Archive for the ‘BornInMalaysia’ category

Shah Alam temple photos, moratorium idea and temple building

October 26th, 2009
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


MalaysianIndian1 Blog has some pictures of the said altar/shrine/temple before it was demolished, while Human Rights Party website has the scanned photos from newspapers post-demolishment.

Looking at the photos, I noticed the deities seem to resemble those found in Chinese places of worship.

So, is a proper religious site or used for obtaining 4D numbers as claimed by MBSA? Does it really matter? Its on government land, so they have right to demolish structure.  But is this considered temple, shrine or altar?

Very confusing. Anyway, MIC Youth wing advisor Vell Paari opined that a moratorium is placed on all Hindu temple demolitions until an amicable solution is reached on the status of these temples in the country. He said a  3 to 5 year period is needed for a “all-party” committee include stakeholders from state governments, political parties, civil societies, religious bodies, and temples,  to establish proper guidelines on Hindu temples. He further mentioned that till a proper guideline enforced with political will is established, temple demolishment issues will be used by political parties as part of the blame game, and the worshippers are the ones who suffer in the end.

I think it comes back to the culture. The Indians are known to be temple builders since thousands of years ago. Life practically evolved around temples if one observes cities in India, especially in southern states.  Things have changed a bit in recent years, as more of them embrace modernity. The “educated” tend to spend less time involved in temples but focus more on economic concerns. The rest still depend a lot on divine interception.  An ant hill or tree trunk can be converted into a place of worship easily. The story in Mahabaratham – Eklavya who makes a clay figure of his guru and learns archery by himself, comes to mind. Even in housing areas, there are residents who build an altar at their car porch area and do prayers till wee hours of night.

Asking the Malaysian Indians to not simply built temples everywhere is one of the possible steps, but how about those places already in existence? MHS is doing study on temples at myhindutemples.com for starters. Do we need some sort of committee at national level? Or to be handled by each states accordingly? Would it be proper to establish one under PM Dept or Ministry of Unity, for example?

Is accepting the culture of the Indian community part of 1Malaysia (or whatever)? If we are to accept others as they are, with warts and all, it should be the same the other way around, no?

Budget 2010 for the regular family

October 23rd, 2009
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


This years budget proposal focused on certain industries like agriculture, transportation infrastructure, green technology, health tourism, crime prevention, financial services, halal products, SME, etc.

For the man in the street, nothing much to shout about. [don’t forget to read the Mr & Mrs Malaysia Survey on Income and Finance). For a typical household  of 4 with monthly income between 2k – 8k, can’t see anything really beneficial. Let’s look at the proposals for individual:

1. Proposed increase from RM8000 to RM9000 for personal tax relief. [could have been more, at least RM10000]

2. Proposed increase for EPF and insurance from RM6000 to RM7000, but the extra RM1000 is meant for annuity schemes with insurance companies, if I read the budget correctly. [Should not be limited to annuity. Medical insurance relief should been increased too]

3. School children aged 13 above using KTM will get 50% discount on fares. [Should have included RapidKL]

4. Tax relief of RM500 for individual for broadband use (Streamyx, WiMax, Celcom/Maxis broadband etc) for year 2010 till 2012. [RM500 is not worth much. A decent package will cost RM1200 per year].

5. RM50 service charge for each credit card and RM25 for each supplementary cards, regardless the card was offered for free or not. [Should have allowed first card exemption. I use credit cards for petrol purchase, online payment, auto-billing etc, which actually reduces cost and risk of carry cash]

6. Students entering IPTA will get a netbook and broadband package for RM50 per month for two years. Up to 100,000 students will be offered first, primarily those enrolling in first year and those from low-income family. [good move!]

7. Tax of 5% charged on sale of property. Waived for once in a lifetime. Transfer between relatives, descendants not charged.  Up to RM1000o or 10% is exempted. [Is this really necessary?]

8. Establishment of 1Malaysia clinics in shophouses to cater for urban folks. [good news to reduced medical costs]

9. New scheme from EPF to allow people to buy house using FUTURE savings in Account 2 to purchase house. [This is indeed risky!]

10. Employee EPF contribution can be reverted back to 11% upon request from 2010. However, it will automatically revert to 11% from 2011 onwards.

11. Student who obtain first class results will have their PTPTN loan converted into scholarships. [good news!]

12. 30 top students will be offered National Scholarships based purely on merit to further studies in top world-class universities.

13. Those self-employed or without fixed income can opt to contributed to a 1Malaysia Retirement Scheme to be offered by KWSP. For every RM100 contribution, government will add extra 5% subject to a maximum amount of RM60 per annum. The government contribution is valid for 5 years only. [good move too]

13. A better petrol subsidy scheme will be introduced to cater for the variety of users. That may mean those using higher CC vehicles will get less subsidy. Details not available yet.

