Archive for the ‘BornInMalaysia’ category

Mini market owner goes to court for 3rd time

December 10th, 2009
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


I’m sure everyone’s familiar with the case of  mini market owner Subramaniam who have been summoned few times by the local council. The court ruled recently that the summons are invalid as the local council don’t have authority to haul someone to court via summons (that’s what I understood). Efforts are underway to change the law, so while that is happening, let’s look at the news below.

Questions are abound. Why wasn’t he given license after 2005? Was he offered an alternative place which he declined? Did he commit some crime like not paying fees or duit kopi(!)? Or was the place marked for development? Or did he vote for the other side? Or someone jealous of his business? Was he selling unauthorised items? Or any complaints on cleanliness by residents? Did he cheat customers? Any sane person would like to know why the license was not renewed, but newspaper did not mention it. When the information is not forthcoming, can you blame people like me for guessing all kinds of reasons?

Would it been different if the owner was not an Indian or Chinese? I like to say no, but well, we being Second (or is it Fourth?) Class citizen and all…

I remember the Pahang Indian Chamber of Commerce making some noise, that’s about it.

Mini-market owner Subra maniam Gopal was charged for the third time this year in the magistrate’s court here with the same four offences of operating his business in 2006 without a licence from the Temerloh Municipal Council.

Once again, Subramaniam, 50, pleaded not guilty to four charges of operating the GSM Mini Market on 10A Jalan Besar Lanchang in Lanchang, Pahang, without a licence on March 10, March 17, April 18 and June 6 in 2006.

Magistrate Ida Rahayu Sharif fixed Jan 26 for mention of the case after his counsel Datuk M. Ramachelvam told the court that they would be raising preliminary objections and Deputy Public Prosecutor Ellyna Othman did not object.

On Dec 1, High Court Judicial Commissioner Akhtar Tahir had released the grounds of his judgment for his Sept 11 landmark decision that Section 120 of the Local Government Act, which had been used by the council to prosecute Subramaniam the first time round, was unconstitutional because it empowered the council to institute prosecutions when Article 145(3) of the Federal Constitution gave that right solely to the Attorney-General.

It is believed the same objection will be taken against yesterday’s charges.

On Nov 22, the Sunday Star frontpaged the Sept 11 judgment and ramifications for local councils nationwide.

In his oral judgment that day, JC Akhtar had also ordered Subramaniam be given a discharge not amounting to an acquittal.

On the following Tuesday, the council served Subramaniam with fresh summonses from the council for the same offences and he was charged on Nov 25 for a second time.

After his not guilty plea was taken, Ida Rahayu allowed DPP Nurshafini Mustafa’s application for a discharge not amounting to an acquittal as the council had applied wrongly for the summonses.

Outside the court yesterday, Subramaniam said he had been running his shop since 1979 and had always had a licence until 2005 when the council rejected his application for a renewal.

“I do not have any alternative to earn a living. I have children studying overseas to support.

“What is happening to me now is not fair as I have been running this business for so many years and I have to continue doing this. Let me live in peace,” he said.

Ramachelvan said his client was in a bind whether to stop or continue with the business because it was his livelihood.

Coalfield Estate problem

December 8th, 2009
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Another test for Selangor government. People not interested to listen to reasons and excuses, which was dished out in generous quantities by previous governments. Now, keyword is proactive and solve problems. If these people not eligible for loans from banks, then work some way out for them. The children can be transfered to schools in Tuan Mee area, for example. Look for solution, not excuse!

And who cares who sees you. I’m not interested in meeting MB or PM or Donald Duck. I just want my problems solved easily, not waste time chasing for appointment and listening to sweet words, but still end up in square one. The protesters also must think of solutions and suggest it.

The residents have to realise, when Tuan Mee estate closes down, the same thing will happen again.

A group of workers from the Coalfield oil palm plantation in Sungai Buloh are decrying the management’s tactics to ‘force’ them to vacate their houses.

Spokesperson Lobat Rajoo said water and electricity supply have been cut to the quarters occupied by 25 families even though negotiations are pending over the eviction order.

“We have had to resort to bathing in the river,” he told reporters, after he and other affected workers held a meeting with leaders of the National Union of Plantation Workers (NUPW) in Petaling Jaya.

He claimed that a further source of frustration was that utility supplies remain connected to some of the vacated houses.

The group had been told to move out by Dec 1, as the site has been earmarked for commercial development.

The families have been offered low-cost housing units near the estate, but are unable to purchase these for various reasons.

Following this, the management reassigned them to the Tuan Mee Estate, some 7km away, where they will be given houses.

