Author Archive

HINDRAF also rebranding?

November 10th, 2008
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Looks like HINDRAF has been forced to rebrand as well. Since it has been branded as illegal organisation, they have to look at the alternatives. Malaysiakini seems to be the only one publishing any news on HINDRAF now. The article mentions the possibilities – either branch out into other civil rights movements or start a political party.

Interestingly, the idea of joining Pakatan seemed to be put on the backburner for a while. Perhaps HINDRAF realises that being neutral is better, Pakatan is not trustable, or Pakatan rejected them (due to some restrictions or demands made by either party). The makkal may also won’t like the idea of HINDRAF joining Pakatan. I also don’t think HINDRAF should be allowed into Pakatan because they will be consisting of members of certain race only, which will automatically imply raced-based politics. Even though one can argue that HINDRAF fights for all Malaysian, the perception of the membership is one of race-based party. Same reason I don’t agree to PAS joining Pakatan (membership limited to religious affliation). Solution – HINDRAF change name and opens membership to all.

The banned Hindu Rights Action Force (Hindraf) is planning to branch out into other civil rights movements to strengthen their struggle and make it difficult for the government to pin them down. Its activists are also mulling the formation of a political party to further champion the cause of disgruntled ethnic Indians in the country.

The Home Ministry’s ban on Hindraf last October has changed the mindset of the movement’s leaders, and they are now open to the idea of exploring other options to spearhead their cause.

Prior to the ban, they said activists were confined to Hindraf, making it easy for the authorities to nail them down.

“It forced us to explore other ways and means to continue our fight for justice, equality and freedom for all Malaysians,” former Hindraf leader RS Thanenthiran (right) told Malaysiakini in Penang last night.

Although former Hindraf leaders had earlier considered joining component parties in Pakatan Rakyat, they have now concluded that having their own non-government organisations and political entities would be more effective.

“We can join Pakatan if we want to, on our own terms,”said Hindraf Perak co-ordinator A Vethamurthy

Home Minister Syed Hamid Albar has claimed that Hindraf advocated ‘extremism’ to justify his ministry’s ban on the human rights movement, which shot to prominency when it filed a suit against the British government, Malaysian former colonial masters, early last year.

Hindraf leaders also believe that the government ban on their movement has stopped several splinter groups, allegedly sponsored by Indian parties linked to the governing Barisan Nasional, from calling themselves the ‘true’ champions of the Indian cause.

London based Hindraf self-exiled leader P Waythamoorthy went as far as declaring that the “ban is a blessing in disguise”.

Penang Hindraf deputy chairperson S Sanjay Ram said the ban had eliminated the confusion caused by these so-called bogus groups and made it clear to Malaysian Indians that only those who supported Waythamoorthy and his detained brother Uthayakumar were ‘genuine’ Hindraf activists.

Sanjay Ram is also optimistic that by splitting Hindraf into several inter-linked civil and political movements, the group can re-emerge as a more powerful movement and attract more support.

“A Hindraf based political party would break up support base of BN Indian parties,” he said.

Since Hindraf activists revealed their intention to join Pakatan partners, it is learnt a delegation from the parliamentary opposition pact had held a private discussion with Waythamoorthy in London a few days ago.

Waythamoorthy has declined to provide details of the said meeting, but confirmed that Pakatan leaders have been in contact with him over the issue.

However, local Hindraf leaders are confident that Waythamoorthy would not make a political deal with Pakatan at the expense of Hindraf and Indian interests.

“He will not shirk his responsibility to the Indian community,” said Thanenthiran of Waythamoorty, who is expected to make a announcement in a week’s time on Hindraf next move.

We have to wait till next week to see how things go. Perhaps there will be some announce to commorate first anniversary of HINDRAF rally in two weeks time.

Non Muslims shouldn’t interfere with Fatwa Council

November 10th, 2008
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


I agree with Zahid’s statement that non-muslim NGOs should not challenge the fatwa council’s credibility. Why should non-Muslims be bothered about those ridiculous statements and rules issued by their religion for their followers? Unless such rules look down/insult our religions, we should stay as far away from this council. For example, if the council decides to rule Yoga as haram, then, they should put in a nice sentence, not make Yoga a devil’s tool, or humiliate other religion/beliefs just to make theirs stand our better.

Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department Datuk Seri Dr Ahmad Zahid
Hamidi today told non-Muslim non-governmental organisations (NGOs) not
to challenge the National Fatwa Council’s credibility.

He said it was unfair to challenge or dispute a fatwa issued by the
council purely on logic because it could create confusion among the
people.

The issue of “pengkid” (tomboyism) for example had
become a social problem when the Department of Islamic Development
Malaysia received complaints and on that ground, the Fatwa Council felt
it was necessary to issue a fatwa on it, he said.

“The problem
of a girl running away with a boy can be solved using the law but what
about a girl running away with a girl who looks like a boy?” he told
reporters here.

Zahid said if the NGOs were confused or wanted
further explanations on the background of a fatwa, he was willing to
organise a forum.

The NGOs or non-Muslim writers would not resort to
disputing or challenging a fatwa but instead respect it should
discussions be held, he said commenting on the protest staged by
non-Muslim NGOs — “Katagender” and “Foot-not-Bombs” — on Friday against
the Fatwa Council ruling that “pengkid” is haram.

