Updated with copy of the actual report:
YB Mike Manikavasagam released the second post mortem results today which indicated death due to other reasons than fluid in the lungs. Looks like he was really interrogated until died in custody.
My friend, whom I met over lunch just now, said that if 1 out of 10 crooks died due to police doing their job, he don’t mind. The violence of the criminals nowadays are terrible until the public don’t feel safe anywhere. Even recently, a girl was raped before the criminals stole the car (sorry, can’t reveal more for reasons of privacy).
I think it depends on view. Some view it as a human being’s life being taken away, while others say its in the line of duty and unfortunate things like this happens.
However, I think in this modern age, there are many ways to get information out of suspects. You can’t simply go around whacking the suspect until the person dies. Maybe in the heat of the moment, or due to lack of cooperation from Kugan, some of the policemen overreacted. Thus, the punishment must be meted out for causing death.
Bottom line is that some one died without being sentenced by court of law. In effect, a crime has been committed. If Kuhan was shot while attempting to escape from police or while hijacking a car, then its another story.
The second post-mortem on suspected car thief A. Kugan showed that he died after being repeatedly beaten.
The post-mortem, conducted by a pathologist from the Universiti Malaya Medical Centre (UMMC) at the request of the 22-year-old’s family, also showed that he had multiple burn marks.
These V-shaped burn marks are believed to have been caused by a hot iron, said Kugan’s family lawyer N. Surendran at a press conference at the headquarters of political party PKR here Tuesday.
The first post-mortem conducted at the Serdang Hospital mortuary only examined the body from the chest up, Surendran said.
The second, which examined the entire body, found 42 other marks, burns and contusions from the sole of his feet right up to his head.
The UMMC pathologist declared, based on the post-mortem, that Kugan was beaten so badly that his tissues broke down and his kidneys failedi, Surendran said.
The pathologist also found that Kugan had suffered hemorrhaging in his trachea, chest, spleen, stomach, the back of his neck and spine, and there were also signs of hemorrhaging in his heart.
The soles of his feet had many bruises caused by beatings and he also suffered blunt trauma to his skull.
The family will submit the second post-mortem report to the Attorney-General’s Chambers Wednesday afternoon, he added.
…The initial post-mortem revealed that he had died due to fluid in his lungs, but Kugan’s family entered the Serdang Hospital mortuary that same day and took photographs of his body, which showed severe bruising.
… Puchong MP Gobind Singh Deo and Teluk Intan MP M. Manogaran, who were also present at the press conference Tuesday, said that in the future, the Home Ministry should always insist on a second post-mortem when there are doubts over deaths in custody.
Updated report from Malaysiakini:
An independent post-mortem report has revealed that deceased 22-year-old police detainee Kugan Ananthan had endured severe beatings and was also starved during his incarceration.
The post-mortem conducted by a Universiti Hospital pathologist who was commissioned by the deceased’s family found that the car theft suspect had died of kidney failure due to the assault.
The beatings had caused a breakdown in Kugan’s muscle cells which then congested the blood flow and resulted in kidney failure.
The findings were revealed by the family’s lawyer N Surendran at a press conference held in the PKR headquarters in Tropicana this afternoon.
“As opposed to the past statement given by the police and the first post-mortem report (which stated that Kugan died of fluid accumulation in his lungs), the second report shows that he had died of acute renal failure due to rhabdomyolysis.
“Which is to say that he died due to the muscle cells disintegrating into his bloodstream and absorbed by the kidney which resulted in kidney failure and death,” said the lawyer.
‘Burnt with extremely heated iron bar’
Showing pictorial evidence to reporters, Surendran said graphic photos taken from the post-mortem report showed that Kugan suffered from massive internal bleeding due to repeated beatings.
“Kugan had hemorrhage in many of his internal organs, his heart, left lung, spleen, kidneys, back of his neck, spine area and the sole of his feet which shows that he took consistent beatings,” he added.
Kugan also suffered from internal bleeding in the scalp area following repeated beatings with a blunt object.
The post-mortem report also stated that Kugan sustained more than 10 severe burn wounds on his back “probably as a result of being burnt by an extremely heated V-shaped iron bar.”
“Almost the entire part of his back is covered with contusions, beating marks and bruises,” said Surendran, adding that the report also indicated that Kugan “was starved during the entire time he was tortured.”
