Gas Bocor?

/* June 25th, 2010 by poobalan | View blog reactions No comments »
 Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Can’t believe I’m actually reading about this. Only 6 weeks or so and already having problem.

Major differences are emerging among the three top leaders of the Gerakan Anti-Samy Vellu or GAS movement started by former MIC Youth deputy chief V. Mugilan to pressure long-time president Datuk Seri S. Samy Vellu to step down.

Sources close to the GAS movement said if the differences are not ironed out, a split in the movement was inevitable and would be a boon to Samy Vellu, who has announced he will only retire “about” September 2011.

His term expires in May 2012.

The differences are partly because of a clash of egos and partly because some leaders are having second thoughts after jumping onto the anti-Samy Vellu bandwagon.

Another reason, sources said, is that some GAS leaders have other agendas other than ousting Samy Vellu like joining up with Pakatan Rakyat (PR) if the attempt to dislodge the party veteran fails and their re-entry into MIC is permanently blocked.

The differences are mainly between founder Mugilan (picture) and expelled CWC member Kumar Amman on one side, and Klang businessman and another expelled CWC member, K.P. Samy.

GAS sources told The Malaysian Insider their differences had been there from the beginning when GAS was formed and held its first rally on May 30 which did not see the anticipated 15,000 people turning up and was dismissed as a non-starter.

Simmering differences surfaced today when K.P. Samy issued a statement in the Makkal Osai newspaper, in which he has an interest, distancing himself from Mugilan.

K.P. Samy said he had nothing to do with GAS plans to distribute 500,000 CDs and posters detailing Samy Vellu’s alleged misdeeds over the past 30 years.

He also said the CDs would not be distributed at the second GAS rally in Klang on July 4, which is organised by him.

GAS supporters were shocked by the announcement as they had been looking forward to receiving the CDs and making the July 4 event a success.

“I have no connection and have nothing to do with the CDs,” K.P. Samy said in the statement published in Makkal Osai.

The statement will come as sweet music to Samy Vellu who has been looking for a chink in the GAS armour to exploit and defeat the movement.

At the GAS press conference a fortnight ago, K.P. Samy did not voice any objection when the CDs and other GAS plans to attack Samy Vellu were announced to the press by the three leaders, who sat jointly together on the same table.

“I have to consider the legal implications,” K.P. Samy said when contacted today while declining to explain why he did not raise objections to the CD plan at the press conference.

Additionally, the July 4 gathering that K.P. Samy is organising is not promoted as a GAS protest rally — as the May 30 gathering was —but as an “Indian awakening” forum to decide on the “future of the Indian community”.

A tall order for an expelled MIC CWC member, a GAS supporter said.

Also, no mention is made of GAS, Samy Vellu or CDs in advertisements that are appearing in the Makkal Osai newspaper to promote the July 4 gathering.

Additionally, the July 4 gathering in Klang has also come under attack from the Tamil Nesannewspaper owned by Samy Vellu’s family, who are calling the gathering an anti-Barisan Nasional and “society destroying” event.

Mugilan and Kumar Amman could not be contacted for comment but their aides say they are working hard not to let the differences split their GAS movement.

“While Mugilan is focused on the mission which is to oust Samy Vellu, K.P. Samy is distracted by other issues like legal implications,” said an aide of Mugilan. “We are unhappy with the differences. There are only three of us and we can’t see eye to eye.

“You should have thought of the legal implications before jumping into the GAS movement,” he said, referring to K.P. Samy’s statement today de-linking from the anti-Samy Vellu CDs.

He accused K.P. Samy of having other political agendas like jumping ship to PR if the GAS movement fails and his re-entry into MIC is permanently blocked.

A staunch supporter of former MIC deputy Datuk S. Subramaniam, K.P. Samy has links with DAP vice-chairman and Ipoh Barat MP M. Kulasegaran, who is on the lookout for “good” candidates in the next general election and thinks K.P. Samy fits the bill.

In contrast, Mugilan and Kumar Amman are staunch MIC/BN men focused on getting Samy Vellu out and rehabilitating and reforming the MIC and winning Indian support in the next general election.

While GAS is heading for a likely split, the political pressure over Samy Vellu’s retirement is also undergoing a change.

It seems unlikely that Samy Vellu can be pressured to step down earlier than September 2011 and the BN political establishment also appears to have come to terms with that deadline.

The camp of deputy president Datuk G. Palanivel, which was also focused on pressuring Samy Vellu to step down through lobbying the media, has eased off the pressure after Palanivel was made a deputy minister and “endorsed” as successor.

