Archive for the ‘BornInMalaysia’ category

Broadband definition

June 29th, 2011
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Just checked wikipedia on what is defined as broadband:

Broadband is often called “high-speed” access to the Internet, because it usually has a high rate of data transmission. In general, any connection to the customer of 256 kbit/s (0.25 Mbit/s) or greater is more concisely considered broadband Internet access. The International Telecommunication Union Standardization Sector (ITU-T) recommendation I.113 has defined broadband as a transmission capacity that is faster than primary rate ISDN, at 1.5 to 2 Mbit/s. The FCC definition of broadband is 4.0 Mbit/s. The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) has defined broadband as 256 kbit/s in at least one direction and this bit rate is the most common baseline that is marketed as “broadband” around the world. There is no specific bitratedefined by the industry, however, and “broadband” can mean lower-bitrate transmission methods. Some Internet Service Providers (ISPs) use this to their advantage in marketing lower-bitrate connections as broadband.

source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Broadband_Internet_access

So, the baseline is 256kbps, which is most commonly marketed worldwide.

I’m not sure which baseline is adapted by our country, but according to the minister, we have reached 60% penetration. If its 256kbps, well nothing much to say. Also need to consider the quality of the transmission.

 

This year’s national broadband penetration 60 per cent target has been achieved, said said Information, Communications and Culture Minister Datuk Seri Dr Rais Yatim.

The distribution of 1 Malaysia netbooks and launched village broadband facilities have contributed to the quick success said Dr Rais, according to Bernama Online.

He was speaking in Kampung Rumpun Makmur, part of the Kerdau state constituency in Pahang today.

The success has spurred the ministry to increase the target to 70 per cent penetration nationwide for 2011.

The minister also highlighted the efforts of the Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission (MCMC) and respective telcos in improving access and quality.

source: http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/malaysia/article/2011-broadband-target-achieved-in-half-a-year-says-minister/

 

misleading subsidy information?

June 29th, 2011
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


I tried searching the statistics for 2010, but so far the 74 billion refers to subsidies in 2009. Not sure if coincidentally the amount is same for 2010.

For 2009, the slides from Pemandu shows that:

 

[click to enlarge]

42.4 billion was for social subsidy (health and education?) which is 57%.  And this is mentioned in media as well, with slightly different figures:

According to Pemandu figures, the country’s total subsidy bill was RM74 billion, or equivalent to RM12,900 per household.

Pemandu said the government subsidises RM23.5 billion for fuel, RM4.6 billion for infrastructure, RM3.1 billion for food and RM41.8 billion for social welfare (health, education and higher education).

But the finance ministry said yesterday the country’s total subsidy was RM18.6 billion or equivalent to RM3,246 per household.

It said that RM7.1 billion was spent for fuel, RM800 million for infrastructure, RM2.9 billion for food and RM7.8 billion for social welfare.

http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/malaysia/article/tsu-koon-defends-pemandus-subsidy-data/

 

However, if the announcement below is correct, then it won’t look good on Pemandu. Hope to hear their clarification soon.

 

The federal government had “misled” the public when the Performance, Management and Delivery Unit (Pemandu) stated it had footed a subsidy bill of RM74 billion in 2010, an economist said today.

NONESpeaking at the Selangor 2012 budget talks in Subang Jaya today, Nottingham University visiting associate professor Subramaniam Pillay said 54 percent of that bill was for education and healthcare, which is in fact government responsibility.

“All governments in the world subsidise different items for different people. But education and health are what economists call ‘public goods’ and are the responsibility of the government,” said Subramaniam who retired as Nottingham University Business School head last year.

“All developed countries around the world subsidise healthcare heavily, except the US, but (President Barack) Obama recently tabled a Healthcare Bill.”

Take the two big-ticket items away and the bill was only RM31.1 billion, of which only food subsidies (RM3 billion or about 2 percent of the federal budget) went directly to the rakyat.

He said much of the RM23.7 billion fuel and energy subsidies paid in 2010 had gone to gas subsidies to independent power producers.

