Posts Tagged ‘Protest’

SPM limit saga continues

December 2nd, 2009
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Education Ministry says:

The Education Ministry is staying firm with its decision to limit the number of subjects Sijil Pelajaran Malaysia candidates may take to 10.

The ministry has no plans to make special provision for SPM candidates wishing to take additional vernacular subjects.

Education director-general Tan Sri Alimuddin Mohd Dom said the 10-subject limit was a cabinet policy that could not be changed at this point. [which Dr Subra is a member of. Maybe the cabinet members not agreeable with his arguments]

He said schools where such vernacular subjects were taught could take the initiative to issue special certificates to students who took school examinations in vernacular subjects, for Form Five school leavers. [initiative? This guy must be joking!]

Alimuddin told the New Straits Times that these certificates could be produced by students when they wished to apply for jobs requiring proficiency in a vernacular subject. [Would employers accept it? Maybe need to have 3rd party certification?]

He said otherwise the students could use the school report cards which also show their proficiency in the vernacular subject. [but it won’t be standardised]

And thus the call for centralized coordination:

Schools which want to offer the vernacular language examinations for students unable to take these subjects at the Sijil Pelajaran Malaysia (SPM) level must be centrally coordinated to ensure standards.

Principal research fellow at the Institute of Ethnic Studies in Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Datuk Dr Denison Jayasooria said the Education Ministry must be in charge of this.

“The learning of community languages is our heritage and should be encouraged especially in line with 1Malaysia,” he said.

National Collaborative Parent-Teacher Association of Malaysia president Assoc Prof Datuk Mohd Ali Hasan said an agency within the ministry such as the Malaysian Examinations Syndicate (MES) should set the guidelines for these examinations.“The MES has to monitor the examinations set by schools to ensure quality as there would be no standardisation if all schools were to set their own papers,” he said.

… United Chinese School Committees Association of Malaysia (Dong Zong) deputy chairman Chow Siew Hon said he disagreed with the suggestion as there would be no standardisation and consistency if schools came up with their own exams to evaluate students.

“My concern does not just revolve around the future of Chinese and Tamil languages but also how the ruling to limit students to taking only 10 subjects for SPM would affect students’ learning and decision when selecting the SPM subjects for the courses that they want to pursue at tertiary level,” he said.

But Dr Ramasamy was more direct:

Education director-general Alimuddin Mohd Dom has been told to resign over his failure to find an amicable solution to the ’10 subject’ Sijil Pelajaran Malaysia examination controversy.

Penang Deputy Chief Minister 2 P Ramasamy slammed Alimuddin for suggesting the ‘bizarre’ idea for schools to draw up their own vernacular language examinations to overcome the hindrance to students caused by the 10-subject SPM cap.

Yesterday, Alimuddin said schools can conduct their own examinations on respective vernacular language subjects and issue certificates to the students to acknowledge their level of proficiency.

Commenting on this, Ramasamy said: “He is not listening to the people’s views and opinions.”

“He is trying to bulldoze an examination policy that would kill vernacular subjects from the country’s schooling system.

“He is incompetent and insensitive over the education needs of all Malaysians. He is not fit to head such an important portfolio,” he told reporters at the Penang state assembly.

Ramasamy plans to table a motion at the ongoing assembly sitting to pass a resolution calling on the federal government to scrap the 10-subject cap and increase it to minimum 12-subject cap.

He said only a minimum 12-subject cap would enable Indian and Chinese students to sit for their vernacular language and literature subjects for SPM.

He said the 10-subject grand plan would first discourage students from taking up their mother tongue subjects at the secondary and tertiary levels, which ultimately would create a severe shortage of teachers in vernacular schools.

Eventually, he said vernacular schools, including 534 existing Tamil schools, would have to close down due to dearth of teachers.

“The 10-subject magical formula is damaging to the Indian and Chinese communities. It’s an Umno grand plan to banish Tamil and Mandarin in the country,” added the former university lecturer.

Over the last 10 years, he said students taking up Tamil language and literature subjects for SPM have gone up, from 340 in 1998 to 4,391 in 2008. [can verify this or not?]

“It shows the interests of students to learn their own mother tongue has gone up,” he said.

