Posts Tagged ‘Marginalisation’

Sentul Crematorium solution

November 10th, 2008
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


It seems to be a small matter, or one can even say that this is a victory for MIC (there’s a blog that keeps track of MIC’s success stories). Let’s see the news by NST today:

CREMATION cremony at the crematorium in Bandar Baru Sentul will no longer be exposed to public view with the construction of parameter wall soon.

Deputy Federal Territories Minister Datuk M.Saravanan said the construction of the eight-metre high walls costing RM200,000, which was approved by the Kuala Lumpur City Hall (DBKL), would begin in one week’s time.

The cost of the construction will be borne by several non-government organisations, including the Sentul Crematorium Association, he told reporters after chairing a meeting with residents on the crematorium here today.

He said the association could also apply for a financial aid from the government to pay the remaining cost of the project.

Residents have complained to the authorities that the burning of bodies at the crematorium were not shielded from public view while smoke and dust get into their houses whenever a body is cremated.

Sounds like a great news, ya? Of course until you read that the approval is for the WALL, and money is from the association. Wah…to get a wall approval for a 100 YEARS old crematorium needs A DEPUTY MINISTER interference. That’s not success to me. That utter humiliation and discrimination. Yup, 100 years old. The place was there before any development took place. Surely the highrise property buyers had the brains to survey the area? That there’s a OPEN AIR crematorium next to their home sweet home?

Now, let’s flashback a bit. Way back in April, Malay Mail reported that the FT Minister Zulhasnan Rafique had agreed to upgrade the facility into a modern crematorium at a cost of RM1.3 million. However, fast forward to November, and our Deputy FT Minister have to cover the gaffe by his boss:

The burning issue of the outdoor funeral pyre in Jalan Bandar Baru Sentul, which has been upsetting residents in the vicinity, took a different dimension yesterday with the authorities saying there are no public funds to modernise the crematorium.

There is no provision for government funds, Deputy Federal Territories Minister S. Saravanan said, to build a modern crematorium on the privately-owned land. He went on to deny that the ministry promised the funds.

Malay Mail reported in April that Federal Territories Minister Datuk Seri Zulhasnan Rafique had agreed to upgrade the facility at a cost of RM1.3 million.

“We never said such a thing. I know there is no government provision or allocation to fund the building of a crematorium on private land,” he said.

The government could only do it, Saravanan added, if the land owner, in this case the Sentul Crematorium Association, handed the land over to the government.

“Since it is a religious issue, we left it to the association and it decided to keep the crematorium as a private concern,” he said. “The association assured me it has the funds and we decided to help with the legal aspects and secure the necessary approvals.

“I personally asked City Hall to give the approval for an eigh-foot-high perimeter wall to shield the place from the public. I am sorry to say City Hall can only help in approving plans for such a facility. It is not responsible for setting up the crematorium with government money,” Saravanan added.

So, the crematorium is on private land, meaning the government could not allocate funding to it. OK, rather than blaming the minister, let’s just blame Malay Mail for reporting wrongly. Easier 🙂

Now, its clear from above that Saravanan said the association has the money and work will start soon. However, the Star reported something different in September 5th. It said the association will build a new, modern crematorium! And there’s a committee too!

The Sentul Crematorium Association is planning to build a new furnace crematorium in place of the old open air cremation in Sentul. With the modern crematorium, residents from neighbouring areas like Gombak and Jalan Ipoh will not have to travel to Cheras for cremation purposes.

The Deputy Federal Territories Minister Datuk M. Saravanan has decided to form a crematorium committee that will comprise leaders from the Sikh, Hindu and Buddhist communities in Sentul.

At present, only the Hindu community uses the traditional open air crematorium behind the Shivan temple.

However, the religious groups in Sentul had mixed reactions to the building of the crematorium.

“We are definitely all for it because we have a big Hindu and Sikh community,” said committee member for the Gurdwara Sahib of Sentul, Surinderpall Singh.

Surinderpall said if the project would ensure the use of hygienic methods, including being electricity-run, it will serve the community well.

The Malaysian Hindu Sangam President Datuk A. Vaithilingam also said the association was all for the project.

“We think it is a good idea to have a modern crematorium for the non-Muslims in the area,” said Vaithilingam.

Vaithilingam also feels that it is the duty of the Kuala Lumpur City Hall (DBKL) to turn it into a modern crematorium.

“It should also be the responsibility of the DBKL to convert the present open air crematorium to a modern facility,” he said.

The Siri Jayanthi Association, however, has not agreed to be a part of the committee for the new crematorium.

“We don’t think it’s a good idea because the crematorium will be too near the temple and it is unhealthy for the monks who live here,” said the association’s president, Mervyn Weerasena.

Weerasena said although the new crematorium would function well in the beginning, it might cause problems in the long run.

“For now there are not many bodies being cremated so it is not too bad but what will happen once the furnace is in place,” he asked.

“We have classes here on Sunday with 300 children so it is definitely not a conducive environment to have a crematorium,” Weerasena added.

So, we have a committee of which two groups supports and another opposes.

Ok, so far we seen the delay being attributed to the association. Let’s read on:

Saravanan said City Hall has given its approvals, but until now, nothing had been done about the crematorium.

Saravanan, who is also MIC information chief, said the party would help out if the association had difficulty raising funds to modernise the crematorium.

Sentul Crematorium Association president R. Balasubramanium confirmed City Hall approval for the perimeter wall has been received and work would start next week.

I am sorry to have delayed the building of the wall,” he said when contacted in Johor Baru yesterday.

Residents nearby have for years been complaining of foul smell, dust and smoke from the open-air crematorium situated just behind the Kaliamman temple.

S. Chandran, a volunteer at the Sri Lankan Buddhist temple, which is just 50 metres away from the pyre site, said the devotees have to put up with “a terrible smell” whenever a cremation was conducted.

“We send our dead to the Cheras Crematorium Centre. Of course, there is a small charge for the service,” Chandran said, adding that with residential development taking place all round the crematorium, it would be better for it to be modernised.

Malaysian Hindu Sangam president Datuk A. Vaithilingam said the movement was all for the project.

“We think it is a good idea to have a modern crematorium,” he said.

Open burning of the dead has been practised in Hinduism for over 5,000 years. Its adherents believe the practice is spiritually the most appropriate way to free the soul from the body.

Not sure if the MHS president is confused, but having a wall doesn’t mean it’s modern. Perhaps he was thinking that its the original plan of upgrading the crematorium.

But read what the association president says in Malay Mail. While he apologised in the Star for the delay, he expressed his disappointment with the empty promises.

Corpses are still being burned for all to see and public outrage is mounting. Six months after the open burning at a crematorium in Bandar Baru Sentul was first highlighted, all that residents have had is a lot of hot air and broken promises from the authorities.

Even crematorium owner C . Balasubramaniam’s hopes have evaporated, saying he was  disappointed that he had been given lip service while having to endure constant criticism from the public.

I was promised that funds would be given to upgrade the crematorium or at least to put up perimeter walls to shield the burning of corpses from public view. “So far, there has been no action.

Several politicians and NGOs have visited the site and promised the same thing, but nothing has been forthcoming.”

Federal Territories Deputy Minister Datuk S. Saravanan, who six months ago said measures would be taken to upgrade the facility to a modern crematorium centre, yesterday sang a different tune.

“We were not supposed to build the facility. It was the Sentul Crematorium Association who pledged to do so. We only allocated the land,” said Saravanan. “I’ll be calling for a meeting within the next 10 days for an update.”

When Malay Mail checked yesterday, the crematorium was operating as it had done before, much to the frustration of residents in the vicinity.

M. Manikam, 73, commenting on the situation, said: “I am disappointed with those people who made the promise to upgrade the crematorium but didn’t keep their word. This crematorium has been here for 100 years but back then, there weren’t so many people living here.

A few months ago, so many government officials visited the site and said walls would be erected. As you can see, they only gave us false hopes.”

Mohd Amirul Ikhwan, 22, who lives right across the crematorium at Pangsapuri Melor, said smoke and dust get into his apartment whenever a body is cremated.

“I would like the government to help upgrade this facility. I was told many Hindus still use this place. I am fine with that as long as the government does as it promised and shields the open burning from public view,” he said.

So, what actually happened? 6 months to get approval for a 8-feet high wall. And so many years before that, full of inaction. Developers could have sponsored a wall. Those house buyers could have not bought houses there. The crematorium association could have put a wall earlier. The DBKL could have done proper planning and relocated the crematorium. They approved the development project, so they should know better. You tell me if this is a success story.

We are better than USA since all our prime ministers are of mixed ancestry

November 6th, 2008
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


PM Badawi mentioned that “anyone” can become a leader of a country while congratulating Barack Obama on his presidential win:

It is possible for anyone from a minority group to be a nation’s leader, even in Malaysia, says Prime Minister Datuk Seri Abdullah Badawi.

“It is up to the people to decide, just as the Americans had done through the democratic process,” he said while extending his congratulations to Senator Barack Obama.

Reporters had asked him in the Parliament lobby yesterday if it were possible for a person from a minority group to become Prime Minister in Malaysia.

While we Malaysians rooted for Barack Obama to win (due to his manifesto and his minority background), we should not be misled that this kind of miracle only happens in USA. In fact, we in Malaysia are far better than USA! How you ask? Well, in its 232 years of independence, this is the first time an American of mixed parentage became the president. While in Malaysia, we have in our 50 years of independence, not one, not two, but all Prime Ministers who came from a mixed background!

  • Tunku Abdul Rahman is born of a Malay father and Siamese mother.
  • Tun Abdul Razak is from Bugis ancestry.
  • Tun Hussein Onn is from Turkish ancestry.
  • Tun Mahathir is born of a half-Malayalee (Indian) father and Malay mother. Mahathir’s father was born of a Malayalee father and Malay mother.
  • Abdullah Badawi’s maternal grandfather (on his mother’s side) was from mainland China.

OK, I’m kind of stretching it a bit, but still we have one half-Siamese, a quarter-Indian, and a quarter-Chinese as prime ministers. Not bad for a 51 year old country.

However, it wrong to say that just about anyone can be a Prime Minister in our country. the Prime Ministers is decided among the MPs (one who commands the support of the majority of the MPs). So, we elect MPs, who then in turn, choose the PM based on their coalition, principles, and so on. Its totally different from USA, where you know who are the candidates for presidency and can vote for or against him/her. In Malaysia, the candidate for PM has always been the president of UMNO, but only a selected few have the power to choose him – the UMNO delegates and division members. And, by virtue of being a party limited by race, only a person of that race can be the president, and subsequently the Prime Minister. Of course, “halfbreeds” and “quarterbreeds” are also accepted as in the case of our Prime Ministers. The only way I see a minority becoming a Prime Minister is by being a Muslim. That means a non-malay muslim who is a member of MCA/MIC/Gerakan/PPP or in DAP/PKR (if opposition becoming ruling coalition in the future). But I think a non-muslim will be a better Prime Minister since will not be pressured by the religious zealots in the country.

Successes of Cabinet Committee on Indian Community

October 31st, 2008
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Let’s look at the whole article first:

PUTRAJAYA: The special cabinet committee to deal with Indian affairs has successfully addressed scores of problems faced by the community.
Human Resources Minister Datuk Dr S. Subramaniam said by addressing the concerns of the Indian community, it would help Barisan Nasional win over the Indians.