If these changes hold, the GAS movement could become irrelevant over the next 15 months as Samy Vellu’s reaches his retirement at his own pace.

Minimum Wage plan postponed due to low blog feedback!

/* June 23rd, 2010 by poobalan | View blog reactions No comments »
 Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


I’m not sure if Malaysian Insider wrote this story correctly, because the answers just don’t seem to gel. Why did the blog generate only 77 response? You can try searching in MOHR website and let me know if can find any link to the blog because I certainly can’t find it. Maybe the blog is hidden somewhere? Found the blog here but the poll is closed!

Secondly, we are talking about minimum wage for “LOW INCOME” workers. Can a blog be the best to tool to gauge their response? Our broadband penetration still not over 40%, and people not really have MOHR website bookmarked.

Or is the blog meant for employers and the middle/high income employees to respond?

I think there should have been other ways to get response from target group. Could have paper-based survey during many of the goverment events like 1Malaysia youth program at Bukit Jalil, concerts, by-election areas, and so on. definitely would have got more than 77 replies.

They could have even talked to Income Tax department to include a survey when employees file their returns via e-filing in April. If just 30% of 1 million tax payers responded, you’ll get 300,000 responses!

Pity the security guards.

Despite strong calls from many quarters, including the MCA, the government announced today that it was shelving a minimum wage policy due to poor public feedback.

Human Resources deputy minister Datuk Maznah Mazlan told Parliament that the government had only received a total of 77 responses from the public since March this year.

“The ministry launched its blog on March 24 this year to obtain feedback from Malaysians on the proposal to introduce minimum wages.

“Until today, the ministry has only obtained 77 responses,” she said when replying to a question by Charles Santiago (DAP-Klang),

Maznah said that of the 77 responses, 70 or 91 per cent agreed with the proposal, about three per cent disagreed and 6 per cent were indifferent.

The feedback is too small for us to implement the policy, especially in comparison with the over 11 million workers in the labour force nationwide.

“It is not representative of the number of workers,” she said.

She added that the ministry would continue with its blog to obtain more feedback as well as to organise a three-party workshop in mid-July this year involving workers’ associations, employers associations, academics and government agencies.

“Whatever feedback we obtain from the blog and the workshop will be used as input for the government’s consideration,” she said.

In a supplementary question, Charles slammed the ministry for deferring its decision to introduce minimum salaries for security personnel to 2011 although it was set to begin on July 1 this year.

“It is important for the nation. The government had decided to introduce the policy but suddenly, this was a retracted.

“This is like one step forward and three steps back. From what I have read from the news, I see that this shows that the government is afraid of the private sector, especially the security firms that have been urging the government not to introduce the policy,” he said.

Charles asked if the government had the “political will” to introduce minimum wages for the country, especially in view of the New Economic Model’s target of achieving a high-income status for the country.

In her response, Maznah said that the Cabinet had on January 13 this year instructed the ministry to study the proposal to introduce minimum wages.

“For your information, your accusation that we are frightened of the private sector and that we have no political will — this is just a perception typical of the opposition.

“The introduction of minimum wages involves many processes and many ministries. It involved the communication between the ministries and other important parties like the workers unions and other associations,” she said.

Maznah pointed out that a single policy could not be used for all sectors.

“We need to have a proper, detailed study, which would include making comparisons to other countries as well,” she said.

In another supplementary question, Dr Dzulkefly Ahmad (PAS-Kuala Selangor) asked Maznah for the ministry’s plans in improving the wages of the labour force.

“About 40 per cent of the labour force earn less than RM1,500 monthly and 75 per cent of them are the bumiputras from Sabah and Sarawak,” he said.

Maznah said that the 10th Malaysia Plan programmes provide ways and means to improve the welfare of the labour force.

“We are also looking into ways and means on how to lessen our dependence on foreign labour as well as how to improve the skilled workers force.

“Our target is to raise our 25 per cent of skilled workers in the workforce to at least 50 per cent,” she said.

PPP proposal on discount for house buyers

/* June 23rd, 2010 by poobalan | View blog reactions No comments »
 Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


This is one of the better things to come out from PPP in recent memory. As house prices are inflated and artificially increased over last one year, many people will find it difficult to buy a house. Imagine if 25-30 years ago, you can buy a double-storey house with your salary of RM2000 or less, now its a mini miracle if you can even get such a house for below RM300,000 in Klang Valley. Most are priced upwards of RM400,000 already. So, can someone earning RM4000 or so buy such a house? Considering increased food cost, need for own transport, petrol cost and telco bills, can forget it la.

