Posts Tagged ‘Politicians’

YB Manoharan’s seven motions for Indian community

August 29th, 2011
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


The seven motions:

1. Felda-like scheme involving 2000 acres of land for 200 hardcore families.

2. RM10 million fund to be set up to assist Indians in small and medium enterprises.

3. set up an Indian affairs bureau under the purview of the menteri besar.

4. at least 10 acres of land for all Tamil and Chinese schools in the state.

5. renaming Jalan Barat in Petaling Jaya to Jalan V David to commemorate the late unionist.

6. seven percent discount for all poor Malaysians who are purchasing homes from the Selangor State Development Corporation (PKNS).

7. “no demolition” order or shifting of temples erected in the state before 2008.

Number 7 was accepted with a modification:  no demolition or shifting a temple without the approval of the executive council in charge.

Motion number 1 is difficult due to land scarcity, but I believe Selangor still got plenty of land outside Klang Valley which can be utilised for agriculture. The state government can even consider reserving certain percentage for the poor Indians in any schemes being implemented/planned.

Motion 2 is not a big problem. Can easily be set up.

Motion 3 is even easier.

Motion 4 is noble indeed. Must be supported.

Motion 5, well, not exactly top of my list. Can even consider naming some of the new projects being done by the state government instead of renaming, if its an hassle.

Motion 6, totally agree. Not sure if anyone in the right mind will disagree to this.

Motion 7, as it has been amended, we can hold the executive councillor in charge responsible if any demolition happens.

Out of the 7, 3 are outright motions to help Indian community, while the other 4 are mixed or of no direct help.

Gotta agree with the YB, this kind of motion was unheard of before this. I hope its retabled and let’s see how the state government responds.

I’m not sure what the senator Barat Maniam meant by saying that MIC representatives will support the motion if BN wins Selangor. Someone need to table the motion FIRST, before you can support it. So, would MIC representatives make promise to table such a motion?

 

Just days after Pakatan Rakyat lawmakers conceded that the opposition pact, which rode to victory in five states on the wave of Indian support in 2008, had failed the community, a legislator revealed that several motions beneficial to Indians had been dismissed by the Selangor State Legislative Assembly.

According to Kota Alam Shah state assemblyman M Manoharan, the assembly has dismissed seven motions which he had tabled in July.

He said if the motions had been passed and become law, not only would the Indians have benefited but all the poor in Selangor would have also found reprieve.

Explaining the motions, Manoharan said he had moved for a Felda-like scheme involving 2,000 acres of land to be set up for 200 hardcore Indian poor in Selangor.

He had also moved for a RM10 million fund to be set up to assist Indians in small and medium enterpries in the state.

“I also tabled a motion to set up an Indian affairs bureau under the purview of the menteri besar and asked for at least 10 acres of land for all Tamil and Chinese schools in the state,” he said.

The other three motions he had tabled were renaming Jalan Barat in Petaling Jaya to Jalan V David to commemorate the late unionist, a seven percent discount for all poor Malaysians who are purchasing homes from the Selangor State Development Corporation (PKNS) and a “no demolition” order or shifting of temples erected in the state before 2008.

“But the only motion that was accepted by the assembly was the temple order.

“But that too they (Pakatan lawmakers) tweaked to read no demolition or shifting a temple without the approval of the executive council in charge,” said Manoharan, who added that he will again table the same motions in October sitting of the assembly.

Land and housing

Manoharan, who was upset with the dismissal of his bids, said it was “high-time Indians enjoyed the benefits denied to them since Independence”.

“About one-third of the entire Indian population in Malaysia lives in Selangor.

“If the motions had been passed and become law, they would not only help Indians but also all those who are poor in the state.

“I asked for the land so that we can teach the Indian community to cultivate it for agriculture or livestock.

“This would also empower our youths and deter them from joining criminal activities,” said Manoharan,who is from the DAP.

On the housing issue, he said owning a house was a basic necessity for everyone.

He added that PKNS was in a position to assist Indians and the low-income earner acquire homes.

“PKNS is an established property company and it makes money from its housing projects.

“Surely, it can help our low-income people by offering discount.

“Besides, the Menteri Besar (Khalid Ibrahim) is the chairman of the government-linked agency and he can monitor it directly,” said Manoharan.

Malay votes

Asked why the other Pakatan state assemblymen refused to support his motion, Manoharan said it could be due to fear of losing Malay votes.

However, he added that even the Malay assemblymen were aware that the Indians were left behind in many areas.

“Some lawmakers did come to me after the state assembly meeting and said my ideas were good.

“But when I asked why they didn’t support it then, they kept mum,” he said.

However, Manoharan stopped short of criticising the Pakatan state government, saying the assemblymen now enjoyed more freedom to table their motions unlike in the previous state government.

“The Indian representatives then would not even dare to table such motions.

“I must thank our current speaker (Teng Chang Khim) for allowing more freedom in the assembly.

“And I am going to table the motions again in the next state assembly sitting in October. I’m confident my fellow Pakatan assemblymen will support me,” said Manoharan.

‘Good ideas’

Meanwhile, newly appointed Senator V Subramaniam, however, supports Manoharan’s motions, saying the ideas “were good”.

Subramaniam, however, conceded that allocating 10 acres for Tamil schools in Selangor would be tough as some schools were located in densely populated areas like Petaling Jaya where land is scarce.

“However, the rest of the motions are good. The (state assembly’s) rejection shows that Pakatan is not sincere in helping the Indians despite riding high on the community’s votes in 2008,” said Subramaniam, who is better known as Barat Maniam.

Subramaniam, who is Petaling Jaya MIC’s division chief, said if BN wins Selangor in the next polls, MIC representatives will support the motion to improve the Indians’ lot in the state.

“The ideas are in line with the 1Malaysia concept. If we win in the next polls, we will look out for the welfare of all Malaysians.

“Besides, that is why we are elected into the post,” he said.

Last week, Indian DAP leaders conceded that the opposition pact had failed the community after having a closed-door meeting involving 50 DAP members, including lawmakers.

One DAP member said that Pakatan is doing “another BN” for Indians in Selangor, Penang and Kedah.

Among those present at the meeting were DAP national vice-chairman and Ipoh Barat MP M Kulasegaran, Penang DAP deputy chairman and deputy Chief Minister II P Ramasamy, Perak DAP deputy chairman and Tronoh assemblyman V Sivakumar, Perak DAP vice-chairman and Sungkai assemblyman A Sivanesan and former ISA detainee V Ganapathirau.

source: http://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/2011/08/29/sgor-rejected-motions-to-improve-indians-lot/

4 Malaysian Indian ministers?

August 18th, 2011
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Personally, I think this will backfire on Dr Xavier. As pointed out in the article below, even in Selangor, there’s only 1 EXCO, while PKR claims not to follow raced-based appointments. So Dr Xavier’s statement is contradictory. I think whoever forms the government should focus on consolidating and run a lean government that reduces unnecessary expenses, not simply create more positions.

What’s the point of having many  ministers? MIC President appointed as Minister on 9th August, but no portfolio till today.  Isn’t that embarrassing?

 

MIC secretary-general S Murugesan has dismissed a claim that Pakatan Rakyat will appoint four Cabinet ministers should it form goverment as an empty promise.

He was responding to Selangor state exco Dr Xavier Jeyakumar’s statement which appeared in the Malaysian Nanban Tamil daily today.

Murugesan believes that Pakatan was caught in a bind after the recent appointment of MIC president G Palanivel as a minister.

“So they are attempting to confuse the Indian community by claiming that Pakatan will appoint four Indian ministers,” he told FMT.

Xavier, the Seri Andalas assemblyman, also slammed MIC for the woes faced by the Indian community.

In view of this, the PKR leader said the community had little to rejoice about Palanivel’s appointment.

Meanwhile, Murugesan asked why the Selangor state government only had one Indian exco instead of two for the benefit of the community.

When the state itself refused to give an additional portfolio to an Indian leader, he said, Pakatan would definitely not appoint four federal ministers if it seized power at the federal level.

Who is he in Pakatan?

 MIC CWC member KP Samy also lashed out at Jeyakumar over his ‘empty talk’.

“Who is he in Pakatan Rakyat to give such an assurance? He even failed to get a strong support in his own (PKR) division elections.

“Forget appointing four ministers. How about making an immediate appointment of another Indian exco member in Selangor? Can he do that?” asked Samy.

He also challenged Jeyakumar to appoint more Indians to state-owned companies and subsidies first before talking about ministerial appointments.

‘Ask Anwar to say it’

Also taking Jeyakumar to task was former PKR leader S Kotappan, who challenged the exco to get his boss Anwar Ibrahim to publicly state that four Indian ministers would be appointed.

He alleged that the PKR leader’s statement was made due to a personal agenda since he was expected to contest in a Parliament seat in the next polls.

