IDD activated after 8 working days by TM

/* June 25th, 2009 by poobalan | View blog reactions 1 comment »
 Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


After the initial reply from TM (received on Sunday evening), on their failure, I replied to them via email. I also made THREE more calls – on Monday, Tuesday, and today. Monday’s call got a response that my application has been processed and will be activated, but the staff could not guarantee that it will be done on Monday itself. On Tuesday, same thing. Finally, today (24th) I called to inquire and the staff confirmed IDD has been activated. I successfully faxed some documents.

My letters to newspapers: came out in Malaysiakini. Not sure about the other two.

So, after a grand total of 12 days (8 working days), TM managed to activate IDD service. Bravo!

And this company is the one going to provide broadband speed of up tp 2Mbps in rural areas and 10Mbps in prime areas by 201o for a cost of RM 11-15b (If I’m not mistaken).  For comparison, both US and Australia are also drawing their respective National Broadband plans with targets of (hold your breath):

Median US broadband speeds are less than 5.0 megabits per second (Mbps)–capable of moving five million bits of data per second–according to the ITIF, far slower than those of Japan (63 Mbps) and South Korea (49 Mbps).

The FCC presently defines broadband as 786 Kbps–too slow for efficient video streaming, for example–and the ITIF and other groups are seeking target speeds of between 10 and 50 Mbps.

Australia earlier this week announced plans to build a $30bn government-controlled national broadband network offering speeds of up to 100 Mbps to 90 percent of homes and businesses and 12 Mbps to the rest. [I suppose 12 Mbps is for the outbacks]

Oh ya, I got another email response two days after replying to their initial email:

Dear Mr. M Poobalan,

Thank you for your reply. Firstly, we would like to apologize for the late response.

Referring to you e-mail dated 21th June 2009, upon verifying in our system, we found that this issue had been addressed by our personnel with the reference number XXXXXXXXXXXXX and it still in progress. Kindly noted, we have notified the respective department on your e-mail and latest status for their updates. They are in the midst of investigating and rectifying the issue. Your patience on this matter is highly appreciated.

We wish to take this opportunity to thank you for your continued patience and understanding, as well as extend our appreciation for your continued support of TM. We wish to assure you that we are constantly improving our service and listening to customer feedback to further improve on the level of our service and customer satisfaction. Should you need to check on your report status, kindly contact our Technical Department at 100 and select “Telephony and Data Services”.

We would like to apologise on the unpleasant experience that you have encountered.

For further assistance or feedback, kindly e-mail us at help@tm.com.my .
Alternatively, you can also contact TM at 100 and select “Telephony and Data Services”.

We look forward in serving you better.

Regards,

Kairun Azizi Md Noor
Customer Care Support, Internet Services,
Customer Service Management,
TM Retail.

Caring for school with single student

/* June 24th, 2009 by poobalan | View blog reactions 1 comment »
 Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


I first heard this via the 8am news on Minnal FM. Then saw the article in NST:

A school with only one pupil is no reason for the government to shut it down.

This was the undertaking given by Deputy Prime Minister Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin when asked on the case of SRJK (T) Ladang Sungai Timah in Teluk Intan, which has only one student.

However, Muhyiddin, who is also education minister, said the government had advised schools with low enrolments to register students in larger schools nearby.

This, he said, would provide students with a better learning environment and better interaction with their peers.

“These cases are prevalent, especially among Tamil schools. Whatever it is, we leave it to the discretion of the school’s management.

“This is a considerate government and we will not shut schools like this. The student wants to study, so let her.”

K. Humah, 12, is a Year Six student and had been the sole student at the school, which has three academic staff and a gardener, since her first year.

Muhyiddin agreed that any attempt to close the school would be politicised.

“If that happens, some within the community would accuse the government of not caring for their education.”

Only thing missing was the announcement of some immediate allocation to improve something in the school.

Now, if I was  really caring and had the power, I would advise the student to shift to another Tamil school nearby, or make arrangements to provide transport. Then, I’ll proceed to authorise the transfer of the school to another location where there is high probability of more students registering.

The girl is in Standard Six. 4 more months and she will be ex-student. Nor is it practical to ask her to move in the midst of UPSR year. What will be the status of the school in 6 months time? No students enrolled in any other year. Unless the school manage to get some students enrolled for Year One next year, the school will be closed down, no? So, another Tamil school closed down due to “considerate” attitude? If not closed down, then what? Empty of students, the staff do what everyday?

As we all are well aware, there’s no new vernacular school license being issued. Thus the only way to survive is to relocate schools with very small enrolment to different locations. The authority to provide permission to transfer school license lies with…hmmm…..

Is there an attempt to pull our legs here?

Earlier in April (if I’m not mistaken), there was similar act in being “considerate” to the plight of SJKT Ladang Bukit Jalil, by asking to increase the number of classrooms in the original plan. But the actual problem is the small land allocation in the MIDST of a cemetary and temple. This was being protested by the  parents and PIBG of  SJKT Ladang Bukit Jalil as its an unconducive environment. The land allocated also did not consider future expansion and increased enrolment.

I smell a rat here.

Tale of a Cendol Seller

/* June 21st, 2009 by poobalan | View blog reactions 1 comment »
 Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


As usual, when I go Banting, will drop by a cendol stall to have a bowl of cendol. Had a bit of time to talk to the owner and was surprised to hear that many of the customers (especially the older ones) ask if its Muslim – owned. She ceased to put a “pottu” on the forehead, worried business would drop. She joked that soon may need to adorn a tudung (head cover) to ensure business continuity. Admittedly, the stall is located in a Muslim majority area, thus she’s totally dependent on them for sales.

