I read that History subject may be taught in primary schools following PM Badawi’s suggestions recently. Of course, its just an idea, and various groups will have proposals and objections. I’m more interested in who’s version of History would be taught. Which period of history would the subject cover – circa 1957, circa 1500s, or circa 1970s?
As its commonly knows history is written by the winners.
Universities in Malaysia have been urged to create a new co-curriculum to explain issues regarding the social contract which has often drawn the attention of various parties off late. Umno vice president Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin said explaining the issues to the younger generation especially university students was important so as to avoid confusion.
“The important thing is not to question the social contract but to give an explanation so that they understand what the social contract is all about especially among the younger generation, because not all understand the social contract.
“Therefore, giving the explanation with proper methods and linking it with the country’s history is important,” he told reporters after delivering a lecture on Malay-Muslim Politics – Crisis and Solution at Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM) here today.
Besides, he said, university lecturers should play a crucial role in giving the explanation.
“An effective explanation is important because when the students leave and mix around with the community, it will be easy for them to understand the concept of democracy and the constitution that we have,” said Muhyiddin who is International Trade and Industry Minister.
He said the social contract issues had been solved long ago and all parties should accept it.
One can easily wonder if this is nothing more than a brainwashing exercise to enforce master-slave relationship. One can only wonder.
I was feeling a bit guilty for not attending any of Mindsblog gatherings so far due to busy schedule (and the fact that I’ll be the oldest fella around didn’t exactly motivate me). So, when the Mindsblog admin announced a photoshoot outing at Batu Caves, I gave my standard “will try to come if nothing else crops up” reply, but told myself I’ll be there.Latest update showed 11 people confirmed (minus myself), so I was hoping to meet many new faces. And I won’t be the oldest since Selian was coming too 🙂
Thus, on Saturday morning, managed to drag myself out of bed, settle dog-walking, garden watering, and a quick breakfast before speeding off to Batu Caves. Had to utilise my racing skills to reach Batu Caves at 9.13am (left at 8.36am, that means 37 mins from Puchong to Batu Caves).
I was ready to apologise for being late, but to my utter dissappointment no one was there! Immediately called the person in charge, who was on the way. Next person to arrive was Rames. I’ve seen his blog before, and he is good. As for me, hmm…like land and sky, if compare with him or Selian.
Anyway, managed to get some tips and advice from Rames, and we decided to start shooting away while waiting for others to arrive. The weather was cloudy and quite a number of tourists were milling around. We did not go up the stairs, but just took photos at ground level. The main attraction without a doubt were the pigeons and the monkeys. Oh ya, Lord Muruga’s golden statue as well.
I was tired by around 10.00am, and told Rames that we should take a break. By then, the organiser arrived – Amutha, who brought a guest, Parimala. We adjourned to Rani Restaurant. Being the ever-inquisitive (kepoh) person, I think I may have irritated the rest with many questions. Sorry guys 🙂
We resumed our activity at about 10.40am, and decided to go up the stairs into the main cave. Selian joined us halfway up the stairs. So, that’s 5 people already. We spent more than 1 hour in the cave taking shots. While up there, another two people turned up – Pushparaaja and Sundra (hope i got that correct). Up to 7 people now.
We came down at about 1pm. Took some group shots. The next activity was to enter the Kalai Kudam (Art Cave) but since I have other commitments (well, have to show I’m busy person ma!!!), I took leave.
Ok, that’s for the reporting part. Now the comments and opinions:
1. I think those who promised to come must inform the organiser if they can’t make at last minute. This will spare us from waiting unneccesarily. No point giving your name, but then go AWOL. Especially the models. 🙂
2. In future, a small tutorial/lecture/talk on photography concepts will be useful so that it will inspire bloggers to learn more about their camera. Nothing heavy, but some basic ideas and theories will suffice (err..are theories considered heavy?)
(update: Ronaldo scores. Man Utd 2-0 WBA). So, now you know what I’m doing at 2.00am.