“For infrastructure, all the subsidies go to (highway concessionaires) not because they need it but because they signed an agreement (with the government), which was stupid. It’s not a subsidy for therakyat,” he said.

The Pemandu figure of RM74 billion has been cited by the government to justify its subsidy cuts on petrol, natural gas, diesel and food items.

http://www.malaysiakini.com/news/168198

Ganeson the crusader of dogs and cats

June 22nd, 2011
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


I think I’ve seen this guy in action near Bandar Bukit Puchong 2’s new agama school area. There were two people who were feeding the dogs under the highway. Really respect this guy!

 

V. Ganeson is not only a big man, he also has an equally big heart.

For five years, he has been on a crusade to rescue and protect stray dogs and cats in and around Kuala Lumpur.

The former Kuala Lumpur City Hall employee has long witnessed acts of cruelty perpetrated against these animals.

Happy moment: Ganeson’s four-legged family members never stop showing excitement whenever he visits them at the farm.

Determined to help the defenceless animals, he gave up his job to execute his noble wish, which has also earned him some solace.

“The animals also take care of me by providing unconditional friendship,” he said.

Several kind-hearted souls who have heard of his crusade have come to his aid, allowing him to keep the dogs and cats at their construction sites and on vacant land.

“A few have even offered to put them up in the basement of their unoccupied buildings,” said the father of two who lives in Kinrara, Puchong, with his factory worker wife A. Pushpawati.

He added that they had two dogs at home that his wife was very fond of.

Currently, Ganeson looks out for some 50 dogs and 10 cats in Kuala Lumpur and about 200 dogs and 20 cats outside the Klang Valley.

“I have rented a plot of land just outside Kuala Lumpur for RM1,000 a month. It has a small house on it,” he said, adding that he visited the farm once or twice weekly. A worker tends to the animals during his absence.

Beloved pooch: Pushpawati feeding one of the two dogs at their home in Kinrara, Puchong.

Ganeson said health officers from various authorities had visited his canine sanctuary and were impressed by his good work there.

“They told me if everyone could take care of their own pets and not dump them, there would not be a problem with strays,” he said.

Soon after quitting his job, Ganeson began buying and selling used cars to feed and shelter his four-legged family.

“At first, it was just a few dogs and I could manage on my salary but now I need around RM15,000 a month,” he said, adding that there were desperate times when he was short of money to feed the dogs and cats.

The details of his expenses are written down meticulously in a scrapbook, which he keeps in his car.

He buys three 10kg packets of rice at RM18 per pack daily for one meal in the day, and for dinner they are fed 25kg of pet food, which costs him RM90 per 18kg pack.

“Then there are the toiletries, medical costs and salaries and provisions for my two workers,” he said, waving to a wolf-like dog he had recently picked up from Old Klang Road.

House of healing: One of Ganeson’s dogs being treated at the UPM animal hospital in Serdang.

Faddy came running, leaving its half-eaten meal, leapt and hugged Geneson, almost throwing him off balance by its weight.

He had seen the frail-looking dog outside a house on many occasions and found out that the owner had sold the property and abandoned the dog.

A few months later, Faddy was taken ill and admitted to the Universiti Putra Malaysia animal hospital in Serdang.

“I spent almost RM760 to treat the dog which, according to the vet, was suffering from leukemia,” he said, adding that it had made a wonderful recovery.

On his ride back home to Puchong, Ganeson also stops daily at several locations to feed stray dogs and cats.

“This is good food. I buy rice and some powdered mutton and feed them,” he said when asked if the food was leftovers picked up from restaurants and hotels.

“People say I am mad for spending so much money on dogs. Several people even called me up after a newspaper published my story and poked fun at what I was doing.

“My obsession has brought me a world of good which money cannot buy,” he said.

“I am at peace with myself, I have no worries, no debts and my two sons are respectable members of society.

“I learnt to forgive and forget just like my dogs.