I just remembered something someone said – if so many agama lessons and agama classes does nothing to improve the condition, do you think a fatwa will achieve anything at all? Not that I’m against the rules, but perhaps the solution lies in other areas, rather than issuing fatwas.

Non-muslim NGOs should not fight against such rulings on behalf of others. If the muslims are indeed against certain fatwa ruling, let them voice out. There’s millions of them, with many many NGOs. Surely got many channels to highlight their objection.

allocation for non Muslim place of worship still available

November 10th, 2008
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


RM1.8 million – wow, that’s a lot!. With less than 2 months left, there’s not much activities that can be done. Allocations that are not used will not be carried forward to next year. What the places of worship can do is small renovations, purchase of items, and also perhaps organising charity event. School is around the corner. It will be great if some underprivileged kids are given new uniforms, shoes, bags and stationeries. If RM3 million can be finished in 60 over days under BN, why does it take new government long to finish the money?

1 – current government inefficient
2 – current government very stingy or ask too many question
3 – previous government very lax or used it as election goodies
4 – money went to cronies/favoritism under previous ruling
5 – lack of awareness

Only 10% of the additional RM2mil allocation by the Selangor Government for non-Muslim places of worship has been used up.

State Local Government, Study and Research Committee chairman Ronnie Liu said one reason more than RM1.8mil remained untouched was because many did not know its existence.

He said the previous Barisan Nasional government had allocated RM3mil for such places of worship this year, but all had been spent before the general election in March.

“The additional RM2mil is part of the commitment of the new government to help non-Muslim places of worship,” he said.

The allocation, he added, was meant for repairs, renovations and organising charity events.

He added that so far only Taoist and Hindu temple committees have applied.

“We hope churches and temples will apply before the end of Decem­ber,” he said.

Liu, who also sits on the committee for non-Muslim affairs, said there would be a higher annual allocation next year.

He said the allocation, for RM6mil, was approved in the state assembly last month.

Those who want to apply for this year’s allocation can write to the State Secretariat, Bangunan Sultan Salahuddin Abdul Aziz Shah, Bukit SUK, Section 5, 40503, Shah Alam or call 03-5544 7000.

The Mind’s Afternoon with Vinod Shekhar 2

November 10th, 2008
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


The Star covered the talk by Vinod Shekar. I also found a posting in Tulipspeaks’s blog with some pics as well.

Malaysian Indians should stop blaming others for their woes and start taking responsibility, said Petra Group chief executive officer Datuk Vinod Sekhar.

Speaking at a forum on the future of Indian youths here on Saturday, he said the first step was to see themselves as Malaysians and not Tamils, Telugu or Malayalees.

“We are Malaysians and we should not let anybody tell us otherwise,” he added.

The forum was attended by about 600 middle-class youths and professionals including budding business people hungry for financial and other help to expand.

Vinod was speaking as a role model at the forum organised by TheMind (Malaysian Indian Educational Development Association).

Vinod, who is supporting TheMind with RM100,000 a year to network, establish self-help programmes and open up opportunities for Indian youths, urged Indians here to set up groups and seize opportunities as Malaysians and to not rely on Indian-only organisations and political parties for leadership.

“They should develop multiple leadership potential from within the community,” he said, adding that the community should stop blaming and start asking what was holding it back.

“We’ve got to coalesce and look out for each other and build on it,” he said to questions from the floor.

“Our political parties let us down, we let ourselves down.

“We have to help each other and help others, including the poor among Malays and Chinese,” he said, adding that the idea was to start small at local levels and get as many individuals involved.

Not sure if there 600 people though. I think more closer to 400. Hope that those who attended get some benefit one way or another.

Kavyeas investigates Murugiah visiting Teresa

November 10th, 2008
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


After branding Murugiah as small boy, now Kayveas is under pressure to investigate of Murugiah went to see Teresa Kok over her complaint on food during detention. Teresa Kok not bothered to reply!!!

I think PPP council member Shanmuganathan will be next target because he was quoted as supporting Murugiah.

PPP Youth chief Senator T. Murugiah’s aggressiveness in overseeing the Public Complaints Bureau has landed him in the soup with his own party.

Party president Datuk M. Kayveas has written to Seputeh MP Teresa Kok to enquire if she had made an official complaint to the bureau concerning the poor quality of food served to her during police detention.

Kayveas wanted to know if Teresa had personally approached Muru­giah, the Deputy Minister in the Prime Minister’s Depertment, to handle her case.

Your feedback is important to the party as to whether he responsibly discharged his duties as a deputy minister, wrote Kayveas in a letter dated Sept 29.

Kayveas, when asked, said he had been questioned by someone (whom he did not want to identify) whether Murugiah went to Teresa’s office on his own initiative.

I am being asked why a BN official went to an opposition party member’s office to see Teresa and I have to reply.

When contacted, Kok said she was not going to reply to the letter because she did not want to get involved in PPP’s internal politics.

I have ignored the letter and I really do not know what is the purpose of the letter.

As far as I am concerned, Murugiah had genuinely executed his duties as a deputy minister and there should be no reason for the letter to be written to me, she told The Star.

On Saturday Kayveas was asked at a press conference if there was any problem with Murugiah’s public service, to which he answered no.

Meanwhile, PPP supreme council member Dr N.A. Shanmuganathan said Murugiah was doing excellent public service attending to problems faced by the public.

His work has created a great impact on the public as he has been able to resolve problems immediately by getting the parties involved to communicate and iron out issues.