Posts Tagged ‘Education’

Teacher Transfer Saga

December 19th, 2010
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


I’m sure you are aware of the refusal by some 100 language teachers in some districts in Selangor to be transfered to other districts within the state. Same problem occurring in Penang as well. According to one reader’s letter to the Sun:

Many of those involved were English and Bahasa Malaysia teachers. The letter was dated Nov 25 and was effective Dec 1.

This showed that the redeployment was done in a haste and not thought of properly. This is only the first phase and I heard that the whole process, in three phases, will involve nearly 1,000 teachers.

Some comments from Malay Mail:

Some 100 teachers involved in a redeployment exercise have refused to be transferred to other districts in Selangor.

National Union of Teaching Profession (NUTP) president, Hashim Adnan, said the  84 English Language and 16 Malay Language optional teachers were redeployed under the programme to strengthen Bahasa Malaysia and English 2009–2010.

“Mismatch of teachers was among factors that gave rise to this problem. Transfer of teachers will cause more problems rather than solve existing ones,” he told a Press conference at Wisma NUTP here today.

Hashim said the ministry should consider factors like age, health and family when considering appeals from the 100 teachers redeployed.

Meanwhile, NUTP secretary Lok Yim Pheng, said the transfer of teachers to districts involves high transportation cost.

“They have to leave their families and only get to meet them on weekends, thus creating problems. Transfer on short notice is inhuman.”

Lok urged the government to increase the age of teachers pursuing the ministry’s long distance study to 48 years from 45 presently.

“The age for those studying on their own should also be increased from 50 to 53 years. We need to create professional teachers,” she added.

The problem in Selangor:

The redeployment of teachers announced in Selangor recently has drawn flak from the 100 affected by the exercise.

National Union of the Teaching Profession (NUTP) president Hashim Adnan said the teachers were upset at being transferred to schools which were too far from the schools they were currently based in.

“For instance, a teacher who is teaching in Klang is being deployed to Sabak Bernam,” he told a press conference at the NUTP headquarters.

Hashim said 84 English option teachers and 16 Bahasa Malaysia option teachers were involved in the redeployment exercise in Selangor.

Teachers are transferred be tween the districts in the state to meet the shortage of language teachers in the rural areas, in support of the policy on Upholding BM and Strengthening English announced by the Government.

According to Hashim, more than 20 teachers have lodged complaints with NUTP to express their dissatisfaction.

“Teachers who are unhappy with their transfers are advised to appeal to the state education department,” said Hashim.

NUTP secretary-general Lok Yim Pheng urged the Education Ministry to look into the complaints of the teachers as many of them had to leave their families behind when they move to the new schools.

“Some of the teachers were given very short notice. Teachers with young children are the ones who are badly hit by this redeployment exercise,” she said.

“These teachers also have to fork out extra expenditure to pay for rent and the long distances travelled.”

A teacher who was at the press conference said she had to travel more than 100km every day in order to get to her new school.

NUTP suggested the ministry look at other measures, such as holding conversion courses to retrain the non-option teachers so that they could teach the subjects.

On another matter, NUTP appealed to the ministry to increase the age limit for teachers applying for the distance learning programme from 45 to 48.

The State Education Department says teachers can appeal and only 20 had appealed so far:

Teachers who are redeployed to schools far away from their current base are allowed to appeal to the Selangor Education Department.

“Each appeal will be looked through and given due consideration,” the Education Ministry said in a statement yesterday.

It has been reported that about 100 teachers in Selangor are upset about the transfers. Some of them were apparently sent to places that were 100km away from their present schools.

The ministry said in the statement that there was an imbalance in the distribution of teachers within schools in a district and within districts in the state.

“The redeployment is mostly to Kuala Selangor and Sabak Bernam as both districts are facing a critical shortage of English teachers.”

Other districts especially Klang, Petaling Perdana, Petaling Utama and Hulu Langat have a surplus of English teachers.

The redeployment also involves Bahasa Malaysia option teachers as there was a surplus in Sabak Bernam and Kuala Langat. Thus, these teachers would need to be sent elsewhere to minimise the mismatch, the ministry said.

In Shah Alam, a group of teachers held a demonstration in front the National Union of the Teaching Profession (NUTP) office yesterday to voice discontentment over their transfers to schools about 100km away from their current location.

The transfers were implemented on Dec 1. However, many have not reported at their new schools yet.

“Most of the teachers are from Klang but they now have to move to Sabak Bernam,” said a secondary school English teacher who identified himself only as Vijay, 47.

“We don’t want to leave because we’ve settled down here for years. We have our families to think of.”

Another teacher who wanted to be known as Anamalai, 47, urged the NUTP to fight for their welfare.

“We pay the union RM72 a year. What are they doing to protect us?”

They suggested that the NUTP appeal to the ministry and send fresh graduates to the rural areas instead as the older ones had been through transfers before.

“I taught in Sarawak for five years when I first became a teacher. Young graduates have fewer problems being redeployed,” said a teacher known as Bala, 46.