“Even if you beat them, accidentally step on their paw or yell at them for some minor transgression for a moment they look at you all sad-eyed but then five minutes later, they are all happy and act like nothing happened,” he added.

Recalling the day some five years ago that made him dedicate his life to the care and protection of stray dogs, Ganeson pointed to Chinna, a mongrel and said: “This is the fellow that changed everything for me.”

“He was just an abandoned puppy hiding out in the crevices of chunks of boulders and rubble at an abandoned building in Brickfields.

“I used to park there daily to avoid paying parking charges and return late in the evening to collect my car.

“I used to buy this fellow buns and other stuff whenever I came to fetch my car,” he said.

This relationship had been going on for several months when one day he left the car overnight and came to collect it the next morning.

“This puppy refused to eat the bun I bought but kept on barking and running around my car which was parked on a slope,” he said.

Ganeson sometimes encountered problems starting the car and had parked on a slope to make it easier if he needed to push-start the car.

“I tried to shoo him away but he kept on barking,” he said, adding that when he had checked to see if anything was amiss, he had noticed that several bolts had been loosened from one of his tyres.

After tightening the bolts, he took the dirty, rash-covered puppy to a pet shop for some medication before taking it home and giving it a proper bath.

The next day, as he pulled out his wallet to pay for a drink at a stall, he found the pet shop receipt with six numbers on it staring at him.

He walked next door to a gaming shop and bought the six-digit number and the following day he struck RM100,000.

Soon it dawned on him that there was more to life than accumulating money, buying a big house and fancy cars.

For him, there is no turning back in his selfless endeavour in caring and protecting stray dogs and cats.

Along the way he has met many kind souls, including a woman who contributes five packets of pet food monthly.

“Besides, officers from the Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (SPCA) come around regularly to provide free treatment and medicine for my dogs,” he said.

Ganeson believes he can build a dog and cat sanctuary for unwanted dogs and cats with support from the public.

He can be reached at 010-2866114.

source: http://thestar.com.my/metro/story.asp?file=/2011/6/21/central/8719897&sec=central

 

Klang Valley has more taxis than New York, London, Sydney, HK, Jakarta???

June 22nd, 2011
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


This is another success story for us! we have more taxis than some of the biggest  or famous cities in the world.

For reader’s info – Population of the cities (year): New York (19.5 mil, 2009) , London (7.75 mil, 2009), Sydney (4.57 mil, 2010), Hong Kong (7 mil, 2009), Jakarta (9.58 mil, 2010) against Klang Valley (7.65 mil)?

Within one year, we have 10,000 extra taxis.

And I wonder, how many of the taxi drivers are Malaysians.

Of course, some will say a taxi permit doesn’t translate into a taxi or that some taxis are for designated areas (KLIA for example).

Taxi permits are business tools as well as political tools?

 

 

Are there too many taxis in the Klang Valley? Pose this question to any public transport-user who has experienced spending hours attempting to flag down a cab on a rainy Sunday night, and there’s a good chance you’ll be met with a disbelieving look.

Yet, the figures don’t lie. The Klang Valley has more taxis on its streets than even one of the world’s busiest capitals, New York City.

As of March, the Klang Valley is currently home to 37,000 budget as well as executive taxis. This puts New York City’s 13,237 world-famous yellow cabs well in the shade.

Figures compiled by the Land Public Transport Commission (SPAD), the independent regulator for public transport, reveal that the Klang Valley’s taxi-to-passenger ratio also tops that of other bustling capital cities such as London, Sydney, Hong Kong and even Jakarta.

However the commission tasked with overseeing the country’s public transport demands, faces a monumental challenge on its hands, not just due to logistics problems but that of greed.

Since assuming the reins this year, SPAD has had to fend off numerous approaches for even more taxi permits.

The requests, said SPAD chairman Tan Sri Syed Hamid Albar, come from all quarters, including politicians.

He described the situation as nothing short of a “dilemma”.

“Despite the already high numbers, we are still receiving requests to approve new taxi permits from various groups.

“These include associations, retirees and even politicians,” he told The Malay Mail.

