Archive for the ‘Indian’ category

SJKT Batu 14 Puchong fund for classrooms

July 3rd, 2011
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


They got Rm150k from one MIC guy and RM130k from Selangor government. Still need about RM50k more. Don’t think MOE would give any money, so depends on makkal for support.

 

AFTER numerous attempts to raise funds for additional classrooms, SJK (T) Batu 14 finally received RM113,000 from the state government.

The school’s Parent-Teacher Association (PTA) chairman Murali Mathukrayan received the cheque from Puchong MP Gobind Singh Deo last Saturday.

Of that amount, RM3,000 will be given to 200 poor students who could not afford school fees.

According to Murali, the school desperately needs the extra classrooms as the number of students has doubled from 700 to 1,400 over the 10 years.

“We had to use the school labs and the library as makeshift classrooms.

“Over the years, we have been applying for funds to build classrooms from the Education Ministry but we only received a letter from them stating that ‘the application will be considered’.

“It costs RM330,000 to build eight classrooms. We received RM150,000 from an individual from MIC,” he said, adding that the remaining amount would be raised through fundraising efforts.

Gobind said it was a collective responsibility to ensure that there are sufficient facilities for schoolchildren.

“I would also like to call upon other PTAs in need of funds to come forward, we will help if we can,” he said.

source: http://thestar.com.my/metro/story.asp?file=/2011/6/29/central/8978938&sec=central

 

Roundtable Conference on Tamil Schools

June 29th, 2011
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


This is a good news, even though it is very very late. Well, better late than never. Of course having roundtables, squaretables or notables makes no difference if no action is taken, as mentioned by Naragan in his letter it will be a just “wayang kulit” (shadow play). I fully agree with his arguments – we see lots of rhetorics, chest-thumping and promises. But when it comes down to action, the numbers speak for themselves. No one can hide from this fact.  Just check the allocated budget and the expenditure for the last 6 or 7  Malaysia Plans.  In terms of percentages, there’s very little allocation all around. Most of the time, its ad-hoc token sums given to troubleshoot school problems. Never a long term strategic solution.

Let’s look at a simple issue – license for a school. What hinders the Education Minister from issuing license to relocate a school? Lack of land? Lack of money? Lack of agreement from school/PTA?

Next is status of school – fully or partially aided. What causes a school to be partially aided? The size of land? The ownership of land on which the school sits on?

I pass by Bandar Bukit Puchong 2 often. I notice a brand new school being build  – a religious primary school (and its quite big!). Just imagine if build a national school there – everyone can study? Why the school can get such a big land in a new housing area? And vernacular schools can’t even get land to relocate? Or relocate to shitty areas? If Chinese housing developer still OK can help to relocate Chinese schools by donating land (for example SJKC Ladang Harcroft by IOI – relocate from Sitiawan to Puchong – across states!). Tamil schools need government intervention because not many developers will be willing to donate land.  Then, there’s not many philanthropists who are willing/able to help out with financing the construction. End up, we get small buildings and lesser facilities. Few years down the lane, same problem recur.

BTW, I don’t think the teachers of schools closed down will lose their job. They will be relocated to other schools or pooled in some district/state education offices.

So, I wonder how seriously this roundtable will taken.  will it be just talk, talk, talk and nothing comes out in the end? Most likely yes.

Since things are at critical level, the committee should suggest that every new housing project in areas/district/mukim with at least 7% Indian community population  should allocate land for relocating tamil schools from underserved areas (if we take schools with less than 50 students, that’s about 250 schools). And this to be made a rule in next month. Now, it would be interesting to see how that works!  Next, all schools should be allocated a minimum of 5 acres, and given an allocation of RM20 million per school for construction. That’s just R500 million, which can be spread over 5 years. Every year, relocate and construct 50 schools. Good boost for economy, no?

Finally, ensure that the overseeing committee consists of NGOs, as the developers, local councils, land offices, state governments, education departments etc. cannot be trusted to carry out the orders.

Several Barisan Nasional and Pakatan Rakyat MPs held a historic roundtable conference on the future of Tamil schools.

