Are Malaysians into slavery?

/* June 20th, 2009 by poobalan | View blog reactions No comments »
 Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


I share Irene Fernandez’s opinion on the survey results showing majority of respondents opposing the mandatory one-off day per week for domestic helpers (aka maids). Star poll showed nearly 76% opposing the idea. In fact, the mandatory day off is already part of our law.

And it seems Fillipino maids get a day off, unlike their counterparts from other countries (due to the church activities?). Isn’t that discrimination? Blame who? The Indonesian government for failing to protect their rakyat?

I saw in TV3 Buletin Utama today – one person saying they also take the maids out for outing during weekends. Really? Tell me, is your idea of weekend outing or holiday same as the maid’s? Go for holiday also, the  maid still works for you – carry bags around, chaperone kids, and so on. Weekend outing also same – you go shopping while maid follows behinds with bags and kids. And, do you bring your maid for Indonesian movie, or is watching movie means the latest Hollywood/Cantonwood/Bollywood blockbuster? Is it really a holiday/outing or forced working day under pretext of a day out?

Look at the work of a maid – basically everything in the house is done by them. Some also bring their maid to parents or siblings house to clean up there as well. Some maid double up as workers in stalls or the family business. So, do these people pay extra to the maids? I hope so. I also see some maids outside the house cleaning window. but from second floor. if fall how? Some even climb out of the apartment window to clean it. If fall – sure die la. who pay for funeral cost? Do they have insurance for occupational hazard?

Another person is “worried” that the maids will mix with bad hats. Hello…first please check where your kids/family members/relatives are going la. Why not lock up your kids at home? Don’t let them go to school or shops in case they mix with bad hats. Most crime conducted by locals (statistics by our good police force) so better protect our family from our own rakyat!. Actually, if you treat your maid (and pay  maybeRM1000 as salary), would she jump ship? Anyway, if you are really worried about others’ safety and actions, extend that to your employees at office, colleagues, neighbours, and regular Joe on the street. Dare or not?

Anyway, no point just blaming employers. The maids are also of inferior quality – lacking training, suspect health conditions. Maids who don’t bathe. Maids who don’t know how to carry a baby. Maids who are lazy. Maids who pretend to be sick. Maids who are carrying infectious disease.

And I wonder why the foreigners still want to work as maids in Malaysia when the pay is better in other countries? is Malaysia a stepping stone for a “better life”? maybe due to “islamic” nature of the population? or is it the “rejects” are the ones being employed here? or maybe its close to their homes (indonesia/phillipines)?

I also think many of the families are not qualified to be maid employers, just like many of the maids are not qualified to be maids. We have guys taking advantage of the maids, maids being abused worse than animals, forcing maids to work for endless hours…all for what? a measly few hundreds and some food on the table?

Anyway, you pay peanuts, you get monkeys – isn’t that the saying? most of the money goes to agents/middleman/govt dep fees/permit etc. you pay someone rm450/500/550 per month to work from sunrise till midnight nearly everyday…susah jugak. What is a fair salary? One way to judge is to put yourself in that place and do the work. Try formulate a calculation of how many hours worked, the difficulty level of the work, and so on. Take into account the benefits – free lodging and food, house environment, no transport costs etc. take into account the minus points – work all day, no rest; no/minimum social life; no freedom.

The maids also opportunists. Their salary is held back for up to 6 months to cover this and that – some of them borrow money at home country to pay for the trip here (in some case, agent pay for it, so they owe the agent company). Once here, they also look for better opportunity la. This is human nature. I guess many other jobs also the same – teaching, nursing, accountant, engineer, doctor, manager, contractor, taxi driver, lawyer… blah blah blah – for many of us, the  rules of the day are:

“cut corners”, “less work more money”, “bottomline counts”, “all for me and nothing for company/employer”, “what i can get out of this”, “laws are meant to be broken”, etc.

So, we end up reading robberies happening with help of maids. We read about maids absconding with cash and jewellery. Maids kidnapping babies.

So, who is the guilty party here? Everyone. Employers for taking for granted their maid as forced workers. Maids for not being truthful/honest in their jobs. Agents for not being honest and professional. Government for not enforcing better law/protection/rules for all parties involved.

I think we should start hiring locals as maids, maybe calling them home assistants or something else. Pay starts from RM1300/month. Working hours is 10 hours a day with one day off per week. 14 days annual leave. For employers – maid must be certified – either a proper skills-based certificate that takes 6 months to complete or some sort of diploma in home management. This should be a long term plan to replace the foreign maids. Secondly, one should properly vet the prospective employers – are they qualified to be employers, how many people staying in the house, any family member having mental illness or police record for violence, etc. Next is agents. The word agent itself evokes negative connotations – bribery, dishonesty, unprofessional etc. How to regulate the maid agencies? One way is to reduce the companies to perhaps about 10-20 only per state. No company can operate in more than one state. Allow employers to bypass the agents and hire own foreign maids if need to. Encourage employement of local workers instead of foreigns – tax relief perhaps?