Lobat said many in the group are third-generation estate workers and resisting relocation because of the costs that will be incurred. For example, their children will have to travel a longer distance to attend school.

Malaysiakini made several phone calls to the Coalfield estate manager’s office to seek comments, but these went unanswered.

‘State did try to help’

Selangor exco member Dr Xavier Jayakumar, who oversees estate workers’ affairs, said the state has tried to intervene, even though the matter involves an industrial dispute.

However, some of the workers, including Lobat’s group, do not qualify for bank loans to buy the low-cost houses.

He denied allegations that Menteri Besar Abdul Khalid Ibrahim, the state representative for the area, has ignored the plight of the affected workers.

“Khalid has met them twice – once at his office and once on the ground,” said Jayakumar (right), when contacted.

Hindraf activists and Malaysia Consumer Advisory Association president Varatharajoo Murugan, who accompanied the workers to the NUPW office, had earlier alleged that the state government has not been helpful to the group.

Chinese and Indians are Class two citizens while Malays are Class one

December 8th, 2009
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


So says some intelligent being as below.

Ahmad Mahayuddin said Kulasegaran should not even question the rights of the Malays.

“Our numbers are bigger and we have been on this soil before the other races,” he said.

“Kulasegaran must apologise and we give him two weeks to do so or we will protest in front of his office,” he said adding that the Government should revoke Kulasegaran’s citizenship.

“We Malays have been passive over numerous issues. We do not question the rights of the Chinese or Indians on the economic grounds.

So, we want other races not to question our rights. All must remember the Chinese and Indians are Class two citizens while Malays are Class one, said Ahmad.

Surprisingly, the above was not mentioned in NST or Malaysiakini. Only appeared in Star which carried the Bernama version.

This is what the country have achieved. Creating monsters through various policies, education, and lop-sided views.

Who is this Ahmad? (I’m curious, is “Ahmad” a “Malay” name? Did it exist before 15th century? Anyway, not relevant I guess.) Well, Ahmad was part of a group who were protesting today after the cow head group case was heard. He is from the Section 23 Action Group or something like that.

I remember the DAP people apologised after the door mat photo issue, so I guess these guys will be doing the same? Or am I asking too much from these animals?

The full article is below:

Motorists on the busy Jalan Utama here were startled when a group of men unfurled a banner depicting caricatures of DAP leaders with cows’ bodies complete with horns and started stepping on them

Some of the 30-odd men, including the 12 charged in connection with the ‘cow head’ protest on Aug 26, kicked and stepped on the caricatures of DAP adviser Lim Kit Siang, secretary-general Lim Guan Eng and Perak DAP secretary Nga Kor Meng.

The protest took place after the 12 had stepped out of the Sessions Court where Judge Hasbi Hassan had fixed their trial for April 12.

They immediately joined the others who were already outside the court for the protest.

The group shouted Jangan Memperbodohkan Orang Melayu (Do not hoodwink the Malays’).

Asked on the reason for the protest, the non-governmental organisation Badan Bertindak Penyatuan Ummah chairman Ahmad Mahayuddin Abdul Manaf said he had no knowledge about the protest but joined in as he walked out of the court.

“What I understand is that the group who unfurled the banner was angry with the recent incident where DAP members walked on the ‘doormat’ pictures of ex-Pakatan Rakyat representatives Hee Yit Foong, Mohd Osman Jailu and Jammaluddin Mohd Radzi,” he said.

He said the group was ‘just expressing their displeasure against such behaviour (by the DAP.’

The group also lodged 19 police reports against DAP vice-chairman M. Kulasegaran at the Shah Alam police department in Section 11, for questioning the rights of the Malays at the Dewan Rakyat on Monday.

Ahmad Mahayuddin said Kulasegaran should not even question the rights of the Malays.

“Our numbers are bigger and we have been on this soil before the other races,” he said.

“Kulasegaran must apologise and we give him two weeks to do so or we will protest in front of his office,” he said adding that the Government should revoke Kulasegaran’s citizenship.

“We Malays have been passive over numerous issues. We do not question the rights of the Chinese or Indians on the economic grounds.

“So, we want other races not to question our rights. All must remember the Chinese and Indians are Class two citizens while Malays are Class one, said Ahmad

Inside the Sessions Court earlier, judge Hasbi set aside five days for the trial, which will be heard by Sessions Court judge, M. Gunalan.

The twelve are Ahmad Mahayuddin, 36, Ibrahim Sabri, 43, Eyzva Ezhar Ramly, 31, Mohd Azmir Mohd Zain, 35, Ahmad Suhairy Zakaria, 30, Mohd Hilmi Ni, 40,Jainuddin @ Zainuddin Md Yusuff, 67, Mohd Jurit Ramli, 39, Mohamad Nordin Zakaria, 46, Jamil Mohamad Isa, 40, Rahimuddin Md Harun, 39, and Azhari Shaari, 39.