On a community note, majority of the funds/projects is expected to filter down to the rural folks, entrepreneurs, and youths from the majority community via established entities like RISDA,FELDA, TEKUN, JAKIM, MARA etc. The Indians are allocated RM20 million under TEKUN for the coming year.

Unfortunately, no increase in alcohol and tobacco taxes.

The budget presentation went on smoothly except at the end, when the PM mentioned about Bagan Pinang victory, which caused a ruckus in the Parliament. There were shouts of “rasuah” by the opposition. Ill-advised move, I’ll say.

Mr and Mrs Malaysia Survey

October 23rd, 2009
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Managed to write this just in time for the Budget. I’m waiting for it to start in 20 minutes or so.

CLSA produced its Mr and Mrs Asia 2009 report, which covers the expenditure and financial trends of the average person (hence the Mr and Mrs in the report). I read the Malaysian segment presentation which was received via an email. The details extracted below are from the Mr and Mrs Malaysia survey updated  Summer 2009. Their first survey was in 2007, so there are some comparisons made at times.

So, do you fit in anywhere in here? Are you an average Mr or Mrs Malaysian? Check it out (note that I have categorised the main points/findings):

  • Location: 285 respondents in Kuala Lumpur (171 or 60%) and smaller cities like Johor Bahru (29), Ipoh (34), Kuantan (17) and Penang (34).
  • Income: Typical household income is RM2,001-5,000 per month (42%) with 84% currently working. 18% have monthly income above RM10,000, 2% earning less than RM1000, 14% earning beween Rm1001 and Rm2000, and 24% earning between RM5,001 and Rm10,000 per month.
  • Age: Their sample has a mean age of 33.2, reflecting Malaysia’s young demographic. 78% are less than 40 years old.
  • Gender: More than half, 58%, are female.
  • Children: 62% have one child and 14% have no children in their household. 15% have two children while 3% have more than 3 children.
  • Dependents: 49% had other dependents than children, and 65% said those were parents.
  • Household Size: Average household has at least four people. Typically two members of the household are employed.
  • Economy Effect on Income: Despite 1Q09 GDP contracting by 6.2% YoY and exports falling 23.5% YTD,  56% said household income has not been affected.
  • Economic Effect on Employment: 67% say the downturn has not affected their employment and 67% have not seen family members affected. 23% say the downturn has affected the jobs of other family members, with 59% saying  one family member is affected. The downturn has affected household income of 44% of respondents, and 70% have changed their spending patterns. But 10% said the income has increased, 63% said income dropped, and 27% said income unchanged since start of 2008.
  • Spending Pattern: Nonetheless, Mr & Mrs Malaysia remain fairly cautious with 70% having changed their spending patterns since the downturn, cutting spending on leisure and entertainment, clothing, food and groceries. Children’s education, mortgages and healthcare took priority. Households have cut spending on leisure/entertainment (1) , clothing (2), food and groceries (3), communications (4), and utilities (5). Changes in income (+/-) affects the leisure/entertainment expenses. Food, mortgage and transport account for bulk of expenses.  Children’s education, healthcare, communication, and clothing account for less of the spending.
  • House: 31% lives in a 1,500-2,000sf house; 79% own their own homes while 64% have one other property. 52% have a mortgage, and of that, 72% said its for one property only.
  • Cars: 94% of respondents own cars. Favorite cars are Toyota and Honda
  • Credit Card: 90% have credit cards. 68% have more than once credit card. Favorite credit card provider is Citibank and favorite debit card provider is Maybank. Credit card preferred over debit cards. 63% spend less than RM1000 on their credit cards, while 24% spend between RM1001 and RM2000. 17% said the credit card expenses increased, but 42% said it reduced.
  • Savings Pattern: The key buffer is the nation’s high savings rate. Malaysians save the equivalent of 43% of GDP. But Mr & Mrs Malaysia are cautious: 81% place their savings in cash deposits and 72% have not bought stocks in the last 12 months. 45% of respondents save 10-20% of their income, and 47% say savings patterns are unchanged since the downturn. 10% are actually saving more while 43% saving less. 65% do not plan to buy shares in next 12 months. Best investments are cash deposits and properties, while the worst are bonds and stocks. 58% put their wealth in properties, 53% invest in equities while another 31% invest in foreign currencies.
  • Employment Outlook:  Despite the slowdown, 19% expect job prospects to worsen in the next 12 months, while 40% said it will improve.
  • Future Expenditures: This is also reflected in their plans to buy big ticket items in the next 12 months, with 28% planning to buy a house and 13% a car. 40% said they won’t make any big purchases in the next 6-12 months, but 26% plan to buy a house within that period.
  • Concerns: Respondents are largely concerned with unemployment and income decline, followed by inability to save and medical costs.
  • Expectation on Government: Mr & Mrs Malaysia want the government to prioritise improving the country’s economic conditions. Unfortunately, not many are confident that the Najib administration can handle the downturn well. 66% do not have confidence in the way the government is handling the downturn and many want the government to reduce crime rates. 49% wants the government to improve the economy.

