Author Archive

Government consider converting Tamil schools status if land issue settled

July 26th, 2008
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


There was a meeting on Thursday to discuss about the partially-aided Tamil schools, chaired by Education Minister, Hishamuddin. Others included Devamany, Murugiah (PPP), Saravanan.

The meeting repeated the same mantra on the schools being on private or estate land, but this time there are plans to get those lands from the plantation/private companies and convert to government owned. With quite a number of schools on GLC lands, it should not be a problem, and should have never been a hurdle in the first place.

While the report says there are about 250 (or half the schools) were in private land, if I’m not mistaken, more than 320 schools (about 2/3) are partially aided.

There should also be efforts to relocate under-enrolled schools to other places. Education Ministry should set up a channel for residents/community to forward their requests. If there are ample number of potential students, let’s say 200 of them, then relocation must be seriously considered.

But what made me stand up was the news report in Minnal FM which says that MIC was thankful for government to converting schools after getting the land from plantations. This is quite misleading because the meeting highlighted the possibility only, and nothing has been done yet.

One have to ask why this effort is being taken now. What was the catalyst? Obviously Samy Vellu and MIC 😉

From the Star:

KUALA LUMPUR: The Government will consider converting the status of partially aided Tamil primary schools to fully aided, if the land issue can be solved.

Education Minister Datuk Seri Hishammuddin Tun Hussein said the problem was that about 250 Tamil primary schools were presently built on estate land.
Status problem: Hishammuddin (right), Deputy Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department S.K. Devamany (middle) and Deputy Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department Senator T. Murugiah holding copies of the ministry’s reports on the status of Tamil primary schools after the meeting yesterday.

“We can’t have a fully aided school if the land doesn’t belong to us,” he told reporters after chairing a special committee meeting to overcome Tamil school issues.

He said the ministry had to identify if the land belonged to government-linked companies, private companies or individuals.

Besides land, he said, the Government also had to look at other issues such as the supply of teachers, upgrading of schools and under-enrolled schools.

“There is no point converting a school if it only has three pupils. This is why in our meeting, we identified the actual number of pupils and schools, schools which need to be upgraded or are overcrowded,” he said.

There are presently 523 Tamil primary schools in the country.

He said the committee found that the overall situation at Tamil primary schools was not as bad as painted by some parties.

“We are also working closely with the Plantation Industries and Commodities Ministry to upgrade the infrastructure of Tamil schools in plantations,” he said.

Hishammuddin said 171 applications had been approved in cases of children who do not have birth certificates as long as their parents obtained a confirmation letter from their village headman or the Village Development and Safety Committee (JKKK) head to allow them to go to school.

A bit on Tamil Schools

July 26th, 2008
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Taken from the NST:

MUCH has been said and written about the plight of Tamil schools in the country, often said to be treated as the step- child or, as an educationist puts it, “the Cinderella of the Malaysian educational system”.

But who is treating it as a stepchild? Most fingers point at the government, but there are several pointing at the Indian community itself.

Comparisons are sometimes made with Chinese schools which, like most Tamil schools, are not fully funded by the government.

Malaysian Indian Businessmen Association president P. Sivakumar dismisses outright claims that the community is not doing enough to assist Tamil schools.

If not for private donors and wealthy businessmen from the community, Sivakumar argues, half of the 523 Tamil schools in the country would have been closed down a long time ago.
He cites a recent example where a hall for a Yahya Awal Tamil school in Johor Baru, costing RM700,000, was built with public donations.

Does this mean the community can now stop asking for government handouts? Can it become like the Chinese community, which even runs private independent schools?

Sivakumar says it is unfair to compare the two communities.

“Almost 90 per cent of the (Indian) community are wage earners. There is no way for these people to contribute when they themselves often do not have enough. “It is high time these schools were turned into fully-funded schools. Don’t drag out the problem any more.”

