MMSP faces crisis

/* December 2nd, 2009 by poobalan | View blog reactions No comments »
 Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Looks like Malaysian Makkal Sakthi Party is facing its first internal crisis, barely 3 months after its launching by PM Najib.  Similar to MIC, MCA, PPP, and IPF, the issue is related to the top leadership. The other leaders are claiming that he’s high-handed, dictatorial, and so on. Demand is there for him to resign. Well, it may be the end of MMSP which tried to ride on Hindraf and Makkal Sakthi tags.

I guess MMSP has served its purpose to jolt MIC into some sort of action.

Launched just two months ago by Datuk Seri Najib Razak, the Makkal Sakti party, one of a host of disparate political parties formed from what remained of the Hindraf movement, is now in turmoil with a majority of its leaders calling for its president R S Thanenthiran to quit with immediate effect.

The group of dissidents, led by deputy president A Vathemurthy is claiming the backing of more than 15 out of the 27 central committee members.

“We want Thanenthiran to relinquish the presidency. A motion to remove him was supposed to have been discussed today but the central committee meeting was cancelled at the last minute,” said Vathemurthy at a press conference here.

The central committee was supposed to meet tonight, but party secretary-general R Kannan issued a notice to cancel the meeting today.

The newly formed Makkal Sakti Party, which Prime Minister Najib is hoping will help him win over the Tamil working class, appears now to be in a major split over what some senior party leaders say is “the Samy Vellu-style, dictatorial” tendencies of president Thanenthiran.

The rebels have accused Thanenthiran of high-handedness and failing to share decision making with other senior leaders.

The senior leaders had requested an emergency general meeting for today.

The party, which was formed in May this year, launched by Najib on Oct 10 and largely considered as an alternative political party to the Indian community. MIC had expressed its objection, saying that the formation of Makkal Sakti would split the Indian community further.

Vathemurthy said that majority of CC members and ordinary members have absolutely no confidence in the leadership of Thanenthiran “ … and think that his continued presence as president is a severe threat to the stability, progress and future of our newly-formed Malaysia Makkal Sakti Party and the larger interest of Malaysian Indians.”

About 12 members of CC that he claimed were supporting him on this issue attended the press conference today.

He added that they were extremely unhappy to note that, without any prior notice and their approval, the Secretary General has yesterday unilaterally decided to postpone the said meeting of the CC fixed for this evening.

“We have taken legal advice and believe that this conduct of the Secretary General is illegal and very unfair to us,” he said.

He claimed that Thanenthiran had been “absolutely derelict and careless” and had shown no signs of effective leadership, thereby causing the party to be split into two factions.

“He runs the party as a one-man show, with the association of his family members and relatives as CC members,” he said.

Thanenthiran’s brother is also one of the party’s vice presidents.

The deputy president also claimed that Thanenthiran was not transparent and accountable in his financial dealings.

“We asked him how much money was collected and the source, but he ignored us and said that we should not ask him such questions. So where is the element of democracy in the party that we fighting for?” he said.

He also asked the Prime Minister and all parties to disengage from any dealings with Thanenthiran.

“As the matter deserves serious attention, we will explore all avenues to save our party.

“In this interim, we make a sincere plea to our Prime Minister and all parties to disengage from any dealings with Thanenthiran as it will not be in the interest of our party,” said Vathemurthy, who stressed that his group will remain in the party.

Asked about his next move, Vathemurthy said that he would ask for another CC meting soon.

“We will give them another chance to discuss the agenda. Then we will move from there,” he said and added that they would appoint someone either from inside the party or even an outsider as the new president.

However, he declined to reveal any more.

Migrate or is abroad?

/* December 2nd, 2009 by poobalan | View blog reactions No comments »
 Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


I got a shock of my life when BERNAMA reported that 300k++ Malaysian have migrated overseas in the past ONE year!  Don’t believe? Read this:

304,358 M’sians Migrated To Other Countries From March 2008 Till Aug 2009
KUALA LUMPUR, Nov 30 (Bernama) — The Dewan Rakyat was told Monday that 304,358 Malaysians migrated to other counrtries from March 2008 till August this year.

Deputy Foreign Minister Senator A. Kohilan Pillay said the figure for 2007 was 139,696 citizens.