Ibrahim and Ahmad Mahayuddin are jointly charged with stepping on the head of the cow, Eyzva Ezhar with bringing the cow head to the scene while Mohd Azmir, Ahmad Suhairy and Mohd Hilmi are jointly charged with carrying around the cow head and stepping on it during the illegal assembly.

They are charged under Section 4(1) of the Sedition Act 1948 and face a maximum of RM5,000 in fine, or jail of up to three years, or both. All the six claimed trial.

The six of them also pleaded not guilty to an alternative charge of hurting the feelings of Hindus at the same place and time and face up to a year in jail, fine, or both, under Section 298 of the Penal Code.

Ahmad Mahayuddin and Ibrahim are the chairman and deputy chairman respectively of the Shah Alam Section 23 Residents Action Committee. They led the demonstration in protesting the Selangor state government’s plan to relocate a Hindu temple from Section 19 in Shah Alam to their area.

The others Jainuddin, Mohd Jurit, Mohamad Nordin, Jamil, Rahimuddin and Azhari Shaari are charged with participating in an illegal assembly.

They are charged under Section 27(5)(a) of the Police Act 1967 and can be fined up to RM10,000 and jailed up to a year, if convicted.

Deputy Public Prosecutors Datuk Razali Che Ani and Harris Ong Mohd. Jeffery Ong appeared for the prosecution while all the accused were represented by counsel Hashim Ibrahim. – Bernama

DBKL hotline to have Tamil too!

December 7th, 2009
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


This is a rarity. DBKL is launching a hotline for complaints early next year. The number is 1-800-88-3255. Its being tested now, and the cool thing is that there operators will also handle complaints in Tamil! Not bad.

The call centre, which is expected to be fully operational next year, will be the first of its kind undertaken by a local authority to provide its citizens a convenient and fast way to connect with the local government.

Kuala Lumpur mayor Datuk Ahmad Fuad Ismail said the DBKL was currently finetuning the system and conducting a trial run to monitor the system.

“We are currently training staff to improve their communications skills. The first batch of five officers are currently testing out the system but it will only be launched in January,” he said.

The call centre will be located at Menara DBKL II and will operate from 9am to midnight, seven days a week. Operators will speak in Bahasa Malaysia, English, Mandarin and Tamil and will take in all complaints on various issues.

Cabinet backtracks on SPM subject limit

December 5th, 2009
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


After Samy’s not-so-subtle reminder that support for BN will erode, the government today revised its own decision. I’m still not clear on the details (and that is worrying too) – but more on that later. On one side, MIC is being praised for able to convince the government to allow students to take up to 12 subject for SPM, while on the hand, some consider this as fixing a problem which self-created in the first place. And shockingly, it needs intervention of PM to solve the problem.

For last 6 months since the implementation was announced, nothing moved. Education Department was strong on its stance, saying limit is 10 subjects as it was cabinet policy. The DG even mentioned about school-level certification,which made the Tamil groups’ blood boil because it looked as if downgrading the language.

Today, news came via FB that cabinet had listened to the points by Dr S.Subra and decided to revise (some already labelled it as flip-flop!) its own decision.

So, no protest next week. Who should we thank? I say Samy Vellu because he knew what words to say that will push the button in the right places. All this while, nothing much happened (Dr Subra said that MIC doing many things but cannot announce, and that’s why people may consider it not being proactive – me included). Well, if don’t announce what you doing, its like digging own grave. Same as like not updating websites. Not easy to have blogs and websites, you know.

The NGO’s also deserve a big thanks, because they decided to push the ante. If not, MIC may have not moved in to solve the problem and save itself more ridicule from the community.

Putera MIC started a petition, which is still in the hundreds of signatures. Should have done that earlier, much earlier. But hey, better late than never!

Who should not be thanked – Those late-comers from certain opposition political parties who issued statements recently. No news for last few month but now want to protest and “save” the Tamil language. No brownie points  for you guys.

OK, let’s move to the solution. I listened to radio and read two papers. Excerpts from Malaysiakini report as below while from  Star report is after that.

The cabinet has decided to allow students sitting for the SPM examination to take 12, instead of 10 subjects to let some students to take vernacular language papers.

The decision comes following strong protests from various groups, including MIC and MCA, who argued that the 10-subject cap would not bode well for the future of vernacular languages.

