IIUM Study on voters and current issues

/* October 9th, 2010 by poobalan | View blog reactions No comments »
 Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Interesting to read that 14% of Indians are choosing not to choose any sides. Probably they realised being taken for a ride by both groups? Assuming that previous study has 0% of non-choosers, that would mean Indians support for PR dropped a whopping 10%!

With 59% still supporting BN, MIC can still breath a bit.

As it is, with the issues grappling PR coalition, it would only further enhance BN, unless of course BN shoot themselves with words/(in)actions that hurt the community.

Also, I think the respondent category for Malay/Bumiputera should be split to get a more clearer picture. Not all Bumiputeras are Malays.

Note that the number of respondents are just 1367, and may not be indicative of the true situation.

The report:

The people’s support for the Barisan Nasional (BN) has increased of late compared to during the 2008 general election, according to a recent study conducted by the International Islamic University of Malaysia (IIUM).

The study shows that BN’s popularity increased by four per cent to 55 per cent from 51 per cent during the 2008 general election, while only 37 per cent of Malaysians are willing to vote for Pakatan Rakyat (PR), a drop of 12 per cent from 49 per cent in the same period.

Eight per cent of the 1,367 respondents in the survey said they were unsure which party they would vote for if elections were to be called tomorrow.

The same study was done in August 2009 involving 1,458 respondents.

According to the latest study, Malay support for BN has increased by three per cent to 61 per cent in August 2010 from 58 per cent in August 2009. Chinese support for BN is still low but has increased by two per cent from 40 per cent previously.

However, support from the Indian community has dropped from 63 per cent to 59 per cent because 14 per cent of them chose not to support any party.

The study was done from August 1 to 18 nationwide to obtain the views of respondents aged 21 and above, on current issues. The 1,367 respondents comprised Malays/Bumiputeras, Chinese, Indians and Malaysians of other races.

The study was headed by Azrul Hisyam Wakichan and supervised by Prof Datuk Seri Syed Arabi Idid, senior lecturer of the university’s Commmunications Department.

According to the study, BN’s increased popularity is due to several factors, including the effectiveness of the government’s programmes and that the BN component parties have recovered from their internal problems, as well as Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak’s leadership.

Pakatan Rakyat’s popularity, on the other hand, has taken a dip due to the internal squabbles among party members and between its component parties, and its failure to fulfil the promises made in the last general election. – Bernama

SITF program in Perai Penang for Indian community problems

/* October 9th, 2010 by poobalan | View blog reactions 1 comment »
 Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


This is the 4th location focused by the Special Implementation Task Force, if I’m not mistaken. Please spread the word around and get those people having problems to attend. As usual, no info on MIC websites.

Regardless whether action is taken later or not, please attend and get your problem registered at the relevant departments.

Tamil version

Malay Version

Cabinet Committee For Indian Affairs which chaired by our Prime Minister will be organizing a program called Program Mesra Rakyat 1Malaysia specially for our Indian people. The objective of the program is to solve many outstanding issues involving our Indian people such as welfare, citizenship, ic, red ic & birth cert problems, education opportunities, skill & training institutes, business loan opportunities, EPF & SOCSO problems and many other issues. 14 Govt Agencies will be attending to the needs of the Indian people. The program already done in Ijok, Selangor and Kulim, Kedah and received overhelming support and response from our Indian people. Now the program will be held in Perai for our Seberang Perai Indians. The details are below :

DATE : 16th OCTOBER 2010

DAY : SATURDAY

TIME : 10 am – 4 pm

VENUE : DEWAN SERBAGUNA CHAI LENG PARK
TAMAN CHAI LENG PARK, PERAI

The program will be focused on govt and documentation related issues, pls help to spread the news to our Indian people and encourage them to attend this program to solve their problems. Human Resource Minister will be attending this program too, if there is any issue that needs his attention can be addressed directly to him.

Note: received via email from Navindranair.

KL is 48th most global city

/* October 9th, 2010 by poobalan | View blog reactions No comments »
 Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Got this from Malaysian Insider’s report:

In terms of liveability, KL ranks just 79th out of 130 cities in the Economist Intelligence Unit’s 2010 ranking of easiest places to live and was stagnant at 75th in the Mercer study of best places to live from 2006-2009.
The city also failed to make the list of the top 100 most innovative cities with strong cultural and human infrastructure and global links as assessed by Australian innovation consultancy firm 2thinknow.