“In brief, it appears that Kugan was severely tortured over period of days and the kind of pain he had suffered is unimaginable.
“One could only imagine what was going through this young man’s mind (during the torture). Perhaps, he had wanted to die (to escape the torture), we wouldn’t know,” he said.
Procedural exclusion in first post-mortem
Another baffling point, said Surendran, is the fact that the second post-mortem report indicated that no examination below the heart area of Kugan’s body was conducted during the first post-mortem.Surendran said this was puzzling as it is compulsory for any pathologist to conduct a complete check-up.
The independent post-mortem report was commissioned by Kugan’s family after they were dissatisfied with the first report tendered by Serdang Hospital.
Kugan had died on Jan 20 at the Taipan police station in Subang Jaya, five days after he was arrested in connection with the theft of luxury cars.
Meanwhile, Surendran said the second post-mortem conducted by Dr Prashant N Samberkar from the UniversitI Malaya Medical Centre is not just an investigation into the death of an individual.
“This is a damning indictment on the Malaysian police force. I hope the police will hang their heads in shame, institute thorough reforms and stop placing obstacles in the implementation of the Independent Police Complaints and Misconduct Commission (IPCMC),” he stressed.
Report to be submitted to AG tomorrow
Teluk Intan DAP parliamentarian M Manogaran, who was also present at the press conference, said he and other Pakatan Rakyat leaders will submit the post-mortem report to the Attorney-General’s Chambers in Putrajaya tomorrow.
“The AG (Abdul Gani Patail) is duty-bound to act on this report and what Malaysians, in particular Kugan’s family, want is that whoever is responsible for his death be brought to court and answer charges for murder,” he said.
According to Kapar MP S Manickavasagam, from the year 2000 to 2008, there have been more than 80 cases of reported deaths in police custody but nothing has been done to address this.
He also claimed that more than seven police officers are involved in Kugan’s case.
Another DAP leader present, Puchong MP Gobind Singh Deo said the report should give the AG sufficient evidence to act swiftly on the matter.
He also said this incident shows the importance of having an independent post-mortem report done for custodial death cases.
The case was initially classified as sudden death but following the emergence of a video clip which revealed severe lacerations on the deceased’s body and sparked off public outrage, the AG reclassified the case as murder.
Other leaders present at the press conference were PAS Kota Raja MP Dr Siti Maria Mahmud, PKR secretary general Salahuddin Hashim and watchdog group Police Watch director S Jayathas.










Its ok if one of the crooks die when police do their job??? Ehmmm. Well we punish criminals to reform them.
If saint Valmiki sentence to death because he was robber , we probably will not have ramayana to read.
Well Vijay, as I said, there’s few school of thoughts. Some say (i) its not police job to punish, (ii) detainee have rights, (iii) every life is valuable, (iv) kuhan not proven guilty yet. Another group says (i) its ok in view of the “bigger picture”, (ii) imagine the trauma and violence faced by the public due to these criminals, (iii) let this be a lesson to our indians and criminals in general etc.
My opinion, we must change people’s perception on criminals. When they start to think yess only one and it will be lesson for other, then no point we have court and law. Just a police is enough, shoot a few the rest will obey. Do we want it to be this way???
We must make sure not even one innocent punished for crime he/she never do. Even a notorious serial killer like John Wayne Gacy who killed 33 people, were put on trial before sentenced to death.
yes, the opinion that “only one” and “lesson for others” is not right. but due to the experience faced by the victims of snatch thieves, rape, robbery, carjacking, kidnapping etc, the public are having different thoughts. even snatch thief caught by public are given a good bash before police come in to “save” the criminal. people start taking law into their own hands in some cases. partly due to corrupted law and enforcement officers, plus ineffective agencies/councillors/politicians/leaders. the public certainly have some part to blame. we buy pirated VCD, not realising where the money goes. we hire illegal maids and illegal immigrants in our business without caring if they have any proper documents. we bribe others to do work. we tend to keep quiet when it happens to other people. sendiri kena, baru terkial-kial and blood boiling.
anyway, my friend asked me an interesting question. how many of the indians “killed” by police were known to be innocent? how many of the immediate family members and work colleagues came forward t vouch for their innocence? as far as i remember, there were two cases where police paid compensation for wrongful death – the pregnant lady and another case. i think one way to verify the innocence of the victims is to get testimony from family members, friends, and colleagues. as the famous saying goes – one is judged by the friends one has. you mix with wrong company, you will get the effect as well. i have no doubt that some of these cases are due to that – hanging out with bad hats.