3. Should structure the event so that we have a timeplan and focus. For example, 1 hour at ground level, 1 hour in cave, and so on. Will ensure better use of time.
Overall, I had a good time and met new friends. I liked Rames and his positive attitude. He is easy-going and willing to share his knowledge. Parimala was vivacious and bubbly (hehehe…i hope its the correct English word to use!), a welcome addition to the group. Didn’t really got a chance to talk to Pushparaaja and Sundra. Fret not, we shall meet again.
(update: Berbatov scores his first goal for Man Utd. 3-0 now).
Ok, I’m going off-tangent here. The main reason for the outing was to take PHOTOS, not chit-chatting with people. I’ve uploaded the pics at Picasa. I’m not into editing, so its WYSIWIS (What You See Is What I Shot). Images are JPG and resized from 700-800kb to 70-100kb. Originals are in RAW.
(update: Nani scores. Man Utd 4-0 WBA. Looks like the Big Four all scored at least 3 goals)
I agree with the demand by MIC Youth. What were Nanban editors thinking of when they allowed the advertisement to be published? Which company did the advertisement? The MIC Youth should make formal complaint to the AAAA (if I’m not mistaken).
MIC Youth demands an apology from Indian daily
Tamil Nanban and a beer company for an insensitive Deepavali
advertisement that appeared in the newspaper yesterday.
They also lodged a police report against the
newspaper and the Skol beer company claiming it was insulting to the
Indian community.
Its secretary, C. Shivarraj, said the advertisement by Skol printed on
page 5 could lead to misperception on the Indian community as well as
convey a wrong message to Indian youth.
“They are insulting the
Hindus’ Rangoli kolam by putting the beer bottles in the middle and
stating that the Deepavali celebration will be more enjoyable with Skol
beer,” said Shivarraj at the Sentul police station here yesterday.
He said members of the public who saw the advertisement might get the wrong idea that Indians were fond of drinking.
Shivarraj added that Indian youth might also get the wrong idea that it was a norm to get drunk when they were adults. “This misperception and wrong message of the Indian community must stop,” said Shivarraj.
He called for an apology from the newspaper and the beer company before Deepavali on Oct 27.
The report was lodged by MIC Youth, Culture and Religion Bureau chief, K. Sathasivam, who was accompanied by Shivarraj.
The guilty parties are the advertising firm, the alcohol selling company, and the newspaper. But I think there are another two culprits as well. Do readers remember that alcohol advertisements were once banned from print media? When and who allowed it again? Did you recall reading about it anywhere? I can’t. So is it legal for such advertisements to be published or not? We can even see alcohol advertisements in cinemas.
The other culprit is the community itself. Alcohol has forged deeply in our festivals and daily lives – in the name of socialising, modern lifestyle, and stress reducer. We can find minibars in affluent and middle-income Hindu houses nowadays, while restaurants and samsu shops still cater for those who are in lower income category and outskirts of towns. We hear our politicians given names related to alcohol – such is the level of humilitation we bring onto ourselves.
We console ourselves by saying that some pubs and alcohol outlets are run by our Indian brothers – must give them business. Well, did anyone point a knife in their backs and force them to sell alcohol?
So, I think we deserve being given such a “gift” in the Nanban paper. Yeah, laugh about it. “Small matter” – yup, I can hear some saying that. Well, wait till your 13-year old kid comes home drunk (what’s the big deal when his dad drinks?) or your loved one ending up in the hospital after being hit by a drunk 18-year old car driver, then we’ll see how small the matter is.
The controversial Deepavali celebrations at Ipoh Little India was launched on Friday by Lim Kit Siang. At the same time, a nationwide campaign calling for the ban on the Hindraf movement to be lifted.
Lim Kit
Siang urged traders and patrons of
Little India to mark this year’s Deepavali celebrations with a
unified voice condemning the ban.
But there’s no mention on who organised the campaign. DAP? Pakatan Rakyat? Perak state?
