Posts Tagged ‘Politicians’

deputy minister interview on BTN

December 20th, 2009
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Below is excerpt of interview between Deputy Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department Datuk Ahmad Maslan and NST. I’m not sure how readers will interpret the replies by the deputy minister. It will be difficult to monitor thousands of the presenters or trainers involved in the camps, but it has to be done. I think the modules should be vetted by third party. And the presentation/explanation of the modules should be monitored. We also need to remember the participants are those who are dependent on the authorities (occupation or scholarship), so to expect them to openly question the presenters or content is difficult. One may only grumble in private, among friends.

Q: Feathers were ruffled by the labelling of non-Malays as pendatang. How could this have happened?

A: In the module, no one is labelled pendatang. But if the country’s history was taught, maybe it could have been mentioned. If the lecturer was talking about the past, then it’s different; that’s a historical context.

The social contract was drawn at that particular time when everyone agreed to it. That part takes up only five minutes of a two-hour session on Kenegaraan and Perlembagaan Negara.

That’s history, a small part of the whole story on how Malaysia was formed. It is an old episode. We have achieved independence. Indians and Chinese in Malaysia have become citizens.

Q: Why were BTN participants shown videos of the Hindu Rights Action Force (Hindraf) demonstration?

A: Videos were shown during intermissions to keep participants occupied as speakers sometimes arrive late.

The one on past demonstrations, which included the Hindraf protest, was among a few videos shown to instil patriotism in participants.

There are also videos on the war in Palestine and patriotic songs. When we show the street demonstration videos, our message is that we don’t do things like that if we’re patriotic.

We tell participants that there are other ways to solve a problem instead of taking to the streets.

Q: Are participants made to sign agreements forbidding them to divulge what went on in the course?

A: No. Participants are only not allowed to bring recording instruments into the classrooms.

Q: Why then are there BTN videos of Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, and how did they end up on YouTube?

A: I don’t know. I haven’t even seen the video. I don’t know whether cameras were allowed into the sessions in the past.

Q: Some participants have alleged that the BTN course is a form of political indoctrination, or the government’s brainwashing tool.

A: Sometimes, when we talk about the country’s policies, some people assume that’s indoctrination. But for us, as government agencies, we have been entrusted with this task to talk about policies.

So we have to explain the rationale behind policies, from corporatisation and privatisation to education, agriculture, youth and poverty eradication.

If we don’t explain these to the participants, when are we ever going to do so?

If they take that as indoctrination, that’s too bad.

Good news for Batu Estate residents

December 17th, 2009
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


This would be music to their ears. Deputy FT Minister Saravanan managed to get something right this time, so congrats to him.

These residents were promised houses when the area was supposed to be developed but end up labeled as squatters. And, as usual, its ex-estate land. No wonder nowadays, similar cases see lot of skepticism among the victims and demand for proper agreements.

AFTER three years of endless debate, the residents of Batu Estate in Jalan Segambut will finally receive due compensation and a low-cost flat unit each.

Developer Mayland Properties Sdn Bhd has offered RM2mil to the residents while the Kuala Lumpur City Hall (DBKL) has agreed to give them flat units nearby.

The agreement was reached during a meeting with Deputy Federal Territories and Urban Wellbeing Minister Datuk M. Saravanan at the DBKL headquarters at Jalan Raja Laut on Dec 16.

Saravanan said 48 families would receive the compensation while another 12 were still being investigated.

“Each of them will receive between RM20,000 and RM30,000 and a home from the DBKL either in Kepong or Jinjang as there are no vacancies at the Batu Muda flats,” he said.

The developer has also agreed to give a three-acre plot of land to the DBKL as compensation for the flat units DBKL has had to give out.

“DBKL does not usually give out flats to squatters on private land but because we have stepped in to help, the developer is giving us the land as compensation,” Saravanan added.

The squatters have been the subject of discussion for many months as a majority are former workers at the estate and had been promised houses in the area after the estate was developed.

Mayland is planning to build a fourth phase of apartments on the land after the residents have moved out.

MIC waiting for money for schools…

December 17th, 2009
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


At last, there’s some news on the allocation asked by MIC in order to complete the renovation of Tamil schools and construction of additional or replacement buildings for schools. The initial allocation of RM100 was deemed in sufficient due to escalation in material costs. There was a request for additional RM60 million, but according to news below, the request is for RM53 million. Not sure how much will be approved, since government is short of funds and even operating expenditure is being reduced by 10-15% next year.

MIC is awaiting clearance from the Finance Ministry on the party’s request for an additional allocation of RM53 million for the construction of new buildings in several Tamil schools, including the SJK (Tamil) Sungai Tok Pawang in Kedah’s Jerai constituency.

MIC president S Samy Vellu said at least RM1.6 million was needed to construct a new building for the SJK (Tamil) Sungai Tok Pawang on a piece of land reportedly already earmarked for the school.

“This project (SJK (Tamil) Sungai Tok Pawang) was supposed to have started some time back but because of the escalation in the construction cost of the Tamil schools, it had to be deferred along with several other (Tamil) schools,” he said in a statement today.

Samy Vellu was commenting on a Malaysiakini report today which said that despite a 5.5 acre land allocated by the Kedah state government last April for the SJK (Tamil) Sungai Tok Pawang, there was still no word on the construction of the building.

Samy Vellu said the request for the RM53 million extra allocation to cover the escalated construction cost from the original RM130 million allocated by the government, was made to Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak, who is also the finance minister when he chaired the special cabinet committee for the development of the Indian community recently.

He said the RM53 million additional allocation was “over and above” the RM100 million approved by Najib under the two economic stimulus packages and another RM30 million approved during Abdullah Ahmad Badawi’s tenure as prime minister.

“Once the additional allocation has been approved, work on the projects can start after tender processes are completed by the Public Works Department (PWD),” he said, adding that all allocations from the Finance Ministry would be channeled as usual through the PWD.

Samy Vellu said MIC had listed out many Tamil schools which required new buildings, and construction work would commence in stages, depending on the availability of funds from the Finance Ministry.

“The government has already rebuilt many Tamil schools over the years through MIC, and many more will be redeveloped,” he said.

He also said MIC was working with the Education Ministry to switch partially-aided Tamil schools into fully-aided schools.

I hope they update the list of schools, complete with the work done and costs. Photos will be great too. Is that part of some KPI for MIC?

The issue arose after news about SJKT Sg Tok Pawang school came to light. This school has been sharing compound with a national school for two decades:

Sekolah Kebangsaan Tok Pawang and Sekolah Jenis Kebangsaan Tamil Sg Tok Pawang share the same compound, but it’s a different story with the canteen.

SJK(T) pupils have been denied access to the canteen. This was decided by SK Tok Pawang teachers after frequent quarrels between the pupils of the two schools. [err..why not just adjust the break time so that it doesn’t clash?]

The SJK(T) PIBG then organised a makeshift canteen for the 170 Tamil school students at a corridor behind the building.

Students of both schools also do not share classrooms.

Twenty-three years ago the students of the Tamil school were accommodated at SK Tok Pawang after they had to abandon their own building due to pollution caused by the nearby Lee Rubber building.

The Tamil school received a new lease of life when the Kedah state government allocated 5.5 acres of land to build a new school on April 3 this year.

Menteri Besar Azizan Abdul Razak, accompanied by deputy P Ramasamy and the current state exco S Manikumar, attended the groundbreaking ceremony to a joyful atmosphere of excited schoolchildren and parents.

At the event, he said that the state government is giving the land to the school without any premium charge. They have also waived the assessment and the school needed to pay only a token sum of RM10 for the land.

This happened about eight months ago. The situation has not changed since then.

SJK (T) Tok Pawang students still share the school building with SK Tok Pawang pupils. There is no sign of a new building being built on the land that was given to the Tamil school.

Azizan had, at the groundbreaking ceremony, clearly indicated that the state government had done their job by giving the land.

It was now up to the school to negotiate with the Education Ministry to obtain the RM1.6 million needed to build the school.

Jerai MP Mohd Firdaus Jaafar said that now the ball was in MIC’s court to “pressure the minister (of education) at the federal level to make sure the building gets built.”