More than 20 national Indian non-government organisations (NGOs) have already planned to stage a protest on Dec 12 at the Wisma Peladang in Petaling Jaya against the ministry’s attempt to introduce the 10-subject SPM formula.

Ramasamy welcomed the rally and hinted he would take part in it.

“Indians definitely need to hold a major protest against this infringement of our language rights,” he said.

Oh ya, MIC Youth submitted memorandum protesting the limit to DPM today.

MMSP faces crisis

December 2nd, 2009
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Looks like Malaysian Makkal Sakthi Party is facing its first internal crisis, barely 3 months after its launching by PM Najib.  Similar to MIC, MCA, PPP, and IPF, the issue is related to the top leadership. The other leaders are claiming that he’s high-handed, dictatorial, and so on. Demand is there for him to resign. Well, it may be the end of MMSP which tried to ride on Hindraf and Makkal Sakthi tags.

I guess MMSP has served its purpose to jolt MIC into some sort of action.

Launched just two months ago by Datuk Seri Najib Razak, the Makkal Sakti party, one of a host of disparate political parties formed from what remained of the Hindraf movement, is now in turmoil with a majority of its leaders calling for its president R S Thanenthiran to quit with immediate effect.

The group of dissidents, led by deputy president A Vathemurthy is claiming the backing of more than 15 out of the 27 central committee members.

“We want Thanenthiran to relinquish the presidency. A motion to remove him was supposed to have been discussed today but the central committee meeting was cancelled at the last minute,” said Vathemurthy at a press conference here.

The central committee was supposed to meet tonight, but party secretary-general R Kannan issued a notice to cancel the meeting today.

The newly formed Makkal Sakti Party, which Prime Minister Najib is hoping will help him win over the Tamil working class, appears now to be in a major split over what some senior party leaders say is “the Samy Vellu-style, dictatorial” tendencies of president Thanenthiran.

The rebels have accused Thanenthiran of high-handedness and failing to share decision making with other senior leaders.

The senior leaders had requested an emergency general meeting for today.

The party, which was formed in May this year, launched by Najib on Oct 10 and largely considered as an alternative political party to the Indian community. MIC had expressed its objection, saying that the formation of Makkal Sakti would split the Indian community further.

Vathemurthy said that majority of CC members and ordinary members have absolutely no confidence in the leadership of Thanenthiran “ … and think that his continued presence as president is a severe threat to the stability, progress and future of our newly-formed Malaysia Makkal Sakti Party and the larger interest of Malaysian Indians.”

About 12 members of CC that he claimed were supporting him on this issue attended the press conference today.

He added that they were extremely unhappy to note that, without any prior notice and their approval, the Secretary General has yesterday unilaterally decided to postpone the said meeting of the CC fixed for this evening.

“We have taken legal advice and believe that this conduct of the Secretary General is illegal and very unfair to us,” he said.

He claimed that Thanenthiran had been “absolutely derelict and careless” and had shown no signs of effective leadership, thereby causing the party to be split into two factions.

“He runs the party as a one-man show, with the association of his family members and relatives as CC members,” he said.

Thanenthiran’s brother is also one of the party’s vice presidents.

The deputy president also claimed that Thanenthiran was not transparent and accountable in his financial dealings.

“We asked him how much money was collected and the source, but he ignored us and said that we should not ask him such questions. So where is the element of democracy in the party that we fighting for?” he said.

He also asked the Prime Minister and all parties to disengage from any dealings with Thanenthiran.

“As the matter deserves serious attention, we will explore all avenues to save our party.

“In this interim, we make a sincere plea to our Prime Minister and all parties to disengage from any dealings with Thanenthiran as it will not be in the interest of our party,” said Vathemurthy, who stressed that his group will remain in the party.

Asked about his next move, Vathemurthy said that he would ask for another CC meting soon.

“We will give them another chance to discuss the agenda. Then we will move from there,” he said and added that they would appoint someone either from inside the party or even an outsider as the new president.

However, he declined to reveal any more.

More BTN stories

December 2nd, 2009
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Interviews (1 and 2) from Malaysiakini below. Its similar to what I have heard from reliable friends too.