Held in Parliament today, the conference was organised by DAP’s Ipoh Barat MP M Kulasegaran.

He said discussions were held to set up a steering committee to chart a blueprint for the future of Tamil schools in the country.

Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department Mohd Nazri Abdul Aziz, who chaired the conference, promised that the government would not close down or demolish Tamil schools in the future.

“What the Indian community should to do now is engage with all political parties no matter BN or Pakatan, become a united group to raise Tamil school issues,” he said.

Present at the conference were Deputy Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department SK Devamany, Federal Territories and Urban Wellbeing Deputy Minister M Saravanan, DAP stalwart Lim Kit Siang and Penang Deputy Chief Minister P Ramasamy.

Others who attended the conference were MPs M Manoharan (DAP-Teluk Intan), S Manikavasagam (PKR-Kapar), Charles Santiago (DAP-Klang), R Sivarasah (PKR-Subang), Selangor exco Dr Xavier Jeyakumar, Sungkai assemblyman A Sivaneson, Senawang state assemblyman P Guna and Senators Daljit Singh Dalliwal and S Ramakrishnan.

Schools facing closure

Kulasegaran expressed concern over the situation of Tamil schools located on private land as well as the issue of partially and fully-aided schools and the danger of closure of some 50% of Tamil schools.

“The danger concerns Tamil schools which have less than 50 students and this involves nearly half of the 523 schools. There are 64 Tamil schools with less than 25 students which are facing closure. This will cause some 200 teachers to lose their jobs,” he said.

He added that in the last 30 years, 68 Tamils schools had been closed down.

Devamany said that over the last three years, the government had spent RM300 million on Tamil schools.

The MIC vice-president also stressed that his party was willing to work with any group or political organisation to develop Tamil schools.

Meanwhile, NGO Tamil Foundation suggested that the government grant licenses to relocate several Tamil schools from the estates to urban areas.

According to statistics in 2010, 84% of the Indian community were living in urban areas.

Licence for Simpang Lima school

Sivaneson suggested that the government change its policy that all schools which owned land must be recognised as fully-aided schools.

Currently, schools with five acres and more were eligible to be fully-aided schools.

A resolution was also passed at the conference that the government must immediately grant licence to the Simpang Lima Tamil cchool in Seri Andalas, Selangor.

The school was the first Tamil school picked as a cluster school among the 30 schools appointed under the Education Ministry’s cluster of excellent schools programme. However, the school was facing a shortage of places for the 2,400 pupils.

Kulasegaran said that the second meeting would be held on July 8 to select the members of the steering committee.

It is learnt that of the 18, there would be six members from BN, six from Pakatan and the rest from Tamil Foundation and other NGOs.

source: http://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/2011/06/27/bn-pakatan-reps-meet-over-tamil-schools/

HINDRAF still planning to sue British government

June 28th, 2011
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Not sure what to make of this.  Even if sue, no guarantee of winning. I remember the Batang Kali massacre case which was unsuccessful.

And would the UK government pay USD 4 trillion? Sure bankrupt la.

Hindraf Makkal Sakti is set to refile its suit against the British government by the end of he year.

Hindraf chairman, P Waytha Moorthy, originally filed a class action suit on Aug 31, 2007, the 50th anniversary of Malaysia’s independence, against the United Kingdom London courts for US$4 trillion.

The suit was filed prior to Nov 25 historic Hindraf rally in Kuala Lumpur, to demand compensation for Indian Malaysians whose ancestors were brought in by the colonial government as indentured labour.

It claimed that, after granting independence to Malaya, the British had left the Indians without representation and at the mercy of the majority Malays.

However, the suit was stalled following the Malaysian government’s clampdown on Hindraf and arrest of several lawyers, including the movement legal adviser and Waytha Moorthy’s brother Uthayakumar under the draconian Internal Security Act (ISA).

Hindraf’s lawyers in London say that to refile the suit they need relevant documents which is kept by the British Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO)

The lawyers have made a second request to the FCO to facilitate its impending million pounds suit against the former colonial master.

The movement’s legal counsel in London, Imran Khan (pix below) has made the second request on May 25 this year after the Hindraf’s first request on Jan 6 this year was refused by FCO.