“The future augurs well for us as it helps in the process of revitalising the Indian community and in giving it a healthy direction,” he said in his speech at his ministry’s Deepavali celebrations.

The Human Resources Ministry is the secretariat to the cabinet committee chaired by the prime minister.

Dr Subramaniam outlined the successes of the committee in addressing the woes of the Indians.

They included:

– streamlining the procedure for bringing in Hindu, Sikh and other priests from India;

– agreeing to a policy of converting all partially-aided Tamil schools to fully-aided schools;

– increasing the number of Public Service Department (PSD) scholarships for Indians studying in foreign universities to 163 students;

– enabling those who scored 9As and above in the Sijil Pelajaran Malaysia examination to be given scholarships to study in local universities;

– recognising the Asian Institute of Medicine, Science and Technology University as one of the institutes where scholarship students could enrol. As a result of this more than 150 students had gone to study there under PSD scholarships; and

– agreeing to set up a special task force under the Home Ministry to deal with the 30,000 Indians born in Malaysia who are without documents.

Now, let’s analyse:

“has successfully addressed scores of problems”
– this is a misleading statement because it implies many problems have been “addressed”. Not necessarily solved. And you’ll know why when you see the “successes” listed above. Only 6 items are listed. What are the “scores” of other successes?

“- streamlining the procedure for bringing in Hindu, Sikh and other priests from India;”
– this issue dragged on from November last year. It takes the DPM chaired committee to get things moving. Even earlier announcements were not followed by the relevant departments. Isn’t that a shame? Or is it a “success”?

“- agreeing to a policy of converting all partially-aided Tamil schools to fully-aided schools;”
– this is a good one. “agreeing” means just that. Agree only. When? how? who? Don’t ask many questions? Wait till next election. And again, this is issue has been talked about for a decade at least. Why now only agree? Should we be thankful for this “success” or angry that it took so long? Does it mean that if next election the Indians dump BN, they will get more goodies? Others get goodies before election. We get after election, and also when we protest.

“- increasing the number of Public Service Department (PSD) scholarships for Indians studying in foreign universities to 163 students;”
– out of how many recipients? are the 163 students qualified or are we wasting tax payers money by sending unqualified students? Are the students really poor or come from financially unstable families?  And didn’t this happen in June?

“- enabling those who scored 9As and above in the Sijil Pelajaran Malaysia examination to be given scholarships to study in local universities;”
– If I’m not mistaken this covers all students, not only Indians. And it was announced  earlier.

“- recognising the Asian Institute of Medicine, Science and Technology University as one of the institutes where scholarship students could enrol. As a result of this more than 150 students had gone to study there under PSD scholarships;”
– well, what’s the big deal? If the university is qualfied, then it is appropriate. No point sending students to unqualified universities. The way this “success” is highlighted, its like AIMST does not actually deserve to be in the PSD list, but got it through political intervention.

“- agreeing to set up a special task force under the Home Ministry to deal with the 30,000 Indians born in Malaysia who are without documents.”
– I guess this is the only “success” but I have to qualify it with information that another similar entity is also set up to solve problems in Sabah.

Another thing, two of the successes above happened BEFORE the first meeting of the Cabinet Committee took place in July. Miracle? Or is it because we live in Bolehland where timeline can be altered as they wish. The increase of PSD scholarship recipients were done outside the committee as it involved negotiations between MIC. PSD, and the Ministers involved.

Most importantly, there’s no mention on raising the equity of Indians from 1.1% to 1.5% by 2010 as asked by MIC. Also, what about the permits issues?

PKNS for Malays or for all Selangorians?

October 29th, 2008
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


I’m disgusted with the comments from PKNS staff-bodies and also the information revealed by MB Khalid Ibrahim. Selangor, being the most modern state, its coffers being filled by sweat and toil of all its rakyat (plus millons of foreign workers) and PKNS is for Malays? I think all those staff should be sacked. There are thousands of other Selangorians who are looking for work. Let them work for development of the state.

