Posts Tagged ‘Employment’

estate folks get clean water 100 years later

September 5th, 2011
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


I’m at loss at what’s to be proud here. Maybe the state exco can highlight it. 100 years (ok, make it 54 years, since before Merdeka it was under colonial rule), last raised in February, settled in September. One wonders what all the previous excos and authorities were doing all this while.  Should have hauled up the estate owner, slap a hefty fine or even jailed some of them. Oh wait, does our law protect such citizens?

Families in an estate here waited a century for clean water supply. And now their dream has come true.

Previously, residents of the Leong Hin San estate had to depend on a small well and an unhygienic pond for water.

However, state exco VS Mogan, who oversees the estate affairs, human resources and environment portfolio, negotiated with Syarikat Air Negeri Sembilan (SAINS) to connect water supply for the residents’ houses.

“The residents received the water supply about a month ago and the cost of the installation for the houses was around RM120,000,” he said.

According to Mogan, this was another example of how MIC and the Barisan Nasional government were concerned about the welfare of estate workers.

“If there are any other residents in the estate who still do not have water supply, please come forward in order for us to help you,” he said.

Meanwhile, Mogan also directed the estate management to carry out maintenance work on the workers’ houses as well as to ensure hygienic living conditions.

FMT highlighted the plight of the estate workers in February.

The estate’s union leader S Murugan told FMT then that residents found snake skin, dead frogs and goats in the pond from which they collected water.

The union had raised the issue with the estate management for years, but the problem was not fixed.

source: http://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/2011/09/05/100-year-wait-for-water-supply-over/

YB Manoharan’s seven motions for Indian community

August 29th, 2011
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


The seven motions:

1. Felda-like scheme involving 2000 acres of land for 200 hardcore families.

2. RM10 million fund to be set up to assist Indians in small and medium enterprises.

3. set up an Indian affairs bureau under the purview of the menteri besar.

4. at least 10 acres of land for all Tamil and Chinese schools in the state.

5. renaming Jalan Barat in Petaling Jaya to Jalan V David to commemorate the late unionist.

6. seven percent discount for all poor Malaysians who are purchasing homes from the Selangor State Development Corporation (PKNS).

7. “no demolition” order or shifting of temples erected in the state before 2008.

Number 7 was accepted with a modification:  no demolition or shifting a temple without the approval of the executive council in charge.

Motion number 1 is difficult due to land scarcity, but I believe Selangor still got plenty of land outside Klang Valley which can be utilised for agriculture. The state government can even consider reserving certain percentage for the poor Indians in any schemes being implemented/planned.

Motion 2 is not a big problem. Can easily be set up.

Motion 3 is even easier.

Motion 4 is noble indeed. Must be supported.

Motion 5, well, not exactly top of my list. Can even consider naming some of the new projects being done by the state government instead of renaming, if its an hassle.

Motion 6, totally agree. Not sure if anyone in the right mind will disagree to this.

Motion 7, as it has been amended, we can hold the executive councillor in charge responsible if any demolition happens.

Out of the 7, 3 are outright motions to help Indian community, while the other 4 are mixed or of no direct help.

Gotta agree with the YB, this kind of motion was unheard of before this. I hope its retabled and let’s see how the state government responds.

I’m not sure what the senator Barat Maniam meant by saying that MIC representatives will support the motion if BN wins Selangor. Someone need to table the motion FIRST, before you can support it. So, would MIC representatives make promise to table such a motion?

 

Just days after Pakatan Rakyat lawmakers conceded that the opposition pact, which rode to victory in five states on the wave of Indian support in 2008, had failed the community, a legislator revealed that several motions beneficial to Indians had been dismissed by the Selangor State Legislative Assembly.

According to Kota Alam Shah state assemblyman M Manoharan, the assembly has dismissed seven motions which he had tabled in July.

He said if the motions had been passed and become law, not only would the Indians have benefited but all the poor in Selangor would have also found reprieve.

Explaining the motions, Manoharan said he had moved for a Felda-like scheme involving 2,000 acres of land to be set up for 200 hardcore Indian poor in Selangor.

He had also moved for a RM10 million fund to be set up to assist Indians in small and medium enterpries in the state.