The teachers said that they were not against the ministry’s orders but being sent so far away would pose a major inconvenience.

Helmi Che Raus, 32, a Bahasa Malaysia teacher from Kapar, expressed concern over his transfer to Bukit Rimau.

“Travelling will require a lot of petrol and we were told to find our own accommodation. Think of our financial pressure. Our salaries are not increased,” he said.

Din, an English teacher with two children, said she had appealed for help from the NUTP.

“I have not heard from them yet.” .

Similar problem in Penang (hmm..earlier Selangor and now Penang? I guess its just a coincidence):

More than 100 teachers on Penang island are unhappy that they have been transferred to the mainland, including Sungai Petani and Kulim, from this month.

It is learnt that the group only received their transfer letters dated Nov 26 on Dec 13 at their respective schools.

An English teacher in Air Itam said he was transferred to a school in Bukit Mertajam, which is about 40km from his house.

“I will have to fork out an extra RM25 per day for the journey and toll charges which equals to RM500 per month,” he said yesterday.

He said about 80 teachers had submitted their appeals to the state Education Department.

He claimed that some teachers had decided to apply for six months unpaid leave while others had taken forms to apply for optional retirement.

State Education director Ibrahim Mohamad said the redeployment was necessary as there were excess teachers on the island.

He said a meeting would be held before the opening of the new school term to look into the matter and also to consider the appeals submitted by the affected teachers.

NUTP secretary-general Loke Yim Pheng said the Government should pay for the travelling expenses of the transferred teachers.

This is what the state education officer said:

According to The Star, state education director Ibrahim Mohamad said the redeployment was necessary as there were excess teachers on the island.

He said a meeting would be held before the opening of the new school term to look into the matter and also to consider the appeals submitted by the affected teachers.

Now, the Public Complaints Bureau has stepped in. However, I’m not sure how the PCB can interfere in the internal affairs of an organization. This isn’t a public complaint, but employee against employer. Should be handled by Human Resource Ministry. Unless of course parents complaint that education quality dropped or something.

Come Wednesday, the public complaints bureau will meet education ministry officials to seek a solution to the grouses of teachers in Penang and Selangor, who have received transfer letters.

Deputy Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department Datuk T. Murugiah, who is also in charge of the department, said he had received many complaints on the matter from the teachers concerned.

He said, if the teachers were unhappy over the transfers, it would affect their performance, and this in turn, would impact the students.

As the teachers had asked for the department’s assistance for a solution, Murugiah said he would speak to Deputy Education Minister Dr Mohd Puad Zarkashi on the matter.

“Some were transferred too far away. They need to rent a house and some had to spend extra for the petrol due to the far distance from their homes. All these will burden them with additional living costs,” he said on Sunday.

Murugiah was commenting on a report which highlighted the plight of more than 100 teachers on Penang island who expressed unhappiness over their transfers to the mainland, including Sungai Petani and Kulim, beginning this month.

My take – Shifting teachers around is merely hiding the actual problem. Why did the “excess” occur in the first place? These things don’t happen overnight. Who approved the posting of teachers? Who allowed for teachers to pursue bachelor/postgraduate in those fields and end up overqualified for current position? Who does the allocation of seats for teaching colleges for future need? Who come out with these policies? Is there any element of corruption or negligence in these procedures? I think accountability is important. When things go well, everyone wants to take credit. When things fails, try to cover up or blame others. Some people must take responsibility for the excess, be it previous or current ministers, top management, senior officers or junior executives. Its easy to say that as civil servants, the teachers must serve wherever they are ordered to. But that’s just hiding the real problem. Yeah, some may have established own tuition centers and earning handsomely. Shitfing will cost a big loss for them. But is this the right “punishment”?

As for solution, I think we need a better system of keeping track of available teachers and future needs for each subject. Secondly, probably there should be some allocation for those travelling more than 50km per day to cover their expenses.  The government provides for relocation cost but still there’s issue of relocating the children’s school, the spouse finding a job, and also renting a house. If given more time (like 2 months), then it may be acceptable.

Vanitha and Kumutha win Young Merck Scientist Award 2010

December 15th, 2010
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Read about the two winners here (both are postgraduate students at UM):

http://medicine.um.edu.my/?modul=DEPARTMENTS&pilihan=Molecular_Medicine&subpilihan=stud_PhD

TAHNIAH

Kepada semua warga Universiti Malaya yang dihormati,

Adalah dimaklumkan bahawa pelajar pascasiswazah daripada Jabatan Mikrobiologi Perubatan, Fakulti Perubatan, Universiti Malaya (UM), Cik Vanitha Mariappan telah memenangi tempat pertama dalam Merck Young Scientist Award (MYSA) 2010 manakala Cik Kumutha Malar daripada jabatan yang sama telah mendapat Hadiah Saguhati dalam majlis yang sama. Majlis tersebut telah berlangsung pada 28 Oktober 2010 yang lalu di Hotel Le Meridian, Kuala Lumpur.

