ADUN Manoharan to sue Education Ministry over partially aided status of vernacular schools

/* May 24th, 2011 by poobalan | View blog reactions No comments »
 Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Not sure why he wants to sue on behalf of Selangor schools only. Perhaps because he’s ADUN in Selangor. But if its applicable for one state, then can extend to others as well. Should get few ADUNs from other states to join in as well.

Obviously there are some guidelines on establishing the status of the school. The land on which the school stands on primarily is the main issue.  If any part of a schools is privately-owned, then it can’t be fully aided.  Probably the ADUN should look to change the guidelines or ensure the landowner donates the land to government.

 

Kota Alam Shah state assemblyperson M Manoharan has threatened to sue the Education Ministry for failing to recognise all vernacular schools in Selangor as fully-aided public schools. 

A notice of proceedings was issued to Education Minister Muhyiddin Yassin today, urging the ministry to fulfil Manoharan’s demands in 21 days, or else be slapped with the suit. 

According to the notice, there are a total of 108 national-type Chinese schools (SJKC) and 97 national-type Tamil schools (SJKT) in the state. 

“Regretfully, only 55 SJKC and 30 SJKT are categorised as fully-aided schools while 53 SJKC and 67 SJKT are categorised as partially-aided schools,” read the notice. 

Manoharan (right) argued that all schools should be treated fairly, in line with the federal constitution, to ensure racial harmony. But now, numerous schools in Malaysia’s most developed state are in deplorable conditions. 

Contacted for details, Manoharan cited the widely reported case of SJK (C) Chung Hua in Klang, which reportedly cannot even afford to pay its water and electricity bills.

“Students can’t even get decent food from the canteen because the operator cannot store food in the fridge because electricity is turned off at night. 

“This is because it is a partially-aided school. The government only pays the teachers’ salaries and nothing else,” he said. 

PE classes in carpark

He also cited the case of SJK (T) Batu 4 in Kampung Jawa where, despite having a student population of 900, there are no laboratories or library because all available space is used for classrooms. 

“There is also no field. Physical education classes takes place in the car park. Teachers, too, are affected. There are 55 of them, but only one toilet,” he said. 

He said that the situation distressed students, parents and teachers in partially-aided schools throughout the state. 

“Children must love to go to school. This is difficult for those in partially-aided schools, particularly Tamil schools. They are typically badly equipped and are as hot as boiler rooms, without proper facilities,” he said. 

Manoharan adds that he had taken up the issue because he had visited several badly affected schools in the state and is very distressed about the situation. 

“I feel it is a form of cleansing, a move to finish off vernacular schools. What is so difficult for the government to pay to upkeep the condition of schools? 

They spend millions lighting up certain places, millions on water splashing all over the place. Why can’t they afford money for education?” he asked.

 

source: http://www.malaysiakini.com/news/164491

Why roti canai costs 4 times more?

/* May 24th, 2011 by poobalan | View blog reactions No comments »
 Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


So, why does our food cost a lot? According to the article below, its due to (i) rental price, (ii) worker cost, (iii) material cost, and (iv) hidden costs.

Logically, those tepi jalan stalls should be the cheapest places to eat (and yes indeed), but there are some stalls whom prices are equal to restaurants.

Some restaurants may reduce price by sourcing for lower quality products as raw material. This brings down the cost for materials.

Others may hire illegal workers, which also brings down the cost a bit.

Some become creative and reduce the portion of the food, or use smaller plates to play tricks on our eyes.

 

To understand why Malaysians are charged four times more for a 20-sen roti canai, CHAI MEI LING and TAN CHOE CHOE delve into the economics of food to dissect the prices of popular fare

WHY is it that we pay RM3.50 for a bowl of instant noodles when the same amount can get us five packets from the hypermarket?

What is the real cost of a plate of nasi lemak, fried rice and roti canai?

To answer these questions, the New Sunday Times team got insiders from the food and beverage industry to open up on the sensitive and tricky issue of pricing.

The truth is the actual cost of most Malaysian staples is just one-third of the price we are paying.

For example, it takes only slightly more than RM1 to whip up an average plate of char kuey teow, which sells for RM4 at a regular outlet.

Roti telur, the actual cost a mere 60 sen, is priced at RM1.80.

As drinks cost much less to prepare, businesses reap an even higher profit margin.

On an average, consumers fork out five times the actual cost of a drink. It takes, for instance, 30 sen to come up with a glass of teh tarik that we pay RM1.50 for.