Actually Poobalan, from what I noticed in most cases there will be some clowns who will come forward to say those criminals killed were innocent.
In fact HINDRAF and Uthaya kumar’s origin started by fighting for such cases back in late 90s.
I know at least 2 cases personally where I knew the dead persons. In one case the wife went on a hunger strike to claim the innocence of the deceased husband. But most of us know he was involved in crime deeply. So he was shot and killed for violently kidnapping and killing, I was not surprised. Another case was lorry hijacker who was a brutal killer. He was too hardly innocent person as claimed by his mother.
Francis Rayapan whose mother still creating so much of noise dont seem to realise that her son would have been still alive she has educated and discipled her son the right way. No point crying later and blaming police when you don’t discharge your responsibilities as a parent.
One of the reasons I dispise and do not respect Uthaya and his HINDRAF is becoz he always fought for such criminals rather than the law-abiding people who needed help.
Poobalan…
It is difficult to pass moral judgement on someone who has passed away since he is here not to defend himself..
As for my views I would say I am from from the 3rd group…I feel that it is important that the police have check and balance mechanism to ensure they are accountable and misuse their power. But at the same time they shouldn’t be so restrained to the extent they couldnt function effectively. It must be remembered that the police is only trying to reduce the crime and solve problems so we live in peace. If we make people like Kuhan a hero and portray police as the cold blooded murderers then we will eventually demoralise the force. Our criticism of police must be tempered with restrain and mindful of the difficulties that they face and that they are only trying to help the rakyat.
At the same time, human right violations and custodial deaths must not be accepted and the police must be made accountable.
I don’t deny beating still happens but no policeman would want to kill a detainee. So obvious that the case of Kuhan is an exception and something has gone wrong. Put yourself in the shoes of PDRM. How would you feel if someone accuse you of planning and killing Indians on purpose ?
The shooting of criminals these days (incl the Kulim 6 ) are also meant to send a message to violent criminals. It must be understood that no one in their right mind would want to give evidence against violent criminals. As such, there had been numerous cases where some of these violent criminals have not been jailed due to a lack of witness and evidence. So the police often catches these dangerous criminals while they are commiting crimes. I can tell you that the recent shootings has sent a very clear message to the criminal underworld.
To me, I would rather give the police a benefit of doubt in such cases and then let these accused criminals seek justice if they are innocent. If police found to be guilty then they deserve punishment. But demos and irrational actions against the police is totally unnecessary. Even if the victims are Indians.
Some clowns like to blame those dead in police custody guilty without trial as though as he saw them doing crime with his own eyes.
If these clowns really have proof of those dead’s involvement in crime then they should come out and help in investigation. Not hiding like coward behind desktop and condemning those who fight for human rights.
You have a nice blog . I am sure my external post mortem report is similar to the 2nd post mortem .
Thank you.
Yes Dr, your exterior investigation based on photos mentioned about internal bleedings. so it corresponds to the 2nd post mortem results.
Dr Sree…read your report…I thought it was fair and balanced. I do have some experience in this matter and my views are similar. However, I am puzzled by the lack of comments by the pathalogist on the injuries…I saw at least some of them to be old one…problem inflicted by some gang fights…even the burn marks were old…so why did the pathalogist made no comment on these ?
i think the pathologist mentioned that the “v” shaped burns were recent (while in detention)? the old burn marks – indicating association with bad hats?
R.vj
I dont think anyone here is accusing Kuhan as guilty. Likewise it would also cowardish for you and HINDRAF goondas and other NGOs to accuse the police to be the murderers until they are charged and proven as guilty right ?
so are you saying cats and dogs breached into police custody to murder Kugan ?? brilliant brain lor….
Killi…you didn’t read all my comments before you posted your reply, don’t you ? Pls do so in the future so you don’t make a fool of yourself.
normally i dun read all your postings bcos that is when i feel myself a fool .