Warga Universiti Malaya merakamkan ucapan tahniah dan berbangga di atas pencapaian mereka.

Sekian, harap maklum.

**********************************************************

CONGRATULATIONS

Dear Campus Community,

We are pleased to inform that Miss Vanitha Mariappan, postgraduate student f rom the Department of Microbiological Medicine,Faculty of Medicine, University o f Malaya (UM) has won 1st Prize in the Merck Young Scientist Award (MYSA) 2010 . Miss Kumutha Malar from the same department received the Consolation Award. Both students received the award on October 28, 2010 at the Le Meridian Hote l, Kuala Lumpur.

The University of Malaya would like to congratulate them on t heir achievement.

Thank you.

Muhammad Norazlin Mansor
Corporate Relations Officer
International & Corporate Relations Office (ICR)
1st Floor, Chancellery Building
University of Malaya
50603 Kuala Lumpur
MALAYSIA
Tel     : 603-7967 7090 (office) / 6016-34“ 247 (mobile)
Fax     : 603-7956 0027
E-mail  : muhammad@um.edu.my, muhammad_international@yaho o.com
Website : www.um.edu.my

source: http://umnews.um.edu.my/news.php?module=detail&view=10495&cat=studentips

Note: Thanks to Danaraj

5 SJKT Methodist Klang boys go to Manchester City

November 25th, 2010
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Wonderful news indeed. Surely will motivate students to perform better.

Youngsters off to Manchester

Photo by CHAN TAK KONG

FIVE young boys from SJK(T) Methodist, Klang will leave for England on Nov 28 for a three-week training stint at Manchester City.

The five — M. Sriasagis Kumar, M. Nithyananthan, V. Vimel Kumar, M. Parameswaran and N. Denes — will be accompanied by school teacher S. Kanes.

The stint is a reward to the players for being champions in the OHMS Cup — Road to England football competition, organised by the OHMS Foundation and Ken Barnes Football Club of Malaysia.

Going through the paces: The players training under Barnes recently.

Ken Barnes Football Club of Malaysia chief executive officer P. Subramaniam said about 500 primary schools took part in the nationwide competition.

“After the preliminary round in each state, the top two teams qualified for the grand finals and SJK (T) Methodist, Klang became the champions.

“The boys will get the chance to learn more about professional football at Manchester City.

“It is a chance of a lifetime for these young boys,’’ said Subramaniam.

Former England international and Manchester City player Peter Barnes conducted a training session for the five boys in Petaling Jaya recently.

Barnes said the stint would certainly be an inspiration for the young and budding football players.

“It is early to make any comments on their skills. But they were showing a lot of enthusiasm. The stint will be a learning experience for them. It should motivate them to train harder when they return,’’ said Barnes.

Subramaniam said they had plans to set up an academy at Taman Glenmarie in Shah Alam.

source: http://thestar.com.my/metro/story.asp?file=/2010/11/25/central/7467302&sec=central

“We will be inviting the five boys as well as other youngsters in the Klang Valley for regular training sessions. Barnes will be co-ordinating the training programme,’’ said Subramaniam.

Many Schools Missing!

October 29th, 2010
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


We need to bring in the big guns! We have lots of schools missing. Disappeared from the face of the earth (in Malaysia la). May need to seek help of bomohs too.

The statistics clearly show number of Chinese and Tamil schools has been reduced but the Deputy Minister said no schools was closed down and he didn’t really answer the question asked.  From more than 880 Tamil schools in 1957, now left with 523 only.

Dewan Rakyat this morning became heated up during question time, after a query by Nga Kor Ming (DAP – Taiping) on Chinese schools raised the ire of Barisan Nasional MPs.

Nga, during his supplementary question to Deputy Education Minister Dr Puad Zarkashi, questioned why the government had closed many Chinese and Tamil language schools in the country.

“Firstly, I’d like to congratulate the country for establishing 2,637 national schools from the years 1948 to 2000,” said Nga.

“At the same time, I express my sadness knowing that 48 Chinese medium schools had been shut down. The same thing is also happening at Tamil schools.”

At this point, Datuk Seri Jamaluddin Jarjis (BN – Rompin) stood up to interject, accusing Nga of uttering seditious remarks.

Read the hansard below (comments in red are interesting indeed!). Full hansard for 27th October 2010 is available on parliament website here [pdf file]. If schools were not closed down where did they go? How can number of schools reduced? Were they allowed to “die a natural death”?  Do we need Fox and Mulder to investigate?

Most funny is the questions/comments by Jamaludin Jarjis.

