Salary of estate worker

/* December 1st, 2009 by poobalan | View blog reactions No comments »
 Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


I’m sure readers are familiar with the recent spat between Plantation Industries and Commodities Minister Bernard Dompok and PSM over the salary of estate workers. It was started by Dompok who said that plantation workers like rubber tappers and oil palm harvesters earn more than the monthly poverty level amount, even quoting RM1700 per month for one category of workers. This was disputed by the Parti Sosialis Malaysia and JERIT. Dompok is even threatening to sue the challengers. But we need to remember that poverty line is for family income, not individual (Dompok compared wrongly in the first place because he took a person’s salary and compared with family poverty income level). This was even pointed out by the Deputy Minister after MK published pay slips of two people:

Malaysiakini had published two pay slips of plantation workers which showed that they were earning below the poverty line which is set at RM720 a month.

Hamzah, upset over statements from representatives of the plantation workers, asked for the news report to be retracted.

He claimed that this had to be done ‘as its objective was to ruin the dignity of the government and his ministry in particular’.

Hamzah (right) said a probe was done on the persons of whose pay slips were published and it was discovered that they were women who were employed as common workers at an oil palm plantation in Sungai Siput. They earned RM21.30 per day.

“Usually, common workers are women who are involved in fertilising and removing weeds (in the plantations). Mostly, they are wives of workers employed for other duties.

“Generally, the accumulated salary of both husband and wife is more than RM1,200 a month, which is above the poverty line,” said Hamzah.

According to him, oil palm fruit harvesters earn from RM26 to RM60 a day, depending on their productivity.

The wages, he said, were based on the ‘productivity-linked wage system’ (PLWS) which was adopted in the collective agreement between the Malayan Agricultural Producers Association (Mapa) and the National Union of Plantation Workers (NUPW).

“At the level of crude palm oil being priced at RM1,200 per tonne, when a harvester produces 38 tonnes a month, he will get RM844.

“At the level of crude palm oil being priced at RM2,000 per tonne, the harvester’s income is RM1,292.16 a month,” said Hamzah.

Therefore, that it was not ‘an impossible task and it is not a lie’ to say that an oil palm plantation worker could earn up to RM1,700 a month. [ah, not impossible, theoretically. why not produce payslips of workers (say 100 workers) who actually got such salaries? Its not that difficult, is it?]

“Especially workers who are productive and are able to produce three tonne bunches of oil palm fruits a day or 78 tonne of bunches of oil palm fruits a month,” said Hamzah.

Today, PSM provided some info and proof by showing salary slip of workers. Its shocking to say the least! Agreed, its just few workers, so may not really represent the whole sector. But I think HR Ministry, NUPW etc have done a survey on this before. What does it say? I also remember reading that many of the plantation workers are actually foreigners since locals shun these jobs.

The salary may be tied to productivity. Maybe it was low season so not much work or product. In the example below, the guy earns less than RM200 per month and has 8 kids. Not a good example for PSM.  While Dompok is most likely wrong in his assessment, the workers also need to play a part and not make their own lives more difficult. If  8 kids, RM10,000 also not enough in this age!

Many plantation workers in Perak, including foreigners, are being exploited and fleeced by estate managements who charge them exorbitant amounts for electricity and water supply.
Parti Sosialis Malaysia (PSM) state coordinator M Sugumaran told Malaysiakini today that estates are charged industrial rates for both the supply of water and electricity.

According to him, Tenaga Nasional Bhd (TNB) bills the estates on a monthly basis whereas the Perak Water Board (LAP) serves them with a bimonthly bill.

Sugumaran said the management could afford to charge domestic rates as the workers are occupying housing areas inside the estate but a recent survey painted a grim picture.

The survey of the working conditions of plantation workers in about 50 estates revealed that they are not only paid low wages but are also charged high electricity and water rates.

“The average gross daily salary for a plantation worker is RM21.10, inclusive of other benefits and allowances. The management deducts RM50 per person per month for utilities.

“There are about five to six foreign workers sharing a room and RM50 is deducted as electricity charges in their salary slips,” a shocked Sugumaran said.

“You mean to say that the electricity charge for a room in an estate comes to about RM300 monthly?” he asked.

Worker’s monthly salary of RM145

Earlier at a press conference, Sugumaran brought 15 plantation workers from Sungai Siput and Bagan Serai and displayed their monthly pay slips to disprove a claim made recently.

Plantation Industries and Commodities Minister Bernard Dompok (left) had stated in Parliament that rubber tappers earn RM870 monthly while plantation workers earn RM1,700.