“I also tabled a motion to set up an Indian affairs bureau under the purview of the menteri besar and asked for at least 10 acres of land for all Tamil and Chinese schools in the state,” he said.

The other three motions he had tabled were renaming Jalan Barat in Petaling Jaya to Jalan V David to commemorate the late unionist, a seven percent discount for all poor Malaysians who are purchasing homes from the Selangor State Development Corporation (PKNS) and a “no demolition” order or shifting of temples erected in the state before 2008.

“But the only motion that was accepted by the assembly was the temple order.

“But that too they (Pakatan lawmakers) tweaked to read no demolition or shifting a temple without the approval of the executive council in charge,” said Manoharan, who added that he will again table the same motions in October sitting of the assembly.

Land and housing

Manoharan, who was upset with the dismissal of his bids, said it was “high-time Indians enjoyed the benefits denied to them since Independence”.

“About one-third of the entire Indian population in Malaysia lives in Selangor.

“If the motions had been passed and become law, they would not only help Indians but also all those who are poor in the state.

“I asked for the land so that we can teach the Indian community to cultivate it for agriculture or livestock.

“This would also empower our youths and deter them from joining criminal activities,” said Manoharan,who is from the DAP.

On the housing issue, he said owning a house was a basic necessity for everyone.

He added that PKNS was in a position to assist Indians and the low-income earner acquire homes.

“PKNS is an established property company and it makes money from its housing projects.

“Surely, it can help our low-income people by offering discount.

“Besides, the Menteri Besar (Khalid Ibrahim) is the chairman of the government-linked agency and he can monitor it directly,” said Manoharan.

Malay votes

Asked why the other Pakatan state assemblymen refused to support his motion, Manoharan said it could be due to fear of losing Malay votes.

However, he added that even the Malay assemblymen were aware that the Indians were left behind in many areas.

“Some lawmakers did come to me after the state assembly meeting and said my ideas were good.

“But when I asked why they didn’t support it then, they kept mum,” he said.

However, Manoharan stopped short of criticising the Pakatan state government, saying the assemblymen now enjoyed more freedom to table their motions unlike in the previous state government.

“The Indian representatives then would not even dare to table such motions.

“I must thank our current speaker (Teng Chang Khim) for allowing more freedom in the assembly.

“And I am going to table the motions again in the next state assembly sitting in October. I’m confident my fellow Pakatan assemblymen will support me,” said Manoharan.

‘Good ideas’

Meanwhile, newly appointed Senator V Subramaniam, however, supports Manoharan’s motions, saying the ideas “were good”.

Subramaniam, however, conceded that allocating 10 acres for Tamil schools in Selangor would be tough as some schools were located in densely populated areas like Petaling Jaya where land is scarce.

“However, the rest of the motions are good. The (state assembly’s) rejection shows that Pakatan is not sincere in helping the Indians despite riding high on the community’s votes in 2008,” said Subramaniam, who is better known as Barat Maniam.

Subramaniam, who is Petaling Jaya MIC’s division chief, said if BN wins Selangor in the next polls, MIC representatives will support the motion to improve the Indians’ lot in the state.

“The ideas are in line with the 1Malaysia concept. If we win in the next polls, we will look out for the welfare of all Malaysians.

“Besides, that is why we are elected into the post,” he said.

Last week, Indian DAP leaders conceded that the opposition pact had failed the community after having a closed-door meeting involving 50 DAP members, including lawmakers.

One DAP member said that Pakatan is doing “another BN” for Indians in Selangor, Penang and Kedah.

Among those present at the meeting were DAP national vice-chairman and Ipoh Barat MP M Kulasegaran, Penang DAP deputy chairman and deputy Chief Minister II P Ramasamy, Perak DAP deputy chairman and Tronoh assemblyman V Sivakumar, Perak DAP vice-chairman and Sungkai assemblyman A Sivanesan and former ISA detainee V Ganapathirau.

source: http://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/2011/08/29/sgor-rejected-motions-to-improve-indians-lot/

Klang Valley has more taxis than New York, London, Sydney, HK, Jakarta???

June 22nd, 2011
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


This is another success story for us! we have more taxis than some of the biggest  or famous cities in the world.

