Posts Tagged ‘Selangor’

temple chairmen to meet khir toyo

December 31st, 2007
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


 
 
Khir to meet all Hindu temple chairmen this Friday

BERNAMA

 
 

KUALA LUMPUR, MON:

SELANGOR MB Datuk Seri Dr Mohamad Khir Toyo will be meeting the chairmen of all Hindu temples in the state this Friday to discuss problems affecting the places of worship.

Malaysian Hindu Council chairman Datuk R. Nadarajah said the meeting would take place at Batu Caves on Friday and about 800 chairmen of Hindu temples throughout Selangor were expected to attend it.

“We will use this opportunity to discuss with him problems affecting Hindu temples and hope that he will be able to assist us in resolving them,” Nadarajah told reporters this today.

He said a memorandum on the problems affecting Hindu temples would also be handed over to Khir.

interview with mother mangalam

December 30th, 2007
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Malaysia's 'saint of the poor'

SYIDA LIZTA AMIRUL IHSAN

.

Mother Mangalam focused her life on the Pure Life Society after a prayer was answered in 1976.

Datin Paduka Mother Mangalam Iyaswamy Iyer, 81, president of the Pure Life Society, is a relentless social worker bent on serving the less fortunate. This soft-spoken 'mother' to orphans and underprivileged children speaks to SYIDA LIZTA AMIRUL IHSAN about personal struggles, fellow Malaysians and the power of prayer

Q: The Pure Life Society was registered in 1950 to promote multi-religious, multiracial and multi-cultural understanding. Soon after World War 2, it was involved in rescue work and outreach programmes to help the poor. What lessons have you learned along the way?

A: The war was a very big lesson. Everyone had to struggle and start from scratch. I learned a lot from these struggles; to be resourceful, to be able to live with the bare necessities and to learn the feeling of satisfaction.

Those lessons made me what I am. The war displaced families and children. There were people dying from sickness. It made me think hard and got me to do what I do today.

I am, by nature, very much attached to things and people so I cannot handle unexpected deaths. But at this age I have learned to be more steady and stable.

Q: What are some of your personal highlights?

A: If that means something joyful, it was when I came up first in class in Standard Eight (also known as Junior Cambridge). I had worked hard and the results made me happy. The irony was, it happened in 1941, the same year World War 2 broke out in the country.

There have been more struggles than anything else in my life. Sometimes, I get really down. In 1976, for instance, at the time I needed to put up this building badly, my brother was medically boarded in Singapore. I was the eldest in the family and I was responsible for my siblings. So that took a toll on me. On one hand, I had my family and, on the other, the orphans of the society.

I prayed to God and asked that I be shown a way to continue with my work. A couple of weeks later, my mother called to say my dad won first prize in the lottery (so I didn't need to worry about my family). I could literally feel the burden lifting.

It was a change in my pattern of life and I focused on the society.

Q: What are some of the things you have learned about your fellow Malaysians?

A: Malaysians are really a wonderful lot. Somehow, they rise to the occasion every time help is needed. I just have to think about it and it materialises, whatever the needs are. Just the thought will do. Help comes from all races and it's not just in the form of money, but also in service.

Q: Over the years, do you think Malaysians have become more united or less united?

A: In the beginning, this was in the 1940s and 1950s, there were no differences among the people. It was all very inclusive. We didn't regard each other as Chinese, Malay or Indian.

Unfortunately, now, although people try their level best to come together during functions and events, I think it has become a little superficial, and unity is only on the surface. But as far as I am concerned, everyone is my friend.

This society is not a place that's exclusively for Indians. In fact, the first boy from the society to go to university was a Malay.

Before the 1970s, there were Malay kids here. I must say the situation is much better now.

We had three Malay kids here. We sent them to religious classes to learn more about Islam, cooked special food for Hari Raya and made sure they observed their religious practices like fasting.

We should all think that we are part of the human race. If you peel off the skin, we are all the same; same red blood, same bones, same flesh.

Q: What is it about Malaysia that you cannot find anywhere else? What do you love about this country?

A: It is peaceful and that's a fact. Other than war in the 1940s, this country is generally peaceful. Of course, there are bubbles here and there, but that is quite natural. When there is heat inside, there will be bubbles.

But in this country, if you work hard, you will survive and succeed.

Life is much easier now, a far cry from the time of war when I couldn't even find something as simple as aerated water.

And I love Malaysia for the generosity of its people. When (former prime minister) Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad gave a boost to the Malaysian economy, people had more money to give.