I first wrote that even 4 year old kids boss their maids around, but my friend chided me. He said, even 2 years old can give order to maids! Do we own the maid like some sort of personal property?

USM absorbs balance students

/* June 19th, 2009 by poobalan | View blog reactions No comments »
 Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


After the blunder by USM, the balance students who did not get a place in any other public universities were absorbed by USM. That’s above 150 students.4,574 students who were mistakenly declared as successful in USM application managed to get a place in one of the other 19 public universities (but not sure if their choice of course).

Higher Education Ministry director-general Prof Datuk Dr Radin Umar Radin Sohadi said the 150 did not receive other offers as they did not apply to the ministry’s student admissions department.

“Absorbing the students will not complicate matters as USM-supplied data shows that not all accepted students took up their offers,” he said at the ministry’s press conference concerning the 2009 public university intake.

“However, the absorbed students may not obtain places in their preferred course,” he said.

Well, is something better that nothing?

Vigneswaran to rejoin MIC

/* June 18th, 2009 by poobalan | View blog reactions 1 comment »
 Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Hmm…wonder what happened to MIDYF which was started by SA Vigneswaran. According to Samy, the ex-MIC Youth chief has applied to rejoin MIC and the application was approved by CWC.

Samy Vellu also said that former MIC Youth chief SA Vignersawan and three other former Youth members who left the party last year, have now requested to return to the party fold.

“They met me recently and told me that they wanted to return to MIC and I accepted their request,” he said, adding that the CWC endorsed their applications to rejoin MIC.

Somebody, anybody…help me out here. All those accusations Vigneswaran and Samy Vellu traded…. what will happen to it? Forgotten?  What about his loyal followers who quit along with him? Also rejoin?

Oh ya..I forgot. Its politics. There’s no permanent friend or foe 🙂

parent has right to determine religion of child

/* June 16th, 2009 by poobalan | View blog reactions No comments »
 Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Today’s Tv3 news saw coverage of dewan rakyat proceeding. Nazri Aziz was quoted as saying:

On the issue of determining the religion of children below 18 when one of the parents converts to another religion, he said the Cabinet had agreed that it must be made in accordance with Clause (4) Article 12 of the Constitution.

In the case of R. Subashini versus T. Saravanan last year, the Federal Court had interpreted the word “parent” in the law as singular and not plural and as such, the converting parent had the right to determine the religion of their children below 18, he said.

Note: Clause (4) of Article 12 is as follows: For the purposes of Clause (3) the religion of a person under the age of eighteen years shall be decided by his parent or guardian.

Now, the question is which parent should one follow? The converting parent have right to convert the child, but the non-converting parent ALSO HAVE THE SAME EQUAL RIGHT to maintain the child’s religion! Why divert into the converting parent’s rights only?

Isn’t this a deadlock? Both have EQUAL RIGHTS. Just because one of them is a coward who wants to hide behind the name of certain religion, doesn’t make it correct action.

Subashini has all the right to maintain the religion of her kids. How can the court make such an erronous, logic-defying, ill-thought decision?

7 arrested over demolition of houses in jinjang selatan tambahan

/* June 15th, 2009 by poobalan | View blog reactions No comments »
 Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Latest news:

Seven people, including one activist, have been arrested today for trying to stop the demolition of houses in Kampung Jinjang Selatan Tambahan in Kuala Lumpur.

Six of those arrested were residents whose houses were being demolished by the Kuala Lumpur City Hall (DBKL). The sole activist – Julie Wong – was from urban poor people’s organisation Permas.

They have been taken to the Sentul district police headquarters for questioning.

Human rights movement Suaram said that it received reports that several people were injured caused by DBKL officers during the incident.

“We call on the police to release the seven individuals immediately. We remind the police that their duty is to ensure safety of all Malaysians and to curb violence from being used against residents and activists instead of arresting them,” said Suaram in a statement.

The movement also condemned DBKL for taking a heavy-handed approach in the demolition.

“We also call on DBKL to respect the rights of the residents of Kampung Jinjang Selatan Tambahan, to halt demolition works immediately and to take the concerns of the residents of Kampung Jinjang Selatan Tambahan into consideration,” it added.

The demolition exercise by DBKL today involved 17 houses to make way for a new road connecting Jalan Kepong to Jalan Segambut.

The new road project is now stalled as a result of these houses which lie on the way.

Deadline expired yesterday

Although DBKL has issued these residences a notice to relocate, the residents claimed that the notice was served to residents of Kampung Benteng.

Kampung Benteng no longer exists as they have been evicted by DBKL for the same roadwork.

