Posts Tagged ‘Politicians’

Successes of Cabinet Committee on Indian Community

October 31st, 2008
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Let’s look at the whole article first:

PUTRAJAYA: The special cabinet committee to deal with Indian affairs has successfully addressed scores of problems faced by the community.
Human Resources Minister Datuk Dr S. Subramaniam said by addressing the concerns of the Indian community, it would help Barisan Nasional win over the Indians.

“The future augurs well for us as it helps in the process of revitalising the Indian community and in giving it a healthy direction,” he said in his speech at his ministry’s Deepavali celebrations.

The Human Resources Ministry is the secretariat to the cabinet committee chaired by the prime minister.

Dr Subramaniam outlined the successes of the committee in addressing the woes of the Indians.

They included:

– streamlining the procedure for bringing in Hindu, Sikh and other priests from India;

– agreeing to a policy of converting all partially-aided Tamil schools to fully-aided schools;

– increasing the number of Public Service Department (PSD) scholarships for Indians studying in foreign universities to 163 students;

– enabling those who scored 9As and above in the Sijil Pelajaran Malaysia examination to be given scholarships to study in local universities;

– recognising the Asian Institute of Medicine, Science and Technology University as one of the institutes where scholarship students could enrol. As a result of this more than 150 students had gone to study there under PSD scholarships; and

– agreeing to set up a special task force under the Home Ministry to deal with the 30,000 Indians born in Malaysia who are without documents.

Now, let’s analyse:

“has successfully addressed scores of problems”
– this is a misleading statement because it implies many problems have been “addressed”. Not necessarily solved. And you’ll know why when you see the “successes” listed above. Only 6 items are listed. What are the “scores” of other successes?

“- streamlining the procedure for bringing in Hindu, Sikh and other priests from India;”
– this issue dragged on from November last year. It takes the DPM chaired committee to get things moving. Even earlier announcements were not followed by the relevant departments. Isn’t that a shame? Or is it a “success”?

“- agreeing to a policy of converting all partially-aided Tamil schools to fully-aided schools;”
– this is a good one. “agreeing” means just that. Agree only. When? how? who? Don’t ask many questions? Wait till next election. And again, this is issue has been talked about for a decade at least. Why now only agree? Should we be thankful for this “success” or angry that it took so long? Does it mean that if next election the Indians dump BN, they will get more goodies? Others get goodies before election. We get after election, and also when we protest.

“- increasing the number of Public Service Department (PSD) scholarships for Indians studying in foreign universities to 163 students;”
– out of how many recipients? are the 163 students qualified or are we wasting tax payers money by sending unqualified students? Are the students really poor or come from financially unstable families?  And didn’t this happen in June?

“- enabling those who scored 9As and above in the Sijil Pelajaran Malaysia examination to be given scholarships to study in local universities;”
– If I’m not mistaken this covers all students, not only Indians. And it was announced  earlier.

“- recognising the Asian Institute of Medicine, Science and Technology University as one of the institutes where scholarship students could enrol. As a result of this more than 150 students had gone to study there under PSD scholarships;”
– well, what’s the big deal? If the university is qualfied, then it is appropriate. No point sending students to unqualified universities. The way this “success” is highlighted, its like AIMST does not actually deserve to be in the PSD list, but got it through political intervention.

“- agreeing to set up a special task force under the Home Ministry to deal with the 30,000 Indians born in Malaysia who are without documents.”
– I guess this is the only “success” but I have to qualify it with information that another similar entity is also set up to solve problems in Sabah.

Another thing, two of the successes above happened BEFORE the first meeting of the Cabinet Committee took place in July. Miracle? Or is it because we live in Bolehland where timeline can be altered as they wish. The increase of PSD scholarship recipients were done outside the committee as it involved negotiations between MIC. PSD, and the Ministers involved.

Most importantly, there’s no mention on raising the equity of Indians from 1.1% to 1.5% by 2010 as asked by MIC. Also, what about the permits issues?

Datuk Devamany

October 28th, 2008
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Congratulations to newest MIC Datuk. MP for Cameron Highlands, KS Devamany got his Datukship from Pahang Sultan.

Oh, he has a website as well – http://www.ybdevamany.com

Statistics on Temple demolition in Selangor

October 28th, 2008
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


The statistics mentioned by Xavier Jayakumar at Selangor state assembly:

A total of 96 Hindu and 37 Buddhist temples were demolished in Selangor between 2004 and 2007.

State exco member Dr A. Xavier Jayakumar said the move was carried out by the local authorities.

However, so far this year, 54 new applications had been approved by the committee task with regulating non-Muslim places of worship.

Among the applications are for 25 Hindu temples, 19, Buddhist temples and 10 churches.

Dr Xavier, who was answering a question from Lee Ying Ha (PR-Teretai), said although the applications had been approved by the committee, they would still need to be approved by the state executive council before the new places of worship could be built.

96 temples/4 years = 20 temples per year demolished. That’s about one temple every two and half weeks. Is it consistent with HINDRAF’s claims?

There’s also a catch with the approvals given by PR government. The non-muslim religious affairs committee (3 people: Xavier, Ronnie, and Teresa – WHO STILL HAVE NOT replied to my email) gave the approval. Its like a first round. The second round is the state EXCO.

religious structures in Selangor limited to 10000 square feet

October 25th, 2008
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


I’m wondering if NST wrote this wrongly. It says that Dr Xavier said the state government had approved a policy whereby religious structures of any religion other than Islam must not exceed 10,000 sq ft in size .