These lopsided equations may raise the question of unfair trade practices, but traders argue that there are other factors that need to be taken into account.

Rental, workers’ wages, hidden costs and profit are also worked into the price tag, they say.

Of them all, rental carries the most weight, says business operator and chef Khairul Arifin Ismail.

At the high-end restaurant where he works, rent amounts to an astronomical RM40,000 a month.

“Rent is the biggest expenditure for businesses housed in a proper lot. It’s a fixed amount. It’s not something traders can change. Some business people struggle just to pay the rent.”

It is not surprising then that 30 to 40 per cent of what we pay for is attributed to rental. Other factors give business owners more flexibility in fixing an amount that can maximise their profit.

For example, many opt for foreign labour which costs less. This is especially when locals fresh out of school are now demanding up to RM1,000 pay a month.

Workers’ wages normally make up 15 to 25 per cent of the food price, says Khairul.

Businesses also have to contend with wastage and hidden costs, such as food packaging, wear and tear of equipment and miscellaneous items such as tissue paper and plastic cutlery.

If businesses are prudent, they can bring it down to five per cent of the food pricing, and thus channel more of the savings into profits.

With all these to juggle, striking a balance between costs and profit is a huge challenge for businesses. Fix a price too low and one ends up running a loss; charge too high and one risks losing patrons.

To come up with competitive prices, operators depend on experience and business acumen.

Marcus Poon, for one, feels the price of his food items are “reasonable”, if not bordering on cheap.

Poon operates a WiFi-enabled, air-conditioned cafe that serves a combination of Asian and Western cuisine near a residential area in the Klang Valley.

His competitors include hawker stalls and several other cafes in the area.

“Most of my food items cost 35 to 45 per cent of the price I charge. But that is just the cost of materials.

“When you take the cost of labour and rental into consideration, the total cost per item is about 65 to 75 per cent,” says Poon.

So, a profit of between 25 and 35 per cent is reasonable, he adds.

“The F&B business is getting increasingly competitive these days and consumers are spoilt for choice. Although my profit margin is supposedly about one-third of the price, my turnover is not that high,” says Poon.

Khairul says a profit of 20 to 30 per cent is considered normal for any budget and medium-sized business, but high-end restaurants and hotels mostly take home a profit margin of about 10 per cent because of the high costs of investment.

Even then, they are the biggest takers as the value of the margin is much bigger than the profit of smaller businesses.

“A hotel that charges RM45 for a plate of fried rice may gain a 15 per cent profit after deducting all the other expenses that come in the form of a gold-rimmed plate, air-conditioning, expensive tablecloth, good service and such. The value is almost RM7.

“Comparatively, at a normal eatery, a 30 per cent profit amounts to only RM1.20.”

Sometimes, the price of a dish is reflective of the labour that goes into preparing it.

“There’s more to a packet of nasi lemak than it seems. Making the sambal takes a lot of effort,” says Khairul, who has 20 years of experience in the food industry.

“Many people think that nasi beriani gam, which sells at RM8 to RM9 a plate, is expensive. But the process of making it is tedious. We’re also paying for the process, not just for the materials.”

Poon says consumers should appreciate that the prices they pay are also for the ambience of the restaurant.

“Wallpaper, decorations and renovations — all these cost money but we cannot factor these into the calculation of the prices of food items we sell. At least, not in this neighbourhood.”

But this doesn’t mean that he can choose not to repair, upgrade or renovate his cafe because “every restaurateur has to strive to differentiate themselves from others”.

“Everyone likes a concept store these days. Some places sell yucky food at exorbitant prices, but if the concept or design of the shop is appealing, people will still come.

“Ultimately, it is very much a demand and supply situation,” says Poon.

Lim Hui San, a single mother with three children who operates a hawker stall in Jinjang, Kuala Lumpur, says the food business does not promise huge returns.

She says the material cost of a plate of char kuey teow with shrimps, blood cockles and bean sprouts is RM1.20. She sells a plate at RM3.80. On a good day, she can sell up to 80 plates.

Similarly, her profit margin is about 30 per cent after deducting the cost of rental and labour.

“But the coffee shop where I operate my stall only opens six days a week and it also closes shop on public holidays. I also have to pay a local assistant RM1,200 a month.

“I could easily get an illegal for less, probably RM700 to RM800, but I’m trying not to.”

Lim earns about RM2,000 to RM3,000 a month.