Education Minister Muhyiddin Yassin said students can include Chinese or Tamil and Chinese or Tamil literature subjects among the 10, but they will not be counted as “officially recognised” subjects.

“The cabinet has decided that the 10-subject cap will remain but we are giving some leeway for students to have options,” said Muhyiddin, who is also deputy prime minister, after chairing the 65th National Land Council meeting in Putrajaya.

He said Education director-general Alimuddin Mohd Dom would provide a more detailed explanation on the matter soon.

According to Muhyiddin, students can still enrol for more than 10 subjects in SPM examinations if they find it useful, but only 10 would be officially recognised.

“They can take (more than 10 subjects) but it would not counted for purposes of scholarships and other matters. (Additional subjects) might be useful for example if someone wants to be a Tamil teacher and wants to show qualifications,” he said.

“They can take 12 or 11 subjects but it will not be considered in the 10 core and elective subjects,” stressed Muhyiddin.

The cabinet’s decision to limit 10-subject cap has caused outcry because vernacular languages would lose its official recognition at the SPM level.

… In an immediate reaction, MIC president S Samy Vellu lauded the cabinet for making the changes.

“I thank the prime minister and the deputy prime minister for agreeing to our (MIC’s) request,” he said.

Yesterday, Samy Vellu had appealed to Najib Abdul Razak to step in and resolve the issue.

“The prime minister has heard and acted on our request,” said the MIC president, adding that the cabinet’s decision reflected the true spirit of the ‘1Malaysia’ concept.

“The prime minister has understood the feelings of the Indian community. He is a true leader for all Malaysians,” he said, adding that Najib should be congratulated for making a bold move.

Samy Vellu said he hoped the issue will be put to rest, and all concerned parties will accept the decision.

“Tamil language and Tamil literature will continue to flourish in this country with the cabinet’s decision,” he said.

He said that the cabinet’s decision proved that all issues can be resolved through negotiations with the government and not through other means.

“We (the MIC) will continue with this (negotiations) on other issues and I am confident that the government under Najib’s leadership will strive to do the best for the people of all races,” he said.

Samy Vellu also congratulated MIC vice-president Dr S Subramaniam, who is also the human resources minister for securing a solution to the long-standing issue in today’s cabinet meeting.

The Star:

Students sitting for the SPM examination can take two additional subjects but exam results will only be based on 10 subjects, said Education Minister Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin.

He said the matter was decided by the Cabinet request by certain quarters that the ministry allowed students to sign up for 12 subjects.

Muhyiddin, who is also Deputy Prime Minister said the matter was also raised in the Cabinet meeting by Human Resource Minister Datuk Dr S. Subramaniam.

“The Cabinet has decided to give students the flexibility to take two additional subjects for their SPM exams. However, the results of the two additional subjects will not be counted as part of the SPM results. Their SPM results will be based on the 10 main subjects.

“Education director-general (Tan Sri Alimuddin Mohd Dom) will announce the details soon,” he told reporters after chairing the National Land Council meeting Friday.

Muhyiddin said if a student took 12 subjects for SPM, results that would be considered for scholarships, for instance, would be based on the 10 main subjects.

“However, if a student aspired to become a Tamil language teacher, the results of the additional subjects may be used to determine if they qualify to sign up for such courses,” he said.

Recently, youth wings from MIC, Gerakan, MCA and People’s Progressive Party (PPP) had asked the Education Ministry to review its decision to cap the number of subjects in the SPM examination at 10.

They wanted students be allowed to sit for 12 subjects to cater to those keen on Literature or Tamil or Chinese languages.

So, what does it mean? We have two category of subjects: core and elective (which have own sub-branches). For Science stream there are 5 core subjects, and 6 for Arts stream students. Science stream students would take 4 subjects from pure science group, so total nine subjects have been taken, leaving room for one more subject that will be counted for 10 official subjects. That means the Science stream student can choose to take any one from the following: Geography, Accounts, Economy, Tamil, Mandarin, Tamil Literature, Chinese Literature, Malay Literature, English Literature, Arts etc. After that, he/she can choose another two subjects from any group as per his interest. For Arts stream, its similar except that the core subjects are 6, thus leaving only 4 place for elective subjects for the compulsory 10 places. OK, fair enough.

Question is, can the student choose language/literature subjects as part of the compulsory 10, or is it limited to the “extra two ” category?  We have to wait for the details later.

Anyway, its a simple solution, yet effective on the face of it. In fact I think I have read similar suggestion in one of the forums (lowyat or recom). Why wasn’t this done earlier? – could have saved lots of time and hassle. Makes me wonder if the public is smarter than leaders (obviously yes since more heads are better than one!) or even if the leaders are capable and competent in the first place.