Industry analysts have been quick to point out that the massive number of taxis in the Klang Valley has been a major contributor towards the deterioration of taxi services.

They noted that the burgeoning number of cabs have added to unhealthy practices such as complacency and lack of commitment among taxi companies to provide better service.

Syed Hamid, meanwhile, said the commission was aware of the grouses and problems.

“We are aware of the public outcry with the current taxi service in the Klang Valley. The commission wants to make it a win-win situation for the public as well as taxi operators. We want to uphold professionalism within the industry via the National Public Transport Policy Framework and the Greater Kuala Lumpur – Klang Valley Public Transport Masterplan that will be unveiled in September.”

Syed Hamid said improving taxi service should be based on the laws of supply and demand.

“We hope to address the issue of oversupply of permits gradually in the coming years through the PTMP. The master plan includes training for taxi drivers and ensuring a high level of service efficiency, as part of the terms and conditions.

“We expect the taxi operators to fully operate with us on these matters.”

When asked if the commission would reduce the number of taxis in the Klang Valley, he said: “What had been given, we cannot withdraw. But this does not mean we won’t come down hard on indisciplined and problematic taxi drivers. We won’t hesitate to revoke their permits and licences.”

Big number but poor service

AN industry analyst, who wished to remain anonymous, pointed out that based on research, the high number of taxis in Klang Valley have contributed greatly to the deterioration of service, increased level of unhealthy practice which includes the complacency and level of commitment to run a taxi service.

“By looking at the taxis outnumbering those in other cities which include New York and Hong Kong, we wonder why our taxi service is not even close to the standard of the New York City icon – the yellow cabs,” he said.

“Over there, it is easy to hail a cab as they always move around the city and rarely stay put in one place.”

However, he said, the impression of taxi service in Kuala Lumpur was a different story altogether.

Commonplace among the grouses are difficulty in getting taxis in the city, hailing them by the roadside, the deplorable service quality and cabbies’ refusal to serve certain areas including central KL as well as refusing to use the meter by imposing flat rates.

“It is difficult to board or even hail a taxi during peak hours and we also often hear complaints of taxis overcharging and snubbing passengers.

“There’s no denying the fact that oversupply of taxis has led to the attitude problem of haggling and the existence of touts in public transport terminals, shopping malls and other public places,” said the analyst, who is all too familiar with the taxi industry after being in it for the last 25 years.

‘Stop issuing permits’

TAXI associations are pleading with the government to stop giving out new taxi permits in view of the high number of taxis on Klang Valley roads.

Malaysian Taxi, Limousine and Hired Car Drivers and Operators Association (Petekma) president Yusof Lahir, hoped the Land Public Transport Commission (SPAD) would be firm in addressing the issue of taxi permits oversupply.

“I urged SPAD to please stop giving out new permits if we want to reach the level of taxi service in New York, Hong Kong or Singapore. We are already facing an outpour of taxis on the road lately.

“This problem is also contributing to the lackadaisical attitude among the taxi drivers which includes refusing to serve certain routes,” he said.

Yusof said the teething problem of the oversupply of permits stemmed from the system of awarding permits over the years from the previous governing bodies.

“It was an open secret that previous authorities served the socio-economic objectives which were apparently abused by influential politicians which led to the present state of affairs of so many ‘unnecessary’ permits. I had voiced this previously to various ministers. Now we can see the effect of so many taxis around,” he said.

On taxi touts in public transport terminals and at KL International Airport, Yusof said the high number of taxis and lax enforcement contributed to the matter.

“The government should look into enforcement very seriously. I won’t deny the fact that attitude problems by some drivers have smeared the industry, but enforcement should keep this in check.”

Koperasi Pengangkutan Putrajaya dan Cyberjaya Berhad secretary Mohd Salleh Mat Zain, said he was surprised to learn the number of taxis have increased dramatically since last year.

“In 2010, the number of taxis stood at 27,000 and it was tough for us to ‘cari makan’. Today, there are 10,000 more so you can imagine the competition. The over surge of taxis has also contributed to the forming of cliques where some of them have monopolised some suburban areas,” he said.