Sugumaran welcomed the threat by Dompok to sue PSM for refuting his claims and calling him a liar as PSM have documentary evidence to prove the minister wrong.

“Dompok, instead of making statements in the comfort of Parliament, should come down and see the harsh realities of the sufferings of the plantation workers,” said Sugumaran.

Salleh Saari, 44, a plantation worker with eight children from Ladang Gedong in Bagan Serai, provided the press copies of his September and October 2009 salary slips.

His September 2009 salary slip showed that his net take home pay was a mere RM145.94. His gross earning was RM543.36 while his total deductions came to RM397.42.

Deductions were for his two-room estate home, water bill amounting to RM23.40 and electricity at RM85.27.

For October 2009, Salleh had to pay RM35 for water charges and RM93 for electricity usage. “Even a bungalow utilities charges would not be as high as mine,” said Salleh.

His gross October salary was RM381 and his net income after deductions showed RM181.

“How am I to feed my family of eight children? ” he asked, bursting into tears.

All this is going to be rendered academic, because we all know the poverty line is a joke. Good thing government is updating the line to something more sane. I think in rural area it should RM1000 to RM1500 per family of four.

Leaving that issue aside, this is what Sugumaran, coordinator for Plantation Workers Support Group said:

Moreover, he said that not even five percent of the housing policy introduced by former premier Abdul Razak Hussein had been implemented in the plantations.

“Even the clinics are not manned by qualified doctors… the clinics are run by dressers. And almost all Tamil-medium schools are only partially aided because the government does not have the will to convert the schools into fully aided schools,” said Sugumaran.

Also responding to the recent appeal by Human Resource Minister S Subramaniam to the Malaysian Agricultural Producers Association (Mapa) to create housing funds for estate workers, Sugumaran said:

“The problems of the estate workers can be solved if the employers and the government implement the existing policies.

“Since the Second Malaysia Plan, employers have been asked to implement housing schemes when the plantation sector was to be developed but most employers have not implement the policy. Until now fewer than 59 plantations have implemented the policy,” he said.

“It is clear here that employers are not committed to the implementation of housing schemes for their own workers. Then what is the use of the minister asking Mapa to invest these funds?

“Mapa will not execute it. Is it not better for plantation workers that a housing policy be enacted as law that requires companies to implement the practice?” Sugumaran suggested.

Why would employers build housing schemes when its more lucrative to redevelop land into housing schemes which can generate billions of ringgits? There’s no law, just policy.

MIC to talk about SPM subject limit in cabinet again

/* November 30th, 2009 by poobalan | View blog reactions No comments »
 Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Tamil School Action Committee organised a forum today. Can read about in in MIC Info chief P.Kamalanathan’s blog. Below is Bernama version:

Human Resources Minister S Subramaniam said he would request the Cabinet to again allow Indian students to take a maximum of 12 SPM subjects.

“I will also continue to hold talks with deputy prime minister Muhyiddin Yassin (on this),” said the MIC vice-president after meeting with 20 Indian NGOs today.

Muhyiddin, who is also education minister, announced last June that students would be allowed a maximum of 10 subjects in the SPM from next year.

Subramaniam said the MIC wanted the education ministry to allow Indian students to take the Tamil Language and Tamil Literature subjects, along with the 10 subjects as decided by the ministry.

He said he had been asking for a review of the ruling at Cabinet meetings for the past three to four months, and would continue to engage in consultations with the education ministry until a reasonable solution was found.

He said his priority now was to work out a solution that would ensure Indian students took 12, instead of 10 subjects.

“We are working towards that. This is what the (Indian) community wants,” said Subramaniam.

In a related matter, Subramaniam said there was no point in getting emotional over the issue as it would not solve the problem.

He was referring to reports that some Indian NGOs wanted to protest over the issue.

He urged the NGOs and other interested parties to work with “one voice and one determination” to find an amicable solution to the problem.

“It was for this reason we held the meeting with the NGOs today to get their feedback and then submit it to the cabinet and the MIC education committee,” he said.

what’s going on here?

/* November 30th, 2009 by poobalan | View blog reactions No comments »
 Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Stepping on cow head, spritual leader who asks people to pray someone dies, protester burns photo of Chief Minister (where was the police then?), local leader wants to burn effigy of minister, stepping on photos of defectors. What is going on where? Are these people watching too much bollywood channels or world news?

BTN to be revamped?

/* November 30th, 2009 by poobalan | View blog reactions No comments »
 Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


So says Nazri Aziz, Minister in the PM’s Dept. Looks like there is something not right with it after all. And why not secondary school History subject too while they are at it?