‘We were shown a picture of Anwar Ibrahim with an American. The instructor told us that he is a traitor to the country as he had a good relationship with the Americans.’
This was among the issues raised during a nation building programme carried out by Biro Tatanegara or the National Civics Bureau, recalled fourth year economics student Fakhrul Zaki Fazial.

Fakhrul, who is studying in Universiti Islam Antarabangsa (UIA), said the focus of the talks is on the Malay race.

“They (the instructors) also criticise leaders from the opposition and consider their criticism as being patriotic,” he added.

Universiti Malaya student leader Mohd Ridzuan Mohammad, who attended the BTN programme in 2004, said there were even talks about other races being a threat to the Malays.

“It is not the right thing to do for BTN to play up racial sentiments… that will create racial rift…(as) this programme could influence some students (into accepting the propagation of racist ideologies),” he added.

Chin Shin Liang, a former Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM) student who attended a BTN course in December 2008, related his experience.

“We were shown video clips of the Bersih rally and then pictures of war-torn Palestine with a caption; Is this what we want?…we were also shown an (unidentified) protester throwing stones.”

‘Promoting blind obedience’

Describing it as “incredibly biased”, Chin said: “It does not show who the stone thrower is, probably a Mat Rempit who decided to join the fun or how the police provoked the protesters with a water canon in the first place.”

He said the instructors also taught that the BN government is chosen by the people and therefore is the legitimate government while making no attempt to distinguish the political party and the government.

The instructors, he said, also suggested that all government agencies should serve BN and be careful of any requests from the opposition which is trying to topple the government.

“This is very misleading, because as a rule, government agencies should be neutral and serve the country as a whole (not just a particular party/coalition),” he added.

It is as if the course is suggesting that the BN government ‘represents’ the country and should be blindly obeyed without question, he noted.

Meanwhile, Fakhrul expressed doubts over BTN’s choice of instructors.

“I feel that some of the instructors were not qualified because they were very emotional and not intellectual in their presentations.

“If students disagreed with their viewpoint, they would be scolded in front of everyone,” he said.

‘BTN taught us mutual respect’

Brickbats aside, there are some quarters who felt that BTN courses have been unfairly targeted.

Yesterday, a group calling itself ‘ex-BTN graduates’ held a press conference in Kuala Lumpur to air their views.

“We feel it is our social responsibility to correct the lopsided views about BTN courses,” said its leader Ahmad Shafei Ahmad Hanbali (left).

He denied that the modules sowed seeds of hatred towards other races. “BTN taught us how to mutually respect the rights of other races as spelt out in the constitution.”

“It is not fair to say that BTN tries to create division when it is only teaching the country’s official history,” he said.

On the allegation that BTN is a propaganda tool of BN, Ahmad Shafei alluded that there was nothing wrong with teaching obedience to the sitting government.

“In a mature democracy, those who lost, even by one vote, must respect those who have won and the victory that the majority of the rakyat has given to the victors,” he said.

Also coming to the defence of BTN was Majlis Gabungan NGO Pembela Negara (Magaran) legal adviser, Mohd Khairul Azam Abdul Aziz.

He said everything that is taught in BTN courses follows what is spelt out in the constitution.

He explained that the special position of the Malays, Bahasa Melayu and Islam is clearly mentioned in articles like 152 and 153 of the constitution.

Mohd Khairul, who claims to be a BTN graduate himself, said “these are facts, not opinions.”

ISO certification

As for allegations of facts, issues and images being manipulated and misrepresented, he explained: “These images and issue are not uncommon even outside BTN, these are usual fare in blogs, publications and other sources. Every fact, image and issue shown or mentioned is credited to sources.”

“Participants can think for themselves, BTN is just exercising freedom of speech. I think that the use of those images are appropriate (in order to highlight certain matters).”

Asked about the problem some graduates have with instructors, Mohd Khairul said: “Report the wrongdoings of the instructors and BTN will address the problem. Don’t reject BTN totally.”

In 2008, BTN was apparently awarded ISO certification by Sirim for its courses.

However, concerned parties have pointed out that Sirim’s endorsement only confirms BTN’s ability to deliver the training on a consistent basis, not an endorsement of the course contents.