For reader’s info – Population of the cities (year): New York (19.5 mil, 2009) , London (7.75 mil, 2009), Sydney (4.57 mil, 2010), Hong Kong (7 mil, 2009), Jakarta (9.58 mil, 2010) against Klang Valley (7.65 mil)?

Within one year, we have 10,000 extra taxis.

And I wonder, how many of the taxi drivers are Malaysians.

Of course, some will say a taxi permit doesn’t translate into a taxi or that some taxis are for designated areas (KLIA for example).

Taxi permits are business tools as well as political tools?

 

 

Are there too many taxis in the Klang Valley? Pose this question to any public transport-user who has experienced spending hours attempting to flag down a cab on a rainy Sunday night, and there’s a good chance you’ll be met with a disbelieving look.

Yet, the figures don’t lie. The Klang Valley has more taxis on its streets than even one of the world’s busiest capitals, New York City.

As of March, the Klang Valley is currently home to 37,000 budget as well as executive taxis. This puts New York City’s 13,237 world-famous yellow cabs well in the shade.

Figures compiled by the Land Public Transport Commission (SPAD), the independent regulator for public transport, reveal that the Klang Valley’s taxi-to-passenger ratio also tops that of other bustling capital cities such as London, Sydney, Hong Kong and even Jakarta.

However the commission tasked with overseeing the country’s public transport demands, faces a monumental challenge on its hands, not just due to logistics problems but that of greed.

Since assuming the reins this year, SPAD has had to fend off numerous approaches for even more taxi permits.

The requests, said SPAD chairman Tan Sri Syed Hamid Albar, come from all quarters, including politicians.

He described the situation as nothing short of a “dilemma”.

“Despite the already high numbers, we are still receiving requests to approve new taxi permits from various groups.

“These include associations, retirees and even politicians,” he told The Malay Mail.

Industry analysts have been quick to point out that the massive number of taxis in the Klang Valley has been a major contributor towards the deterioration of taxi services.

They noted that the burgeoning number of cabs have added to unhealthy practices such as complacency and lack of commitment among taxi companies to provide better service.

Syed Hamid, meanwhile, said the commission was aware of the grouses and problems.

“We are aware of the public outcry with the current taxi service in the Klang Valley. The commission wants to make it a win-win situation for the public as well as taxi operators. We want to uphold professionalism within the industry via the National Public Transport Policy Framework and the Greater Kuala Lumpur – Klang Valley Public Transport Masterplan that will be unveiled in September.”

Syed Hamid said improving taxi service should be based on the laws of supply and demand.

“We hope to address the issue of oversupply of permits gradually in the coming years through the PTMP. The master plan includes training for taxi drivers and ensuring a high level of service efficiency, as part of the terms and conditions.

“We expect the taxi operators to fully operate with us on these matters.”

When asked if the commission would reduce the number of taxis in the Klang Valley, he said: “What had been given, we cannot withdraw. But this does not mean we won’t come down hard on indisciplined and problematic taxi drivers. We won’t hesitate to revoke their permits and licences.”

Big number but poor service

AN industry analyst, who wished to remain anonymous, pointed out that based on research, the high number of taxis in Klang Valley have contributed greatly to the deterioration of service, increased level of unhealthy practice which includes the complacency and level of commitment to run a taxi service.

“By looking at the taxis outnumbering those in other cities which include New York and Hong Kong, we wonder why our taxi service is not even close to the standard of the New York City icon – the yellow cabs,” he said.

“Over there, it is easy to hail a cab as they always move around the city and rarely stay put in one place.”

However, he said, the impression of taxi service in Kuala Lumpur was a different story altogether.

Commonplace among the grouses are difficulty in getting taxis in the city, hailing them by the roadside, the deplorable service quality and cabbies’ refusal to serve certain areas including central KL as well as refusing to use the meter by imposing flat rates.

“It is difficult to board or even hail a taxi during peak hours and we also often hear complaints of taxis overcharging and snubbing passengers.

“There’s no denying the fact that oversupply of taxis has led to the attitude problem of haggling and the existence of touts in public transport terminals, shopping malls and other public places,” said the analyst, who is all too familiar with the taxi industry after being in it for the last 25 years.

‘Stop issuing permits’

TAXI associations are pleading with the government to stop giving out new taxi permits in view of the high number of taxis on Klang Valley roads.