The second request is made to seek access to all documents and information held or that which is within the knowledge of the FCO as well as any material held by any other governmental departments which have had access/dealings with Malaya between 1945 and 1957.

“In the event that the FCO refuses to provide us with the documents, we will then exhaust all internal review procedures to have access to the disclosure of these materials and documents.

“If this too failed, we will pursue other avenues such as a judicial review to force the FCO to release the documents necessary for the claim,” said solicitors Imran Khan & Partners in a statement to FMT.

More documents available

The statement said the FCO has turned down Hindraf’s first request citing that domestic records of colonial administrations did not form part of British official records and they were kept by the individual states created at independence.

It has now come to Hindraf’s knowledge that there were more classified documents held in undisclosed locations by the British government, as stated by Lord David Howell, Minister of State for FCO in the recent “Mau Mau uprising” case in London.

Lord Howell has also said that it was the general practice for the colonial administration to transfer to the United Kingdom, in accordance with Colonial Office instructions shortly before independence, selected documents held by the governor.

Lord Howell has said that these documents were deemed not appropriate to hand on to the successor governments.

FCO is said to hold about 8,800 files from 37 former British administrations, including Aden, Brunei, Cyprus, Fiji, Gambia, Jamaica, Kenya, Malaya, Malta, Mauritius, Nigeria, Northern Rhodesia, Palestine, Sarawak, Seychelles, Sierra Leone, Singapore, Solomon Islands, Swaziland, and Uganda.

The UK legal firm said it was first instructed by Waytha Moorthy in 2009 to look at the prospects of re-filing a legal action in the English courts for reparation against the UK government for failing to protect the legitimate interests of the minority ethnic Indian group under the Malaysian Federation Constitution when it was drafted in 1957.

Independently, Waytha Moorthy and a small team of volunteers of their own volition have unearthed nearly 35,000 “declassified” documents from various independent sources.

Hindraf’s solicitors were seeking more classified documents because the documents on hand clearly showed a huge lacuna (gap) in the information leading to Malaya’s independence.

Hindraf claimed that the Reid Commission was partly to blame for the government’s discriminatory policies as the commission did not provide for constitutional protection to the Indian community.

source: http://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/2011/06/24/hindraf-seeking-more-classified-documents-to-sue-britain/

 

MMSP still alive

June 28th, 2011
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


I have to thank Bersih for reminding that MMSP still exists. I thought the folks had already closed shop. Last I read about them was some leadership around the end of last year. After that, nothing.

Suddenly this party wakes up and issues a statement. OK, so you are still around.

I enjoyed reading their statement, constantly reminding myself that the president himself was a “protestor” who was “without any hidden agenda”.

Reminds me of a comment someone made over the weekend saying that government-friendly or neutral NGOs were being asked to make police report against the Bersih rally.  Not sure how true it is, but that’s what the person said (having experienced it).

The Malaysian Makkal Sakti Party (MMSP), set up by several key members of the outlawed Hindu Rights Action Force (Hindraf), has expressed objection to the illegal assembly planned for July 9, saying it will not benefit the people.

President Datuk R.S. Thanenthiran said Tuesday the planned street demonstration purportedly to demand free and fair elections went contrary to the wishes of the majority of the people.

The group planning the illegal gathering had been manipulated by certain quarters to promote their own political agenda and not champion the people’s rights as claimed, he said in a statement.

Thanenthiran said the leadership of Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak had proven that the people were enjoying rapid development since he took over the administration of the country.

“Elections in Malaysia are conducted in a fair manner, and this is evident from the number of opposition elected representatives we have now in Parliament and the state legislative assemblies,” he said. Thanenthiran said his party would lodge a police report at the Dang Wangi district police headquarters here at 11am Wednesday and simultaneously in every state nationwide.

He said the party wanted to prevent the people from being subjected to instigation that would result in a negative impact on the nation’s rapid development.

MMSP, which is Barisan Nasional friendly, was set up on May 11, 2009, and launched by Najib on Oct 10 of the same year. – Bernama

source: http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2011/6/28/nation/20110628120334&sec=nation

National Science Fair for Young Children Day 2

June 27th, 2011
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Continuing from Day 1 yesterday (BTW, the photos are a bit darker at time due to flash malfunction. The battery leaked).