Before that, it was quite difficult to get support. We had to do a lot of fundraising. When the economy got better, people could afford to help more.

Q: Who are your heroes?

A: There are many. Among them are the late Tun Tan Cheng Lock (founder and first president of MCA), the late Pendita Zaaba (educationist and thinker), the late Tun V.T. Sambanthan (former MIC president), the late Datuk Onn Jaafar (Umno founder), the late Tun Mohamed Suffian Hashim (former lord president), and the late Syed Hussein Alatas (founding member of Gerakan).

My heroes also include Raja Muda of Perak Raja Dr Nazrin Shah, Datuk Michael Chong (MCA Public Services and Complaints Department head) and Tan Sri Lee Lam Thye (National Service Training Council chairman).

These people are very broad in their views and understanding. There is an element of wisdom in the way they look at the future.

And I look up to Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad. He really put Malaysia on the world map.

I also admire Toh Puan Dr Aishah Ong (Universiti Malaya pro-chancellor) and Tun Dr Siti Hasmah Mohd Ali. They stood by their husbands through thick and thin. I admire women who stick by their husbands through difficult times.

Q: You were recently conferred the Datuk Sultan Sharafuddin Idris Shah (DSIS) which carries the title "Datin Paduka" for women by the Sultan of Selangor, Sultan Sharafuddin Idris Shah. How do you feel about that?

A: I feel the same. I'm still the same Mother Mangalam. I hope this will be of help to the organisation though. The praise goes to the children, staff, people around me and the society. Without them I wouldn't be here. And of course, praise be to God.

Q: During the ceremony, the sultan asked you to advise the Indian community not to be extreme. What was your reaction to his request?

A: I believe it is bad for anyone to be an extremist. We must always be moderate in our approach. What the sultan says is correct. If it's extremism that these people pursue, it is not proper.

We already have enough problems in the world, so extremism by anyone, of any race, anywhere, is bad. But whether the people are really extremists is another question altogether, one that I am not in a position to answer.

Q: What do you think about the youth of today? Living in the post-independence era, do you think they have lost sense of the struggle? What do you think they want?

A: Sadly, I think today's youth just want money without having to work hard for it. They always think in terms of money, and they want to study a subject that gives them a lot of money, not what they are passionate about. They change jobs because they want more money. They must realise that money is not everything in life. I think they have become imbued by this sentiment because of the affluent period in the country.

Children demand a lot of pocket money from their parents these days. "Enjoyment" becomes a prominent word in their vocabulary. There is no end to their desires.

They must learn to be satisfied because that is the greatest wealth. Until you are satisfied, you can never be at peace with yourself.

The word "struggle" has no place in the lives of today's youth. They don't want to struggle, they want everything easy. When they go to university, they want loans and scholarships. Even then, some don't repay their loans.

Q: What is your wish for Malaysia as we enter 2008?

A: I hope the mindset of its people will change. I wish adults, from all levels and positions in society and whatever jobs they hold, will become role models to the young.

This is especially so with teachers and social workers because children imitate and follow them.

Q: What do you want to see improved in the country?

A: I think the first thing people must learn is how to maintain their toilets. Public toilets, school toilets, home toilets, anywhere. Once they know how to do that, everything else will follow.

I think the character of a person can be ascertained from how they manage their waste, how they dispose of rubbish, recycle and keep things clean. It's very important.

Q: Could you please share with us what you think is the quintessential Malaysian experience?

A: Food. We get all types of food here. Unfortunately, I'm diabetic so I usually stick to my diabetic bread and raw vegetables wherever I go. But I like food cooked with a lot of spices.

And the friendliness of the people is, I think, something also uniquely Malaysian.

newspaper vendor welcome malays

December 29th, 2007
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Hmm…looks like digging their own grave. All it takes is a policy under certain ministries saying vendors must be registered as bumiputra, and the existing vendors will be either out of job or become errand boys.
'We welcome Malay vendors'

source

KUALA LUMPUR: The newspaper vendor business is open to all, including Malays, and not just restricted to Indians.

Selangor and Federal Territory Indian News Vendor Association president Datuk N. Muneandy said the association was more than willing to help Malays who wanted to venture into the newspaper vendor business.

"I say to my fellow Malay brothers that we are ready to assist those who wish to venture into this business," he said at the association's 43rd annual dinner here last night.

New Straits Times Press (M) Bhd's head of circulation Tasmin Harith Ismail represented NSTP chief executive officer Datuk Syed Faisal Albar.

