offered loans/scholarships?  Given entrepreneur grants? Taught new skills?

Just like Mahathir giving meritocracy a new definition, maybe this is an attempt to do likewise to the word racist?

Programmes to assist the poor which may be seen to favour bumiputras should not be misinterpreted as racist policies, said Deputy Prime Minister Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin.

He said such programmes implemented since the start of the New Economic Policy were meant to provide aid to groups most in need of them, regardless of their race or ethnicity.

Muhyiddin said the policy was a national policy aimed at all, ensuring equitable division of the country’s wealth to all races.

“There is no discriminatory or racist policy here.

“This is a national policy, a policy for the equitable distribution of wealth which we have known about since 1970 (the NEP),” he said after opening the Pahang hardcore poor and urban poverty eradication programme here yesterday.

He said certain quarters who had labelled the Government’s move of helping more poor bumiputras as racist were themselves behaving as racists.

“No quarter should label a policy to assist bumiputras, many of whom are still poor and weak in certain areas, as a racist policy because when the NEP was launched, it was accepted by all the races, including the non-Malays,” he said.

On educational assistance, Muhyiddin said it should also not be made an issue as that would only cause dissatisfaction and animosity between the races, as after 53 years of independence education remained the basis of stability in the country.

“Therefore, whatever the Government does should not be misinterpreted, as it is for the good of all, regardless of race.”

He said the Government was also upset with some Malays who questioned the policy.

He said these people did not understand that there were still many in the community who still needed the Government’s assistance.

“If there are Malays who sabotage their own community’s struggle, then others would take advantage of the situation and acknowledge the policy as a racist policy.”

Respect or fear?

August 25th, 2010
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Ex-PM Mahathir: “And respect only comes if we are strong and in power.” – from Malaysian Insider.

Me says: “fear comes if we are strong and in power”.

Reinvention of meritocracy deserves Nobel Prize

August 25th, 2010
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Someone, please, nominate ex-PM Mahathir for Noble Prize! Reinventing (or misleading) the meaning of a word surely deserves some sort of accolade. We can put an entry in our Malaysia Book of Record for a start. Can also contact dictionary publishers to update their dictionary with new meaning for meritocracy. Malaysia Boleh!

I really feel pity to hear him say this which is putting down his own adapted race:

“It implies dominance by the race with the greatest merit in every field; in education, in business and in all fields of human endeavour “

Really, the statement should be nominated for joke of the year!

Meritocracy allows for change and competition. There’s no guarantee that meritocracy means one race will prevail in all fields of human endeavour, all the time.  By saying the above, is he saying that the Malays are genetically weak? not able to compete in any field? Always going to need a stick to stand properly? That one race (presumably the Chinese) are always superior to the rest? What kind of finding is this?

There’s a reason why we have “sell-by” date. Things don’t usually work well after that.

As for the use of religion as political tool, well, the focus on Malay first itself already going against the religion. On one hand you say you are Muslim with all the good virtues/values of your religion, and on the other hand, you discriminate by putting your race above others, which doesn’t look like fair to me. Really contrast like white and black. Hope you guys can clarify this part because it doesn’t gel.

Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad mocked proponents of meritocracy today, calling them racist and decried Malays who support meritocracy as having misplaced pride.

Dr Mahathir also described his Umno party as weak and mismanaged.

The former prime minister blasted advocates of meritocracy, calling them “meritocrats” who are pushing for dominance by one race in all aspects of the country.

Mahathir’s diatribe will likely embolden supporters of conservative Malay NGOs such as Perkasa which has already threatened several times to punish the Najib government over potential reforms intended to make Malaysia a developed high income nation.

“Today we see a lot of Malay NGOs trying to defend the Malay position. Invariably they have been labelled racists,” said Mahathir (picture) on his blog today. “The unfortunate truth is that those who labelled them are equally racists because of their advocacy of meritocracy.”

“If ‘Malaysian Malaysia’ conjures equality between races, ‘Meritocracy’ implies something stronger,” he added referring to the DAP’s old slogan.

“It implies dominance by the race with the greatest merit in every field; in education, in business and in all fields of human endeavour.”

Dr Mahathir said that the campaign for meritocracy is not a campaign against racism but a campaign by racists against racists.

“The meritocrats are as much racists as the Malay NGOs, and Perkasa,” he said. “Incidentally by writing this I know the meritocrat racists will condemn me as racist. So be it.”

The attack on meritocracy by Dr Mahathir comes as the nation grapples with a brain drain that has seen talent from all races abandon the country out of frustration due to decades of government administration that favoured ethnicity and political connections over ability.

