Posts Tagged ‘Selangor’

Selangor MB supports UiTM for all

August 11th, 2008
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


well, this won’t go down well with the myopic few. Selangor Menteri Besar Khalid Ibrahim said that he agrees with suggestion by state executive councillor for higher
education Dr Halimah Ali, who said there was nothing wrong in opening
up UiTM to non-Bumiputeras. He went further to suggest that 10% of the places are reserved for non-Bumiputeras and foreign students (something like matriculation).

He said the move would be timely as it followed the changes in the education system. At the same time, it would give early exposure to UiTM students to be more friendly towards other races.

“UiTM was set up to uplift Malays and Bumiputeras from Sabah and Sarawak in the education sector. This effort must continue.

“But at the same time, UiTM should think more globally to ensure their graduates are more friendly with people of different races in the nation.”

He said inter-ethnic interaction was crucial for UiTM graduates as they would be better prepared to step into the working world, which was far different from life as they knew it.

I can guess that the responses will be – “there are many other ways to create inter-ethnic interactions, why pick on UiTM”, “number of students in UiTM small compared to private colleges/universities, so not much effect”, “over my dead body”, “don’t dare to question our rights”, “normal Malaysians won’t be interested to join UiTM”, etc etc.

Protest over Buddhist park in Shah Alam

July 21st, 2008
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


While there is a protest over building of a surau in Desa Mentari, the new Selangor government faces another potential bomb in Shah Alam, this time over a Buddhist park. The Bodhi Park project by Young Buddhist Foundation Malaysia is to be located in Section U12, Shah Alam. The project was kick off by Ong Ka Chuan, Housing And Local Government Minister. Just like the Desa Mentari surau, this protest happened during the ground breaking event.

According to Star, six people who claimed to be residents from the nearby Desa Alam neighbourhood led by Ahmad Shakri Tarmuchi handed a memorandum to Ong, urging him to scrap the project citing that the neighbourhood was a Muslim-majority area and Bodhi Park should not be built in there. Ahmad Shakri told reporters the residents were not informed of the project by the City Council and there was no notice board at the site announcing the project from the time they had occupied the housing estate in December 2006. Minister Ong replied that “people there should live in harmony”.

Bodhi Park is being built by the Young Buddhist Foundation Malaysia ona 0.68ha of land and the building committee chairman Goh Seng Chai said it would serve as a leading centre for Buddhist educational outreach and cultural activities. A Bernama report mentions that the park will comprise an auditorium, a centre for Buddhist research and studies, a multipurpose hall, and a main shrine for devotees.

In the early 1990’s, the foundation bought a 0.6-hectare piece of land in Section 24 for the project but the state government found it unsuitable for religious use and offered the alternative site in November 2002, Goh added. He said the land for the project was bought from the Selangor Economic Development Corporation for RM95,844 and the sale-and-purchase agreement was signed in April 2004. Goh said the development order for the project was approved on April 24 this year and construction was scheduled to commence in September.

What is your take on this? Is it the previous government’s fault for allocating land in a Muslim majority area for a Buddhist park? Shah Alam itself is 90% Muslim populated, so not much place will be suitable. Generally, I find Buddhist programs are not noisy, so it won’t be disruptive as other religion’s function. So, should the park?

Protest over surau while MP gets punched in Desa Mentari

July 20th, 2008
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


I guess all Malaysians already know that MP for Kelana Jaya, Loh Gwo Burne got punched in the corner of his eye by the aide of fellow PKR state assemblyman, Nik Nazmi (currently overseas). As reported in Malaysiakini, Loh says he has forgiven the attacker, Mior Azam Shah Mior Yahya and had talked to him later. Loh made a police report, nonetheless, and police has taken statement from Azam. Says Loh:

I do not hold any grudges against Azam. I still do not fully understand why he hit me but I am not angry at him. When he saw me at the police station, he apologised. He made a mistake.

However, Loh stated that he will not retract his police report because it was necessary to send out the right message.