Education, Welfare and Research Foundation Malaysia (EWRF) president S.P. Pathi agrees that the community cannot take care of the Tamil schools on its own. He dismisses as illogical the comparison between the Indians and the Chinese as economically, the Indians were way behind them. “About 10 years ago, 85 per cent of the Tamil school-going pupils came from families earning RM1,200 and below. Things have not changed much,” he says.

A dissenting voice comes from YSS director of policy research, K. Manikam.

“Many businessmen and well-to-do Indians are not coming forward to help Tamil schools,” says Manikam, who has been involved in Tamil school issues for eight years. “Most Indians are willing to spend on temples rather than Tamil schools. Temples are given very little allocation but Indians fork out their own money and build big temples costing millions of ringgit. “Why can’t the same be done for Tamil schools?”

Manikam says the community must take the initiative to invest its resources in primary education.

Perhaps there is another major difference between Chinese and Tamil schools.

The Chinese, although speaking different dialects at home, have a common “Chinese language” in Mandarin whereas Tamil schools are mainly for Tamils and not for all Indians, who have their own written and spoken languages. This could be why, although there is a growing number of well-to-do Indians, the contribution to Tamil schools remains small.

Manikam agrees that most of the other sub-ethnic groups like the Telugus, Malayalees and Punjabis prefer not to send their children to Tamil schools as it is not their mother tongue. “The English-speaking and non-Tamil speaking families also prefer to send their children to national schools. “Many feel it is beneath their status to send their children to Tamil schools as most of the pupils there are from poor families,” he says.

Tamil schools in the country began in 1816 when the first was established in Penang. More followed with the opening up of rubber estates although not all owners supported or provided funds. Things improved in the 1930s when the Indian government raised the issue of the treatment of Indian labourers with the colonial government in then-Malaya. Soon, the government started providing financial aid and teacher training and appointed inspectors for Tamil schools.

At its height in 1957, there were 888 Tamil schools, but the number had fallen to 523 by last year. Nevertheless, the enrolment has seen a 108 per cent increase, rising from 50,766 pupils in 1957 to 105,618 pupils last year. The number of teachers has also risen from 3,258 teachers in 1970, to 7,126 last year. The numbers clearly show that there is a demand for places in Tamil schools.

Or is it a case of parents having no choice but to send their children to such schools because national schools are too far from their homes?

Manikam says there is an increase in the enrolment in Tamil schools because of the improvement in academic performances. “In 2002, only 45 pupils scored 7As in their UPSR but the number increased to 583 pupils last year,” he says.

inflation is at 7.7 percent

July 24th, 2008
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Our inflation rate used to be the lowest in the region if we used the official value of 2.8 percent. After the fuel price increase and its domino effect across the consumer sector, it was estimated that inflation will double to about 6%. Warning came in the form of May’s inflation which was 3.8% and some like Aseambankers expected it to be between 7.5 and 8 percent for the period July to December.

Today’s major headlines brought the bad news – 7.7 percent for June, and its expected to be the same in July due to increase in electricity tariff. This value is a 27-year high, since 1981’s 10.8 percent.

The substantial rise in the price of petrol and diesel announced by the
Government beginning June 5 is the main reason for the surge, said
Domestic Trade and Consumer Affairs Minister Datuk Shahrir Abdul Samad.

Other figures announced by the minister:

  • CPI for January to June this year had also increased by 3.7% compared
    with the same period last year, which was from 105.1 to 109.
  • Index for food and non-alcoholic beverages for June compared to the
    same month last year showed high percentage change of 10.0% while the
    index for non-food increased by 6.7%.
  • From January to June,
    index for food and non-alcoholic beverages increased by 6.1% and
    non-food 2.6%, while among the groups with high weights were transport
    (+4%), and housing, water, electricity, gas and other fuels (+ 1.4%).
  • The
    6.1% increase in the index for food and non-alcoholic beverages was the
    result of increases in the index for items such as milk, cheese, eggs,
    rice, bread, cereals, meat, vegetables, seafood, fruits, sugar, jam,
    honey, chocolate, confectionary and fats.
  • Among the food items
    that recorded notable increase in the June index were tomatoes, chicken
    eggs, rice, glutinous rice, imported beef, beehoon, dried noodles,
    watermelon, carrots, chicken and wheat flour.