He also concurred with the call for the government to regulate the industry and take stringent measures to raise the level of professionalism among the taxi drivers.

“The taxi industry is staring at a bubble with torrent of taxi permits over the years.

“We have seen how taxi drivers refuse to use meters, haggling passengers and prefer to ply specific routes instead of going out to seek customers in the city.”

source: http://mmail.com.my/content/75761-we-beat-new-york

 

low cost flat developer charges extra

June 22nd, 2011
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


This is indeed surprising! As mentioned in the article, its low cost flats, and yet the developer want to charge for parking bays and also collect parking fees? As we all know, its very easy to buy a car, be it new one or from secondary market. In many cases, car purchase is necessitated due to unacceptable levels of public transport, location of the flats, and the job nature of the residents. However, to maintain a car is another story. You have to factor in fuel cost, parking cost, annual fees (road tax, license, insurance), car servicing cost, toll cost, and any parts replacement due to wear and tear.

Maybe because we can see many luxury or higher end cars at low cost apartments, we can say that the residents are not from low income group?

If this move is not nipped in the bud, then I’m afraid it will be used as a precedent by other developers impose more cost and fess to residents living in low cost apartments. This will defeat the purpose of providing affordable homes since the “extra” cost will be burdensome.

Maybe this is one way for developers to “reclaim” money from providing temporary accommodation or rental for the displaced people earlier.

More seriously, CFs were issued, but got complaints that no water supply and incomplete sewerage system??? What is this la?

Now the MBPJ need to act fast and clarify the issues before it becomes more serious.

 

RESIDENTS of Impian Seri Setia low-cost flats in Sungai Way, Petaling Jaya, are unhappy with the terms and services provided by the developer.

They are complaining that the flats are not fit for occupation, lacking in parking space and additional charges imposed that were not stated in their sales and purchase agreement.

Selangor MCA Public Complaints Bureau (BPA) deputy chairman Kelvin Chong, who was speaking on behalf of the residents, said the keys had been handed over to the residents over the past two weeks.

“However, the flats are not fit for occupation despite the issuance of Certificate of Fitness (CF), as there is no water supply and the sewerage system is not completed.

“There is also insufficient parking space. Under the council’s Planning Approval, it was stated that there would be one parking bay for every two flat units.”

As there are 476 units, Chong there should be 238 parking bays as well as an additional 10% bays for visitors, but the developer has only built 201 bays.

Bureau legal adviser Datuk C.K. Lim questioned the developer’s move to sell parking space at RM5,500 per bay, when they are not allowed to do so for low-cost flats.

“The developer will be imposing monthly collection charges. All these matters will lead to haphazard parking and inconvenience, which is a common problem in high-rise buildings,” he said.

Fellow bureau legal adviser KC Wan said the residents had to pay a monthly service charge of between RM66 and RM77 upon completion of their flats.

“However, special consideration should be given to them as these are housing for low-wage earners and the charges are too high,” he said.

Resident Oh Loke Hooi said only half their renovation deposit had been refunded, and that the flats’ management was forcing the residents to only engage the developer’s contractors for renovation work.

“The developer collected a RM500 deposit from each flat owner, but only refunded RM250 after carrying out the renovations, when we should have been refunded in full,” said the 48-year-old.

According to the residents, the land that Impian Seri Setia sits on was formerly a TOL (Temporary Occupation Land) land where they as squatters stayed.

They had to make way for a development project that included apartments and commercial units.

The affected 148 squatters were each given a concession of RM7,000 discount to buy a flat priced at RM42,000.

In the meantime, each squatter was given a RM124 monthly compensation until their flats were completed.

Chong said the bureau had sent a memorandum to Petaling Jaya mayor Datuk Mohamad Roslan Sakiman urging the Petaling Jaya City Council to clarify the matter with the residents, but the council had yet to respond.

“We also urge the developer to have a meeting with the MBPJ and the residents to sort out the issue,” he said, adding that the developer claimed to have fulfilled the contract.