In terms of liveability, KL ranks just 79th out of 130 cities in the Economist Intelligence Unit’s 2010 ranking of easiest places to live and was stagnant at 75th in the Mercer study of best places to live from 2006-2009.
The city also failed to make the list of the top 100 most innovative cities with strong cultural and human infrastructure and global links as assessed by Australian innovation consultancy firm 2thinknow.

… The next few years will be critical for KL’s ambitions to be a world class city as the AT Kearney report notes that the gap between the top cities and those who rank at the “tail” end is increasing.

KL’s 48th position puts it behind Bangkok – 36 and Taipei – 39 but slightly ahead of Manila – 51, Jakarta – 53 and Ho Chi Minh city – 61.

AT Kearney noted that global cities are the urban elite and are shaping the future with new deals and ideas.

“Global cities are where you go to do business, yes, but also to see the greatest art, hear the greatest orchestras, learn the latest styles, eat the best food and study in the finest universities,” said the report.

“They have global corporations. But they also have think tanks, jazz bars and broadband. In a word, they have clout.”

Blame the Monkey?

/* October 7th, 2010 by poobalan | View blog reactions 1 comment »
 Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Firstly, condolences to the family who lost a newborn baby (just 4 days old).  Its indeed sad and tragic to read news like this, especially when a life is lost for no reason.  As Hindus, we can only take it as karma and move on with life. God has other plans for the baby.

Anyway, my opinion is about blaming the animal (monkey of macaque type). According to one expert Dr S Vellayan, its one of the two species as mentioned below:

If a monkey killed the infant in Seremban, the perpetrator was likely to be either the long-tailed macaque (macaca fascicularis) or pig-tailed macaque (macaca nemestrina), said an expert.

Associate professor Dr S. Vellayan, one of the country’s pioneers in primatology and based in Universiti Teknologi Mara, said the two species were aggressive and had bitten human beings.

“We can determine whether the baby was bitten by a monkey by looking at the bites and scratches,” he said in an interview, adding that it was usually the males which tended to be aggressive.

“If the monkey had carried away and killed the baby, it could have entered the house following development encroachment into its habitat,” he said.

He advised the public to not make direct eye contact with monkeys which might feel threatened and become aggressive.

“To ward off the monkeys, people could keep dogs, use small fire crackers or laser pointers to cause fright,” he said.

Malaysian Nature Society head of environment education division Shan Mugaraj said long-tailed macaques were persistent and could turn aggressive when they did not get what they wanted, such as food.

Pig-Tailed Macaque from www.sabah.gov.my

Long-tailed Macaque from travel.mongabay.com

While its easy to blame the monkey for the death and kill it, I believe that’s just a symptom of a more serious underlying problem. We are talking about animals with their own basic survival instincts. They don’t differentiate babies from food. When development happens and animals get displaced, this is one of possible outcomes. We heard about snakes, boars, bats, monkeys, etc entering houses before this. Why? Why the development process didn’t consider relocating the animals? Is it because these are not endangered species? Or just for convenience sake and to reduce red-tape in order to develop the land? Its time to talk about relocating the animals when redeveloping land. It must be supervised by a certified NGO and relevant government department, to ensure developers don’t take easy way out by culling animals.

I notice more monkeys around the Cyberjaya-Pulau Meranti road nowadays. Maybe same story is recurring. The jungle is being cleared for more development. Where are the animals going to go? Don’t be surprised if you find monkeys roaming in Lim Kok Wing Uni or causing accidents when crossing the roads.

Also, the news mentioned that the family kept a monkey as pet. Maybe this is an added attraction to the macaque?

Here’s the sad story:

In mere minutes, a young woman turned from a happy mother to a grieving one when she lost her four-day-old baby to a wild monkey that was shot dead several hours later.

In the 1.15pm tragedy yesterday, the macaque stole into the living room; snatched the child and fled up the roof of the house. The baby fell to the ground and died.

The mother, V. Revathy, 26, had left her first-born child in the living room of the single-storey house near Taman Happy Garden to use the toilet. The baby’s body was discovered later outside the house with her face and neck badly bitten. She was rushed to the Tuanku Ja’afar Hospital here where she was pronounced dead.

Young mother Revathy and her husband V. Neru at the hospital. Inset: A medical officer taking the baby’s body to the Tuanku Ja’afar Hospital mortuary.