Muneandy said he also wrote to Prime Minister Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi to clarify a misconception that Indians controlled the newspaper vendor business.

"Many see the industry as dominated by Indians but it is a lowly paid job. Although many vendors are Indians, the main distributors are Chinese."

He also thanked the NSTP for extending its insurance coverage to registered newspaper vendors. Each vendor is entitled to hospitalisation benefits and upon death, there will be a RM50,000 payout. Each family will also receive RM1,000 every month for the next 15 years, in case of death.

more on subashini’s case

December 28th, 2007
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


My understanding (which stands to be corrected) is that the duality is creating problems.

1. The civil marriage should be dissolved in the civil court. the judges agree on this. What if subashini declines to proceed with the divorce? will she be still the legal wife under civil law, but not recognised by syariah law? Can she sue for living expenses, the husband's property etc. later under civil law? If she divorces him, would the property and assets be divided accordingly? how about living subsistence?

2. the husband who converted can pursue his divorce proceedings in shariah court, but it will be recognisable only within islamic domain. so, will the NRD recognise the divorce? If not, will the husband be punished for being legally married to a non-muslim? Can the syariah court accept the divorce result from civil court – to save time and cost and duplicity?

3. Since in syariah law (selangor state), it is said that a parent can convert his/her child as well, what the husband did was correct under law. but this is a cruel and vile act indeed. so much for the compassionate religion. Now the learned judges are telling that there should be an avenue for the other parent to voice objection. what avenue? civil court? then syariah may throw out the civil court judgement since it may be enroaching on islamic issue. if syariah court is the avenue, subashini may not get a fair treatment, besides being non-muslim which means she is not subject to syariah law. so, again another grey area!

4. if each apply for child custody in separate courts, whose judgement will be binding? syariah court may say husband keep the children since they are converted by the husband (how convenient!) while civil court may say subashini keeps the children. or civil court may say that since children have converted, husband gets to keep them. have you seen any worse injustice and perversion of law than this? since the children are product of civil marriage, the children's fate should be decided in civil court. but the cunning husband converts the child and makes him subject to syariah court!

the situation may turn out that subashini gets to raise her children who will be converted to islam by the husband while she is filing another appeal. she can't stop the conversion as it agreed that a parent can do the conversion, no matter how evil, vile and cruel it sounds.

For me, the solution is to ask the husband if he is malaysian first or muslim first. if he is muslim first, kick him out of the country. we don't need such people here. if he is malaysian first, the go to civil court which is open to all malaysian. that's fair in my eyes.

for future cases, JAKIM and other govt agencies must ensure that any would be converts get explicit approval from their families or spouses and settle all divorce/custody/property/asset issues first before converting. perhaps those planning to convert should be given counselling first by their respective religious bodies like Hindu Sangam etc. to ensure the conversion is not superficial or to try bring back the would-be converted back to the original path.

The Subashini case: High Court can hear marriage dispute but…

By : V. Anbalagan

PUTRAJAYA: A High Court has the authority to hear matrimonial disputes of a non-Muslim marriage even if a spouse has converted to Islam.

Federal Court judges Datuk Nik Hashim Nik Abdul Rahman, Datuk Abdul Aziz Mohamad and Datuk Azmel Ma'amor took the unanimous stand yesterday over this longstanding contentious constitutional issue.

However, in a majority ruling, the apex court dismissed R. Subashini's appeal against the dismissal of her injunction application to stop her husband T. Saravanan, whose Muslim name is Muhammad Shafi Abdullah, from dissolving their civil marriage at the syariah court and converting their underage child. Nik Hashim and Azmel in a 2-1 ruling dismissed Subashini's appeal because her divorce petition was filed prematurely.

They also said that the spouse who had converted would not have abused the court process by going to the syariah court to obtain the necessary remedy.

Aziz, who dissented, said since Shafi's date of conversion was unclear, it must be tried before the High Court and as such the injunction should be granted.

All three also held that a spouse who had embraced Islam could convert his or her children without the consent of the other spouse. Aziz, however, said in this case, Subashini must be given the opportunity to object to the conversion.

In the majority judgment written by Nik Hashim, he said section 51 of the Law Reform (Marriage and Divorce) Act 1976 allowed Subashini to dissolve her marriage on grounds that her husband had converted to Islam. He said a proviso in that section, however, imposed a caveat on the wife not to file the petition of divorce until a lapse of three months from the date of the husband's conversion. Nik Hashim said that Shafi and his elder son, Dharvin Joshua, had converted on May 18 last year and that their certificates of conversion conclusively proved this fact.