The lack of a meritocratic culture and loss of talent is widely acknowledged as the main reason the country has fallen behind its regional peers such as Singapore, South Korea and Taiwan in terms of development and per capita income and is caught in a middle income trap.

Bloomberg columnist William Pesek recently blamed four decades of affirmative action for Malaysia’s  lack of competitiveness.

Dr Mahathir also took a swipe at his party Umno, calling it “weak” and “mismanaged”.

“That is why today we have Perkasa and other Malay NGOs who are as openly concerned about the Malays as Umno once was,” he said. “The condemnation by those said to be advocating meritocracy is because they see the racism of the meritocrats, just as the Malays of 1964 saw the racism of ‘Malaysian Malaysia’.”

Islamist party PAS also did not escape coming under fire from the veteran politician who said that it was using religion for political gain.

“There are quite a large number of Indian Muslims in Malaysia but they do not figure in the political party said to be Islamic,” he said.

“The party, by using Islam, knows full well they are appealing to Malays almost exclusively. But the intention is not to defend the Malays but merely to gain their support. One can say they are not Malay racists. Rather they are Malay political opportunists.”

Dr Mahathir said that Malays who protested against meritocracy were condemned as racists and many therefore dared not support the race based New Economic Policy (NEP).

“Some, perhaps due to mistaken pride have begun to support meritocracy, undermining the Malay position further,” said Dr Mahathir.

Muniandy Muniswaran Temple Setapak gets new site

August 24th, 2010
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Finally, a bit of good news for the Muniswaran Temple in Setapak. But another two temples in the vicinity were demolished earlier, the Perianna Muneswarar Temple and Maha Kaliamman Alayam.

THE Sri Muniandy Muniswaran temple in Air Panas, Setapak, will be relocated to its new site near SMK Tinggi Setapak after an amicable agreement was reached between the temple management and relevant parties a week ago.

Federal Territories and Urban Wellbeing Ministry secretary-general Datuk Ahmad Phesal Talib, who visited the old temple site, said they would be providing financial aid to speed up the temple relocation.

“We have asked the temple management to submit their building plan for the new temple to Kuala Lumpur City Hall (DBKL) as soon as possible. They may even get approval within a month provided they adhere to the guidelines,” he said.

Ahmad Phesal said a Chinese temple that was previously located in Jalan Ayer Tawar would also be sharing the site.

He also said the ministry along with the Federal Territories Lands and Mines Department took the initiative to reserve the new site for both places of worship.

“We have had six discussions with the temple management and relevant parties since March 19 to find an amicable solution,” he added.

The relocated temples are making way for a RM7.86mil DBKL development called the Air Panas Setapak Neighbourhood Park under the 9th Malaysia Plan.

“This project involves 10.5ha of land, including a water retention pond. The park will be for the residents in the area,” Ahmad Phesal said.

The project that began in June 2008 was supposed to be completed end of March this year but was delayed for more than a year due to the problem of relocating the temples.

Temple management vice-president Veerayah Seeneevasagam said they were happy to get a plot of land which is near bus stops and along the main road.

“Now we have a permanent place and we are thankful to get the land, especially in the city,” Veerayah said, adding that Hindu custom had not allowed them to move between July 7 to Aug 15.

They have already planted a arasamaram tree at the new site and expect to bring plant eight more trees behind the Public Housing Project Sungai Bunus soon.

“We are also happy with the 1Malaysia concept of the new site with the Chinese temple nearby,” Veerayah said, adding that their requirements for a new temple included a 12m by 18m hall.

Currently, the temple is housed under a temporary tent at the new site.

This is problem already started since early last year. According to Deputy FT minister Saravanan:

Twenty-eight out of 29 Hindu temples sitting on disputed land around Kuala Lumpur have agreed to relocate by May.

Deputy Federal Territories Minister Datuk M. Saravanan said all 28 temple caretakers had agreed to relocate to several locations provided by the Kuala Lumpur City Hall (DBKL) except for the Sri Muniaswarar Temple in Jalan Air Panas, Setapak, which remained adamant in staying put.

“It is the government’s policy not to demolish any house of worship without first giving it an alternative area to relocate to.

“To those who refuse to relocate, they will be given 30 days and an alternative location, following which we may proceed to demolish the building,“ he told reporters at the Buddha Miao You Temple in Setapak yesterday.

Saravanan said the temples had been given notices to relocate last year but many refused to do so until the DBKL issued the last notice on March 1.

“We did not force them to move out without giving them another place to go; several alternatives had been suggested,” he said.

So, it took about 17 months to settle the relocation.