Revathi’s father-in-law A. Valayutham, 70, was in the living room with the newborn but had gone to get a glass of water when the tragedy occurred.

“We frantically searched all over the house and saw her body covered in blood lying outside the house,” he said.

Valayutham added that he had noticed a few monkeys outside the house compound at that time.

The area where the family stayed was sandwiched between two residential areas with a foliage of trees nearby where there were monkeys.

Negri Sembilan Wildlife and National Parks director Ishak Muhamad said the macaque was shot dead at 4pm.

“We suspect the macaque was rummaging for food inside the house. It could have taken the baby to the roof thinking the newborn was food.

“The baby died when it fell to the ground. The monkey had apparently released the newborn, probably because it was alarmed by the parents’ shouts,” Ishak said yesterday.

He added that the parents had called the Fire and Rescue Department at 2.15pm, which immediately contacted the Wildlife and National Parks Department.

“We reached the house at about 3pm and set off with the baby’s father to look for the macaque,” he said.

Ishak said department officers saw the macaque in some bushes several metres from the house at about 4pm.

The macaque was shot when it began to act aggressively.

Ishak added that it was the first such case in the state, and believed the male monkey was attracted by a female kept in captivity as a pet by the family.

“This is very unusual. Normally, these monkeys simply steal food or pluck fruit from the yard,” he said.

The baby’s father, lorry driver V. Neru, 29, who was not at home when the incident occurred, said he could not believe that such a thing could have happened.

“I rushed to the hospital only to be told that she was gone.

“She was our bundle of joy and we were looking forward to spending many happy years with her … I just cannot believe she’s gone,” he said.

R. Shanty, 35, who lives nearby said it was common to see monkeys in groups of three or four in the area.

“A while back, my pet dog was attacked by these monkeys. Its badly-bitten body was thrown from a tree.

“I really hope the authorities take action and not wait until another life is lost,” she said.

Rahang assemblyman M.K. Arumugam, who visited the family yesterday evening, expressed regret over the incident.

“I have brought this matter up before but sadly no action was taken. I am very disappointed that something like this had to happen before the authorities took notice,” he said.

Endhiran

/* October 6th, 2010 by poobalan | View blog reactions No comments »
 Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


WARNING: spoilers ahead!

As Then says: Inthe robottum love naale vinapoche….

Watched this at Sunway Pyramid. There were some technical problem because the dialogue went missing for about 10 secs each time, happened about 5-6 times during the first half of the movie. Ticket cost RM14: RM11.20 for ticket and 2.8 for tax. Cinema was about 1/3 full (60+ people) for morning show.

Initial Thoughts:

The ending scene which involved animation was definitely new for an Indian movie (and even in English movies, I have not seen such animations) and is a welcomed innovation in that sense. However this involves humongous cost, so not sure how many other movies can afford to follow this track.

Some scenes were copied/derived from other movies like Matrix, Terminator, I Robot and so on. The robot reminds us of Sonny from I Robot.

Acting: Rajini’s dual role was OK. Improved dance moves, variety of fashion (ala Sivaji) and style. However, I have a feeling that other actors could have been put in his place and the movie will still be a crowd-puller. The traditional Rajini “magic” was not that evident, apart from some dialogues, facial expression, and acting. His acting as the robot in a villanous mode is worth mentioning as he did a good job. In fact, I’d say the villain role suits him better than the scientist role. Think back 16 Vaithinile, or 6il Irunthu 60 Varai to imagine Rajini in a character role.

Aiswarya. Well if you are into watching beautiful married mid 30s women dancing around like peacock/camel/chicken (whatever it is) in revealing clothes and kissing Rajinikanth 10-20 times, then you would be entertained. Again, you could imagine Shreya or Nayanthara or some other actresses in this role.

The Story:

Story was inspired by a short story by Tamil writer the late Sujatha (if I’m not mistaken) and it took director Shankar about 10 years to finally make this movie. The movie marks Rajinikanth as India’s highest paid Actor (about Rs20 crores + profit sharing) and Aiswarya earned about Rs6 crores, making her the highest paid actress in India. The producers have already recouped their investment as distributions rights were sold of for more than the production cost which is Rs160++ crores or RM112 million as of Oct 2010.

If you are interested on such robot themed stories, also read books by Isaac Asimov who talked about the 3 laws of robotic.