4. Tuan Nga Kor Ming [Taiping] minta Menteri Pelajaran menyatakan secara terperinci satu demi satu status terkini pembinaan 19 buah sekolah jenis kebangsaan SJK(C) yang diumum serta dijanjikan oleh kerajaan pada 31 Januari 2008 serta kos terlibat dalam menyiapkan sekolah-sekolah tersebut.
Timbalan Menteri Pelajaran II [Dr. Haji Mohd. Puad bin Zarkashi]: Assalamualaikum warahmatullaahi wabarakaatuh dan salam 1Malaysia. Tuan Yang di-Pertua, Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia sentiasa berusaha meningkatkan pembangunan pendidikan dalam memastikan pembangunan modal insan lebih berkesan tanpa mengamalkan diskriminasi ke atas mana-mana sekolah yang terdapat dalam sistem pendidikan kebangsaan. Untuk makluman Ahli Yang Berhormat, proses perpindahan dua buah SJK(C) telah siap dan mula beroperasi pada tahun ini iaitu SJK(C) Tai Hong, berpindah dari Kota Tinggi ke Taman Impian Emas, Johor Bahru dan SJK(C) Pai Tze dari Bukit Serampang ke Setia Eco Gardens, Johor Bahru.
Manakala perpindahan lima sekolah lagi telah mendapat kelulusan pihak berkuasa tempatan dan dalam proses pembinaan sekarang ini iaitu SJK(C) Bandar Bukit Tangga – Bukit Beruntung, Selangor – RM3 juta. SJK(C) Pay Fong 1 –
Crimson, Krubong, Melaka juga RM3 juta. SJK(C) Pun Pong – Alor Setar, Kedah – RM3 juta. SJK(C) Tung Hwa – RM3.8 juta iaitu Seremban dan SJK(C) Kiow Min – Taman Perkasa, Alor Gajah, Melaka sebanyak RM2.3 juta. Dua lagi baru selesai isu tapak iaitu SJK(C) Wu Tek – Bandar Pak Len, Kelang, Selangor. Yang kedua ialah SJK(C) Pai Chee – Bandar Jasa Cemerlang, Johor.
Untuk makluman Ahli Yang Berhormat, untuk sekolah baru daripada enam yang dicadangkan, baru satu telah selesai perolehan tapak iaitu SJK(C) Emerald – Rawang. Tapak adalah ihsan daripada pihak pemaju bernilai RM3.5 juta. Manakala selebihnya, pihak Lembaga Pengelola Sekolah (LPS) dalam proses membuat perolehan tanah, penyediaan pelan bangunan atau mengemukakan permohonan kebenaran merancang untuk kelulusan oleh pihak berkuasa tempatan. Keseluruhan peruntukan yang disediakan untuk semua sekolah tersebut termasuk yang dijanjikan ialah RM95 juta. Terima kasih.
Tuan Nga Kor Ming [Taiping]: Terima kasih Tuan Yang di-Pertua dan terima kasih jawapan dari Timbalan Menteri. Pendidikan adalah teras pembangunan negara. Mengikut statistik yang saya ada, saya mengucapkan tahniah kepada kerajaan kerana berjaya membina 2,637 buah sekolah kebangsaan sepanjang tempoh dari tahun 1948 hingga tahun 2000. Walau bagaimanapun, saya berasa amat sedih dan kesal, pada tempoh yang sama sejumlah 49 buah sekolah jenis kebangsaan Cina telah ditutup. Ini sama juga berlaku kepada sekolah jenis kebangsaan Tamil, tutup. Memang jumlah bilangan sekolah telah berkurangan. Tadi wakil kerajaan telah memberikan jawapan…
Dato’ Seri Dr. Jamaludin Mohd. Jarjis [Rompin]: Saya hendak minta, Tuan Yang di-Pertua, 36(6). Ini kenyataan benarkah kita tutup sekolah Cina ni?
Tuan Nga Kor Ming [Taiping]: Ini sekarang floor saya.
Dato’ Seri Dr. Jamaludin Mohd. Jarjis [Rompin]: Your floor, but you are seditious, how can you tuduh tidak betul.
Tuan Nga Kor Ming [Taiping]: What seditious?
Dato’ Seri Dr. Jamaludin Mohd. Jarjis [Rompin]: Ini you kata tutup sekolah mana? Mana ada kita tutup sekolah Cina.
Tuan Nga Kor Ming [Taiping]: Ini saya cadangkan..
Tuan Yang di-Pertua: Tidak apa Yang Berhormat Rompin, biar Menteri yang jawab nanti.
Tuan Nga Kor Ming [Taiping]: Jumlah bilangan sekolah yang… ini Duta Amerika, balik Amerika Syarikatlah. Jangan buang masa masuk Dewan.
Dato’ Seri Dr. Jamaludin Mohd. Jarjis [Rompin]: Betulkah sekolah Cina ditutup supaya kita menang dalam pilihan raya?
Tuan Nga Kor Ming [Taiping]: Belum saya habis pertanyaan, buat apa kacau dalam Dewan ini? Balik Amerikalah, jadi Duta Amerika, mengapa duduk sini?
[Dewan riuh]
Dato’ Seri Dr. Jamaludin Mohd. Jarjis [Rompin]: Ini hak saya, ini hak saya, saya ada hak saya.