I will not retract the police report. If I do so, that sends out a message that anybody can whack me and I don’t want that.
I only hope there will be no serious consequences against him. I don’t want him to go to jail.

The reports in NST and Star did not mention details except saying that its over a place of worship, but Malaysiakini had more details, for example mentioning that the place of worship is actually a surau!

According to my sources, the area in Desa Mentari already has 3 surau. The large Indian community there were upset when plans to put up fourth one came up as it will cause more noise. They were expecting a playground instead.

The Star version:

The alleged incident occurred during the ground-breaking ceremony for a place of worship at Desa Mentari here at about 3pm. It seems residents living in the area had protested against the construction of the building there and Loh, who was present, had approached them.
After speaking to the group, Loh approached the organisers of the function to discuss with them the protesters’ concern when he was allegedly punched by Azam. Loh said he went to the scene after being informed about the protest.He said he was surprised because the matter was supposed to have been resolved on Thursday. He said the problem started two weeks ago when residents complained about construction of the building and he was unable to find out who was responsible for the construction.
“When I arrived there today, I kept on asking him (the aide), ‘Who was responsible for this?’ I must have asked him about 10 times and pointed at him saying that, ‘You as a PA should know’. That was when he punched me in the face above my right eye,” he said.The crowd then stopped the individual, he said.“I do not think I provoked him,” Loh said.He added that the party should do something “comprehensive” against his alleged assailant.

Malaysiakini version:

The parliamentarian went to see what was going on after learning there was a protest by residents living in the area against the construction of the surau. He said the problem started two weeks ago when residents complained about the construction of a surau but he could not find out who was responsible for the construction.
He also noted that the structure has no permit from the local council and the residents disagree with the structure. “The residents wanted a playground for the children, not another surau. “I am not opposed to anything that people want to build as long the
residents are properly consulted and have agreed to it,” he stated.
After speaking to the protesters, Loh approached the organisers of the function to discuss with them the residents’ concern and was suddenly punched in the face by Azam. “I kept asking (Azam), ‘Who was responsible for this?’ for about 10 times and pointed at him saying, ‘You as a PA should know’. That was when he punched me in the face above my right eye,” he said.
Immediately after the incident, the police controlled the crowd who tried to reprimand Azam themselves.

Loh then said that the people behind this construction had decided to halt the project as they await further consultation with about 6,000 of the residents there.

Selangor MB, Khalid Ibrahim said that the assault issue has been resolved after apologies were exchanged by the two persons involved. He claims that incident is due to “young PKR leaders eager to bring forward their respective opinions as representatives of the local people”. Does he mean that there are gangsters in PKR? In The Star, the MB is quoted as saying this issue is an internal dispute.

It’s among the young ones of PKR. We see it as an internal dispute that has been solved between both individuals. Both men have apologised and it’s a neighbourhood issue that will be resolved in an amicable manner with the help of Kelana Jaya division chairman Syed Shahir Syed Mohamud.

Khalid said no disciplinary action would be taken on either individual as it was just a difference of opinion.

The young ones are eager to do their best for the people, express the people’s views but it has to be done through constructive
consultation and must not get physical at any moment of time.

One good thing that has come out of this is the high level of transparency, accountability and the presence of the people’s representatives in the neighbourhoods to solve issues.

Asked how it could be an internal dispute when the incident occurred in public, Khalid once again played the matter down by saying that it was all right as it shows that the party members are very much involved in the field and are with the people.

Differences of opinion take place but we encourage constructive consultation and views shared. It also fosters a better understanding among the leaders and its people in a particular neighbourhood.

Khalid said to avoid future misunderstandings; construction of all places of worship must obtain approval from the respective local authorities. But isn’t this ALREADY a rule for non-muslim places of worship???

By the way, UMNO’s Muhammad Muhammad Taib took this opportunity to tell some lies. Read this:

During Barisan Nasional’s administration, since 1957, there were never incidences about fighting over places of worship. “We
usually resolved everything through a consensus. We allowed churches, temples, mosques and all … but now they have to get physical about it

Does he think we forgot about Padang Jawa?