“A respectable amountlah. Any less and I would not know how to survive in Kuala Lumpur.”

source: http://www.nst.com.my/nst/articles/10mfo/Article/#ixzz1MrG83EVh

Almost 40 percent of MIC members are not voters

/* May 24th, 2011 by poobalan | View blog reactions 2 comments »
 Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Wow! MIC got 700,000 members (that’s about 35% of estimated 2 million ethnic Indians in Malaysia). And wow! nearly  40% of those members are not voters!

Looks like big task for MIC to get members registered.

 

MIC president G Palanivel revealed today that almost 40 percent of the 700,000 party members have not registered as voters. 

He therefore urged all divisions and branch leaders to step up efforts to get these members registered as voters before the 13th general election. 

When opening the 17th Kuala Langat MIC division meeting in Banting, Palanivel said data compiled by the Election Commission (EC) and the party headquarters showed that only 321,000 MIC members were registered voters. 

“We must first get our (MIC) members to register as voters to ensure they will be in a better position to seek assistance from the government or Barisan Nasional (BN) leadership,” he said. 

He also reminded MIC grassroots leaders on the maturity level and changes in perception of voters who were more independent now in making their decisions. 

“They used to support us (MIC) and BN, now we really need to work hard to gain their trust back in order to secure their support,” stressed Palanivel. 

He also asked the delegates to identify all the voters in their respective branches and ensure they were re-registered in the respective constituencies. 

“This will help them in securing better lobbying power when they seek assistance from their respective representatives and avoid travelling to other towns or states to cast their votes,” he said. 

On MIC’s effort to reactivate all the defunct or deregistered branches, Palanivel explained to the delegates that the party wanted to go further under his leadership. 

“We want not only to see a return of old members, but we go further than that by recruiting more new members. 

“I want to see genuinely new faces in the party and lately I’m glad to witness some new members attending our (MIC) functions,” he added. 

At the Kuala Langat meeting, some 120 delegates unanimously adopted a resolution urging the party leadership to secure two cabinet posts for the party. 

Currently, MIC is only represented by S Subramaniam in the cabinet as the Human Resource Minister.

 

source: http://www.malaysiakini.com/news/164831

Even if I am sacked, I will eventually be taken back into the party

/* May 20th, 2011 by poobalan | View blog reactions No comments »
 Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


I couldn’t help laughing when I read this statement:

“Even if I am sacked, I will eventually be taken back into the party and reinstated in the same position for the sake of unity,” he said.

What logic!

The MIC disciplinary committee has issued a show-cause letter to its Bagan division chief Datuk Henry Benedict Asirv­atham over allegations he made against the party president.

Disciplinary committee chairman Tan Sri K.S. Nijhar confirmed that Henry had been given two weeks to submit written evidence to support his allegations.

In an interview with a news portal on May 6, Henry had alleged that MICpresident Datuk G. Palanivel’s recent move to reunite the different factions in the party was to “kill off” his deputy Datuk Dr S. Subramaniam.

He was quoted as saying that the re-admission and re-instatement of nine sacked leaders done in the name of unity was to mislead the Indian community.

The real reason, he said, was to get rid of Subramaniam, who is also Hu­­man Resources Minister.

A spokesman said the letter was issued following complaints lodged by other party members.

In Butterworth, Henry said he would reply to the letter.

“Even if I am sacked, I will eventually be taken back into the party and reinstated in the same position for the sake of unity,” he said.

source: http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2011/5/20/nation/8722140&sec=nation

DAP wants to work with MIC to save Tamil schools?

/* May 20th, 2011 by poobalan | View blog reactions No comments »
 Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Already critical stage, now only want to work on blueprint? Crazy people. First of all, I wonder if MIC themselves have any blueprint or not. Want to relocate even one school take years, and need some minister intervention. We are talking about relocating dozens of school here.  You think easy ahh? Who want to give land? Who want to give money to build new building? Who want allow convert to fully-aided status?

First, try run a campaign to say all DAP Tamil (or even other Indians) members should send kids to Tamil schools. I don’t remember MIC running any such campaign, so MIC should start one too. I wonder if these guys can survive such a campaign or not.

MIC will tell the usual stuff: its complicated, they are working with the relevant people, will take time, got some quarters not cooperating. Which is true. Its complicated because you need land. Who want to give precious land to 4th class citizens’ education? Housing developer?  If manage to get land, it will be in some corner, next to sewerage pond, highway, cemetery or some faraway place.  Then, the cost of building the school. Government says limited fund. So, need to get sponsor from businessmen and public. Will take time.  Finally, if meet all the requirements (not easy because got many departments who need to give approval), have to apply for fully-aided status. In the middle of all this, will have different groups – parents, PIBG, HM and teachers, NGOs, politicians, and school board,  who may try to interfere and oppose relocation, for various reasons.