Tuan Nga Kor Ming [Taiping]: Dia tidak tahu, sebab itu jangan putar belit, jangan putar belit. [Dewan riuh]
Tuan Yang di-Pertua: Ahli-ahli Yang Berhormat, Yang Berhormat Taiping.
Dato’ Seri Dr. Jamaludin Mohd. Jarjis [Rompin]: Apa cakap macam ini?
Tuan Nga Kor Ming [Taiping]: Ikut peraturan mesyuarat. Saya belum habis.
Tuan Yang di-Pertua: Duduk dulu Yang Berhormat Taiping. Itu sebabnya Ahli-ahli Yang Berhormat, saya sering kali mengingatkan bahawa apabila berhujah, kalau boleh elakkan menggunakan perkataan-perkataan yang mengundang reaksi negatif dari sebelah, fasal beginilah. Apabila saya bercakap begini ada yang mengatakan bahawa saya berkhutbah. Bagus lagi saya berkhutbah daripada mendengar pertengkaran yang tidak habis-habis. Kepada Ahli-ahli Yang Berhormat berkenaan, saya sarankan supaya pergi ke Batu Sapi dan Galas. Sila, teruskan.
[Ketawa]
Tuan Nga Kor Ming [Taiping]: Terima kasih Tuan Yang di-Pertua yang bijaksana. Soalan tambahan saya, tadi wakil kerajaan katakan kerajaan tidak pernah mengamalkan apa-apa dasar diskriminasi ke atas semua aliran sekolah. Maka, adalah tugas saya sebagai wakil rakyat untuk memaklumkan kepada Timbalan Menteri tentang garis panduan dan surat pekeliling kementerian yang wujud pada hari ini.
Soalan pertama saya, garis panduan dan surat pekeliling yang sedia ada menetapkan tapak rizab sekolah hanya boleh digunakan untuk bina sekolah kebangsaan dan sekolah jenis kebangsaan lain seperti Tamil dan Cina tidak diberikan layanan yang saksama.
Kedua, garis panduan dan surat pekeliling dari kementerian juga menetapkan jika Lembaga Pengelola Sekolah yang ingin memohon, merayu untuk membina sekolah baru, sebelum mereka mendapat membuat permohonan untuk permit membina sekolah, mereka perlu merayu dan mendapatkan sumbangan wang sekurang-kurangnya 80%, 80% raised baru boleh memohon.
Garis panduan ketiga, surat pekeliling yang dikeluarkan oleh kementerian sendiri. Mana-mana pelajar yang belajar di sekolah jenis kebangsaan Cina, jika hendak tukar kepada sekolah kebangsaan boleh tetapi sebaliknya jika hendak tukar dari sekolah kebangsaan hendak tukar kepada sekolah jenis kebangsaan Cina atau Tamil, tidak boleh. [Dewan riuh]
Sebab itu – Yang Berhormat Rompin, sudah lama tidak datang Dewan Rakyat, tidak tahu, maka jangan buat kacau dalam Dewan ini. Ini surat pekeliling, bukan yang dikeluarkan oleh Pakatan Rakyat. Itu dikeluarkan oleh kementerian, sebab itu saya hendak tanya, soalan saya dengan atas dasar 1Malaysia, Rakyat Didahulukan, Pencapaian Diutamakan. Saya hendak memohon jasa baik …
Dr. Haji Mohd. Puad bin Zarkashi: Okeylah, saya boleh jawab.
Tuan Nga Kor Ming [Taiping]: Bilakah kementerian akan mengetepikan…..
Dato’ Shamsul Anuar bin Haji Nasarah [Lenggong]: Yang Berhormat Taiping kena cirit birit macam Yang Berhormat Jelutonglah.
Tuan Nga Kor Ming [Taiping]: Bilakah kerajaan akan mengetepikan dan memansuhkan surat-surat pekeliling yang tidak adil ini supaya semua rakyat dalam negara ini berasa mereka diberikan layanan yang adil dan saksama? Itu soalan saya.
Dr. Haji Mohd. Puad bin Zarkashi: Tuan Yang di-Pertua, Yang Berhormat Taiping ini memang kaki gaduh, sebab itulah dengan Yang Berhormat Ipoh Barat pun dia gaduh juga. Kawan sendiri pun dia gaduh. Saya hendak tanya bila hendak cium mulut dengan Yang Berhormat Ipoh Barat. Tuan Yang di-Pertua, Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia tidak pernah menutup sekolah-sekolah SJK(C), SJK(T) dan sebagainya. Bahkan, ada SJK(T) yang tinggal satu murid pun kita tidak tutup. Sebab itulah jangan buat tuduhan yang melulu. Kita ada juga sekolah yang sudah ditutup kerana berpindah tempat lain tetapi mohon dibuka semula pun kita buka semula – kita beri. Kalau Yang Berhormat sebut tentang sekolah SJK(C), kita ada tapak untuk SK (sekolah kebangsaan) yang kita beri dengan penuh ihsan untuk membina sekolah SJK(C) seperti yang di Bukit Sentosa tadi. Kita tidak ada diskriminasi. Sebab itulah dalam Bajet 2011 dengan cukup jelas disebut kita menyediakan RM250 juta untuk sekolah bantuan modal dan RM2,000 kita sediakan untuk bayar utilities setiap bulan untuk sekolah-sekolah bantuan modal termasuklah SJK(C). Untuk makluman Yang Berhormat, kalau kita hendak discriminate, kita terima 800 guru GSTT daripada SJK(C) ke dalam program KDC. Lapan ratus orang satu jumlah yang ramai.