The theme of the movie is about “how if a robot can have emotions and falls in love?”. Rajini plays dual role – as scientist Dr Vasigaran (aka Vasi) and the robot Chitti the Robo. His lady love is Sana (Aiswarya, who age is showing now), a medical student. How a medical student can fall in love with a scientist is not covered in the movie. Maybe she flunked few times and is not a young 20-something student.

Story goes that Dr Vasi has spent about 10 years of his life researching on making humanoids (robots that look like humans) for the Indian Army. He thinks that soldiers life can be saved by using robots in battle.

There are some scenes to display Chitti’s capability and falability as well. We can see how Chitti cooks, helps Sana to cheat in her exams, and also how Chitti fights bad guys who attack them in the train.

However, Dr Vasi’s prototype Chitti fails at the evaluation process by the government department. The evaluation was led by Dr Vasi’s mentor Prof Bhora (Actor Danny Denzongpa) who is envious of Dr Vasi (student doing better than teacher syndrom). The Prof is also trying to creat such robots and sell them to the highest bidder (in case you are still not clear, he’s the villain). Prof Bhora highlights that Chitti doesn’t know emotions and can’t differentiate right from wrong. He just follows orders. The evaluation fails. As dejected Dr Vasi leaves the department, they encounter an apartment complex on fire. Dr Vasi orders Chitti to save the victims trapped in the fire. One of the victim was a young teenage girl who was bathing. She’s in the middle of a burning building and was more concerned of her modesty than her life, shouting “i’m not dressed!”. Chitti answers “so am I” and scoops her off into safety. The media focuses on the robot saving a naked girl. The girl was embarassed and attempts to run away from the onlookers and media, whereby she is hit by an oncoming vehicle and dies. This further angers Dr Vasi and reinforces Prof Bhora’s claims. Dr Vasi scolds Chitti, but Chitti doesn’t understand what wrong it did.

Prof Bhora later tells Dr Vasi that the government is planning to cancel the project as its considered a failure (the death of the girl becomes major news). Dr Vasi asks for some time to figure out how to add “emotion” into Chitti. The Prof gives him a month. Rajini tries to impart knowledge on emotions, senses, feeling, spiritualism, life and death, etc into Chitti. One day, lightning strikes Chitti, but he seems to be OK.

When all seems to fail, and Dr Vasi was cursing Chitti, Chitti talks back in anger. Success! The robot could feel anger! He is sent for evaluation again, and passes. However, trouble is brewing because the “emotion” module in Chitti is starting to interfere with Chitti’s “dos and don’ts” rules. He helps a lady to give birth, and Sana kisses him, causing him to feel the emotion of “love” (???). Soon Chitti’s thoughts stray towards obtaining Sana, at all costs. There’s one scene where Chitti tries to find a mosquito that bit Sana and there’s some dialogue between the mosquito colony and Chitti! Maybe these scene were added to excite children. Anyway, Chitti starts to compete with Dr Vasi for Sana’s attention as well. During Sana’s birthday, Chitti kisses Sana (censored) and this angers/shocks Dr Vasi. Chitti reveals that he feels “love” for Sana and wants her. He argues with Dr Vasi. Sana explains to Chitti why its not possible for human to love and live with a robot. Chitti walks away in disappointment.

At night, Prof Bhora appears to talk to Chitti, trying to influence Chitti to come to him. Chitti says no.The next day, a final evaluation with the Army was conducted and during the evaluation, Chitti does not perform as expected. Instead, his antics embarassed Dr Vasi as Chitti talked about his “love” for Sana, asking the army officers to not make war but fall in love! An angry Dr Vasi takes Chitti back to his office and breaks him to pieces. Chitti is then disposed in the garbage dump site.

Chitti manages to assemble itself and when Prof Bharya goes looking for it, it manages to enter his car and he brings it back to his lab. There, Prof Bhora reassembles Chitti with the help of Dr Vasi’s ex-assistants Karunas and Santhanam. However, Chitti reveals his “neural schema” to the Prof in the return for the Prof helping to reassemble Chitti. The Prof also adds an “destruction module” that allows Chitti to wreck havoc. He plans to use Chitti as prototype to sell his robot soldiers to some terrorist group. A newly reassembled Chitti’s first focus is his lady love. As it is, Chitti was reassembled on the same day as Dr Vasi’s wedding to Sana. Chitti attacks the wedding hall and kidnaps Sana.

