Some photos of the Anti-ISA Freedom Run by DAP, courtesy of a reader. Note the T-shirts that read “Bebaskan Makkal Sakthi 5”.
RPK at Anti-ISA Freedom Run
/* November 17th, 2008 by poobalan | View blog reactions No comments »
Teagarajan aims for Deputy President post
/* November 17th, 2008 by poobalan | View blog reactions No comments »Another MIC old hat enters the election. This time, its also an “has-been” – Datuk V.K.K Teagarajan. He is going for Deputy President post (currently held by Palanivel). At a relatively younger age, 60, he aims for the second highest position, with hope that can take over once Samy retires/quits.
KUALA LUMPUR: Businessman Datuk V.K.K. Teagarajan, 60, a former MIC central working committee (CWC) member, has announced his intention to contest the MIC deputy presidency at the party elections slated for September next year.
The tussle for the party’s No. 2 position is expected to be intense as Samy Vellu had apparently told several leaders that he would vacate the presidency soon after the September 2009 MIC elections and let the deputy president take over as acting president.
Teagarajan, the former president of the Malaysian Associated Indian Chamber of Commerce and Industry told Bernama that MIC had to be rejuvenated and strengthened after having lost the support of the Malaysian Indian community in the last general election, held on March 8.
“I am declaring this (bid to contest) after speaking to my supporters and party members in general. They feel that there should be new blood in the party, and I would like to offer myself for the position of deputy president,” he said.
Unlike in the case of the presidential contest, a party member needs only one nomination to qualify to contest the post of deputy president, the three posts of vice-president or any of the 23 CWC posts.
For the post of president, a candidate must obtain 50 nominations, with each nomination having a proposer and five seconders. The proposer and seconders must be branch chairmen.
While the president is elected by branch chairmen, who number some 3,200, the candidates to fill the other national posts are elected by about 1,400 delegates at the party general assembly.
Teagarajan, who joined the largest Indian-based political party in the country in 1987, stood for one of the three posts of vice-president at the last party elections, in 2006, but came in fourth.
In 2003, he filed nomination papers for a veep post but withdrew barely seven hours later after being dissuaded from contesting by party president Datuk Seri S. Samy Vellu.
Teagarajan, who is also a former senator and had served as party information chief in 2003, was elected to the CWC, the party’s highest decision-making body, in 1997, and served in that capacity until 2003.
Teagarajan is the second MIC leader to announce his intention to contest a top party post. Last week, former vice-president Datuk M. Muthupalaniappan declared his bid to contest the MIC top post in the presidential election scheduled for March next year.
“I know the elections are 10 months away but we have to start somewhere … and I feel this is the start,” said Teagarajan, who is also former Kuala Lumpur MIC chief.
Asked about the possibility of him pulling out of the contest for deputy president, he said he would only do so if he found another “worthy candidate”.
“But for now, I do not see anyone making the move for the deputy president’s post. If they come in, then by all means, they can contest. But for now, I am not going to back off,” he said.
At the 2006 party elections, current deputy president Datuk G. Palanivel beat then incumbent Datuk S. Subramaniam who had been deputy president for more than 20 years. – Bernama
UMIC 3rd Annual Treasure Hunt 2008
/* November 16th, 2008 by poobalan | View blog reactions No comments »UMIC’s treasure hunt took place today. I had a bad start – overslept, still not feeling 100 percent due to stomach upset, and car battery was dead. Managed to reach the starting point as flag-off took place.
This time around, 28 cars took part in a hunt around Klang Valley. It was from 8am till 12.30pm. As mentioned earlier, its the third time UMIC is organising the hunt.
My team joined in as support, in fact its the second time we are taking part. The first was last’s year’s hunt!
The questions were tough, but I thought we did well for 3 adults and a teenager. Not that we won anything this time. But I think I’m getting the hang of it.
Since we were rushing, couldn’t take lots of pics. Most of the photos are of the price giving ceremony:
Silibin versus Patto
/* November 16th, 2008 by poobalan | View blog reactions 1 comment »First, let’s look at two different statistics:
NST:
He pointed out yesterday that during a month-long survey conducted by the state DAP, only 12 out of 100 respondents living in Jalan Silibin had voiced their reservations over the renaming of the road.
He said 55 residents and business operators had supported the renaming while 37 others were neutral in the matter.
55+37+12 = 114. This is more than 100 possibly because the combination of residents and business owners, but still need to clarify why 114 responses exist.
He said of the 74 respondents interviewed, 55 supported the idea while 12 disagreed and seven were neutral.
“We made sure we got the views of a multiracial group of people so that all races were represented,” he said.
55 + 12 + 7= 74. Perfect fit.
But how can the Star and NST report two different set of numbers? Who to believe?
Let’s see both side of the arguments:
For change
– honor the late Patto
– the late Patto served Silibin area before
– The hassle for residents is minimal. (well, then perhaps the state government can cover the cost of the changes – MyKad, business cards, letterheads etc.).
– Jalan Silibin is not that well known, unlike Jalan Alor which is world famous
– No record of the history or origin of the name “Silibin” – claims Kulasegaran.
– 70% of residents affects agree to the change
Against change
– Its a hassle and unnecessary expense
– Will affect businesses
– Can rename a monument or park, or name a road in new housing area.
– Silibin has lots of historical significance.
A group of businessmen even sent a petition to Perak Menteri Besar protesting the proposed change.
I think there should be a study on the historical significance or origin of “Silibin”. It should be having some history behind it. Secondly, since 30 percent are opposing, perhaps the state government can hold a public forum to get more responses (being a transparent state, its should do so). The state can also identity other sites/roads that can be named after the late Patto. Being a caring government, it can reimburse the affected businesses and residents if the name is changed.
Protest sans signs of protest
/* November 16th, 2008 by poobalan | View blog reactions No comments »Imagine you want to complaint against your school. The school says fine, but you cannot carry any banners, wear any clothing opposing the schools, nor say anything negative about the school. In other words, just stand in a place for a while until you feel contented or have achieved something, and then disperse.
That’s the scenario with the anti-ISA vigil held at PJ, which saw police attacking the crowd last week. This week, a permit was given, but with 12 conditions. Three of them are as follows:
One of the organiser of the gathering, lawyer and blogger Harris Ibrahim told Malaysiakini
that the police had given permission for the gathering on the provisions that no candlelight vigil was held, no anti-ISA T-shirts were worn by the participants and no speeches by politicians – all main ingredients of the pasts gatherings.
Anil Netto provides few more of the conditions:
- No candles allowed
- No T-shirts showing support for the Abolition of the ISA allowed
- “Penganjur dilarang melakukan sebarang aktiviti yang lain yang melambangkan simpati terhadap tahanan Akta Keselamatan Negara” (Organisers are prohibited from any other activity that suggests sympathy towards ISA detainees!)
- No banners or distribution of leaflets allowed
- No political speeches allowed
I got to say this: Only in Bolehland!!!
Well, as mentioned by commenter Novinthen in another post, the alternative is join the ruling party! You get permit, no questions asked. 🙂