Bagaimana Yang Berhormat kata kita hendak diskriminasi sedangkan banyak lagi sekolah-sekolah kebangsaan juga…
Tuan Nga Kor Ming [Taiping]: Surat pekeliling. [Dewan riuh]
Dr. Haji Mohd. Puad bin Zarkashi: Banyak sekolah kebangsaan…
Tuan Nga Kor Ming [Taiping]: Bagaimana dengan garis panduan…
Dr. Haji Mohd. Puad bin Zarkashi: Yang menghadapi masalah di pedalaman – sekolah banjir, sekolah menumpang, sekolah dua sesi di pedalaman. Ini juga perlu diberi perhatian. Kita tidak ada memberikan sebarang sikap yang diskriminasi kepada SJK(C), bahkan kita membantu. Kita bayar gaji RM2,900. RM1.8 bilion untuk sekolah-sekolah SJK(C) ini – gaji guru ya. Jadi ini Yang Berhormat kena terima. Saya hendak beritahu, lima daripada sekolah yang tidak selesai tanahnya adalah di Selangor. Di Selangor, kalau boleh Kerajaan Negeri berilah tanah. Apa yang berlaku, dia ambil tanah untuk curi pasir. Itu yang berlaku sebenarnya.
Puan Teresa Kok Suh Sim [Seputeh]: Bantahan.
Dr. Haji Mohd. Puad bin Zarkashi: Tanah untuk bina UiTM pun dia ambil.
Puan Teresa Kok Suh Sim [Seputeh]: Tuan Yang di-Pertua…
Tuan Nga Kor Ming [Taiping]: Ini sangkaan jahat.
Puan Teresa Kok Suh Sim [Seputeh]: Tuan Yang di-Pertua, Kerajaan Negeri Selangor memang ada bagi mewartakan banyak tanah untuk mendirikan…
[Dewan riuh]
Tuan Yang di-Pertua: Yang Berhormat duduk dahulu, duduk dahulu. Ahli Yang Berhormat duduk dahulu.
Puan Teresa Kok Suh Sim [Seputeh]: Ia ditukar untuk membina SJK(C).
Tuan Yang di-Pertua: Duduk dahulu Ahli Yang Berhormat, duduk dahulu.
Tuan Nga Kor Ming [Taiping]: Mereka yang mengundang kekecohan Tuan Yang di-Pertua.
Tuan Yang di-Pertua: Duduk dahulu, duduk dahulu.
Beberapa Ahli: [Menyampuk]
Tuan Yang di-Pertua: Duduk dahulu. Inilah masalahnya. Apabila soalan ditanya, bising, soalan dijawab setimpal, bising.
Datuk Ir. Haji Idris bin Haji Haron [Tangga Batu]: Yang Berhormat Seputeh hendak register kehadiran itu.
Dato’ Seri Dr. Jamaludin Mohd. Jarjis [Rompin]: Tuan Yang di-Pertua, saya hendak bawa Point of Order 36(10)(c). “Adalah salah pada peraturan menggunakan perkataan-perkataan yang harus menaikkan perasaan bersakit-sakit hati ataupun bermusuh-musuhan di antara satu kaum dengan satu kaum dalam Malaysia atau melanggar mana-mana syarat dalam Perlembagaan atau Akta Hasutan, 1984.” Tadi Yang Berhormat Taiping mengatakan kerajaan menutup 40 buah sekolah Cina.
Tuan Nga Kor Ming [Taiping]: Siapa makan cili dia rasa pedas.
Dato’ Seri Dr. Jamaludin Mohd. Jarjis [Rompin]: You shut up!
Dato’ Shamsul Anuar Nasarah [Lenggong]: Kurang ajar ini orang.
Dato’ Seri Dr. Jamaludin Mohd. Jarjis [Rompin]: Duduk! Duduk! Ini hak saya. Saya majoriti besar di Parlimen Rompin itu. Jangan kacau. Ini menghasut. Ini kerana apa? Ini kerana dua pilihan raya kecil di sana supaya pengundi Cina tidak menyokong kerajaan Barisan Nasional dan sanggup menghasut orang Melayu kucar kacir antara kaum, ini politik apa ini? Menyalahgunakan ini. [Mengangkat buku Peraturan Mesyuarat] Saya minta maaf. Saya sudah tidak tahan dengar. Saya diam tetapi cara ini…
Tuan Yang di-Pertua: Terima kasih, terima kasih. Saya arif benar dengan peraturan mesyuarat tadi itu tetapi selama duduk di sini lebih kurang tiga tahun, saya mempunyai kesimpulan bahawa ahli-Ahli Yang Berhormat ini kadang-kadang hatihati kamu cukup keras. Kadang-kadang tidak terjolok, kadang-kadang tidak sakit, kadang-kadang tidak sensitif. Ini kerana kalau sensitif, andai sakit, tidak adalah Ahliahli Yang Berhormat yang mengeluarkan hujah melanggar peraturan mesyuarat. Terima kasih.