People’s Progressive Party (PPP) president Datuk M. Kayveas has suggested that non-Bumiputeras earning an income of less than RM3,000 be given a 10 per cent discount currently enjoyed by Bumiputera house buyers.

He said a Bumiputera house buyer received a 10 per cent discount, irrespective of the person’s financial capability, whereas a non-Bumiputera house buyer needed to pay that 10 per cent.

“In this way, it is believed that every citizen will be more confident on the implementation of the quota and status system,” he said in his policy speech at the PPP’s 57th annual general meeting here today.

The meeting was opened by Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak.

The other parties should come out in support of this proposal. Would they?

Also, I think houses priced about RM500,000 should not be given any discounts.

MIC Youth launches appeal hotline for STPM students

/* June 22nd, 2010 by poobalan | View blog reactions No comments »
 Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


MIC Youth launched an hotline yesterday for STPM students who failed to get a place in IPTA. According to the statement, Indians constitute only 5.68% of the applicants who got a place, which is 2,304 students out of over 40,000 successful candidates.

They question why the intake is low. Is it due to not enough STPM candidates or quality of student results are low. At the moment, there’s less than 8,000 Indian students left in IPTA.

It seems Indians have limited option to enter IPTA: either STPM, Matriculation (limited intake of 10% for non-bumiputera), and diploma from polytechnic. I think he forgot to mention that its for degree. There’s a small number of students who enter IPTA to do diploma after SPM, and also there’s a group that get KPLSPM to do teaching degree after SPM.

Another thing to consider is the statement that students/families considering the offer if the university is located far away. I think another factor is also the course being offered.

Reply from JPA on request to publish scholarship recipients names

/* June 22nd, 2010 by poobalan | View blog reactions No comments »
 Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


This was posted today at JPA website. I wonder why the bother replying to the initial comments published in newspapers because the reply doesn’t answer the question! People want to see the list on names and relevant details. Is that so difficult to understand?

The Public Service Department (PSD) specifically refers to the letter “Publish list of JPA scholars” published on 15/6/10 in The Star and other letters related on PSD scholarships generally.

The PSD had announced the application criteria for its 2010 Overseas Sponsorship Programme (PILN) in the major newspapers in January and February this year, in addition to posting these criteria on its website. On 6th April, in his press statement, Y.A.B. Deputy Prime Minister reiterated these criteria as well. Over 18,800 students applied, out of which 10,956 applicants fulfilled the minimum requirements and qualified for the interview process. Of the qualified applicants, 7900 scored all As, in all the subjects they had taken, including 214 students who scored all A+s.

As stated in the PSD website and the statement by YAB DPM, scholarships were given according to the following four categories:

  1. Category 1 : Academic Excellence
    Twenty percent of the scholarships were allocated for this category. Applicants under this category were assessed purely on merit based on academic excellence (85%), co-curriculum activities (10%) and performance at the interview (5%). The socio-economic background of the applicants was irrelevant under this category.
  2. Category 2: Racial Composition of the Population
    Sixty percent of the scholarships were allocated for applicants streamed under this category. Applicants under this category were assessed based on academic excellence (75%), co-curriculum activities (10%), socio-economic background (10%) and performance at the interview (10%). The selection of scholars reflected the racial composition of the population.
  3. Category 3 : Bumiputera Sabah and Sarawak
    Ten percent of the scholarships were reserved for Bumiputera applicants from Sabah (5%) and Sarawak (5%). The selection was done based on academic excellence (65%), co-curriculum activities (5%), socio-economic background (25%) and performance at the interview (5%).
  4. Category 4: Socially Disadvantaged Group
    Ten percent of the scholarships were allocated for applicants from schools that lack, or have limited, proper educational facilities and those that hailed from low-income families. The selection was done based on academic excellence (65%), co-curriculum activities (5%), socio-economic background (25%) and performance at the interview (5%).

Outstanding students who were not selected for the PILN 2010 scholarships (given the limited sponsorship of 1500) were offered additional 2000 scholarships to study in local private institutions of higher learning, including local campuses of foreign universities in Malaysia, such as, the Nottingham University, Monash University, Swinburne University of Technology and Curtin University of Technology. A notification to this effect was posted on the PSD’s e-SILA website on 16th June.

Apart from the PILN, the PSD will also be offering a local sponsorship programme (Program Ijazah Dalam Negara or PIDN). A total of 8,250 scholarships will be made available under PIDN. These scholarships are for students who have secured places at local institutions of higher learning.

Corporate Communications Unit
Public Service Department Malaysia
18th June 2010