Posts Tagged ‘discrimination’

want discount to buy house for RM300k?

July 18th, 2010
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Hey, everyone would want some discount too!

Can’t blame this couple since the system had groomed them as such.

But really, this couple can afford RM300k for a house and go to UK to study law together. Is such discounts appropriate for you, or more suited for the poor folks who earn less than RM1500 per month?

I would be ashamed to even consider asking for discounts.

Damn the system. No wonder some people change their names.

From Malaysian Insider:

A married couple in their 20s is opting for a condominium instead of a house to live in Kuala Lumpur due to budget constraints.Although a landed property is their preferred choice, Natrina Majid and Nik Ahmad Asraf, both aged 26, said that they can only afford condominiums currently after working for only a year plus in Malaysia since returning from the United Kingdom (UK) last year.

“If we can buy landed, we would buy landed. But we can only afford condominiums,” lawyer Natrina told The Malaysian Insider today at the Malaysia Property Expo (MAPEX) 2010.

“My budget is RM200,000 to RM300,000. Houses in Kuala Lumpur would cost at least RM600,000,” she added while cradling her seven-month-old baby in her arms.

Natrina said that their target areas were Taman Melawati or Wangsa Maju since they both work in Kuala Lumpur and also because Natrina’s in-laws were staying in Taman Melawati.

Currently, the young couple is staying with Natrina’s in-laws.

Senior assistant registrar Nik Ahmad also said the other main reason behind their hunt for a condominium was for investment purposes, adding that they may want to sell it sometime in the future.

“It is very easy to find buyers for condominiums compared to landed property,” said Nik Ahmad.

“The market is very big for condominiums compared to landed (property), like students and single people,” he added.

The couple’s choice for a condominium over a house because of a tight budget fits a growing trend of young Malaysians opting for condominiums or apartment units that can cost half the price of houses in Petaling Jaya or Kuala Lumpur.

Statistics by the Valuation and Property Services Department showed that condominium and apartment units formed the bulk of total residential property transactions in Kuala Lumpur last year at 49.1 per cent (9,936 units).

When asked to describe their property search that began since their return from the UK last year, Natrina said that it was “stressful” while Nik Ahmad cited it as a “very tedious and long process.”

The couple were married five years ago before going to the UK to study law together.

”We want something where we want to stay in and also something that we can sell down the line. So it is very difficult looking for something with that dual purpose,” said Natrina.

“It was stressful (looking for properties) because of the price. The ones you want are really expensive. Sime Darby properties are nice but are expensive. We are also looking for one with a 10 per cent bumiputra discount as we don’t want to pay a down payment,” added the lawyer.

Nik Ahmad said that it was very difficult looking for property according to several criteria they had.

“Our budget is RM300,000. We also like condominiums with low density. There is also security and traffic. We don’t want very congested traffic and we want easier access,” he added

12 new campuses but not for all to benefit

July 18th, 2010
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


UPDATE – Today’s Star reports that the “The construction will be fully-funded by private companies, with the project cost for each campus not exceeding RM300mil” according to Higher Education Minister. Wow, I wonder which private companies are so benevolent to spend a collective amount of RM3.6 billion, and what’s the catch. And if these are companies with the public as shareholders, then maybe the shareholder should start asking questions on how RM300 million can be better utilised. Maybe should boycott such companies. – END UPDATE.

What would you do if you are a believer in justice, fairness, equality, and pray to God? Build campuses at cost of RM300 million each that would only benefit certain groups, or benefit everyone?

Universiti Teknologi Mara (UiTM) will build 12 new campuses by 2015, said Higher Education Minister Datuk Seri Mohamed Khaled Nordin.

He said this was in line with UiTM’s target of having 200,000 students in five years’ time.

The construction of six of the campuses have been approved while the rest are still are at the discussion stage prior to the Cabinet’s approval, he told reporters after the earth-breaking ceremony of UiTM Johor campus in Pasir Gudang here Saturday.

Mohamed Khaled said besides Pasir Gudang, other campuses would be built in Pekan, Dengkil, Tapah, Jasin and Seremban Tiga.

He said each campus, which would be built at the cost of RM300 million, would enrol between 4,000 and 5,000 students while each hostel could accommodate 2,000 students. On the Pasir Gudang campus, he said it would be completed in three years’ time and would offer diploma in engineering (civil, electrical, chemical and mechanical), and diploma in business studies.

12 x RM300 million = Rm3.6 billion for just one group of people. And the rest scrape the bottom of the barrel is it?

Why not build new campuses for UM, UKM, UTM, UTEM, UNIMAP, UPM, USM, UNIMAS, UMS, etc?

Yeah, we support 1Malaysia.

On an hindsight, I think 1Malaysia is the most misused and abused word in Malaysia, at the moment. Everything also, shout 1Malaysia. Get something, its due 1Malaysia. Don’t get something, say not following 1Malaysia. Rakyat is smart already 🙂

SJKT Kulai Besar to be rebuilt but still partially-aided

July 2nd, 2010
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


The school (one of the top performing schools in UPSR) was partially burnt down recently on June 19th, and nearly half the students end up studying in tents. 7 classrooms and 6 other roooms (living skills, sports, remedial, counselling, textbook and special pupils’ rooms) were destroyed with the loss estimated at RM436,902.

The good news:

the DPM who is also the Education Minister, has instructed that the new school be built here immediately for the benefit of its 1,258 pupils. The new school building will have 25 classroom, an increase from the earlier plan of 18 proposed by PWD (JKR).  Also, RM100,000 has been allocated for the construction of cabins for temporary use.

“We want the new school to be ready within 12 months,” he said at a meeting with the Parent-Teacher’s Association (PTA) of the school, here Saturday.