Beberapa Ahli: [Bangun]
Tuan Yang di-Pertua: Yang ini berdiri untuk soalan…
Dato’ Shamsul Anuar bin Haji Nasarah [Lenggong]: Tambahan.
Tuan Yang di-Pertua: Okey, sila Yang Berhormat Ledang.
Dato’ Kamarudin bin Jaffar [Tumpat]: Maknanya Tuan Yang di-Pertua membuat ruling menolak apa yang dipohon oleh Yang Berhormat Rompin. Terima kasih. [Ketawa]
Datuk Ir. Haji Idris bin Haji Haron [Tangga Batu]: Kami minta ruling Tuan
Yang di-Pertua. Apa hukuman ruling untuk Yang Berhormat Taiping, ruling untuk Yang Berhormat Taiping.
Datuk Haji Mohamad bin Haji Aziz [Sri Gading]: Yang Berhormat Rompin itu bawa perkara yang benar sebenarnya.
Datuk Ir. Haji Idris bin Haji Haron [Tangga Batu]: Satu pandangan yang racist. Ruling untuk Yang Berhormat Taiping Tuan Yang di-Pertua.
Datuk Haji Mohamad bin Haji Aziz [Sri Gading]: Yang Berhormat Taiping membuat perasaan bersakit-sakit hati.
Dato’ Seri Dr. Jamaludin Mohd. Jarjis [Rompin]: [Bercakap tanpa menggunakan pembesar suara]
Tuan Yang di-Pertua: Terima kasih Yang Berhormat Rompin, terima kasih Yang Berhormat Rompin.
Datuk Ir. Haji Idris bin Haji Haron [Tangga Batu]: Ruling ini memang kena.
Dato’ Seri Dr. Jamaludin Mohd. Jarjis [Rompin]: [Bercakap tanpa menggunakan pembesar suara] Ini menghasut.
Datuk Haji Mohamad bin Haji Aziz [Sri Gading]: [Menyampuk]
Tuan Yang di-Pertua: Ya, ya, terima kasih, terima kasih.
Dato’ Seri Dr. Jamaludin Mohd. Jarjis [Rompin]: Tuan Yang di-Pertua, ini kena tarik balik ini. Ini kenyataan tidak benar dan boleh menghasut yang jelas salah. Akan tetapi parti DAP untuk menang pilihan raya, apa jua mereka akan buat, tiupkan
semangat supaya orang Cina benci Malaysia. Apa ini?
Puan Teresa Kok Suh Sim [Seputeh]: Kenapa Yang Berhormat Rompin begitu bimbang tentang pilihan raya kecil?
Dato’ Seri Dr. Jamaludin Mohd. Jarjis [Rompin]: Betul tidak kerajaan menutup SJK(C)?
Tuan Yang di-Pertua: Yang Berhormat Rompin, Yang Berhormat Seputeh sudah, sudah.
Dato’ Seri Dr. Jamaludin Mohd. Jarjis [Rompin]: Betul tidak? Kalau betul tidak apalah, tetapi saya rasa tidak. Ini tohmah, pendustaan yang besar, fitnah
besar.
Ir. Haji Hamim bin Samuri [Ledang]: Okey Tuan Yang di-Pertua.
Tuan Yang di-Pertua: Sila Yang Berhormat Ledang.
Beberapa Ahli: [Menyampuk]
Tuan Yang di-Pertua: Sudah saya buat ruling Ahli-ahli Yang Berhormat. Soalan yang diajukan itu kalau merupakan pembohongan, ia telah dijawab oleh Menteri. Jadi soalan seperti tumbukan kalau 50% kuatnya, jawapan pun 50%, bagi saya fairlah. [Ketawa] Sila Yang Berhormat Ledang.
Ir. Haji Hamim bin Samuri [Ledang]: Terima kasih Tuan Yang di-Pertua.
Sebagaimana yang kita sedia maklum Tuan Yang di-Pertua, bahawa semua sekolah kebangsaan dan semua sekolah menengah kebangsaan adalah untuk seluruh rakyat Malaysia, tidak kira Melayu, Cina atau India. Semua sekolah menengah kebangsaan adalah untuk seluruh rakyat Malaysia. Kita tahu kerajaan prihatin dan kerajaan tidak pernah mengabaikan soal pendidikan. Justeru Tuan Yang di-Pertua, saya ingin tahu sejauh mana – lebih daripada ini, kerajaan lebih prihatin terhadap pembangunan pendidikan sekolah-sekolah bantuan kerajaan? Ini kerana kita lihat setiap sekolah-sekolah ini menghadapi masalah seperti kekurangan guru, bangunan yang daif dan kekurangan kewangan dan sebagainya di seluruh negara. Ini adalah semua sekolah. Tidak ada sekolah Jawa, tidak ada sekolah Iban, tidak ada sekolah Banjar, Bugis dan sebagainya. Ini adalah untuk semua rakyat Malaysia tidak kira Melayu, Cina atau India. Sejauh mana kerajaan prihatin berbanding dengan keistimewaan yang telah kerajaan berikan kepada semua sekolah-sekolah lain. Sekian, terima kasih.