“Among the factors for their migration were because of education, brighter career or business prospects as well following their spouses for Malaysians who married foreigners,” he said when replying to a question for Chua Tee Yong (BN-Labis) on the matter.

Then I read the longer version in Malaysian Insider:

The number of Malaysians who surrendered their citizenship has almost doubled in this year, according to Deputy Foreign Minister Senator A. Kohilan Pillay, who revealed today that about 3,800 Malaysians have given up their citizenships to date compared to 2,000 last year.

This figure, however, is much smaller than the 304,358 Malaysians who were reported to have migrated from March 2008 to August 2009.

Kohilan clarified that the number of “Malaysians who migrated” consists of those who are working abroad and registered with the respective Malaysian embassies.

There was nevertheless a sharp rise in the number of Malaysians who registered themselves as having moved abroad with 210,000 of them doing so from January to August this year compared with 94,000 from March to December 2008.

He also said that between 45 to 55 per cent, or roughly half, of the Malaysians working abroad are professionals.

The volume of Malaysian talent moving abroad is a potentially damaging brain drain and a matter of concern as the country is attempting to remake itself into a developed high-income nation.

The most common reasons given for migration were better education, brighter career or business prospects and marriage.

Kohilan also pointed out that the government is taking some steps to attract talent to the country, including making it easier for foreigners with desired expertise to obtain permanent residence.

Kohilan, who is from Gerakan, also criticised the Penang state government currently under Pakatan Rakyat, saying that they should stop using the shortage of engineers an excuse for the recent loss of an RM10 billion electronic factory investment and should instead find ways to overcome it.

“Penang should not blame others if there is no investment,” Kohilan told The Malaysian Insider. “What professionals would want to stay there if there is only push factors? There must also be pull factors. They must think wisely and make sure the state also has pull factors.”

Kohilan said that there was no breakdown by race for Malaysians who have moved abroad but some migration agents have noticed a rise in applications from Malays to migrate over the past few years.

Robert Chelliah, who runs a migration consultancy in Petaling Jaya says that he has seen a noticeable increase in interest among Malays to move to Australia.

“These are educated Malays and they feel frustrated with the system of governance and they have a global frame of reference to make comparisons,” he said.

“Generally, the push factor from Malaysia has been on the rise … people feel pushed away from the country. They feel alienated and they feel that their prospects are limited by factors that they have no control over,” he added.

According to Kohilan, Australia had the most number of Malaysians registered with the Malaysian embassy with 274,000 and the US second with 31,000 and Taiwan third with 14,000.

He added that there were about 50,000 Malaysian students now studying abroad.

Now that is a better number. Only 3800 gave up citizenship. Not so bad lah, even though nearly double than the year before.

Rising application from Malays? Well, that’s just one consultant’s view., But if compared with statistics from 1996 to 2007 in which only 1720 Malays migrated, I wonder how many moved away in the last one year.

Australia is having high population of Malaysians due to students who graduate and continue living there, and parents who migrate to put up with their children. Even ministers take up PR there 🙂 .

More BTN stories

/* December 2nd, 2009 by poobalan | View blog reactions No comments »
 Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Interviews (1 and 2) from Malaysiakini below. Its similar to what I have heard from reliable friends too.

‘We were shown a picture of Anwar Ibrahim with an American. The instructor told us that he is a traitor to the country as he had a good relationship with the Americans.’
This was among the issues raised during a nation building programme carried out by Biro Tatanegara or the National Civics Bureau, recalled fourth year economics student Fakhrul Zaki Fazial.

Fakhrul, who is studying in Universiti Islam Antarabangsa (UIA), said the focus of the talks is on the Malay race.

“They (the instructors) also criticise leaders from the opposition and consider their criticism as being patriotic,” he added.

Universiti Malaya student leader Mohd Ridzuan Mohammad, who attended the BTN programme in 2004, said there were even talks about other races being a threat to the Malays.

“It is not the right thing to do for BTN to play up racial sentiments… that will create racial rift…(as) this programme could influence some students (into accepting the propagation of racist ideologies),” he added.

Chin Shin Liang, a former Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM) student who attended a BTN course in December 2008, related his experience.

“We were shown video clips of the Bersih rally and then pictures of war-torn Palestine with a caption; Is this what we want?…we were also shown an (unidentified) protester throwing stones.”