Commenting on this, Tenaganita director Irene Fernandez asked whether the authorities who issued the certification are “conscious of the seditious and racially inflammatory nature of the curriculum”.

Student council representatives from several public universities are opposed to the controversial Biro Tatanegara (BTN) courses which is a requirement at campuses.

Universiti Malaya Students Council president, Mohd Ridzuan Mohammad, said only four out of 41 council members who have been asked to attend the course chose to do so.

“I made it optional for members as I felt the course was unsuitable. It incites racial sentiments and does not help provide better representation to the student body,” he said.

The council received an official letter from the Ministry of Higher Education, via UM’s student affairs department, saying it was compulsory for council members.

Ridzuan, who had attended a BTN course in his first year, said his decision to make it optional had “angered” assistant vice chancellor of student affairs, Azarae Idris, who threatened disciplinary action.

However, he said, Azarae withdrew his threat after Ridzuan made his case in a meeting with the vice chancellor after the BTN course in April earlier in the year.

Ridzuan’s defense was that pro-opposition student leaders were depicted negatively at a BTN course held in Kuala Terengganu.

He said the incident where a pig’s head was thrown into a surau in UM was used to tarnish the image of pro-opposition student leaders.

“The course is run over three days, which I think can be better spent on looking after the welfare of the students on campus,” he said.

When contacted, neither Azrae nor senior officers at the student affairs department were available for comment.

Compulsory for Islamic studies students

At University Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), student council member Hisyamuddin Che Ali said most chose not to attend despite warnings from the student affairs department.

“We received calls from the student affairs department almost everyday to pressure us to go,” he said.

Thus far no action has been taken on those who did not attend, as it is not compulsory for most UKM students.

The course, however, is a must for Faculty of Islamic Studies students. Unhappy at being singled out, the faculty’s mostly Muslim students protested to the vice chancellor.

“They too, complained that racial sentiments were fanned at BTN courses…for example, they were told that the Chinese are lording over the country,” said Hisyamuddin.

Other complaints included the inciting of political sentiments and the fact that male and female participants were not segregated during the activities.

Hisyamuddin said the student affairs department responded by saying that they were merely acting on the instructions of the Ministry of Higher Education.

‘It all depends on the facilitators’

On the other end of the spectrum, a former UUM student council president said that he had encouraged council members to attend BTN course.

Nur Mohd Saifuddin Salahuddin said that 25 of the 36-member student council members attended the course.

“It’s good for team-building,” he said, adding that the courses were optional for UUM students despite rumours that those who did not go would not be allowed to graduate.

Saifuddin, who has attended several BTN courses, said the benefits outweighed negative perceptions, and that the modules mostly concentrated on historical facts.

“Whether or not BTN is an indoctrination camp depends on the facilitator, as some facilitators choose to focus on politics,” said the member of the Pro-Aspirasi faction.

Pro-Aspirasi is commonly known to be a pro-Barisan Nasional government group in campus politics.

Saifuddin said that out of the 20 to 30 facilitators present at the BTN courses which he attended, only one or two made their political leanings obvious.

“I had even provoked a facilitator, calling him an ‘Umno man’, but he told me that it was a requirement for BTN facilitators to not be members of any political party,” he said.

‘Steer clear of politics’

Despite supporting the ISO-certified BTN, Saifuddin felt BTN courses should be clear of political influences, and use history instead of current events, as a teaching reference,

“I do not agree with some facilitators who try to convince those with different political leanings by stating ‘fact’ after ‘fact’.

“If they must relate the modules to current events, at the very least they should stay neutral and not be so partial to the ruling government,” he said.

He also said that the BTN courses should be more transparent, to ensure that the public understands what takes place.

Currently, all participants are asked to surrender cameras, mobile phones and all other recording devices.

This is not the case in Selangor’s BTN equivalent SPIES where students taking part are allowed to bring along recording devices and best of all, the course is not compulsory.

“It popular because the facilitators are qualified and the activities are fun and beneficial,” said Universiti Selangor student council president Wan Azraei Wan Husin.

Wan Azraei said the course includes the history of political parties, motivational speeches, spiritual lessons and outdoor activities like white water rafting, something also included in BTN course modules.