He had instructed the Public Works Department to issue a Letter of Acceptance immediately so that construction work on the school costing more than RM3 million on a 2.19-hectare site contributed by Asiatic Development Berhad, the developer for Asiatic Indahpura, could begin next month.

A bit of background on the school:

The Star on Friday had highlighted that pupils in Year 3, 4 and special needs classes had to rough it out in both the morning and afternoon sessions since the fire on June 19.

The school, which is more than 60 years old, has 1,246 students and 74 teachers.

The losses sustained in the fire is estimated to be around RM436,000.

When asked at a dialogue with parents about the delay and the many promises that were made in the past about the relocation of the school, Muhyiddin replied that he was the Education Minister and work on the new school would start by next month and it was expected to be completed within one year.

The school’s PTA chairman K. Sree Thren said the parents and the Indian community in the area were elated as this put to rest a problem that had been plaguing the community for the past 14 to 15 years.

“In 2008, we found a piece of land about 1km away for the relocation of the school but unfortunately the project never got off the ground,” he said.

Now for the part that pisses me off (if indeed its true):

He (DPM) brushed aside another request from a parent who wanted the school to be turned into a fully aided school, saying, “It is all the same as presently, the salaries of all the teachers here together with new buildings and cabins are being paid for by the Government.

Doesn’t make sense at all right? If its “all the same”, then why bother having two categories or why don’t want to convert the school into full-aided? There’s a difference between being fully-aided and partially-aided, and I think its unbecoming and misleading to say otherwise.

In fact,  since the new school building will be on land donated by the private sector, it will be easy to convert to fully-aided status. So, what gives?

PPP proposal on discount for house buyers

June 23rd, 2010
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


This is one of the better things to come out from PPP in recent memory. As house prices are inflated and artificially increased over last one year, many people will find it difficult to buy a house. Imagine if 25-30 years ago, you can buy a double-storey house with your salary of RM2000 or less, now its a mini miracle if you can even get such a house for below RM300,000 in Klang Valley. Most are priced upwards of RM400,000 already. So, can someone earning RM4000 or so buy such a house? Considering increased food cost, need for own transport, petrol cost and telco bills, can forget it la.

People’s Progressive Party (PPP) president Datuk M. Kayveas has suggested that non-Bumiputeras earning an income of less than RM3,000 be given a 10 per cent discount currently enjoyed by Bumiputera house buyers.

He said a Bumiputera house buyer received a 10 per cent discount, irrespective of the person’s financial capability, whereas a non-Bumiputera house buyer needed to pay that 10 per cent.

“In this way, it is believed that every citizen will be more confident on the implementation of the quota and status system,” he said in his policy speech at the PPP’s 57th annual general meeting here today.

The meeting was opened by Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak.

The other parties should come out in support of this proposal. Would they?

Also, I think houses priced about RM500,000 should not be given any discounts.

Reply from JPA on request to publish scholarship recipients names

June 22nd, 2010
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


This was posted today at JPA website. I wonder why the bother replying to the initial comments published in newspapers because the reply doesn’t answer the question! People want to see the list on names and relevant details. Is that so difficult to understand?

The Public Service Department (PSD) specifically refers to the letter “Publish list of JPA scholars” published on 15/6/10 in The Star and other letters related on PSD scholarships generally.

The PSD had announced the application criteria for its 2010 Overseas Sponsorship Programme (PILN) in the major newspapers in January and February this year, in addition to posting these criteria on its website. On 6th April, in his press statement, Y.A.B. Deputy Prime Minister reiterated these criteria as well. Over 18,800 students applied, out of which 10,956 applicants fulfilled the minimum requirements and qualified for the interview process. Of the qualified applicants, 7900 scored all As, in all the subjects they had taken, including 214 students who scored all A+s.

As stated in the PSD website and the statement by YAB DPM, scholarships were given according to the following four categories:

  1. Category 1 : Academic Excellence
    Twenty percent of the scholarships were allocated for this category. Applicants under this category were assessed purely on merit based on academic excellence (85%), co-curriculum activities (10%) and performance at the interview (5%). The socio-economic background of the applicants was irrelevant under this category.
  2. Category 2: Racial Composition of the Population
    Sixty percent of the scholarships were allocated for applicants streamed under this category. Applicants under this category were assessed based on academic excellence (75%), co-curriculum activities (10%), socio-economic background (10%) and performance at the interview (10%). The selection of scholars reflected the racial composition of the population.
  3. Category 3 : Bumiputera Sabah and Sarawak
    Ten percent of the scholarships were reserved for Bumiputera applicants from Sabah (5%) and Sarawak (5%). The selection was done based on academic excellence (65%), co-curriculum activities (5%), socio-economic background (25%) and performance at the interview (5%).
  4. Category 4: Socially Disadvantaged Group
    Ten percent of the scholarships were allocated for applicants from schools that lack, or have limited, proper educational facilities and those that hailed from low-income families. The selection was done based on academic excellence (65%), co-curriculum activities (5%), socio-economic background (25%) and performance at the interview (5%).

Outstanding students who were not selected for the PILN 2010 scholarships (given the limited sponsorship of 1500) were offered additional 2000 scholarships to study in local private institutions of higher learning, including local campuses of foreign universities in Malaysia, such as, the Nottingham University, Monash University, Swinburne University of Technology and Curtin University of Technology. A notification to this effect was posted on the PSD’s e-SILA website on 16th June.

Apart from the PILN, the PSD will also be offering a local sponsorship programme (Program Ijazah Dalam Negara or PIDN). A total of 8,250 scholarships will be made available under PIDN. These scholarships are for students who have secured places at local institutions of higher learning.

Corporate Communications Unit
Public Service Department Malaysia
18th June 2010