‘Promoting blind obedience’

Describing it as “incredibly biased”, Chin said: “It does not show who the stone thrower is, probably a Mat Rempit who decided to join the fun or how the police provoked the protesters with a water canon in the first place.”

He said the instructors also taught that the BN government is chosen by the people and therefore is the legitimate government while making no attempt to distinguish the political party and the government.

The instructors, he said, also suggested that all government agencies should serve BN and be careful of any requests from the opposition which is trying to topple the government.

“This is very misleading, because as a rule, government agencies should be neutral and serve the country as a whole (not just a particular party/coalition),” he added.

It is as if the course is suggesting that the BN government ‘represents’ the country and should be blindly obeyed without question, he noted.

Meanwhile, Fakhrul expressed doubts over BTN’s choice of instructors.

“I feel that some of the instructors were not qualified because they were very emotional and not intellectual in their presentations.

“If students disagreed with their viewpoint, they would be scolded in front of everyone,” he said.

‘BTN taught us mutual respect’

Brickbats aside, there are some quarters who felt that BTN courses have been unfairly targeted.

Yesterday, a group calling itself ‘ex-BTN graduates’ held a press conference in Kuala Lumpur to air their views.

“We feel it is our social responsibility to correct the lopsided views about BTN courses,” said its leader Ahmad Shafei Ahmad Hanbali (left).

He denied that the modules sowed seeds of hatred towards other races. “BTN taught us how to mutually respect the rights of other races as spelt out in the constitution.”

“It is not fair to say that BTN tries to create division when it is only teaching the country’s official history,” he said.

On the allegation that BTN is a propaganda tool of BN, Ahmad Shafei alluded that there was nothing wrong with teaching obedience to the sitting government.

“In a mature democracy, those who lost, even by one vote, must respect those who have won and the victory that the majority of the rakyat has given to the victors,” he said.

Also coming to the defence of BTN was Majlis Gabungan NGO Pembela Negara (Magaran) legal adviser, Mohd Khairul Azam Abdul Aziz.

He said everything that is taught in BTN courses follows what is spelt out in the constitution.

He explained that the special position of the Malays, Bahasa Melayu and Islam is clearly mentioned in articles like 152 and 153 of the constitution.

Mohd Khairul, who claims to be a BTN graduate himself, said “these are facts, not opinions.”

ISO certification

As for allegations of facts, issues and images being manipulated and misrepresented, he explained: “These images and issue are not uncommon even outside BTN, these are usual fare in blogs, publications and other sources. Every fact, image and issue shown or mentioned is credited to sources.”

“Participants can think for themselves, BTN is just exercising freedom of speech. I think that the use of those images are appropriate (in order to highlight certain matters).”

Asked about the problem some graduates have with instructors, Mohd Khairul said: “Report the wrongdoings of the instructors and BTN will address the problem. Don’t reject BTN totally.”

In 2008, BTN was apparently awarded ISO certification by Sirim for its courses.

However, concerned parties have pointed out that Sirim’s endorsement only confirms BTN’s ability to deliver the training on a consistent basis, not an endorsement of the course contents.

Commenting on this, Tenaganita director Irene Fernandez asked whether the authorities who issued the certification are “conscious of the seditious and racially inflammatory nature of the curriculum”.

Student council representatives from several public universities are opposed to the controversial Biro Tatanegara (BTN) courses which is a requirement at campuses.

Universiti Malaya Students Council president, Mohd Ridzuan Mohammad, said only four out of 41 council members who have been asked to attend the course chose to do so.

“I made it optional for members as I felt the course was unsuitable. It incites racial sentiments and does not help provide better representation to the student body,” he said.

The council received an official letter from the Ministry of Higher Education, via UM’s student affairs department, saying it was compulsory for council members.

Ridzuan, who had attended a BTN course in his first year, said his decision to make it optional had “angered” assistant vice chancellor of student affairs, Azarae Idris, who threatened disciplinary action.

However, he said, Azarae withdrew his threat after Ridzuan made his case in a meeting with the vice chancellor after the BTN course in April earlier in the year.

Ridzuan’s defense was that pro-opposition student leaders were depicted negatively at a BTN course held in Kuala Terengganu.

He said the incident where a pig’s head was thrown into a surau in UM was used to tarnish the image of pro-opposition student leaders.

“The course is run over three days, which I think can be better spent on looking after the welfare of the students on campus,” he said.