The National Civics Bureau (BTN) will revamp its controversial co-curriculum to be in line with the 1Malaysia concept, said Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department Datuk Seri Nazri Aziz.

“The co-curriculum will be brought in line with the Prime Minister’s 1Malaysia, which means it will be more inclusive and will not divide Malaysians.

“If we have a course for only one racial group, then that is not 1Malaysia,” he said at the Parliament lobby.

He said the Cabinet had agreed to the revamp, with the Chief Secretary to the Government overseeing the process.

Protest against 10 subject limit

/* November 29th, 2009 by poobalan | View blog reactions 4 comments »
 Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Somewhere in early June this year, the Education Minister came up with an idea to limit the number of subjects a students can take for SPM examinations in 2010. The reasons given:

– help to reduce teacher shortage

– 90% of students take 10 subjects

– many students take elective subjects not offered in schools, just to score more As. [Note: Tamil and Tamil Literature usually not offered in secondary schools]

– ease burden on students to excel

– reduce parents’ cost for tuition

– students will be able to focus on other activities

– easier to select students for scholarships

– to create a level playing field: students in fully residential schools were only allowed to take a maximum of nine subjects and those in rural areas too had to take fewer subjects due to a lack of facilities.

The Education Ministry then set up a communication channel to gather public feedback (I gave mine too) within a week, but not sure about the results of the feedback.

Interested parties can send their views on the Education Ministry’s plan to cap the number of subjects taken in the Sijil Pelajaran Malaysia (SPM) by the end of this week.

Education director-general Datuk Alimuddin Mohd Dom urged them to send by e-mail or facsimile their views to him.

“The views will be taken into consideration when I prepare a paper for the minister,” he told reporters after opening the Government Integrated Telecommunications Network Learning in Schools Programme schools’ convention.

Alimuddin can be reached at alimuddin.dom@moe.gov.my or fax: 03-8889 4548.

He was asked about complaints from students who were already studying for more than 10 subjects in Form Four this year.

Alimuddin said he would prepare the paper by next week, adding that the limit on the number of subjects for the SPM examination had not been finalised yet.

“We want to hear feedback from various organisations including teachers. I will also meet with ministry-level professionals.”

He said he would then discuss the matter with the Malaysian Examinations Syndicate before Deputy Prime Minister Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin makes a final decision.

The abrupt proposal caused parents and students to fume since students in Form 4 have already started classes for their subjects. However, DPM Muhyiddin said he was open for suggestions and clarified that any decision would not affect the students:

“Whatever decision made will not affect the people negatively.”

I’m not sure which professionals were consulted, but the decision (proposal) remained and the DPM said this:

“There are many who agree and they come from the education system.”

It seems that the core subjects may be reduced in order to allow more elective subjects. Currently, the core subjects are BM, English, Maths, History. Islam/Moral, and Science (for Arts stream students). However, DPM Muhyiddin mentioned recently that the core subjects will remain, so its back to square one in terms of solving the problem.

Note that it was a cabinet decision, so MIC representative Dr Subra have no choice but to support the decision, even though MIC is protesting the move (even made a resolution during the AGM).

You may want to read what two parents had to say on this limitation here to get some insight as well.

Back in June, this is what MIC rep Dr Subra said:

The MIC has asked the Education Ministry to allow Indian students to take 11 SPM subjects, including Tamil language and Tamil literature.

Party deputy president Datuk Dr S. Subramaniam said he had submitted the request to Deputy Prime Minister Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin before the Government’s recent proposal to limit the number of subjects to 10 from next year.

“If they are not allowed 11 subjects, some (those in the Science stream) will have to miss the Tamil language or Tamil literature subjects. With the 10-subject limit, they have to choose either one, as they already have nine compulsory subjects,” he told reporters in Pagoh yesterday.

Dr Subramaniam said that if Indian students were not allowed to take Tamil language and Tamil literature, some parties might exploit the issue.

He said for those in the Art stream, the new ruling would not pose a problem as they could take both the subjects and two others besides the six core subjects.

And this is what I heard him say last Sunday on TV2 in the interview show by Pandithurai:

MIC is still holding discussions with the ministry. For science stream students, they have to decide which two science subjects they want to take (meaning student already have an ambition or career in mind) if they want to take both Tamil subjects. For Arts stream students, he said not a problem, as there’s four elective places, meaning there two left after taking Tamil subjects.

Clearly, the stakeholders not very happy at the progress being made by MIC, until some guy from PKR wanted to burn an effigy of Dr Subra. There’s also a big protest planned on the 12th December at Wisma Peladang, Old Klang Road by various NGO groups:

More than 20 national Indian NGOs will stage a protest on Dec 12 at the Wisma Peladang in Petaling Jaya against a perceived grand plan to purge the Tamil language from the education system through the Sijil Pelajaran Malaysia (SPM).