The exhibition hall at GMI:

Today was the big day for the teams. Both students and teacher will know who will be the champions for 2011.

The day started early at 7am with breakfast, followed by preparation for the public viewing session at 10am. So, the booth were a scene of hectic activity as students and teachers toiled to fix torn papers, top up materials, arrange their presentation and so on. In between, there was a talk on the judging process for the teachers in a separate venue.

Head Judge Mr Shan:

Students testing their equipments:

At 10am, the doors opened for public to enter the exhibition. The public session was until 2.30pm. Personally, I think the crowd was much less as compared to the Selangor/KL region fair held last year (that’s the one I attended, thus able to compare). Maybe because the hall is wider? Or is the location of GMI, which is quite secluded and relatively unknown to the Indian community? Anyway, I estimate about 300 to 500 people attended this fair today (excluding the students and teachers).

Attending to visitors:

Explaining to visitors:


Visitors:


Interested visitors:

Explaining their work:

Volunteers too are impressed:

During the public session, few booths were set up at the entrance. Among there are MISI (Malaysian Indian Science Intellectuals) who promoted their educational magazine for kids named Thumbi, DHRRA Malaysia, Arivan Fan Club (where I was on duty), Grolier Books, Tamil Foundation and so on. A few games and quizzes were held for visitor to liven up the environment.

DHRRA Malaysia booth:

Arivan Fan Club booth:

Quiz participants:

Telescope section:

At 3.20pm, the closing ceremony started. VIP was Dato’ Dr Jeyaindran of MyNadi. The crowd numbered about 800 people (including participants).

Participants:

First was speech by project director Capt Dr Viknesvaran. He said that 300 schools took part in the School Fair Roadshow, while the Science Fair saw participation of 274 schools this year.

Capt Dr Vicky:

This was followed by MCEF’s Mr Satish Ramachandran’s speech. He gave some suggestions on how to improve the fair for the coming year, for example focusing on certain theme, and also to compile CDs of the projects.

MCEF director Mr Satish Ramachandran:

Next to speak was head judge Mr Shanmugam who  mentioned about the judging process. He also mentioned that some of the teams needs to improve in terms of understanding the fundamental principles.

Head Judge Mr Shan:

Media appreciation followed, after which all the teams were invited on stage to receive participation certificates along with tokens of appreciation.

Presentation of participation certificates and tokens of appreciation to all the students:

This was then followed by MyNadi’s Dato’ Dr Jeyaindran’s speech. He announced that the top 5 winners will be given a trip to Petrosains KLCC and also to the Perdana University in Serdang. He also sprang a surprise by announcing that the 1st place winners (and the teachers) will be taken on a tour to Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO) in Bangalore!!! This is in collaboration with Air Asia and Indian High Commission. This is definitely a wonderful surprise for the participants, and added more tension to the tense environment. Everyone was waiting for the announcement.

MyNadi chairman Dato’ Dr Jeyaindran:

Two new categories were introduced this time: Most Innovative Project and Best Conference Paper. The winners are as below:

Most Innovative Project

Winner: SJKT Kangkar Pulai

2nd: SJKT Ramakrishna

3rd: SJKT Convent Seremban

SJKT Ramakrishna:

SJKT Convent:

Best Conference Paper

Winner: SJKT Kangkar Pulai

2nd: SJKT Sg Tukang

3rd: SJKT Yahya Awal

SJKT Kangkar Pulai:

There was another speech (to add to the tension!), this time by MISI representative Mr Saminathan.

Finally, the moment everyone was waiting for. The winners announcement.

5th place went to SJKT Mukundan

4th place: SJKT Methodist Kapar

3rd place: SJKT Permas Jaya

2nd place: SJKT Tun Aminah

Their booth:

and champions are SJKT Ladang Lanandron!

Their booth:

For the first time, the top three places were swept by schools from the same state, Johor.

The ceremony ended at 5.50pm, and the crowd slowly trickled away.

 

Photos Slideshow: