| 
Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email First, let’s look at two different statistics:
NST:
He pointed out yesterday that during a month-long survey conducted by the state DAP, only 12 out of 100 respondents living in Jalan Silibin had voiced their reservations over the renaming of the road.
He said 55 residents and business operators had supported the renaming while 37 others were neutral in the matter.
55+37+12 = 114. This is more than 100 possibly because the combination of residents and business owners, but still need to clarify why 114 responses exist.
He said of the 74 respondents interviewed, 55 supported the idea while 12 disagreed and seven were neutral.
“We made sure we got the views of a multiracial group of people so that all races were represented,” he said.
55 + 12 + 7= 74. Perfect fit.
But how can the Star and NST report two different set of numbers? Who to believe?
Let’s see both side of the arguments:
For change
– honor the late Patto
– the late Patto served Silibin area before
– The hassle for residents is minimal. (well, then perhaps the state government can cover the cost of the changes – MyKad, business cards, letterheads etc.).
– Jalan Silibin is not that well known, unlike Jalan Alor which is world famous
– No record of the history or origin of the name “Silibin” – claims Kulasegaran.
– 70% of residents affects agree to the change
Against change
– Its a hassle and unnecessary expense
– Will affect businesses
– Can rename a monument or park, or name a road in new housing area.
– Silibin has lots of historical significance.
A group of businessmen even sent a petition to Perak Menteri Besar protesting the proposed change.
I think there should be a study on the historical significance or origin of “Silibin”. It should be having some history behind it. Secondly, since 30 percent are opposing, perhaps the state government can hold a public forum to get more responses (being a transparent state, its should do so). The state can also identity other sites/roads that can be named after the late Patto. Being a caring government, it can reimburse the affected businesses and residents if the name is changed.
He said the event was meant to express the public’s disappointment with the continued use of unjust and repressive laws such as the ISA.
“We have organised this kind of run in the past and every time, it had been fruitful. You can expect this run to bear fruit in the future as well,” Liu said confidently.
After breaking for the night, the second leg of the run will begin at the border between Selangor and Perak before runners take the flag to Kamunting.
By about 4pm, protest representatives handed a memorandum to Sri Lankan embassy officials – as representatives of BN Youth demanding the Sri Lankan government to cease their military aggression.
Abdul Azeez (left) said that Umno Youth and youth wings of other Barisan component parties had joined the MIC Youth initiated demonstration on the basis of friendship.
Asked if a police permit had been obtained for the protest, Murugesan did not give a direct answer.