Dr. Haji Mohd. Puad bin Zarkashi: Terima kasih Yang Berhormat Ledang. Sebab itulah di dalam Bajet 2011, kerajaan menyediakan peruntukan tambahan yang semakin besar untuk Kementerian Pelajaran. Bahkan untuk tujuan pembangunan, telah dinaikkan kepada RM6.4 bilion dengan tujuan bahawa dengan pertambahan yang sebegini besar – selain daripada Belanja Mengurus, maka kita dapat memastikan bahawa mana-mana sekolah yang berada dalam keadaan yang daif, sekolah yang sering dilanda banjir, sekolah menumpang sepertimana yang saya sebut masih banyak terutamanya di Sabah, Sarawak yang banyak sangat sekolah menumpang, ini kita akan dapat atasi dengan jumlah perbelanjaan yang bertambah ini. Ini tidak termasuk yang saya kata Belanja Mengurus dinaikkan kepada RM2.93 bilion.
Oleh kerana itu, saya ingin menyatakan di sini bahawa pendirian kita adalah cukup jelas bahawa sekolah kebangsaan ialah bukan sekolah Melayu. Sekolah kebangsaan ialah sekolah untuk semua rakyat Malaysia termasuk pendudukpenduduk yang berketurunan Iban, Kadazan Dusun, Kayan dan sebagainya. Oleh itu, bila kita membela sekolah-sekolah kebangsaan, maka ia juga adalah untuk sekolah semua kaum. Dalam masa yang sama, kita tidak pernah melupakan sekolah-sekolah bantuan modal. Sebab itu kita kategorikan sekolah-sekolah ini sebagai sekolah bantuan kerajaan iaitu antaranya seperti sekolah mubaligh, sekolah SJK(C), SJK(T), bahkan Sekolah Agama Rakyat dan Sekolah Agama Negeri pun kita bantu. Oleh kerana itulah, saya ingin menyatakan di sini bahawa dasar kerajaan dalam soal pembangunan modal insan ini adalah cukup adil, cukup saksama sebenarnya. Sebab kita tahu bahawa pendidikan ini penting.
Sebab itulah pada saya apa juga yang dibangkitkan oleh pembangkang terutama DAP memang adalah bertujuan politik. Mereka langsung tidak pernah membela sekolah-sekolah kebangsaan di pedalaman yang cukup daif. Mereka tidak pernah pergi pun ke Sabah, Sarawak, pedalaman ini. Yang hanya mereka lihat hanya sekolah di bandar.
Tuan Nga Kor Ming [Taiping]: Tunggu Pakatan Rakyat jadi kerajaan, kita akan pergi.
Puan Teresa Kok Suh Sim [Seputeh]: Jangan cabar.
Dr. Haji Mohd. Puad Zarkashi: Penghasut besar.
Puan Teresa Kok Suh Sim [Seputeh]: Nanti kalah.
Datuk Seri Panglima Wilfred Mojilip Bumburing [Tuaran]: Tuan Yang di- Pertua, pertamanya saya ingin merakamkan setinggi penghargaan dan tahniah kepada Tuan Yang di-Pertua kerana watak dan peranan sebagai Tuan Yang di-
Pertua yang world class.

Taylors College Visit

October 27th, 2010
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


About 5 months ago, I had the chance to visit the brand new Taylors College (university now) Lakeside Campus (Not sure if the lake is a ex-mine).

At that time, there were less activities because the new building had started operating only in 2010. Some of the features of the college is as shown in the pictures below (click to view larger image):

The buildings are quite modern-looking. The building on the right (with red column) is supposed to be the student hostel.  The lake divides the area into two parts, and I stood at the office area (some student office and exam hall is there too), right in the middle. The wind was quite strong and at times I felt as it the floor structure shook. Maybe its just me.

The glass buildings below housed the cafe, library, restaurants etc. Quite classy look. There’s Starbucks, Baskin Robbins and what-nots. Doesn’t sound like the college of the old days, and nope, definitely not for the poor or low-income people to study unless got scholarship 🙂

The Hospitality and Tourism programmes  run here will be interesting because there will be some sort of “hotel” run by students. I think students will get good training from running the hotel and restaurants here.

Another thing that made me quite worried is the electricity cables running just behind the campus. I think the distance barely 20 meters or so from the nearest building. Not sure if this is within permissible levels or not. Wonder how/who authorised the building in such way if this is hazardous to health. Students park their cars there daily, and some of the rooms are quite close to the cables.