The bureau will also be following up on the matter with the Housing and Local Government Ministry.

“We want to check on the quantum of charges imposed on the residents and why they are being charged maintenance fees despite the flats not being fit for occupation, and whether the developer is allowed to absorb the deposit without a valid reason,” said Wan.

“The developer cannot sell parking bays in low-cost flats as it is considered a facility and common property, or collect parking charges,” said Lim.

“We want to have these issues addressed because these could create a dangerous precedent and affect other similar projects.”

source: http://thestar.com.my/metro/story.asp?file=/2011/6/21/central/8936201&sec=central

 

Another version from with comments from the developer:

SOME house owners of Impian Seri Setia low cost flats in Sungai Way, Petaling Jaya are caught in a quandary with various issues surfacing after the completion of their units.

Selangor MCA Public Services and Complaints Department head Datuk Theng Book and its deputy chairman Kelvin Chong accompanied several house owners — former illegal squatter residents of Jalan SS98/4 who opted to purchase the units — to hand over a memorandum to Petaling Jaya mayor Datuk Roslan Sakiman to help settle their problems recently.

Chong said the complainants were asked to vacate their premises in 2008 for redevelopment and given the option of either staying in other low-cost flats at the expense of the developer Taipan Focus Sdn Bhd or receive an allowance of RM124 every month, for three years pending the completion of the flats.

“The developer has delayed the completion by about six months. They have submitted the application for the Certificate of Fitness (CF) to the Petaling Jaya City Council (MBPJ) on May 23.

The CF for the units were issued yesterday.

Other issues include high maintenance fees and allocation of parking spaces.

The maintenance fee was fixed at RM86.90 per month, almost double the amount compared with other similar low cost flats such as Pangsapuri Permai in Taman Medan (RM45) and Impian Baiduri in Jalan 226 (RM46.50).

“To make matters worse, there are 476 units but only about 200 car parking spaces. And each parking lot is on sale for RM5,500, a huge amount considering each hose only costs RM35,000,” said Chong.

Theng doubts the legality of selling parking spaces. He also expressed his dissatisfaction over the clause by the developer stating that any renovation done by external contractors will void the defect liability period of 18 months.

“The clause was not specified clearly, Basic renovations like installation of iron grilles and doors should be allowed and not subjected to the clause.

The purchasers also complained that the charges imposed by internal contractors are double the amount compared with others,” he said. [typical of developers]

When contacted, Taipan Focus vice-president Simon Ignatius said they have complied to all the regulation by the Selangor government.

“There has been a delay but we are already providing them with temporary housing at low-cost houses in Subang and absorbing the costs.

“Those who rent elsewhere rejected our offer and are receiving an allowance of RM124 every month without fail.

The maintenance fee is not the same for all low-cost houses but calculated accordingly by totaling the costs and dividing by the number of units. [divide by total cost? so this project cost is high, but house price and house size still same range?]

“Regarding the parking space allocation, the guideline set by Selangor government for low-cost houses when we got the approval in 2007 was to provide one car parking space for every two units thus the number. There are free open parking spaces outside and about 200 basement parking spaces which are charged,” he said, adding that they were also building a private tiered parking spaces nearby which the residents can utilise. [ so, basement parking is charged, while the private tiered parking should also be chargable ones ]

“Beautifying the house is not renovation. As long as the renovation does not interfere with the wiring, plumbing or the natural structure of the building, it is okay. Therefore, installation of grilles and doors are fine,” he added.

A purchaser Chang Mei Yong who is currently temporarily residing in a low-cost flats in Subang just want to move in to her new home.

“Living in Subang is very difficult for me especially since I rely on buses to go around. I just want to come back to my original place where I am comfortable,” she said.

Chong hopes the mayor would interfere and expedite the issuing of the CF and have a dialogue with the developer, city council and house owners to help solve their problems fast.

source: http://www.mca.org.my/en/flat-owners-want-mayor-to-help-settle-issues-with-developer/