This seems to be a ridiculous rule indeed. Why would there be a limit? Logically, the community that wants to build a place of worship will know its own financial strength and the viability of such places. Secondly, religious buildings/structures can double up as tourist attractions. So, limiting the size is inappropriate.

Secondly, those owners of illegally built places of worship will be fined continuously until government recognition is received. This is also illogical. If the owners are in the dark about existence of such places on their lands, or if such places are in process of getting recognition, the fines should be waived.

The Selangor government in July instructed all local authorities in the state to fine owners of houses of worship built illegally, said State Health, Plantation Workers, Poverty and Caring Government Committee chairman, Dr Xavier Jayakumar.
The fines needed to be settled continuously until the owners received government recognition for the houses of worship, he said when answering a question from Sulaiman Abdul Razak (BN-Permatang) in the State Assembly here today.

By the way, I’m still waiting for Jayakumar et. al.’s reply to my email on temple demolition report.

Blogged with the Flock Browser

Rulers defend special privileges but guess what Hishamuddin said

October 17th, 2008
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


This is the press statement issued after the 215th meeting of the Conference of Rulers yesterday:

“Press statement issued by the Keeper of the Rulers’ Seal on the role of the Yang di-Pertuan Agong and the Malay rulers regarding the special privileges, position, eminence or greatness of the Malay rulers, Islam, Malay as the national language, the special position of the Malays, and genuine interests of the other communities in accordance with the Federal Constitution.

“The Malay rulers who attended the meeting of the Conference of Rulers conferred on the issuing of this special joint press statement.

“The Malay rulers hold the constitutional role to safeguard the special privileges, position, eminence and greatness of the Malay rulers, safeguard Islam, Malay as the national language, and the genuine interests of the other communities in Malaysia.

“The actions of certain quarters in disputing and questioning these matters, which formed the primary basis for the formation of Malaysia and are enshrined in the Federal Constitution, had caused provocation and uneasiness among the people.”In retaliation, several quarters particularly Malay leaders whether in the government or non-governmental organisations as well as individuals had expressed their dissatisfaction and anger against those who had made the statements and reports and organised the forums.

“Among the reasons identified for these to have occurred is the cursory knowledge of those concerned regarding the historical background as to why these provisions were enshrined in the Federal Constitution and the influence of their attempts to implicate the principles of impartiality and justice without regard for the historical background and social condition of this country. Narrow political interests are also a cause.

“Unless this phenomenon is arrested immediately, it can lead to disunity and racial strife that can undermine the peace and harmony which has all this while brought progress, development and success to the nation.

“As such, it is necessary for the Conference of Rulers to emphasise and remind all quarters of these constitutional provisions besides giving emphasis to the assurance of safeguarding the genuine rights of other communities.

“It has to be emphasised that each provision in the Federal Constitution has undergone the process of discussion, consideration, consultation, sacrifice and compromise of the highest degree for what has been championed, discussed, considered, benefited from as well as agreed to by all quarters concerned, until the realisation of the provisions in the Federal Constitution which are known as the Social Contract.

“It is not proper to dispute and question this Social Contract and more so to subject it to a review or change because it is the primary basis of the formation of Malaysia. Therefore, it is appropriate for the Malay rulers to remind that there should never be any attempt ever to test and challenge issues related to the Social Contract.

“Truly, the leaders of the pre-independence era were insightful, far-sighted. They brought along with them the Malay rulers for the negotiations to claim independence. The institution of the rulers was retained and legally enshrined in the Constitution of an independent Malaysia.

“The institution of the Rulers was accorded eminence, was positioned at the apex of government, as the head of the country and the states, as a protective umbrella, ensuring impartiality among the citizens. The institution of rulers takes on the role of being a check-and-balance to untangle complications, if any.

“The Conference of Rulers also calls on the Malays to be united to safeguard the privileges, position, eminence and greatness of the Malay rulers, safeguard Islam, Malay as the national language, and the genuine interests of the other communities in Malaysia as enshrined in the Federal Constitution. It has to be emphasised that this agenda is more important and foremost than political or factional interests.

“Non-Malays should not harbour any apprehension or worry over their genuine rights because these rights are guaranteed under the Federal Constitution and provisions of the state constitutions of Malaysia contained in Article 153 of the Federal Constitution.

“It is hoped that with this emphasis, all confusion among the people regarding these matters can be contained and an atmosphere of peace, harmony and mutual respect can continue to exist among the people for the maintenance of order in the country.”

Well, disappointing to read the statement. The public is clamoring for change, for natural justice, for fairness. Well, what to do. I also think that the press statement is a warning to Bar Council as well due their organising of the forums.

Anyway, guess what Education Minister Hishamuddin said:

When asked whether the Barisan constitution would allow a second deputy position to be created, Hishammuddin said:
“The constitution is drafted by human beings. If it is for the benefit of all people, there is no constitution that cannot be amended,” said Hishamuddin.

Even though he was referring to BN constitution, I’m sure he agrees that its applicable to any other constitution as well. In fact our Federal Constitution have been amended so many times!