The protest is over the government’s elimination of Tamil language and Tamil literature under the 10-subject SPM package system from next year.

The joint NGO group organizing chairman A. Thiruvenggadam (left) said because of the restrictive ruling, Indian students whose mother tongue is Tamil would not be able to sit for subjects in their language and this is not what 1 Malaysia is all about.

“The problem has arisen because the package is restricted to only 10 subjects. If an Indian student sits for nine subjects, he has only one more subject which can be used up for Tamil language, and will not be able to sit for Tamil Literature.

“And if the Indian student takes all 10 subjects there is no option at all for both the subjects,” he said in an interview with Malaysiakini.

The system of the 10 SPM Subject System, he said was a grand plan to eliminate Tamil as a vernacular language in Malaysia and this is not keeping with the 1Malaysia concept the government is propagating.

“It is totally unfair and an abuse of the education system to discard Tamil as a language spoken by a major component race of Malaysia. This is a ruling that will mark the progressive closure of Tamil schools in the country.

“Eventually, Tamil students will not be able to take Tamil as a language in STPM and university. This is another plan to eliminate Tamil totally out of the system,” he said on behalf of Indian NGOs.

Some of the NGOs jointly participating in the protest are the Malaysian Hindu Sangam, Malaysian Tamil Literature Association, Malaysian Dravidian Association, Hindu Dharma Maha Madhuram and several other Indian NGOs.

Most of the these NGOs constitution provides for the protection and propagation of the Tamil language and Tamil Literature in the community.

“When students are unable to take Tamil language there will not be enough Tamil teachers to teach Tamil in schools in future,” he added.

While it may not be just to eliminate Tamil language (I wondered if it got anything to do with BM borrowing heavily from Tamil and Sanskrit), I think the state has a responsibility to provide education of vernacular language to its citizen. We can’t be only interested on promoting multi-cultural aspect of our country, but not willing to invest on building those multi-cultural identities.

What I feel is also not right is this:

The only exceptions would be students in the joint science and religious stream who will be allowed to take 11 subjects next year until the curriculum is streamlined by 2011, after which they too will be able to take a maximum of 10 subjects.

Such leeway should be given to other students tamil vernacular language as well, while a proper solution is devised.

I’m also unhappy with these two fellows: Dr Ramasamy and MP Kapar Manikavasagam because was quiet all this while. Now, there’s a posting on MP Kapar’s blog and also Malaysiakini article featuring Dr Ramasamy. Where was the noise before this? Looks like cheap publicity for me.

Dr Subra claims that such protests and actions may jeopardise the effort of MIC, but I beg to differ. The NGOs and public should also voice out their unhappiness in some way, which will help MIC to promote its cause. And, the reality is, people not really trusting MIC now. Perhaps MIC could have started a poll or survey or mobilized its various branches to gauge feedback from parents. But no, its still in processing of changing, so no proactive effort there.

Even in Minnal FM program call-in session recently, parents and teachers also opposed the move, saying it will deter students from taking Tamil subjects.

As for current status, Dr Subra says this:

Dr Subramaniam said he had on Monday met officers from the Education Ministry, including its director-general Datuk Alimuddin Mohd Dom, on the matter.

“We proposed that the Indian students be allowed to take 11 subjects, which would include Tamil and also Tamil Literature.

“However, the officials counter-proposed that the students wanting to sit these two papers could drop a subject, such as moral education or one of the four science subjects. We are not agreeable to this and this is why we are still in talks with the authorities.

I’m all for dropping Moral. Its a pathetic excuse for a subject!  Just take out Moral, and make it 4 core subjects (5 for Arts students). Or increase the subjects limit to 11 or 12. Is it so difficult? Another options is to allow student take language subjects separately (without SPM grading). A simple pass should be enough to provide the prerequisite for entering language related courses in IPTA or maktab, a workaround if you may. Something like MUET.

I have to repeat here: The state has a responsibility to ensure the multi-cultural heritage of the country is nurtured. One of the core elements is language. Instead of promoting growth of language, its seems to be the opposite. Its myopic to view language subjects as purely for examinations. In fact, why not make vernacular language as compulsory subject as well?

I hope Tamil proponents, ex-Tamil school students, NGOs, MIC’s 530,00 members, PKR’s members, DAP’s members, etc. all will turn up at Old Klang Road next weekend in a show of  force as voters of next general elections. That will be better than any discussion MIC can initiate.