Chitti works on creating more copies of himself, essentially creating an army of Chittis. He kills Prof Bhora as well. The police come after Dr Vasi since the robot is committing many crimes in the city. Dr Vasi clarifies that his robot has been dismantled and he suspects that maybe Prof Bharya is behind this. They rush to Prof Bhora’s lab and find him dead. Meanwhile, Chitti had captured the government department where he was evaluated, and uses it as a base to create more robots like him. Sana is kept as a hostage there. Chitti tries to force himself on Sana, saying that he’s creating an robot embryo, and soon Sana can be carry the world’s first human-robot baby! She faints.

Dr Vasi manages to enter the building and communicates with Sana. He asks her to distract Chitti as much as possible while the army and police try to stop Chitti.

The power supply to the government department area is cut, and soon, the robots fall down one by one due to inability to recharge. However, Chitti manages to recharge itself by using battery from a car, and other robots start to do the same. The battle between robots and humans start. The robots can combine and become various shapes such as a huge ball, baseball bat, drill, giant robot, tower, snake, and so on. Many policemen and soldiers die while Dr Vasi tries in vain to disable the robots by using worm (a kind of computer virus) and demagnetisation. Finally, they manage to capture Chitti and remove the “destruction module” in him, making him normal again.

The court sentences Dr Vasi to death for creating a robot that caused so much death and destruction. However, Chitti comes to Dr Vasi rescue by revealing that it was Prof Bharya who did the actual misdeed. Thus, the court releases Dr Vasi and orders Chitti to be dismantled. Chitti gives some advices while being dismantled.

Forward 20 years, and we see Chitti’s body part in an museum. Some school children visit the museum and a girl asks the guide why Chitti was dismantled 20 years ago, and Chitti answers “because I started to think!”

Summary:

The movie does have an advantage of exposing moviegoers to science and technology, and is far far away from the regular fighting scenes we see in Vijay/Barath/Arjun etc movies. It may well trigger students to learn more about technology, instead of getting involved in gangsterism and violence.

Comedy is not really handled by Karunas and Santhanam. In fact, their roles and many others are wasted. Could have just put anyone else and wouldn’t made a difference. Comedy comes from Rajini’s dual roles.

The movie’s main attraction is the technology. Its something that Indian cinemas has not seen before. All the rest as the usual masala stuff.

As for science and technology terms/theories in the movie, some are believable, other are not. Its just a movie, so we can take as creative liberty. As with many other Tamil movies, there are plenty of loopholes and illogical scenes which will make you go mad if you start to analyse. So, take it with a pinch of salt and enjoy the movie 🙂

Direction: Typical direction with some loopholes. Its a director’s movie as the actors scope is reduced. Focused too much on technology until some scenes were neglected. Could have been edited to reduce length and make it more compact.

Story: New story for Tamil cinema, focusing on technology and different issue.

Acting: The main actors Rajini and Aiswarya were the focus. Traditional Rajini fans may be disappointed to see lack of style. He did well acting as a robot and an villainous robot. Aiswarya didn’t have any problem looking pretty and batting her eyes from time to time. Nothing much to shout about. Other actors just fill up the spaces, nothing earth shattering.

Songs: This is where to movie tops. Nice songs by AR Rahman, especially Kadhal Anukal, Kilimanjaro, Irumbile Oru Idhayam. Must listen to the lyrics carefully to appreciate it. Songs are a marvel due to the lyrics that married technology with poetry. The scenery for songs were simple and nice. However, somethings just doesn’t feel right with Aishwarya’s dance steps.

Conclusion: Watch this for Rajini, Aishwarya lovers, and for those looking for new angle in Tamil cinema. Wholesome entertainer for family, not violent or adult themed.

Cast: Rajinikanth, Aishwarya Rai, Danny Denzongpa, Karunas, Santhanam, etc.

Genre: Sci-Fi, Action.

Acting : 6/10

Story : 6.5/10

Special Effects: 8/10

Cinematography: 8/10

Overall Oomphness: 7/10

Note: Read about Endhiran’s achievements at Wikipedia. BTW, do you know the villain is a well known singer who acted with Brad Pitt, won Padmashree Award and is married to a princess? Read about Danny Denzongpa at Wikipedia as well 🙂