 

The worse is the racist attitude of their staff who oppose the appointment of current Finance and Corporate deputy general manager Low Siew Moi, 57, (trained accountant working for PKNS for 35 YEARS!) who will have her annual contract extended to replace the existing GM – Datuk Harun Salim, whose annual contract expires this Thursday. His contract is not extended, as he is 60. Harun retired in mid-2003 and will have to leave the government entity in compliance with the Public Services Department’s age requirement.

 

Low is to be given a one year contract.

 

According to the 6 staff bodies:

In their joint memorandum dated Oct 25 to Khalid, the staff associations said: “PKNS was established for Malays and to fulfill the Malay agenda. Because of this, the organisation needs to be led by a Malay.”

The document was signed by the respective heads of associations of senior officers, executive officers and workers; the sports and recreation club; Islamic association, and staff welfare body.

“The associations, unions and welfare bodies do not deny the capabilities of Low Siew Moi (left) in the management of finance,” they said.

“However, leading PKNS would need certain leadership criteria, among them, rapport with all staff and associations and ability to communicate with different levels of personnel.”

The memorandum stated that, as PKNS conducts activities that are spiritual in nature, its leader must understand and practice Islamic values.

“In other words, the one who will become the general manager will be the ‘imam’ for all the staff,” the signatories said.

Urging Khalid to retract Low’s appointment, they said they would only extend full support if current deputy general manager in charge of administration and development – Md Nasir Md Arshad – is promoted to general manager.

Since when is PKNS is for Malays? All Selangorians must make a police report against this seditious statements which threaten racial harmony. This is what happens when the organisation is being monopolised by certain race only. Other people don’t exist in their eyes.

 

This is another classic example of making use of religion for discrimination. If want to have an imam, hire one specifically la. Don’t bog down the leader with extra work. Or when it comes to religious events, ask a representative to attend. All this petty excuse of serve to increase the contempt and anger against government bodies like PKNS. Let us not go into government agencies.

 

The staff also issued a veiled threat to MB Khalid that they won’t support the Low if she is appointed. Isn’t that considered treason or something? The staff have a responsibilty to the rakyat, not to pick sides or decide who can lead them.

 

The reason given by Khalid is that they cannot afford to have both Low and Harun to retire at the same time. He said its for one year while they look for a ” bumiputra person with high calibre and ethics and someone who is committed to lead the state’s business arm.”. As Haris Ibrahim asked : Is it not enough that the individual is a person ‘with high calibre and
ethics and someone who is committed to lead the state’s business arm’? Why need to have a racist and discriminative policy? Isn’t this depriving other Selangorians of getting the job? If this is not discrimination, what is?

 

Khalid also revealed two other facts:

 

1. a group of senior officers have 30% shares in PKNS subsidiary – PKNS Infra Sdn Bhd, which will possibly lead to biased decision, cronyism, corruption, etc. Is this what PKNS’s version of Islam and spirituality all about?  Can the staff bodies answer this?

 

2. 75% of projects awarded by PKNS were given to non-bumiputra firms either directly or indirectly. Now, there’s two things here. Firstly, since the staff bodies boldly claim that PKNS is for Malays and Malay agenda, how can this happen? So, they are not doing their jobs (their version)? Secondly, what’s wrong with work being done by non-bumiputras? As long as the job is done correctly, people will be happy. The old way of allocating to bumiputra should be discarded. The Pakatan Rakyat government should encourage award of project based on competency, capability, track record. Don’t be like previous leadership.

 

 

If PKNS is only to serve bumiputra businessmen, then better Selangorians boycott PKNS. Why should we support racist organisations?

Denison thought urban poverty was among Indians only

October 6th, 2008
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Suhakam commissioner in charge of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights Datuk Dr Denison Jayasooria was commenting on the fact that the urban poor are not being provided with financial assistance from government departments and other entities. He also said the Welfare Department should deploy more officers to do housecalls instead of waiting for the poor to approach them.