Impact of UMNO and PAS talks

July 23rd, 2008
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


While some PAS stalwarts claim the talks between certain UMNO and PAS leaders were aimed to trap PAS, UMNO leaders asked the nation not to be worried as the focus is on Malay and Islam issues (well, that creates more panic now!). Lim Guan Eng says nothing much to worry but he was interested to know what the talks were all about.

Umno supreme council member Datuk Shahrir Abdul Samad said DAP should
not be overly suspicious as Umno had not abandoned its multi racial
stance.

While UMNO leaders try to clear the air that the talks were purely on the topics above and that non-Muslims should not be worried, Khir Toyo proudly reveals that there were efforts to coax PAS to join UMNO and rule over Selangor just days after the general elections.

In a posting on his blog, Khir said Umno had offered its arch-rival
PAS the menteri besar post during a dialogue session held shortly after
the elections.

Apart from this, he said PAS was also offered the
deputy menteri besar as well as four executive councillors posts if it
agreed to form the coalition.

Khir also said he was willing to be
left out of the state government line-up if that would encourage PAS to
accept the partnership.

“I brought them (PAS) for a muzakarah
(dialogue) with the prime minister and suggested to Abdullah (Ahmad
Badawi) that PAS leaders in Selangor be offered those posts,” he added.

A PAS leader also mentioned that UMNO tried to offer them the Selangor Menteri Besar post in order to get back Selangor.

For PAS, the announcement of such talks have created discomfort and split in the party, something that will make UMNO happy.

For UMNO, this boosts the president’s standing and push him ahead of other pretenders.

Strangely enough, the rest of BN coalition are very quiet. We must remember that MCA, MIC, etc. are against PAS as a matter of political stand. So, how does this meetings affect them? Should Gerakan, a so-called multiracial party initiate talks with PKR or DAP? Wonder what UMNO will say on that 🙂

What is the response from MIC? Happy or unhappy? Any standard replies like “we have faith in the BN spirit”?

PAS was once aligned with UMNO in the BN before the went on separate ways. So, one can’t dismiss the possibility of such affliations happening in the near future. After the demise of Nik Aziz, the road will be clear for such partnership.

And that may well mean the end of BN coalition for MCA, Gerakan, MIC and other non-Muslim parties for UMNO-PAS team will try to “islamize” the country.

With attention turning towards UMNO-PAS topic, those leaders under pressure can breathe easier now. More headache for the rest of the pack.

For Pakatan, the brittle nature of the coalition is being put test. One problem after another keeps poppin up, and only matter of time before the coalition gives way. Most likely PAS will pull out, leaving DAP and PKR. So, PAS will be the dark horse. Will they join UMNO? That will cause MCA, MIC, Gerakan et. al. to leave BN. Will these parties team up with the Pakatan duo? That will change the political scenario into Malay Muslim versus non-Muslims. I believe there’s only one winner in that duel.

Will the time to migrate come soon?

DAP copycat

July 23rd, 2008
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


This is indeed a slap in the face for Penang CM and DAP. One of their Penang state assemblyman was found to have copied questions from their nemesis party, Gerakan’s assemblyman which was raised in the last assembly term.

 

This gaffe was not to be missed by Gerakan, who branded the DAP-led state government a “copy cat” government.

 

The culprit was Sungai Pinang state assemblyperson Koid Teng Guan who was found to have duplicated the written questions in total from those previously submitted by Gerakan’s former Datuk Keramat assemblyperson Ong Thean Lye on November 19 last year. The three questions were on the monorail project, natural gas vehicle pumping stations and the state sports trust fund.

 

Even though fellow assemblymen try to cover for him, citing that his act was not a crime nor unethical, I feel that an elected representative should know how to behave. Copying, from the “enemy” no less, is not a examplery act at all.

 

DAP should send their assemblyman for training first. At least learn to modify a bit la. Even college kids can do better!