When contacted, neither Azrae nor senior officers at the student affairs department were available for comment.

Compulsory for Islamic studies students

At University Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), student council member Hisyamuddin Che Ali said most chose not to attend despite warnings from the student affairs department.

“We received calls from the student affairs department almost everyday to pressure us to go,” he said.

Thus far no action has been taken on those who did not attend, as it is not compulsory for most UKM students.

The course, however, is a must for Faculty of Islamic Studies students. Unhappy at being singled out, the faculty’s mostly Muslim students protested to the vice chancellor.

“They too, complained that racial sentiments were fanned at BTN courses…for example, they were told that the Chinese are lording over the country,” said Hisyamuddin.

Other complaints included the inciting of political sentiments and the fact that male and female participants were not segregated during the activities.

Hisyamuddin said the student affairs department responded by saying that they were merely acting on the instructions of the Ministry of Higher Education.

‘It all depends on the facilitators’

On the other end of the spectrum, a former UUM student council president said that he had encouraged council members to attend BTN course.

Nur Mohd Saifuddin Salahuddin said that 25 of the 36-member student council members attended the course.

“It’s good for team-building,” he said, adding that the courses were optional for UUM students despite rumours that those who did not go would not be allowed to graduate.

Saifuddin, who has attended several BTN courses, said the benefits outweighed negative perceptions, and that the modules mostly concentrated on historical facts.

“Whether or not BTN is an indoctrination camp depends on the facilitator, as some facilitators choose to focus on politics,” said the member of the Pro-Aspirasi faction.

Pro-Aspirasi is commonly known to be a pro-Barisan Nasional government group in campus politics.

Saifuddin said that out of the 20 to 30 facilitators present at the BTN courses which he attended, only one or two made their political leanings obvious.

“I had even provoked a facilitator, calling him an ‘Umno man’, but he told me that it was a requirement for BTN facilitators to not be members of any political party,” he said.

‘Steer clear of politics’

Despite supporting the ISO-certified BTN, Saifuddin felt BTN courses should be clear of political influences, and use history instead of current events, as a teaching reference,

“I do not agree with some facilitators who try to convince those with different political leanings by stating ‘fact’ after ‘fact’.

“If they must relate the modules to current events, at the very least they should stay neutral and not be so partial to the ruling government,” he said.

He also said that the BTN courses should be more transparent, to ensure that the public understands what takes place.

Currently, all participants are asked to surrender cameras, mobile phones and all other recording devices.

This is not the case in Selangor’s BTN equivalent SPIES where students taking part are allowed to bring along recording devices and best of all, the course is not compulsory.

“It popular because the facilitators are qualified and the activities are fun and beneficial,” said Universiti Selangor student council president Wan Azraei Wan Husin.

Wan Azraei said the course includes the history of political parties, motivational speeches, spiritual lessons and outdoor activities like white water rafting, something also included in BTN course modules.

Blame is on the bridge

/* December 1st, 2009 by poobalan | View blog reactions 1 comment »
 Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


The government’s version of the investigation report is out, well in a way. A statement was issued:

The suspension bridge which collapsed near SK Kuala Dipang in Kampar, Perak, did not meet required engineering codes and specifications.

A statement issued by Education director-general Tan Sri Alimuddin Mohd Dom Tuesday revealed that the structure was only able to take the weight of eight pupils (each weighing 35kgs).

The tragedy occurred on Oct 26 when pupils from 60 schools in the state tried crossing the bridge in groups of 14 to 17. [tried? why? was the person(s) supervising the movement aware?]

Alimuddin added that the collapse was caused by a faulty concrete block connection.

“The investigation committee found that the concrete block connection in Pylon A could not handle the uplift force from the back-stayed cable.

“Additionally, the private contractor involved had not submitted a plan of the structure or received any approval from authorities such as the district council and Drainage and Irrigation department,’’ he said.

In the tragedy, three primary school pupils attending a 1Malaysia camp drowned after the suspension bridge they were on collapsed into the Kampar river.

At around 10.30pm after an ice-breaking session at the campsite, the organising teachers allowed pupils in groups of 14 to 17 to cross the bridge for their meal at the school. [so, does it mean the teachers were not informed about the weight limit or there was no info?]