Balasingham, 35, says that he had been waiting for the school to be built since the day he left the school when he was 12.

His daughter now attends the school in Standard 1, but nothing has changed.

At the moment, students have no choice but to go about their familar routine of sharing the same compound and building, and having their meals under a a makeshift canteen.

Thus far, there is not even a hint of a new school building emerging on the land provided to them.

All you can see is the tractor used by the Kedah menteri besar during the groundbreaking ceremony. It sits forlornly by several oil palm trees, a sad reminder of what should have been.

Waytha, Public Enemy No 1

December 16th, 2009
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


This is serious allegation indeed. All along, I thought “Dadah” was “musuh negara”, but it seems BTN says its Waythamoorthy. Hmm…were the presentation materials screened? Is it standardised across all camps?

Hindraf is dead set against the National Civics Bureau (BTN) courses as it demonises the movement’s chairperson P Waythamoorthy in its modules as Public Enemy No 1.

It’s political wing, the Human Rights Party’s pro-tem secretary-general P Uthayakumar alleged that the Nov 25, 2007 Hindraf protests are screened at BTN courses, and an image of Waythamoorthy is shown, captioned as ‘musuh utama negara’ (public enemy number one).

Meanwhile, DAP’s Kota Alam Shah assemblyperson, M Manoharan said he feared for Indian Malaysians as BTN trainees have systematically implemented Umno’s racist, religious and supremacist policies.

“The standard operating procedure is to implement (what is) taught at BTN courses. They are attemping to portray Indians as dangerous and violent people,” said Manoharan.

PAS cannot compromise on its position

December 16th, 2009
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


I really can’t see how DAP and PAS can work together. Its still OK now since they are not the ruling coalition. But for how long this will remain status quo? If one cannot compromise, then its left to the other. Would DAP drop its Malaysia for Malaysian idea? Would it accept a middle path of one country two laws?

I don’t like the idea of an Islamic state. Its a bad, bad, idea to run a country according to a specific religion especially when the population is nearly equally divided. It may have been practical 1500 years ago, but not now. The leaders now are not as good as those in the history books. This would only lead to disaster as rights can be usurped, laws can be misinterpreted, rules dictated according to one faction.

Today the Tok Guru is around, so things can still be talked and negotiated. What if later some Taliban-style leaders lead the party? We can easily end up like Pakistan, Afghanistan, Iran, Iraq, or other Islamic countries that have loads internal problems.

PAS is immovable on its stance, same as DAP on its stance. Both opposite sides of the pole. This is a dead end.


Within Pakatan Rakyat, there is frequent objection to issues like hudud law or the Islamic state. How far is PAS willing to compromise? For example, DAP usually has a different opinion on these issues.

No man can have it easy all the time. Some times we fall ill. Even doctors fall ill. God has created the world this way – there are angels and demons, good and bad, heaven and earth. As Muslims, we live by the teachings of the Prophet. When someone is lazy, we preach about diligence. They then become hard-working. Cowards are told tales of bravery. They become brave. The wayward are taught about the pious (and) become religious.

There is no need (to quarrel). Say what you want, but listen to our reply. Don’t make accusations and (then) when I reply, you don’t listen. Tak boleh! (This won’t do). Islam means you should ask questions. If you don’t understand (our policies), ask.

So you mean that PAS cannot compromise on its position on hudud law and the Islamic state?

How can we compromise? This is our ibadat (religious obligation). If we reject the meaning of Islam, we are rejecting our ibadat. God created man to follow ibadat, which is not restricted to just praying.

So how will PAS go about this? Some younger people in DAP can accept PAS, but veterans like national chairperson Karpal Singh, are more adamant about the party’s secular position.

Tidak apa (It is no big deal). Karpal Singh is someone very senior. Sometimes, when people kacau (agitate) us, we have to look at them first. Sometimes, we look at them at say, ‘Let him be. He is old. Let’s respect him’.

People who speak like Karpal Singh are getting fewer. He is a watak lama (old player).

So Tok Guru, you are willing to talk…

Yes. We can discuss. I like it very much when people ask me questions. If I can answer, I will. If the topic is beyond me, I will ask the person to ask someone else.