Question now will arise on how Pakatan Rakyat goverment will solve this problem. Will they allow building of a unapproved place of worship? Will rules be bent to get the plans approved? Does the surau actually have an approval? Were residents’ view taken into consideration before construction? What if the residents continue protesting? What is Hindraf’s stand on this? Will MIC say something?

Hmm… so many questions arising.

Semenyih Estate workers plight

July 17th, 2008
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


There was a interesting article in Star (Metro section) reproduced below on the plight of the Semenyih estate workers. There were some photos too. Thanks to Then for pointing out.

Few things I want to say:

1. Estate workers must think about owning a house and not be in comfort of living in quarters thinking its free for life. We can’t compare with Malay community who own lands. Thus estate workers have to put in triple or quadraple effort to own a house and provide education for children.

2. Some of the displaced workers, women especially, in Prang Besar and surrounding areas are now working as cleaners in Putrajaya. The maintenance companies hire these local people

3. I wonder who these people voted for, if they could vote.

BEFORE Putrajaya came into existence, there was the Prang Besar Estate.

While the country’s new federal administrative capital was still a design on the drawing board, hundreds of estate workers had toiled daily in Prang Besar. They tapped rubber and worked in the oil palm plantation, savouring the simple life as they knew it. The creation of Putrajaya opened a new chapter in the nation’s history but closed another. The dramatic change in the landscape from that of a rural estate to a modern city with towering structures best embodies the high price we pay for development.

It also acquainted us with the ugly term known as displacement.

According to statistics from the National Union of Plantation Workers (NUPW), the number of estates in Selangor dwindled from 150 in 1986 to 95 in 2006. Besides Putrajaya, former estates converted to mega development projects include Cyberjaya, the KL International Airport (KLIA), Bernam Valley and the Guthrie Corridor.

With Prang Besar Estate no longer in existence, a majority of the former estate workers were relocated to low-cost flats in Dengkil. The estate they had called home for decades was no more and the close community living is all but a fond memory now.

Rubber tapper Subramaniam Munusamy, 45, of Semenyih Estate, firmly believes that they should be compensated with permanent homes. “Semenyih has been my home for nearly three decades. Following the notice of termination of employment from the landowners five years ago, we were offered flats in Nilai,” he told StarMetro during a recent interview at the estate workers quarters. “But this means starting all over again. We have asked for low-cost houses in Semenyih in recognition of our blood, sweat and tears for a commodity which is fetching high prices in the world market,” Subramaniam said.

Since they stopped working for the Semenyih Estate, Subramaniam and his wife Anjalai Devi Chinalagan, 43, have been tapping rubber on a plot of land belonging to a smallholder for daily wages. Their combined monthly income is barely RM1,300. The couple, who have four children, said they could not retire for at least 20 more years. Like everyone else, they hope to enjoy the comforts of living in a house of their own in the near future. The struggle to gain a permanent roof over their heads began five years ago with little progress to show since.

For retirees like Mariayee Palaniappa, 59, and Munichy Muniandy, 53, their meagre incomes come from picking flowers for which they are paid RM8 per tin.

Estate resident Devi Ganie, 30, meanwhile, takes on odd jobs, leaving her five-year-old son B. Mathialagan in the care of neighbours.

Life is hard but the women share some little joy and comfort through communal living.

Back when it was a functioning estate, the Semenyih Estate was home to 100 Indian families. There are only 16 families left now. The others have left to seek their fortunes elsewhere after obtaining their dues from the landowners.

Meanwhile, a looming threat of displacement currently hangs over the Dunedin Estate workers. Dunedin, located 3km from Semenyih town, is still functioning as an oil palm plantation and, like the Semenyih Estate, was established around a century ago.

According to plantation worker Arumugam Subramaniam, 51, and his wife Sarojini Paramasivam, 44, there is talk of the plantation being sold for development but they have yet to receive any notice from the landowners. “There used to be over 100 families here but only a fraction are left now since the rumours began. If the landowners want us to move, we hope to be provided with houses nearby,” Arumugam said.