Salary of estate worker

December 1st, 2009
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


I’m sure readers are familiar with the recent spat between Plantation Industries and Commodities Minister Bernard Dompok and PSM over the salary of estate workers. It was started by Dompok who said that plantation workers like rubber tappers and oil palm harvesters earn more than the monthly poverty level amount, even quoting RM1700 per month for one category of workers. This was disputed by the Parti Sosialis Malaysia and JERIT. Dompok is even threatening to sue the challengers. But we need to remember that poverty line is for family income, not individual (Dompok compared wrongly in the first place because he took a person’s salary and compared with family poverty income level). This was even pointed out by the Deputy Minister after MK published pay slips of two people:

Malaysiakini had published two pay slips of plantation workers which showed that they were earning below the poverty line which is set at RM720 a month.

Hamzah, upset over statements from representatives of the plantation workers, asked for the news report to be retracted.

He claimed that this had to be done ‘as its objective was to ruin the dignity of the government and his ministry in particular’.

Hamzah (right) said a probe was done on the persons of whose pay slips were published and it was discovered that they were women who were employed as common workers at an oil palm plantation in Sungai Siput. They earned RM21.30 per day.

“Usually, common workers are women who are involved in fertilising and removing weeds (in the plantations). Mostly, they are wives of workers employed for other duties.

“Generally, the accumulated salary of both husband and wife is more than RM1,200 a month, which is above the poverty line,” said Hamzah.

According to him, oil palm fruit harvesters earn from RM26 to RM60 a day, depending on their productivity.

The wages, he said, were based on the ‘productivity-linked wage system’ (PLWS) which was adopted in the collective agreement between the Malayan Agricultural Producers Association (Mapa) and the National Union of Plantation Workers (NUPW).

“At the level of crude palm oil being priced at RM1,200 per tonne, when a harvester produces 38 tonnes a month, he will get RM844.

“At the level of crude palm oil being priced at RM2,000 per tonne, the harvester’s income is RM1,292.16 a month,” said Hamzah.

Therefore, that it was not ‘an impossible task and it is not a lie’ to say that an oil palm plantation worker could earn up to RM1,700 a month. [ah, not impossible, theoretically. why not produce payslips of workers (say 100 workers) who actually got such salaries? Its not that difficult, is it?]

“Especially workers who are productive and are able to produce three tonne bunches of oil palm fruits a day or 78 tonne of bunches of oil palm fruits a month,” said Hamzah.

Today, PSM provided some info and proof by showing salary slip of workers. Its shocking to say the least! Agreed, its just few workers, so may not really represent the whole sector. But I think HR Ministry, NUPW etc have done a survey on this before. What does it say? I also remember reading that many of the plantation workers are actually foreigners since locals shun these jobs.

The salary may be tied to productivity. Maybe it was low season so not much work or product. In the example below, the guy earns less than RM200 per month and has 8 kids. Not a good example for PSM.  While Dompok is most likely wrong in his assessment, the workers also need to play a part and not make their own lives more difficult. If  8 kids, RM10,000 also not enough in this age!

Many plantation workers in Perak, including foreigners, are being exploited and fleeced by estate managements who charge them exorbitant amounts for electricity and water supply.
Parti Sosialis Malaysia (PSM) state coordinator M Sugumaran told Malaysiakini today that estates are charged industrial rates for both the supply of water and electricity.

According to him, Tenaga Nasional Bhd (TNB) bills the estates on a monthly basis whereas the Perak Water Board (LAP) serves them with a bimonthly bill.

Sugumaran said the management could afford to charge domestic rates as the workers are occupying housing areas inside the estate but a recent survey painted a grim picture.

The survey of the working conditions of plantation workers in about 50 estates revealed that they are not only paid low wages but are also charged high electricity and water rates.

“The average gross daily salary for a plantation worker is RM21.10, inclusive of other benefits and allowances. The management deducts RM50 per person per month for utilities.

“There are about five to six foreign workers sharing a room and RM50 is deducted as electricity charges in their salary slips,” a shocked Sugumaran said.

“You mean to say that the electricity charge for a room in an estate comes to about RM300 monthly?” he asked.

Worker’s monthly salary of RM145

Earlier at a press conference, Sugumaran brought 15 plantation workers from Sungai Siput and Bagan Serai and displayed their monthly pay slips to disprove a claim made recently.