It is learnt that there would be a swap with Kapar MP S Manikavasagam, who would vie for the state assembly seat and be made exco if he wins.

“Recently, in Johor, Jeyakumar challenged Palanivel that he will stand against the MIC president in the general election. So it is clear that he is aiming for a MP seat,” said Kotappan.

He claimed that Jeyakumar was now eyeing a federal post if Pakatan takes over Putrajaya.

source: http://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/2011/08/18/mic-scoffs-at-pakatans-4-indian-ministers/

82 low enrolment Tamil schools to be relocated

July 21st, 2011
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


This is the kind of news that we want to hear. Hope it becomes a reality and not kept being pushed to later, later, later dates… If MOE doesn’t allocate funds, then its next to impossible to relocate schools. May take another 50 years. The authorities and those in powers must be proactive to identify locations suitable for relocation. Must engage housing developers, plantation owners and the rich people (can start with the anonymous businessman who bought at RM14 billion yacht?) to get support. Enlist help of established NGOs like Tamil Foundation, MCEF, EWRF.

Relocation must consider future population growth and have ample space for field, labs, classrooms etc.

Oh, btw, those involved must not swindle land or money or allocate projects to cronies and party men.

 

Eighty-two Tamil schools with fewer than 25 pupils each will be relocated to suitable locations to benefit more children of the Indian community.

MIC deputy president Datuk Dr S. Subramaniam said 69 of the schools had fewer than 25 pupils each while the other 13 had fewer than 10.

Most of the schools are located in estates where the population has declined after many workers moved to new housing areas, he told reporters after laying the foundation stone of SJK (T) Merlimau’s new building yesterday.

The new RM6.3mil building will be built on a two-hectare site. It is expected to be completed by 2013.

Dr Subramaniam said the relocation of the schools would be done in stages depending on the allocation provided by the Education Ministry. — Bernama

 

http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2011/7/12/nation/9080945&sec=nation

MIC resolutions at recent convention

July 20th, 2011
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Similar stuff since I started going to school. Every AGM or general assembly will have similar requests – special units/agencies, convert Tamil schools status, more allocation for PNB shares, more places in public service, more airtime for Tamil programs, more allocation for entrepreneurs, public holiday for Thaipusam, and so on. Some were successful, others not. Let’s see if this one succeeds.

 

The MIC has asked the Government to set up units in several departments to resolve the problems of the Indian community.

Party deputy president Datuk Dr S. Subramaniam said this was necessary as the Government’s delivery mechanism was too slow in coping with the increasing problems of the community.

Dr Subramaniam, who is also Human Resources Minister, said the party had briefed Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak on the MIC request.

One request is to set up an agency in the Finance Ministry to increase the participation of Indians in the national economy, Dr Subramaniam said after opening the joint MIC Youth, Wanita, Puteri and Putera convention here yesterday.

In his speech, he told the four wings to reach out to professionals, the business community and university students.

“These people have distanced themselves from the party and have now become our biggest critics. If we can convince them, they will become our biggest supporters.”

“We must also have expert groups and knowledge squads to collect and disseminate information on Government projects and programmes to the ground,” he said.

In a resolution passed at the end of the MIC Youth assembly, the movement requested the Government appoint an Indian officer in ministries to handle the community’s affairs.

It was among nine resolutions approved at the meeting, which also included a call for stern legal action against Perkasa president Datuk Ibrahim Ali who had allegedly made racially-biased statements.

The wing also called for increased alllocations for the improvement of the 523 Tamil schools in the country as well as a religious department to handle non-Muslim affairs.

It also asked for an additional Cabinet post as well as a seat in the Pahang state executive council for the MIC.

source: http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2011/7/18/nation/9120795&sec=nation

No support for ADUN Manoharan’s housing discount motion

July 20th, 2011
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Why the own coalition members did not support this motion? Should ADUN Manoharan modify his motion to include Chinese and Lain-lain as well?

 

KOTA Alam Shah state assemblyman M. Manoharan tried to move a motion at the Selangor State Assembly on Thursday to give a 7% discount on PKNS houses bought by Indians.

He said this was aimed at undoing the injustices of the previous Barisan Nasional government and also the Pakatan Rakyat state government because of the non-implementation of the Estate Workers Housing Scheme 1974, reported Tamil Nesan.

His motion was not supported by the 35 PKR, DAP and PAS state assemblymen, including the 12 Indian representatives.

source: http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2011/7/19/nation/9124854&sec=nation