This is the press statement issued after the 215th meeting of the Conference of Rulers yesterday:
“Press statement issued by the Keeper of the Rulers’ Seal on the role of the Yang di-Pertuan Agong and the Malay rulers regarding the special privileges, position, eminence or greatness of the Malay rulers, Islam, Malay as the national language, the special position of the Malays, and genuine interests of the other communities in accordance with the Federal Constitution.
“The Malay rulers who attended the meeting of the Conference of Rulers conferred on the issuing of this special joint press statement.
“The Malay rulers hold the constitutional role to safeguard the special privileges, position, eminence and greatness of the Malay rulers, safeguard Islam, Malay as the national language, and the genuine interests of the other communities in Malaysia.
“The actions of certain quarters in disputing and questioning these matters, which formed the primary basis for the formation of Malaysia and are enshrined in the Federal Constitution, had caused provocation and uneasiness among the people.”In retaliation, several quarters particularly Malay leaders whether in the government or non-governmental organisations as well as individuals had expressed their dissatisfaction and anger against those who had made the statements and reports and organised the forums.
“Among the reasons identified for these to have occurred is the cursory knowledge of those concerned regarding the historical background as to why these provisions were enshrined in the Federal Constitution and the influence of their attempts to implicate the principles of impartiality and justice without regard for the historical background and social condition of this country. Narrow political interests are also a cause.
“Unless this phenomenon is arrested immediately, it can lead to disunity and racial strife that can undermine the peace and harmony which has all this while brought progress, development and success to the nation.
“As such, it is necessary for the Conference of Rulers to emphasise and remind all quarters of these constitutional provisions besides giving emphasis to the assurance of safeguarding the genuine rights of other communities.
“It has to be emphasised that each provision in the Federal Constitution has undergone the process of discussion, consideration, consultation, sacrifice and compromise of the highest degree for what has been championed, discussed, considered, benefited from as well as agreed to by all quarters concerned, until the realisation of the provisions in the Federal Constitution which are known as the Social Contract.
“It is not proper to dispute and question this Social Contract and more so to subject it to a review or change because it is the primary basis of the formation of Malaysia. Therefore, it is appropriate for the Malay rulers to remind that there should never be any attempt ever to test and challenge issues related to the Social Contract.
“Truly, the leaders of the pre-independence era were insightful, far-sighted. They brought along with them the Malay rulers for the negotiations to claim independence. The institution of the rulers was retained and legally enshrined in the Constitution of an independent Malaysia.
“The institution of the Rulers was accorded eminence, was positioned at the apex of government, as the head of the country and the states, as a protective umbrella, ensuring impartiality among the citizens. The institution of rulers takes on the role of being a check-and-balance to untangle complications, if any.
“The Conference of Rulers also calls on the Malays to be united to safeguard the privileges, position, eminence and greatness of the Malay rulers, safeguard Islam, Malay as the national language, and the genuine interests of the other communities in Malaysia as enshrined in the Federal Constitution. It has to be emphasised that this agenda is more important and foremost than political or factional interests.
“Non-Malays should not harbour any apprehension or worry over their genuine rights because these rights are guaranteed under the Federal Constitution and provisions of the state constitutions of Malaysia contained in Article 153 of the Federal Constitution.
“It is hoped that with this emphasis, all confusion among the people regarding these matters can be contained and an atmosphere of peace, harmony and mutual respect can continue to exist among the people for the maintenance of order in the country.”
Well, disappointing to read the statement. The public is clamoring for change, for natural justice, for fairness. Well, what to do. I also think that the press statement is a warning to Bar Council as well due their organising of the forums.
Anyway, guess what Education Minister Hishamuddin said:
When asked whether the Barisan constitution would allow a second deputy position to be created, Hishammuddin said:
“The constitution is drafted by human beings. If it is for the benefit of all people, there is no constitution that cannot be amended,” said Hishamuddin.
Even though he was referring to BN constitution, I’m sure he agrees that its applicable to any other constitution as well. In fact our Federal Constitution have been amended so many times!