Its dreadful to read stories like this. Our community seem to end up as losers whenever development takes place. why? uneducated? illiteracy? wrong advice? ignorance? crooked politicians and administrators? profit-oriented developers/land owners? lop-sided law?  We have many such cases – bukit raja, putrajaya, jinjang, kampung pandan, bukit pala, sungai buloh, bukit jalil, etc. in most (if not all cases), the settlement were established before independence, so what are the remedy for these situations? Who were the people involved in the “talks/negotiations”?

Reading about the mental anguish of one such family is sad indeed:

AFTER months of anguish and sleepless nights, one of the families in the 17 homes in Jinjang Selatan Tambahan (JST) that are to be demolished, called it quits.

M. Ramasamy, who had been living in the area for 45 years, decided to take up the offer of a unit in the Batu flats offered by the Kuala Lumpur City Hall (DBKL) yesterday as he had no other choice.

Too much to bear: Ramasamy being consoled by his family members and neighbours after he broke down.

While the DBKL officials were helping him shift out, the other affected residents were holding a press conference down the road to seek justice for their case.

When the other residents caught wind of Ramasamy’s move, they all went to stop Ramasamy and his family from shifting out.

The residents were upset to see Ramasamy’s family in tears and demanded that the officers put back the furniture they had loaded onto the lorry.

As they persuaded Ramasamy, the tension and anguish got the better of him and he broke down in tears.

“I never wanted to shift; from the first day, we have wanted to remain here. We have lived here for more than 40 years,” he said.

He added that one of the main reasons for his decision to shift out was the mental torture of not knowing when the DBKL would demolish his home.

“At night, unknown people would roam our streets on motorbikes and cars. We felt really unsafe, and all this prompted us to move out,” Ramasamy added.

Ramasamy had not gone to work for a week, which added to his stress.

“I am worried that during my absence from work, they might fire me, but at the same time, I have this problem at home,” he added.

After 15 minutes of shouting, negotiation and tears, the DBKL officers finally put the family’s belongings back into their house.

The JST residents, who held Temporary Occupancy Licences until 1997, had been given a final extension until yesterday to shift out.

Thus far, the DBKL has been branding the TOL residents as squatters of Kampung Benteng and have addressed them as such in letters sent to them.

The residents held the press conference yesterday in a final bid to lobby for a halt to the demolition exercise.

The houses are being demolished to make way for a new road connecting Jalan Kepong to Jalan Segambut (near the KTM Segambut).

JST Residents Association secretary Sin Ah Seng said the road was a not a necessity as it would only create a bottleneck.

“The road will end at Metro Prima Kepong; this route will only flood the place with more cars,” he added.

The road was initially supposed to be built about 20 metres from the affected houses but the route was changed due to the presence of high tension electricity cables.

On June 8, DBKL officers had spray-painted the homes with the words “T/R 10/06/09”, meaning that the houses were to be demolished on June 10.

The residents immediately met DBKL deputy director-general of services Datuk Amin Nordin to seek justice.

“He instead forced us to accept the letter and the keys to the flats if we wanted to stay until June 14,” said another resident, S. Susil Raj.

Raj said they reluctantly opted to accept the keys to buy more time to stop the demolition.

Another issue that is bothering the residents is the DBKL’s offer to them to shift out.

According to resident M. Selvamani, they were offered a flat and RM1,000, but the money would not even be enough for the extra fittings needed in the new flats.

“Amin said the flats are ready for occupation but our survey of the place revealed that most units do not have electricity and water supply,” Selvamani added.

The units also lack light bulbs and fans as well as doors and grills, which would cost RM1,200 to fix.

Moreover, the DBKL would deduct RM402 as deposit and the balance would be given to the residents later, but it was not stipulated when.

For some houses, like Ramasamy’s, which house three or more families, the residents would have to bear extra costs as they would all need to shift into separate units.

Their current furniture will not fit into the flats, which are smaller than their current homes which are more than 1,200 sq ft.

“We will have to buy new mattresses, kitchen cabinets, sofas and a host of other new things,” Ramasamy said.

He added that in the current economic situation, it was a burden to come up with such a large amount of cash.

Selvamani said these problems would only prompt the residents to turn to illegal moneylenders like Ah Long.

Ramasamy said while the land belonged to the government, the homes were theirs and they needed to be compensated accordingly.

“We built our homes slowly over the last 30 to 40 years; the authorities should give us the right compensation,” he added.

The residents will be facing the DBKL officers again today as the extension expired yesterday.

Look at their neighbours at Jinjang Utara, 16 years and still counting – no permanent homes yet, but the people living there still having hope. Our country have lots of people who don’t fulfill promises and yet still stay in power or position.

In another case which was highlighted recently, its the SIME UEP company which did not build houses for ex-plantation workers in Bukit Raja housing project in Klang.