Meanwhile, some pupils returned to the campsite to retrieve their water containers and cutlery.

According to Alimuddin, under the weight of pupils crossing from both directions, the bridge began to collapse.

Additionally, heavy rainfall earlier in the evening had increased the river level and current, causing the bridge to sway.

Some of the pupils who were swept away by the current were saved by the camp commandant, trainers, teachers and workers who had jumped into the river after them, he said.

Firemen, rescue workers and the police showed up later to continue the search for missing pupils.

The Education Ministry, he said, would take into account the views of the Public Works Ministry and Department, the Construction Industry Development Board, and the Attorney-General’s Chambers in deciding the appropriate measures to be taken against the involved parties.

There is also an ongoing police investigation into the incident, he said.

Read the alternative reports here, here, and here.

Nothing was mentioned about teachers, supervisors, and the various departments. How can a bridge be built and these people were unaware? Does it mean, you will allow anyone to just come and built something on your land? Sure, the bridge was faulty. But why was it there in the first place?

SPM subject limit standoff

/* December 1st, 2009 by poobalan | View blog reactions 1 comment »
 Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


MIC is adamant to get 11 or 12 subject limit. The Education Ministry is not budging from its stand. So, how long is MIC going to try talking before giving up? Would it go to extreme measure and quit from BN since it is unable to fulfill the community demand? Radio, newspaper, Internet group, Facebook – most comments is for 12 subject limit. The Education DG proposed the below idea, which was rejected by MIC’s Dr Subra:

To overcome this, the education ministry today suggested that schools conduct their own vernacular examinations for students who were unable to sit for it at SPM level.

Director-General of Education Alimuddin Mohd Dom said, by doing so, school teachers could gauge the ability of the students concerned and issue certificates based on their efficiency and proficiency in vernacular languages.

“I suggest students take school-based vernacular examinations if they are not able to sit for it when the 10-subject limit for candidates sitting for SPM begins next year.

“Learning is an ongoing process and students intending to take vernacular subjects can always continue, upon completing their school,” he told reporters today.

He also said this:

Alimuddin clarified that certain elective subjects could be dropped.

“For instance, if students are interested in pursuing medicine, they have to take mathematics, biology and chemistry but can drop physics.

“So, they can pick any other elective of their choice to replace physics,” he explained.

Would a student risk dropping physics in hope that he will surely get place for medical studies? If forced to chose between physics and chinese/tamil language, what would the student do?

I think this will be a failure for MIC. There’s one other alternative – postpone the implementation until 2011 (similar for the religious stream students). In the meantime, merge the two Tamil subjects into one.  Another extreme possibility is to remove Moral as core subject and replace it with vernacular language (but will be a problem since for Punjabis, Thais etc, their vernacular language is not Tamil or Mandarin). Anyhow, removing Moral won’t be considered by government even though its an useless subject. A case of failing to admit one’s mistake.

Or, this could be some sort of drama, and later the approval will be given so that MIC gets some brownie points. You never know. 🙂

I asked myself, why would a student take language and literature subject for SPM?

1. If Science stream background, then most likely for the love of the language, and obviously, if the students is good, then to gain an extra A or two.

2. If Arts stream student, then its to apply for education line (teaching) or social studies/media. However, since the places for these courses are extremely limited (I checked with UM and there’s only 3 programs that list Tamil as one of the subjects at STPM level. I’m sure you know non-bumiputeras cannot enter UM using SPM results), the students also need to take other subjects like Accounts, Economy, English Literature, Arts, etc so that can have more choices at IPTAs (diploma programs) politeknik and private colleges. So, if a student takes Tamil at SPM level, most likely he/she will take it at STPM level too, if the results are good.

For case (1), the students may accept to take the language as non-examinable subject, maybe subject to school level accreditation (or even from a reputable organisation).

For case (2), the subject must be in SPM certificate in order to apply for certain courses in tertiary education (teaching courses).

For me, as more students enter Tamil schools nowadays, they will be deterred in taking both the Tamil subjects at secondary school level since it will affect their career options. Sooner than later, interest and love for the language will give way for need to score good results in examinations.

But to develop students with more capability, i like to reiterate my suggestion: have a combination of core, elective, and “interest” subjects. It can be 5+4+2 or 4+4+2 (dropping Moral and Agama – if the students are interested in these subjects, can take it under “interest category.).