Posts Tagged ‘Penang’

Indians in Permatang Pauh

August 5th, 2008
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


According to Samy’s mathematics, there are 3,125 Indian voters in the Permatang Pauh parliamentary, of which 2,000 are MIC members. How would they vote this time? Obviously with a voting population of about 47,000, 3,125 is quite small (6.6%). Previous election statistics showed that 67.7% voters are Malays, 26.3% Chinese and 5.7% are Indians.

Most likely the Malay votes will be split. The Chinese are unknowns. So, how about the Indians? Vote for BN to show unhappiness against PR government? Stick with PR in hope of better future? Or abstain from voting?

Prof Ramasamy rebuts yet again

August 2nd, 2008
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


We are seeing a repeating pattern here. Prof Ramasamy or the state government’s handling of Indians is condemned by the certain Indian groups, and he rebuts. First time was in April, then June, and now in July.

This time, Prof says that the claims of “Penang Indians sidelined” are untrue (refer Malaysiakini). He gives the following reasons:

1. it is unfair to expect drastic improvements to the lot of ethnic Indians less than five months after the March 8 election.

2. Within his own parliamentary constituency of Batu Kawan, Ramasamy said
Indians were appointed to head five village security and development
committees (JKKK).

“This had never happened under the
Barisan Nasional in Penang. In the last (Gerakan-led) state government,
only one Indian had been appointed to head a JKKK.

3. The DAP-led Penang government has also ensured Indian representation in
the state executive council as well as city and municipal councils.

4. awarding of land to two Tamil schools, two Hindu temples and groups of goat and cattle breeders. (Which schools and temples?)

5. A state-level committee was also set up to look into the plight of Tamil schools.

6. youth groups have been established to alleviate the problems faced by the Indian poor.

The reason Prof Ramasamy mentioned the above is because of recent complaints by HINDRAF, Pemaswa, and HAN on the “indifferent attittude of Pakatan Rakyat governments” in the three states of Penang, Perak, and Selangor.

The Prof also ups the ante by saying that the “small disgruntled group” is unhappy because these people failed to secure their own appointment as local councillors and members of a certain state religious body.

“We
can accept criticisms, but not mere attempts to discredit the Pakatan
governments. Why don’t they come and meet the state government
representatives to raise these issues?” he asked.

Prof Ramasamy also rejected calls for a special state Indian council as requested by the group. He repeats that Unlike Barisan Nasional, Pakatan Rakyat is not
merely a coalition of parties that represent exclusively the various
ethnic communities.

“I’m helping the Chinese and Malay communities as well. I’ve given financial aid for suraus
and Chinese temples. If they want state Indian councils, then should we
also set up state Malay councils? What about state Chinese councils?
What about state councils for Orang Asli?

“This is not the Pakatan formula. We are a multi-racial coalition and we work for all races,” he stressed.


Well, I’m interested to know, for a start, why the local council cancelled the land for SJKT Azad? Perhaps the good Prof can help to investigate or get his Education Exco to do it.

SJKT Azad land allocation cancelled by municipal council

July 30th, 2008
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


The report in Nanban, carried by the Star says the Penang Municipal Council retracted the land it once allocated to the SJKT Azad Tamil school in Bagan Jermal, Penang. This retraction was done after the general elections, while the allocation date was not mentioned. We can safely assume that it was before elections.

Here’s the flow of events:

The school, which began operating in 1946, is presently “squatting” at the Penang Indian Association building and had submitted numerous applications to the state government for allocation of land so that new premises with proper facilities could be built. The school does not have enough classrooms. There is also no computer laboratory, science laboratory and library.

Previous government under chief minister Tan Sri Koh Tsu Koon and former state executive councillor P.K. Subbaiyah had approved the land near a Hindu temple in the Waterfall area that was identified by the school parent-teacher association in 2005.

The Penang Municipal Council, which owns the land, had also approved the allocation for the school.

MIC president and former Works minister Datuk Seri S. Samy Vellu had also obtained the necessary funds amounting to RM750,000 from the Federal Government to build the new school.

The Penang Municipal Council cancelled the land allocated to the school after the recent general election.

So, what happened?

HINDRAF unhappy with Pakatan states

July 29th, 2008
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Very surprising indeed. in the pro government Star, HINDRAF coordinators Kannan and Thanenthiran were quoted as HINDRAF not regretting asking supporters to vote for opposition. They said many changes were seen after the elections, especially in Pakatan led states.

But today, in the pro-opposition Malaysiakini, a different tune is being sang. The report says that HINDRAF, together with two previously unheard of groups – Penang Makkal Sakti Welfare Association (Pemaswa) and Hindu Action Network (Han) are fed up with the “indifferent attitude of Pakatan Rakyat governments”.

These three groups are now asking for these Pakatan states to set up state Indian councils to be led by the menteri besar or chief minister. The suggested councils will plan and implement beneficial programmes
for the Indian community, with short, medium and long term goals.

Hindraf National Coordinator, Thanenthiran declares that the Pakatan government had failed to fulfill the promises. He said during the elections, Pakatan used the Hindraf tagline Makkal
Sakti but since winning they have not unveiled any policy to benefit
the community. “Pakatan Rakyat ruling parties, be it DAP in Penang, PAS in Kedah and
Perak and PKR in Selangor, seemed to have made empty electoral promises
to the Indians,” he added. He stressed Hindraf would continue to fight along the movement’s
18-point memorandum submitted to the federal government last year.

Pemaswa’s president, G Asohan also chips by saying that Indian leaders in the Pakatan government have “betrayed the Indian community’s trust in them” to deliver the goods. “Until today, the state governments, particularly Indian leaders, are resting on their laurels,” he said. He claimed that more from MIC, PPP and IPF have benefited from the DAP government in Penang than genuine Hindraf supporters.

HAN’s coordinator G Mugunthan criticised Penang’s elected Indian assemblypersons of protecting their
chronic self-interests when they rejected a previous DAP proposal for a
state council. Though DAP members were keen for a one-stop council, the DAP Indian
assemblypersons rejected it as “it will put undue pressure on them to
deliver.” “Now they are freely doing anything according to their
whims and fancies,” he said, adding that the appointment of an Indian
as Penang deputy chief minister has been more “a curse than a blessing”
to the community. “It has only helped some chronic characters from BN.”

The three groups plan to organise a joint dialogue session with all relevant Pakatan Rakyat heads of state governments over the issue.

As for me, in the short period since last August, HINDRAF had done the impossible. and brought immense self-confidence into the community. It may be a relatively short-lived shot in the arm for the community which was fed up with shoddy treatment from all corners. Post-elections, its a new voyage into unchartered areas. Here, HINDRAF, just like the Indian community, had to make sure its stand is clear. How the community’s newly acquired self-confidence is used may be out of HINDRAF’s control. As Waytha admitted in Singapore months ago (the famous misused interview), it is very likely that HINDRAF will cease to exist in the near future. If it has outlived its purpose – to create an awakening – then its time to retire HINDRAF. The spirit of Makkal Sakthi can take form in newer groups or agendas. It might even cleanse MIC, for all we know. But the contribution of HINDRAF is undeniable.

HINDRAF’s main agenda is to push its 18 point memorandum, and to free its detained leaders. They should stick to that and be clear. They should not meddle into many things (like PI Bala’s disappearance) and cloud the situation. They are apolitical. A pressure group. Their job is to push the community’s agenda (just, fair and logical ones) to the authorities. If group A does not help, then move to group B. Remember that political parties need Hindraf, not the other way around. If such parties conveniently forget HINDRAF now, they will be rudely reminded in the next election. Its not end of the world if Pakatan states neglect the community. In the end, these people will come begging for votes. The community have realised that the era of 50 years of empty promises are gone already. Now, 5 years only given, maybe lesser.

On another note, if the Pakatan led governments implement race-independent measures and policies that directly and indirectly benefit the community, HINDRAF should welcome those measures and policies. We have seen settlers getting land title and pig farms projects continuing, but partially-aided Tamils schools have not got their land. Perhaps the process is longer, but Pakatan leaders in Selangor, Penang and Perak must keep the community updated. What is the progress in getting the land? what are the problems they face? Is it due to federal laws?

The Indian community does not owe any party or individuals a living. Those who think that we should bow down and kowtow to others are seriously wrong. We don’t agree that some other group are supremacist, while we are slaves. We stand equal, shoulder to shoulder with other human beings, and are not fourth class citizens. The community may be stuck between two useless groups – the BN and the Pakatan, but it must never lose its self respect.

Pakatan state magazines come under fire

July 29th, 2008
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Penang and Perak state governments had announced the publication of magazines that various groups branded as propoganda. These groups called the the two state governments ‘hypocrites’ as they were doing the same thing as the previous governments which they had earlier criticised.

Malaysiakini carried some of the responses from these groups:

Media Watch:

Penang-based Media Watch group described Suara Rakyat, published by the DAP-led Penang government and Citra Perak in PAS-led Perak as “merely a public media tool of partisan propaganda.”“The Pakatan Rakyat governments are no different from the previous ones after all. They are hypocrites by copying BN media policy to serve their cynical self interests,” said its coordinator B K Ong, stressing Media Watch’s stand on governments to ‘stay away’ from media publications.

Even if a state government funds and publishes a state magazine, he argues it should be administrated by an independent editorial board to provide free and fair news coverage.

“But these magazines are more like mouthpieces of Pakatan Rakyat state governments than independent magazines,” he told Malaysiakini.

By following the precedent set by his predecessor, Ong said Penang Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng had proven to be a hypocrite since “he had condemned BN-controlled media all these years.”

“He should have titled the magazine as Suara Kerajaan (Government Voice) not Suara Rakyat (People’s Voice),” he said.

United Hindu Religious Council:

President G Mugunthan criticised the Pakatan Rakyat state governments of not going on an austerity drive to save government spending, more so during such difficult times for the people.“The Pakatan state governments claim to be thrifty but are wrongly spending precious government funds
on propaganda. The money could have well spent for noble causes like helping the poor and Tamil schools,” he stressed.

Aliran:

Although social reform movement Aliran is not against the government-sponsored publications, it nonetheless said that state magazines should be more for “intellectual discourse, intelligent thinking and people centric.”

Penang Heritage Trust:

Penang Heritage Trust head Dr Choon Sim Poey concurred that it would not be right for the state governments to utilise public funds for political publicity, instead of  publishing government policies and action plans for the information of the people.

Opposition Leader in Penang:

Azhar Ibrahim on Monday criticised the state government of going back on its promise to cut operational costs due to a lack of funds.“Is this what we call the ‘CAT’ government?” he asked, taking a swipe at the state government’s widely-propagated principles of competency, accountability and transparency (CAT).

it is estimated that Penang government will spent RM300,000 (20,000 copies x 3 editions) . Perak is also expected to spend same amount for 6 editions of 10,000 copies each. Suara Rakyat (52 pages), Penang’s version is in 3 languages – Malay, Mandarin, and Tamil. Citra Perak (20 pages) is in Malay only.

Previous Penang government spent nearly RM300,000 a year to publish separate Malay, Chinese and Tamil magazines in Penang. The Malay version, Wawasan Rakyat was published first in 1994, Hong Yuan in Mandarin was launched in 1999 while Makkal Madal in Tamil was started in 2003.

The previous Perak BN government only published Warta Perak in Bahasa.

The Pakatan government must be careful to ensure that they do not follow the path of those they criticised earlier. This kind of expense will not go down well with public, and will be used by opposition to attack government.