“As far as income goes, we are paid daily wages, base pay, cost of living allowance (Cola) and other allowances. It is hard to make sense of the pay slip but basically, my wife and I jointly earn around RM1,250 a month,” he said. “In view of the surge in commodity prices and inflation, the Malaysian Agricultural Producers Association (Mapa) should increase the Cola while the NUPW should push for a higher minimum wage,” he said.

Retiree Baby Angamuthu, 57, in reminiscing how life in the estate was 50 years ago, said that little had changed in the estate community all these years. “We are still living in deplorable conditions although oil palm is a priceless commodity. Some of the quarters are infested with termites, the drainage system is poor and dengue is a constant threat,” she said, cuddling her seven-month-old grandson Thinakaran Murugan.

At present, the future looks bleak for the young generation but parents like Subramaniam and Arumugam realize the importance of education and have sent their children to school. They hope that their children, armed with an education, could leave the estates to work, and break the cycle of poverty.

Parti Sosialis Malaysia (PSM) estate liaison officer Ramalingam Thirumalai can identify with the estate workers struggle concerning displacement. “We at the Sungai Rinching Estate fought for 10 years for our houses. The struggle was long and difficult but we emerged victorious and we also realised that it was better to stand together,” he said.

There is strength in numbers which is why PSM secretary-general and Kajang Municipal councillor S. Arutchelvan wants to mobilise together the estate workers of Semenyih, Dunedin, Bangi and Glengowrie to demand for housing. “Breaking up the communities of estate workers leads to a negative impact on their psyche as they already feel neglected and cast aside,” Arutchelvan said. “With a proper area set aside for housing, displace estate workers can ask for a school, hall and places of worship,” he said.

During his recent visits to the estates, Selangor health, plantation workers and caring government committee chairman Dr Xavier Jeyakumar gave the landowners a timely reminder. Land status conversion for estates with 40ha and above will only be approved if the landowners agree to provide housing for displaced estate workers. This is the condition imposed by the state government,” Xavier said. At present, there are 113 estates in Selangor seeking land status conversion. Xavier also urged estate owners to give preference and priority to locals when hiring workers and not only employ foreigners.

MPAJ councillor under scrutiny

July 4th, 2008
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Out of the two (Star) or three (NST) MPAJ councillor nominees alleged to have criminal records or under investigation, one is said to have a criminal record.EXCO Ronnie Liu says that the list was sent to ACA, police and Bank Negara, but no response from them. So, he said that “cannot wait for six months”. So, looks like its not that the new government didn’t send, but the respondents never replied. This makes me think, how can the previous state government elect their councillors so fast? Is it because of good relationship with the ACA/police/Bank Negara (this implies that new state government is not given due cooperation by these organizations) or the previous government never really vetted their councillors. Which is which?

 

Two councillors will be asked to make statutory declarations (what’s with these declaration thing nowadays?) so that they can be jailed if they are found to have made a false statement. Also, the appointment for councillor position is one year, after which it will be reviewed.

 

Meanwhile, according to checks with police, only one of the three (a 50-year old PKR member) had a police conviction (for ROBBERY!). Two others – Supriamany Sinnayapal, 59, and Sooria Narayanan, 38, were clean.

 

Supriamany, a retired Tenaga Nasional Bhd technician, said:

“I am a victim of political assassination. I have no criminal records. I have never dealt in drugs, stolen or committed murder. Why am I being implicated in this?” he said, adding that he was considering legal action.


Sooria Narayanan, of the Ampang Indian Community Charity Bureau, also expressed shock at the allegation, adding that it had tarnished

his reputation. He also said he did not lobby to become a councillor but was offered the post.The Star reported that one of the two nominees to the Ampang Jaya Municipal Council (MPAJ) accused of having been involved in criminal activities has served two years in restricted residence in Gua Musang. It is learnt the nominee was sent as a restricted resident to the remote Kelantan town from 2003-2005 for suspected vice activities.

From robbery to vice. Still unclear on the whole situation.