I understand, of course, that for the Muslims there’s a need to verify the “halal”ness of the food, so I guess its a valid question. This also made me think. With the population imbalance becoming more obvious, small scale food industry by Indians may see a decline in sales. With a small population, we can’t run a stall or restaurant depending solely on non-Muslim customers. Thus, the need to apply for Halal certificate. Of course, then you will need Muslim workers and so on. But if its a one-man show, like the Cendol seller, what is the options? Does she need to get a Halal certificate for selling cendol? Need to check on this. I don’t think she can afford to hire an employee to maintain the stall. So how? Look for another business? Easier said than done. These people can’t simply relocate to another area to do business. Competition is high, cost is involved.

Then there’s problem of business safety. She’s always worried that sooner or later, her place will be “taken over” by others. She got a proper business license, but still the rule of jungle apply in many places. Even though government changed in Selangor, at ground level, things are based on who you know, who is in power etc. This is the problem faced by the working people who run simple business. Need license. Have license also need to pay extra. Pay also no guarantee business location is permanent.

I hope can give her some advice the next time I drop by. Constructive comments welcomed.

Reply from TM

/* June 21st, 2009 by poobalan | View blog reactions No comments »
 Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


About 24 hours after I posted the complaint on TM’s website over their failure to provide service, this is the reply (edited) I got (via email, since I did not leave a mobile number):

from TM Customer Care Support
to
date Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 5:46 PM
subject COMPLAINT :TM products & services
mailed-by tm.net.myDear Mr. M Poobalan,

Thank you for contacting TM. Firstly, we would like to apologise for the late reply.

Referring to your e-mail dated 20th June 2009 complaint on our service, we regret for the poor service you had experienced through and for the incovenient cause. We assure you that this issue will be highlighted to our management and we will work on improving our service. We acknowledged your complaint and we have taken the initiative to check further regarding this matter.

We assure you that we do care about our customers and we have been implementing various initiatives to improve customers’ experience when dealing with us. As much as we would like to get it right every time, inevitably there will be the odd cases when we have not performed to customers’ expectation.

Concerning to your IDD issue,upon checking in our system we were able to track down the report that you have lodged (report number: <edited>). We have notified our respective Department on your e-mail and latest status for their updates. They are in the midst of investigating and rectifiying the issue.

Please accept our sincere apologies for any inconvenience caused. We wish to assure you that we are constantly improving our services and we thank you for your constructive feedback to improve our level of customer service.  We take this opportunity to assure you that as our customer, your satisfaction with our service has always been our top priority. As our valued customer, the value that we place on your business and satisfaction can never be overemphasized.  We consider it a great privilege to serve your Internet needs and look forward to our next opportunity to serve you again.

For further assistance or feedback, we welcome you to write us again at help@tm.com.my.
Alternatively, you may contact TM at 100 and select 2 for “Internet Services”.

We look forward in serving you better.

Regards,

Razana
Customer Care Support, Internet Services,
Customer Service Management,
TM Retail.

www.tm.com.my

(ICOMS#<edited>)

Now, I’m not sure what IDD got to do with “Internet Services”. Looks like an incomplete cut and paste job, probably modified from an existing standard reply template. Can anyone tell me how to fax to an  overseas number?

Shame on you TM

/* June 20th, 2009 by poobalan | View blog reactions 4 comments »
 Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Let me present the facts:

1. I registered a fixed line last year September.

2. A week ago, I tried making calls overseas – but the ring tone was different. Upon inquiring with TM Customer Service (by dialing 100), I was informed that my fixed line’s IDD service is not activated. I asked the customer care staff on the activation process and she duly informed me that its free and I can apply for activate via phone itself, without making a trip to TM Point. She then, put in a “service”request on my behalf and told me that it will be processed in THREE working days. I made the call on Saturday evening (13th June 2009). She took down my mobile number for reference.

3.Three working days would mean Monday, Tuesday, and Wednesday. Fine with me. I gave them an extra day and tried again to call/fax overseas on Thursday. It was not working.

4. I called back Customer Service on Thursday evening (18th June 2009). The “service request” is still in the “system”. They will act on it, the staff said. The customer care staff took down my mobile number. Fine, I can still bear with that.

5. Its Friday, and I made a call. It seems there’s some problem with the connection or whatever. She asked me to call on Saturday to ensure the activation is done. Again, my mobile number was requested.

6. Saturday morning arrives. I made a call around 10am. The customer care staff checked the “system” and mentioned that a request was put in on the 17th. I clarified with her that I made a call on last Saturday and the request should have been there on the 13th, not 17th. I also mentioned that the staff asked me to call today (Saturday) to check on the activation. To my amusement (or horror), she said the contractors don’t work on weekends, so earliest possible activation would be next Monday. Well, I kind of expected that. She was at loss on why the IDD service is still not activated. Anyway, I told her that customer care already took down my mobile number 3 times and I have not received any call from TM regarding solution of the problem. I also told her to get someone to call me on Monday morning to clarify this.

My question:
1. Who is going to reimburse me for calling TM Customer Service (2 out 4 calls were from mobile phone)?
2. Who is responsible for my inability to make calls/fax overseas – which may impact critical decision making?
3. Who will solve this problem for me?

Such a simple service is not being acted upon. There’s no point in being polite and customer-friendly, when the work is not done. All style, no substance.

Note: I’ve sent this to Star, NST, Malaysiakini, TM Website (Complaints and Feedback).