Another temple demolished in Shah Alam

October 23rd, 2009
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Facebook is quite active with the news of temple being demolished in Shah Alam yesterday. The temple, Mathurai Veeran Temple located at Persiaran Kerjaya, Jalan Glenmarie, Seksyen U1 in Shah Alam, was demolished by MBSA.

MIC was quick to condemn the demolition (OK, we can ignore their record for the moment):

MIC president Datuk Seri S. Samy Vellu said demolition of the Mathu-rai Veeran temple in Persiaran Kerjaya, Jalan Glenmarie, Seksyen U1 in Shah Alam was an “act of treachery” by the Pakatan Rakyat-led state government.

… Samy Vellu said the Mathurai Veeran temple committee had submitted an appeal to the February 2009 notice sent by the Shah Alam Municipal Council but the temple was still demolished without an alternative land being offered.

“There were also no discussion with the temple committee and no recent notices given by the council. They just went ahead and demolished it,” said Samy Vellu.

He wanted the Selangor Government, especially state executive councillor Dr. Xavier Jayakumar to explain the demolition, failing which the MIC would seek legal redress.

Samy Vellu goes on to point EXCO  Xavier Jayakumar to provide explanation:

Samy Vellu wanted the Selangor government, especially its state executive councilor Dr Xavier Jayakumar to explain the demolition, failing which MIC would seek legal redress.

“He (Xavier) does not seem to worry about what is happening. Perhaps this (the demolition) is being carried out because the Indians are not united under the Pakatan state government,” he said.

I too wonder how Samy Vellu knew that MBSA took “direct orders” from the Selangor government to demolish the temple. Who gave the orders? An individual? a committee? Selangor government here means the state secretariat, the EXCO or MB?

“I salute the MPSA for taking direct orders from the Selangor government without consulting the temple committee,” he added sarcastically.

Granted, current Selangor government did announce approval of land for temples time to time, but this is the second such demolishment happening. AFTER they have given their word that temples won’t be demolished without proper relocation. Remember Ampang Jaya? Well, search this blog for the related articles on that demolition.

Back then, MP Kapar Manikavasagam did some drama about quitting and all. There was even news about suspending high level officer in the MPAJ. I sent email to the committee on non-Muslim religious affair. But no news till now.

This time, MP Kapar also mentioned in his Facebook entry that those who did it should be sacked. So, who would it be? Some low-level MBSA enforcement officer? The head of enforcement division? MBSA chief? State secretary? Or ask the 3-man committee (Xavier, Ronnie, Teresa) to resign?

The temple demolished already. So, what’s next? Who going to foot the bill for relocation and reconstruction? Who is going to be demoted/suspended/fined/sacked? Who going to resign? Who will face legal action?

Should MBSA put a non-Muslim as the head to turn things around? Just wondering….

Misuse of welfare funds

October 23rd, 2009
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Just reading the below news makes my blood boil. These criminals should be imprisoned.

WELFARE aid totalling RM418,145 was paid out in cash to 184 people up to December 2008 in Perlis, but there are no records of the recipients with the National Registration Department, revealed the Auditor-General’s Report.

The report found that the Perlis Welfare Department also discovered that 26 recipients who died between 2007 and 2008 continued to receive cash aid totalling RM14,520.

“In one case, the recipient continued to receive cash aid 20 years after he passed away,” said the report.

The report also discovered another startling case where a department employee created 20 fictitious identities and paid out RM16,140 to them until December last year.

The report said that the NRD confirmed that the recipients did not exist.

“The Perlis Welfare Department lodged a police report against an assistant community development officer in February over the alleged misappropriation of funds,” said the report, adding that police were still investigating.

“This case happened due to lack of monitoring and supervision from high-ranking officers. The incident could have been avoided if duty rotation among staff members was practised,” said the report.

The department explained that the cash aid was paid to representatives of the recipients. In one case, a representative was found to be receiving two sets of cash aid, one in Titi Tinggi and the other in Beseri, it said.

Such cases took place because there was no monitoring or checks and change of duty among staff, it said.

“The auditors are of the view that cash aid should not be given to a representative or a proxy. The recipient never gave consent for such representation,” the report said.