Malaysian Taxi, Limousine and Hired Car Drivers and Operators Association (Petekma) president Yusof Lahir, hoped the Land Public Transport Commission (SPAD) would be firm in addressing the issue of taxi permits oversupply.

“I urged SPAD to please stop giving out new permits if we want to reach the level of taxi service in New York, Hong Kong or Singapore. We are already facing an outpour of taxis on the road lately.

“This problem is also contributing to the lackadaisical attitude among the taxi drivers which includes refusing to serve certain routes,” he said.

Yusof said the teething problem of the oversupply of permits stemmed from the system of awarding permits over the years from the previous governing bodies.

“It was an open secret that previous authorities served the socio-economic objectives which were apparently abused by influential politicians which led to the present state of affairs of so many ‘unnecessary’ permits. I had voiced this previously to various ministers. Now we can see the effect of so many taxis around,” he said.

On taxi touts in public transport terminals and at KL International Airport, Yusof said the high number of taxis and lax enforcement contributed to the matter.

“The government should look into enforcement very seriously. I won’t deny the fact that attitude problems by some drivers have smeared the industry, but enforcement should keep this in check.”

Koperasi Pengangkutan Putrajaya dan Cyberjaya Berhad secretary Mohd Salleh Mat Zain, said he was surprised to learn the number of taxis have increased dramatically since last year.

“In 2010, the number of taxis stood at 27,000 and it was tough for us to ‘cari makan’. Today, there are 10,000 more so you can imagine the competition. The over surge of taxis has also contributed to the forming of cliques where some of them have monopolised some suburban areas,” he said.

He also concurred with the call for the government to regulate the industry and take stringent measures to raise the level of professionalism among the taxi drivers.

“The taxi industry is staring at a bubble with torrent of taxi permits over the years.

“We have seen how taxi drivers refuse to use meters, haggling passengers and prefer to ply specific routes instead of going out to seek customers in the city.”

source: http://mmail.com.my/content/75761-we-beat-new-york

 

72 percent of Malaysians optimistic about job prospects

May 26th, 2011
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Wow! We rank fourth in the world in terms of job prospects. Not sure if Malaysians thinking about jobs in the country or overseas. Probably a mix of both.

But then, the Wellness report says 83% of Malaysians consider themselves as suffering or struggling! Hmm…

Probably we are optimistic about getting jobs, but still worried about economy, cost of living, politics, health, environment, education, crime rates, and so on.

Malaysians are among the most upbeat in the world in terms of their employment outlook and ranked as the fourth most optimistic in the world over their job prospects in a Nielsen survey released today.

Malaysia surged to the fourth place globally in the first quarter of this year from sixth in the fourth quarter of 2010 in terms of consumer optimism about their job prospects.

Seventy-two per cent of online respondents in the survey described their job prospects as excellent or good over the next 12 months, compared to 70 per cent in the previous quarter. Across the Asia Pacific region, the average was 66 per cent.

Malaysia came in ahead of Switzerland in fifth place but behind top ranked India as well as Singapore and Saudi Arabia which were second and third most optimistic respectively.

“The positive response mirrored the good news on Malaysian exports which hit a record of RM64.1billion in March 2011, driven by the growth of shipments of goods including electrical and electronics as well as commodities — refined petroleum products and palm oil,” said Nielsen in a media release.

Malaysians fared less well, however, in terms of optimism over the economic outlook, coming in ninth and also expressed concern over their personal finances.

More than half — 55 per cent of online consumers surveyed — felt that the nation is not in an economic recession, compared to 49 per cent a quarter ago. About a third, or 27 per cent, of respondents believed the country is still in recession and anticipated that the recession would last for another 12 months.

“Malaysian consumers seemed concerned that inflationary pressures, rising food and fuel prices and potential interest rate hikes would reduce their disposable incomes,” said Nielsen.

The Nielsen survey also showed that Malaysia ranked second (41 per cent of online consumers) and sixth (33 per cent) globally when it comes to paying off debts/credit cards/loans and investing in shares/mutual funds respectively.

The survey was conducted by global information and measurement company Nielsen and was conducted between March 23 and April 12, 2011 and polled more than 28,000 consumers in 51 countries throughout Asia Pacific, Europe, Latin America, the Middle East, Africa and North America.