BTW, I hope no one goes to town misleading the community saying new school has been built. So far, number of schools is still 523. So where’s the new school? Please be clear if its a relocation, or replacing some school which has closed down already, or just new building.

 

THE DAP is willing to put its political differences with the MIC aside to work on a blueprint to ensure Tamil schools don’t close down, Malaysia Nanban reported.

There are 523 schools nationwide but there is a possibility that many may have to close down, DAP vice-chairman M. Kulasegaran said.

He said many Tamil schools closed down because of poor enrolment and no new ones were opened to replace them in semi-rural and urban areas.

Many estate Tamil schools have low enrolment as these estates have been fragmented or sold off, forcing the workers to migrate to urban areas.

The Ipoh Barat MP said that 70% of the 134 Tamil schools in the state were located in former estates, including about 80 with an enrolment of fewer than 100 pupils.

source: http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2011/5/20/nation/8718356&sec=nation

 

UPDATE: some stats and news from FMT on the same topic:

Tamil schools that were closed because of poor enrolment are not being substituted with new ones in semi-rural and urban areas to cater to the Indian community, the DAP claimed.

Party national vice-chief M Kulasegaran said that nearly 60% of Indian parents preferred to send their children to Tamil schools rather than national schools.

He also said that in Perak, there are over 17,000 pupils studying in Tamil schools – 9,000 in national schools and over 1,500 in Chinese schools.

“Over 70% of the 134 Tamil schools in the state are located in former estates and about 80 of them have an enrolment of fewer than 100 pupils,” said Kulasegaran, who is also Ipoh Barat MP.

“When the estates were fragmented or sold off , the Indians migrated to urban areas and there weren’t enough Tamil schools to cater for their children’s education.

“Clearly there is an anomaly. We urge the authorities to have a new mindset on the Tamil school problem and address them in a holistic manner,” added Kulasegaran.

He accused the MIC of not doing nothing for the past 54 years to address the declining number of Tamil schools, which has now reduced to 523 and is decreasing even further.

DAP is willing to put its political differences with MIC aside to work on a blueprint to ensure the status quo of Tamil schools in the country is maintained.

“We’re willing to have a candid talk with MIC to ensure a win-win situation for our community,” said Kulasegaran.

“Tamil schools with fewer than 100 pupils that have been closed must be replaced with new ones in urban areas.”

The DAP is concerned that without such a blueprint, the Barisan Nasional (BN) government may systematically closed these schools.

Election gimmick

Kulasegaran said that the vernacular system may suffer a slow death as more estates are fragmented resulting in the closure of Tamil schools.

His concern is that when schools with poor enrolment are closed, the government will not replace them with new ones in urban areas with an Indian population .

He said that the federal and state governments were implementing policies on an ad hoc basis.

“For example, Perak MIC chairman S Veerasingam has announced that Tamil schools (with low enrolment) will be relocated to four areas in Jelapang in Ipoh, Langkap near Teluk Intan, Taman Kaya in Taiping and Tun Sambanthan in Sungai Siput ,” Kulasegaran said.

“However, our investigation revealed that the areas are not feasible as they do not meet the education ministry’s guidelines for building new schools, which require at least five acres of land.

“We are concerned that this announcement could just be an election gimmick and for mere publicity to hoodwink the Indian community,” Kulasegaran said.

He alleged that on several occasions, MIC leaders had made empty promises of building new schools to replace the ones in the rural areas, which were shut down.

He claimed that the MIC had taken voters for a ride and had failed to safeguard the interests of Tamil schools in the country. He gave several instances:

  • for the past 20 years, at every election, the MIC pledged to relocate the Tamil school in Merlimau, Malacca;
  • there are Tamil schools that have been squatting in shophouses at Lukut since 2003 and nothing had been done to relocate them;
  • one Tamil school is located in a cinema in Ladang Brausnton, Jeram, Kuala Selangor; and
  • in Kajang there is only one Tamil school with about 1,800 pupils on a half-acre plot of land, whereas in Bandar Mahkota, Cheras, there are three parcels of vacant land measuring about five acres belonging to the education ministry.

“ Why can’t this vacant land be allocated for the construction of a Tamil school?” Kulasegaran asked.

“Though the nation has achieved independence for so many decades, many Tamil schools still don’t have electricity and water supply,” he said.

source: http://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/2011/05/18/tamil-school-problem-still-being-ignored/