He said he agreed with the Court of Appeal majority judgment that Subashini's petition contravened the requirement of the proviso of the section as it was filed two months and 18 days after the conversion. "Therefore, the petition was premature and invalid," he said, adding that it would be appropriate for Subashini to file a fresh petition in the High Court to seek all remedies she wanted.

Nik Hashim said he would proceed to answer the jurisdiction issue although Subashini's petition was invalid because a decision of the Federal Court would be of public advantage. "Assuming the petition was filed three months after the conversion, then the High Court would have the jurisdiction to hear and determine the matter even though the husband had converted and commenced proceedings in the syariah court."

Nik Hashim said the status of the parties at the time of marriage was material in determining the question of jurisdiction. "The husband could not shield himself behind the freedom of religion article in the Federal Constitution to avoid his obligation under the 1976 Act on grounds that the civil court has no jurisdiction over him," he said.

Nik Hashim said by embracing Islam, Shafi and Dharvin were subject to Muslim personal and religious laws and it was not an abuse of process if he sought remedies at the syariah court. "Although, the syariah courts are state courts, they are not lower in status than the civil court. I would say they are of equal standing under the Constitution," he said.

Nik Hashim said Subashini's complaint that Shafi had no right to convert either child to Islam was misconceived because a careful study of the laws revealed that the husband or wife had such right.

Husband’s conversion ‘disputable’

source

PUTRAJAYA: Muhammad Shafi Abdullah's conversion is disputable and this has to be determined at the High Court. 

Federal Court judge Datuk Abdul Aziz Mohamad said as such he was allowing R. Subashini's appeal to stop Shafi from dissolving their civil marriage in the syariah court.

Aziz said the court must determine whether the conversion date of Shafi was based on his certificate or on facts made available to Subashini. "The (Subashini's) petition was presented on Aug 4 last year. It would escape the (three month) prohibition only if the husband converted on May 4 last year or earlier," he said in his dissenting judgment.  (The majority judgment said that Shafi had conclusively converted on May 18 last year.)
 

Aziz said the civil court had exclusive jurisdiction over dissolution of marriage, maintenance, custody and other ancillary relief because the union was solemnised under Law Reform (Marriage and Divorce) Act 1976. Aziz said Shafi had abused the process in getting the custody of the children in the syariah court because the religious court has no jurisdiction in the custody of a non-Muslim marriage.

He added that Subashini had a right to be heard. "She can object to the conversion or seek an injunction to stop the procedure," he said.

Bar Council: Decision a positive move

source

KUALA LUMPUR: Bar Council chairman Ambiga Sreenivasan said the Federal Court's decision was a positive move, as it recognised that the Syariah High Court had no jurisdiction over non-Muslims.

"I need to read the grounds of the judgment in full before I can comment any further. "But judging from the brief report, a positive part of the case is that it has upheld the decision in the case of Tan Sung Mooi v Too Miew Kim, and held that the civil court is the court where dissolution of marriage takes place." In the 1994 case, the court decided that the civil courts would have jurisdiction to annul a marriage where one party was a non-Muslim.

"However, a worrying aspect of the case is it has held that a parent can convert a child, which is not entirely in accord with our reading of the Federal Constitution.

"We think such a decision should require the consent of both parents. Additionally, it doesn't appear to resolve the issues which are faced by couples who are in a similar situation."

more articles in the blog at here and here.

electoral roll gazetted

December 28th, 2007
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


I sent email to SPR on 4th Dec, but no reply till today.

New electoral roll gazetted

source

PUTRAJAYA: The Supplementary Electoral Roll for the third quarter of 2007 has been gazetted after completion of investigations on a few disputes. 

With the gazetting yesterday, the electoral roll now stands at 10,820,650 registered voters. 

In a statement here yesterday, the Election Commission (EC) said it received objections in 21 constituencies involving 39,868 voters and disputes in four constituencies involving 11,118 voters had been completed. 

Of the number, 7,745 were on newly registered voters while 3,373 were on voters who had changed their addresses. 

Completed investigations were on four constituencies – P.037 Marang (Terengganu), P.085 Pekan (Pahang), P.091 Rompin (Pahang) and P.093 Sungai Besar (Selangor). 

The Election Commission also wants help from people to produce death certificates or burial permits of their next-of-kin to the commission to help them clean up the electoral roll. 

To make changes, one can e-mail spr@spr.gov.my or write in. 

The contact number for the Election Commission headquarters is 03-8885 6500.