 

source: http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/malaysia/article/malaysians-4th-most-optimistic-globally-over-job-prospects/

 

Two differing articles on My First Home scheme

May 17th, 2011
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


The first article is quite positive:

A total of RM21.3mil in loans has been approved under the My First Home Scheme since its launch in March, said Second Finance Minister Datuk Seri Ahmad Husni Hanadzlah.

“As of April 30, RM21.3mil in loans was approved to 143 applicants with an average value of RM149,365 per loan.

“We have also received encouraging response from banks as we now have 25 that have agreed to give out such loans compared to 20 initially,” he said before witnessing the signing of a memorandum of understanding between Syarikat Peruma-han Negara Bhd and banks on the scheme.

He said as of April 30, 772 people had applied for loans under the scheme.

The scheme, launched by Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak on March 8, is to enable young adults earning RM3,000 or less to obtain 100% financing for their first home with the price capped at RM220,000.

Ahmad Husni said SPNB had also constructed over 4,500 houses worth between RM100,000 and RM200,000 for the scheme and another 8,991 being built in 16 projects nationwide.

“The future is in creative economy with the private and public sectors playing an important role in corporate social responsibility,” he added.

On the affordable housing programme for young urban folk and the poor announced on May 6, Ahmad Husni said they were looking at providing these in the Klang Valley and other urban areas through a public-private partnership.

“We realise that property prices have escalated.

“We are discussing with various groups to supply such houses. A couple of companies have already agreed to do so.

“We are looking at various initiatives to help the people,” he said, adding that the matter was also being discussed in one of the Budget 2012 focus groups.

SPNB chairman Datuk Idris Haron said they were in talks with land owners in the Klang Valley, including Putrajaya, Cyberjaya, Rawang, Puchong, Damansara, Shah Alam and Klang, to build affordable homes by 2020.

source: http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2011/5/17/nation/8699140&sec=nation

The second is not a rosy one:

There has been poor response to 4,516 housing units under the My First Home scheme in the country.

The units were completed by Syarikat Perumahan Negara Bhd (SPNB) and were priced within the RM100,000 to RM220,000 range.

The scheme, launched by Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak in March, is opened to private sector employees aged between 18-years-old and 35-years-old; drawing a monthly salary of not more than RM3,000.

Potential buyers can get 100% financing and a repayment period of up to 30 years.

According to SPNB chairman Datuk Idris Haron, the company has completed 11,400 low and medium cost houses valued at RM1.1bil which remained unsold.

“Of these, 4,516 housing units in 12 development projects can be categorised under the My First Home scheme.

“The response has not been encouraging, perhaps due to the lack of publicity.

“We need to step up our marketing efforts,” Idris said at the opening of the new SPNB headquarters in Wisma Perkeso, Jalan Tun Razak yesterday.

SPNB signed MoUs with and 19 banks, witnessed by Second Finance Minister Datuk Seri Ahmad Husni Hanadzlah, for the scheme.

Ahmad Husni said as of April 30, 772 applications had been received for the My First Home Scheme.

“A total of 143 applications have been approved, amounting to RM21.3mil in housing loans. The average loan is RM149,365,” he said.

Idris said 8,991 housing units, which fell under the My First Home scheme, were being built in 16 development projects in Selangor, Kedah, Johor, Kelantan, Sabah and Sarawak.

“For future developments in the Klang Valley, we are also in talks with landowners in Puchong, Putrajaya, Cyberjaya, Damansara, Rawang, Klang and Shah Alam,” said Idris.

He pointed out that it was not realistic to build homes under the scheme in prime areas in the Klang Valley due to high land values.

“We work with private land owners. However, in areas that we have built homes, such as Laguna Biru apartments in Sungai Buloh, have good potential to become prime locations in five or 10 years.”

source: http://biz.thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2011/5/17/business/8695472&sec=business

And it appeared in the same paper 🙂 Personally, not sure if its the marketing, or the terms of loan, or even the location of the properties. As a housebuyer, I would like to get a nice property, possibly landed, which seems impossible with the current income levels of many Malaysians. So, if our parents could buy houses, why can’t we, who are more educated and earning “more”?