Plantation Industries and Commodities Minister Bernard Dompok (left) had stated in Parliament that rubber tappers earn RM870 monthly while plantation workers earn RM1,700.

Sugumaran welcomed the threat by Dompok to sue PSM for refuting his claims and calling him a liar as PSM have documentary evidence to prove the minister wrong.

“Dompok, instead of making statements in the comfort of Parliament, should come down and see the harsh realities of the sufferings of the plantation workers,” said Sugumaran.

Salleh Saari, 44, a plantation worker with eight children from Ladang Gedong in Bagan Serai, provided the press copies of his September and October 2009 salary slips.

His September 2009 salary slip showed that his net take home pay was a mere RM145.94. His gross earning was RM543.36 while his total deductions came to RM397.42.

Deductions were for his two-room estate home, water bill amounting to RM23.40 and electricity at RM85.27.

For October 2009, Salleh had to pay RM35 for water charges and RM93 for electricity usage. “Even a bungalow utilities charges would not be as high as mine,” said Salleh.

His gross October salary was RM381 and his net income after deductions showed RM181.

“How am I to feed my family of eight children? ” he asked, bursting into tears.

All this is going to be rendered academic, because we all know the poverty line is a joke. Good thing government is updating the line to something more sane. I think in rural area it should RM1000 to RM1500 per family of four.

Leaving that issue aside, this is what Sugumaran, coordinator for Plantation Workers Support Group said:

Moreover, he said that not even five percent of the housing policy introduced by former premier Abdul Razak Hussein had been implemented in the plantations.

“Even the clinics are not manned by qualified doctors… the clinics are run by dressers. And almost all Tamil-medium schools are only partially aided because the government does not have the will to convert the schools into fully aided schools,” said Sugumaran.

Also responding to the recent appeal by Human Resource Minister S Subramaniam to the Malaysian Agricultural Producers Association (Mapa) to create housing funds for estate workers, Sugumaran said:

“The problems of the estate workers can be solved if the employers and the government implement the existing policies.

“Since the Second Malaysia Plan, employers have been asked to implement housing schemes when the plantation sector was to be developed but most employers have not implement the policy. Until now fewer than 59 plantations have implemented the policy,” he said.

“It is clear here that employers are not committed to the implementation of housing schemes for their own workers. Then what is the use of the minister asking Mapa to invest these funds?

“Mapa will not execute it. Is it not better for plantation workers that a housing policy be enacted as law that requires companies to implement the practice?” Sugumaran suggested.

Why would employers build housing schemes when its more lucrative to redevelop land into housing schemes which can generate billions of ringgits? There’s no law, just policy.

MIC to talk about SPM subject limit in cabinet again

November 30th, 2009
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Tamil School Action Committee organised a forum today. Can read about in in MIC Info chief P.Kamalanathan’s blog. Below is Bernama version:

Human Resources Minister S Subramaniam said he would request the Cabinet to again allow Indian students to take a maximum of 12 SPM subjects.

“I will also continue to hold talks with deputy prime minister Muhyiddin Yassin (on this),” said the MIC vice-president after meeting with 20 Indian NGOs today.

Muhyiddin, who is also education minister, announced last June that students would be allowed a maximum of 10 subjects in the SPM from next year.

Subramaniam said the MIC wanted the education ministry to allow Indian students to take the Tamil Language and Tamil Literature subjects, along with the 10 subjects as decided by the ministry.

He said he had been asking for a review of the ruling at Cabinet meetings for the past three to four months, and would continue to engage in consultations with the education ministry until a reasonable solution was found.

He said his priority now was to work out a solution that would ensure Indian students took 12, instead of 10 subjects.

“We are working towards that. This is what the (Indian) community wants,” said Subramaniam.

In a related matter, Subramaniam said there was no point in getting emotional over the issue as it would not solve the problem.

He was referring to reports that some Indian NGOs wanted to protest over the issue.

He urged the NGOs and other interested parties to work with “one voice and one determination” to find an amicable solution to the problem.

“It was for this reason we held the meeting with the NGOs today to get their feedback and then submit it to the cabinet and the MIC education committee,” he said.