“Some of them are not aware of the assistance provided by these agencies, so it is best if the Welfare Department or other relevant agencies can go to the ground and check on these people and at the same time they can also update their data.”

He said because of the present situation many urban folk were turning anti-establishment as they felt neglected by the government.

“I have met so many of these people and they told me they are Bumiputera and yet had nothing. I thought this problem was only among the Indians, but it seems that I am wrong.”

He said the authorities such as the Welfare Department should rebuild their networks with community heads like the surau chairman for people living in these low-cost flats to use as a referrence point in order to provide assistance.

“In kampungs, the Welfare Department has a link with the village head, but for those living in urban areas they don’t have such contact. That is why it is important to have a reference point. With such a reference point, the Welfare Department can then have a liaison person to speak to and find out more about the situation on the ground.”

I’m not sure if NST quoted him correctly, but Denison seems to have admitted that the Indians have been neglected, and he now realises that the urban poor Malays are also being neglected. By the way, there are many funds and channels to help Malay Muslims – either through welfare or religious agencies. How about funds or channels to help others?

Below is the letter by Denison (published in NST):

Poverty Levels: Show them the way to a better quality of life
By : DATUK DR DENISON JAYASOORIA,
Chairman Economic, Social and Cultural Working Group, Suhakam

SITI Nurbaiyah’s report “Poor Muslims slipping through the zakat net” (NST, Sept 18) highlights the plight of 30 hardcore poor families in Taman Sentul Utama who have not been able to access welfare assistance, either through religious institutions or through the Welfare Department.

This is shocking, especially when the government has made poverty eradication its No 1 priority and also has set a target of zero hardcore poverty by 2010.

There is a major gap between policy makers, service delivery and implementation institutions on the one hand and the very poor at the bottom of society. The poor are alienated and distant from the very institutions that were established to help them.

The poverty-line income, or income measure for the hardcore poor and the poor, is unrealistic. Take the plight of the family of Rosnaini Abu Hassan, whose only income is from her son who earns RM850. This family is statistically “non-poor” and definitely not hardcore poor.

But, look at their predicament: Their house rent is RM450. She has a mother who is 88 and a son who is disabled.
By official statistics they are “non-poor”. In reality, they are very poor in an urban environment of increasing prices and rising cost of living.

This is a common problem for many low-income families living in urban areas. Their life is hard and often the opportunities to build their capability and capacity are not there.

There are similar cases, not just among poor Malays but also among many displaced Indian plantation workers.

A key issue has been why these families are unable to access the Welfare Department for direct assistance or unable to access the poverty-eradication programmes meant for the urban poor.

Access and inclusion are the keys to empowering the poor. It is not through handouts but by being shown the way to a better life that these families can break the cycle of poverty.

Why are the cries of the poor not heard or entertained? Is there some form of discrimination because they are poor or powerless? Why is this so when so much funds are being set aside, both by the public and private sector?

Suhakam calls on the relevant public sector agencies, especially the Welfare Department and the social-development section of Kuala Lumpur City Hall, to review this situation and ensure that these poor families in Taman Sentul Utama are not further marginalised.

The right to development is a fundamental right and the poor must have opportunities to enhance their economic and social rights.

Suhakam also calls on the government to immediately establish a task force, especially in the urban areas which are under the purview of local governments, to identify the poor and ensure they have access to a better quality of life.

Also, the government’s Economic Planning Unit should review the poverty line income and methodology in identifying the real poor. In addition to the income measure, other qualitative or quantitative indicators must be used to ensure greater inclusion and access.

We must establish fair and equitable mechanisms in addressing the root issues and concerns of the urban poor.

There has been repeated calls to reevaluate the poverty line because its ridiculous to set it between RM600 and RM700. The poverty index should include location, number of dependents (and their status) and income.